https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79286
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Reducing the test-case bit more:
$ int a = 0, c = 0;
static int d[][8] = {};
int main ()
{
int e;
for (int b = 0; b < 4; b++)
{
__builtin_printf ("%d\n", b, e);
while (a && c++)
e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79299
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79296
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79297
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79285
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78176
Doug Gilmore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68664
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
new_ready just adds insns to the ready list. High latency isn't
directly a problem: if we can schedule a high latency insn early
speculatively, that is a _good_ thing!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79299
Bug ID: 79299
Summary: [7 Regression] Operand size mismatch for `vpgatherqd'
w/ -O3 -masm=intel -mavx512bw
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79197
--- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner ---
I agree the expander should call gpc_reg_operand and not reg_operand. This is
due to the fact that on PowerPCs with separate floating point registers, SFmode
is represented internally as DFmode when it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79265
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
As I mentioned, the unnecessary null tests inserted by the sanitizer are
usually removed by subsequent optimization passes so they serve no useful
purpose. They do, however, make GCC work harder which can cau
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79272
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
Guess this is key line "Not unifying; Symbol aliases are not supported by
target".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79298
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63238
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Jan 31 01:03:15 2017
New Revision: 245052
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245052&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR63238] output alignment debug information
Output DWARFv5+ DW_AT_ali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78176
--- Comment #17 from Doug Gilmore ---
> This really throws off the costing of substituting different IVs on
> MIPS.
I forgot to mention that for MIPS the net of effect r216501 is to not
produce indexed memory OPs in simple examples where we shoul
-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.1 20170130 (experimental) [trunk revision 245020] (GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78176
--- Comment #16 from Doug Gilmore ---
Created attachment 40632
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40632&action=edit
Tweak to adjust_setup_cost (r220473).
Second patch associated with previous comment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79277
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Note that for compatibility you don't want to change either __alignof__
(double) (preferred alignment, 8) or _Alignof (double) (required
alignment, 4).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78176
--- Comment #15 from Doug Gilmore ---
Created attachment 40631
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40631&action=edit
Prototype change to backout r216501.
> Bisected the problem to commit r216501:
The review discussion of r21650
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67288
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #5)
> (In reply to Christophe Leroy from comment #0)
>
> > The following section is just useless: (shift left 4 bits, remove 16, shift
> > right 4 bits, add 1)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79290
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I forgot to provide the error. For completeness, it's:
s.cc: In member function ‘bool Printer::operator()(SongTag)’:
s.cc:16:36: error: request for member ‘int (Song::*)(unsigned int)
const::__pfn’ in ‘st.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79297
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 40630
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40630&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79297
Bug ID: 79297
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in main_block_label
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79272
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 40629
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40629&action=edit
ipa dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79296
Bug ID: 79296
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in mangle_decl, at cp/mangle.c:3845
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79170
--- Comment #2 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: acsawdey
Date: Mon Jan 30 23:24:24 2017
New Revision: 245041
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245041&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-27 Aaron Sawdey
PR target/79170
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79295
Bug ID: 79295
Summary: [7 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/bcd-3.c fails
starting with r244942
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79289
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79289
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Jan 30 22:26:26 2017
New Revision: 245039
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245039&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/79289
* dwarf2out.c (gen_type_die_with_usa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79286
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79294
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79294
Bug ID: 79294
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in convert_nontype_argument, at
cp/pt.c:6812
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79293
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79293
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Jan 30 21:59:37 2017
New Revision: 245037
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245037&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/79293 - gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c fails starting wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79293
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79082
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79275
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79158
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78597
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824
--- Comment #7 from Leandro Nini ---
Reduced testcase, ICEs with gcc -O2 -floop-interchange:
int a, b, d;
int **c;
int fn1() {
while (a)
if (d) {
int e = -d;
for (; b < e; b++)
c[b] = &a;
} else {
for (; b; b+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79285
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79293
Bug ID: 79293
Summary: [7 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c fails
starting with r244953
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79210
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm ---
In theory we could fix the location of the stringified token; perhaps it could
use the location of the arg.
But cpp_interpret_string_ranges calls cpp_interpret_string_1 which expects the
strings it re-lexes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79289
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #1)
> This patch seems to fix the problem, but I can't tell whether this is
> correct or whether the other obvious change is correct.
