https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505
--- Comment #12 from Elizebeth Punnoose ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #11)
> Fixed on trunk. Closing.
>
> Elizebeth, Thanks for the patch.
Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68468
Waldemar Brodkorb changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78551
--- Comment #7 from Vlad Petric ---
Ok, so the example that I started this bug with is not standard compliant
because it initialized different elements in a union with the constexpr
constructor.
The following does just one. I believe that the fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Still present on Solaris.
Jason,
could you please have a look at this PR? Your patch (r241944)
2016-11-07 Jason Merrill
Implement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78641
Bug ID: 78641
Summary: [OOP] ICE on polymorphic allocatable function in array
constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Looks not enough. Even with the patch, I got a similar ICE for lto case
in testsuite:
FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/stdatomic-op-1.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects (internal compiler error)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78636
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78640
Bug ID: 78640
Summary: [F2015] gfortran accepts invalid allocatable
polymorphic result in pure function
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68159
Natalie Silvanovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||natashenka at google dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78639
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 40222
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40222&action=edit
Bzip2 test case, compile with -g -O3 -mcpu=power9 -fgnu89-inline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78639
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 40221
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40221&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78618
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78639
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78639
Bug ID: 78639
Summary: Power9 bad code generation for cactusADM benchmark
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78614
--- Comment #23 from Bill Schmidt ---
I've backported the insn_is_swappable_p bugfix to gcc-5-branch and
gcc-6-branch. Thanks again for fixing that, Alan!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78586
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 1 23:15:57 2016
New Revision: 243145
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243145&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78586
* gimple-ssa-sprintf.c (format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505
--- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Dec 1 23:11:35 2016
New Revision: 243143
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243143&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-01 Elizebeth Punnoose
PR fortran/77505
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78638
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78577
kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #55 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #54)
> Shouldn't this be closed now as resolved?
nope, it needs back-porting to 6.x and 5.x - will do that after it's been on
trunk a while.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78577
--- Comment #1 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Thu Dec 1 22:52:07 2016
New Revision: 243141
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243141&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-12-01 Kelvin Nilsen
PR target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #54 from Jack Howarth ---
Shouldn't this be closed now as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78638
Bug ID: 78638
Summary: [7 regression] test cases
gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-0.c and rlwimi-2.c fail
starting with r243000
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78568
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is not how C++ c_fully_fold works. There it can be called multiple times,
and it does some caching to avoid consuming too much time, but the caches can
be flushed at certain times.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Bug 37336 depends on bug 59694, which changed state.
Bug 59694 Summary: [F03] no finalization of an unused variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59694
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59694
Damian Rouson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78161
--- Comment #4 from Damian Rouson ---
I'll close this because another developer is going to work on it so my last
comment no longer applies.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78279
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78279
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Dec 1 21:28:41 2016
New Revision: 243134
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243134&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-01 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/78279
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78279
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Dec 1 21:05:49 2016
New Revision: 243133
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243133&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
016-12-01 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/78279
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78279
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Dec 1 20:37:55 2016
New Revision: 243131
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243131&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-12-01 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/78279
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78631
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78101
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78101
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Dec 1 19:26:15 2016
New Revision: 243128
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243128&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-12-01 Michael Meissner
Back port from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78637
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78635
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66149
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78235
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78235
--- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn ---
Author: dje
Date: Thu Dec 1 18:58:47 2016
New Revision: 243126
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243126&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/66419
PR c++/78235
* dbxout.c (dbxout_type_fields): Skip TEMPLATE_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66419
--- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn ---
Author: dje
Date: Thu Dec 1 18:58:47 2016
New Revision: 243126
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243126&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/66419
PR c++/78235
* dbxout.c (dbxout_type_fields): Skip TEMPLATE_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Also note that on some targets indirect calls have a different ABI than calls
to named function. SO changing between direct and indirect calls is strictly
forbidden on some targets.
I suspect there's some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78568
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
c_fully_fold should not be asked to fold the same expression more than
once. When a subexpression is folded during parsing, for whatever reason,
the result should be wrapped in a tree code
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20161201 (experimental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78629
--- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed by r243125, forgot to add PR number to changelog in the patch :/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78636
--- Comment #2 from rhl ---
Created attachment 40220
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40220&action=edit
and the output of valgrind after remove offending Output function in favor out
std::cout
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78636
--- Comment #1 from rhl ---
Created attachment 40219
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40219&action=edit
this is the valgrind output when the segfault occurs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78636
Bug ID: 78636
Summary: PPC Optimization Bug in Libelemental unit test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78608
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
I suspect the same problem should come up with a call to vsprintf. The patch
below should handle this case but I haven't don't done a bootstrap-ubsan to
verify there are no others like it.
diff --git a/gcc/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78608
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|NE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77538
--- Comment #21 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
> is that huge number abnormal?
Let's say it is atypical for C/C++ programs because of fixed-size stacks. But
tsan has limit of 64K frames in the latest version (maybe 4.8.2 had limit of
32K frames).
But do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77373
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn ---
int D::f1() int D::