This one looks good.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79210
--- Comment #10 from David Malcolm ---
For reference, after preprocessing, the format string is:
"0423 lpfc_peer_port_login attribute cannot be set to %d, allowed range is
[0, 1]\n"
^~
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79210
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
Origin of the garbage location_t value:
During macro expansion, temporary tokens (via _cpp_temp_token) use the location
of the last lexed token as their location, so identifying the origin of the
bogus locat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79210
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
The concatenation:
The concatenated string comes from 4 string tokens, with the following
locations, and locs[1] is a bogus value:
../../src/pr79210-via-attachment.c:8:6: note: locs[0]
"0423 lpfc_"#at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79210
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Root cause is:
(a) a garbage location_t value for one of the string tokens within the
concatenation, but
(b) it's not clear that there *is* a non-garbage value for the string token in
question, as it comes fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79290
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79290
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79292
Bug ID: 79292
Summary: address of string constant
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79291
Bug ID: 79291
Summary: r244397 introduces alias related performance issues
for daxpy on MIPS
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79289
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79290
Bug ID: 79290
Summary: [7 Regression] forming pointer to member function
tries to access "__pfn"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78958
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Assignee|unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79289
Bug ID: 79289
Summary: DWARF info for typeof of C function with no args and
no prototype is empty pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79288
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40626
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40626&action=edit
gcc7-pr79288.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53659
--- Comment #11 from PeteVine ---
Super cool, thanks! That makes the OP a true prophet before his time ;)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79288
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78663
--- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #5)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> > > Have you raised this with compiler-rt upstream already?
> >
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79288
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79288
Bug ID: 79288
Summary: [7 Regression] TLS model wrong for static data members
since r241137
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79281
--- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to James Clarke from comment #4)
> Ah, sorry, there's a separate C implementation of all this. I imagine it's
> the bools in "struct M" in runtime.h messing it up, so "struct Note" and
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79287
Bug ID: 79287
Summary: include files not searched for relative to the file
containing the fortran include statement
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79285
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||GC, ice-on-valid-code
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79264
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 40625
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40625&action=edit
Reduced testcase
./obj/x86_64/gcc/cc1plus -fconcepts -std=c++1z -g3 79264-dbg.ii
It's very easy to turn this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79082
--- Comment #14 from Franz Sirl ---
I just finished testing with r245021 and now the warnings are as expected. All
warnings are there with -Wformat-truncation=2 and also -Wformat-truncation=1
behaves according to the documentation (BTW, there's a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79240
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.1 20170130 (experimental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79285
Bug ID: 79285
Summary: new valgrind error in build
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79082
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #13 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78979
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78979
--- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Jan 30 16:08:42 2017
New Revision: 245034
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245034&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Only declare gets for C++ < 2014 on Solaris (PR libstdc++/78979)
Backp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
--- Comment #30 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Mon Jan 30 16:06:15 2017
New Revision: 245033
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245033&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/79061
* asan.c (get_translation_unit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79284
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(gdb) p debug_gimple_stmt(stmt)
mask__5.10_9 = mask__3.9_16 ^ vect_cst__10;
$1 = void
(gdb) p debug_gimple_stmt(rhs1))
Junk after end of expression.
(gdb) p debug_tree(rhs1_type)
unit size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78979
--- Comment #7 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Jan 30 16:01:11 2017
New Revision: 245032
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245032&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Only declare gets for C++ < 2014 on Solaris (PR libstdc++/78979)
Backp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79082
--- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Sylvestre Ledru from comment #11)
> Other testcase:
> ---
> #include
> #include
> int main() {
> char* buf = new char[10];
> uint8_t data = 255;
> printf("%.2x\n", data);// just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79281
--- Comment #4 from James Clarke ---
Ah, sorry, there's a separate C implementation of all this. I imagine it's the
bools in "struct M" in runtime.h messing it up, so "struct Note" and "struct
Lock" need __attribute__((aligned(4))) on their key f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79284
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.1 20170130 (experimental) [trunk revision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79281
--- Comment #3 from James Clarke ---
I believe the problem is in the "m" type in runtime2.go. There are 4 bools in a
row, which is fine, as they will take up 4 bytes, but then "printlock" is an
int8, which means "fastrand" will only be 2-byte ali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79281
--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Perhaps this would be fixed by adding __attribute__((aligned(4))) to some field
of struct Sched in proc.c.
This code is all different on trunk/GCC7. I don't know whether it still has
the same problem or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79259
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79259
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Jan 30 15:35:57 2017
New Revision: 245031
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245031&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix profile corruption with -O1 (PR gcov-profile/79259)
2017-01-30 Marti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70012
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #4)
> > Created attachment 40568 [details]
> > Proposed patch
> >
> > Attaching proposed patch. Iain, would you be able to t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78985
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Jan 30 15:16:33 2017
New Revision: 245030
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245030&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix aarch64 PGO bootstrap (bootstrap/78985)
2017-01-30 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79282
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think this is a problem with the di3_neon pattern in neon.md and in
particular the neon_for_64bits/avoid_neon_for_64bits stuff in the arch
attribute.
I think the last two alternatives that gen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79232
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40607|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77362
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 40623
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40623&action=edit
Patch candidate
The patch fixes issue, however I believe that PHI handling is in general broken
in graphite sinc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> Started with r236440.
Sorry, belongs to a different bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79260
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71351
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Started with r236440.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79260
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Mon Jan 30 14:39:50 2017
New Revision: 245029
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245029&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79260
* config.gcc (arm*-*-*): Add arm/arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79260
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79276
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67288
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79276
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 30 14:24:37 2017
New Revision: 245026
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245026&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-30 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/79276
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79230
--- Comment #22 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > Finally rt_error --check radiation_generator failed with
> >
> > Running test: radiation_generator_1
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory
> > reference.
>
> Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo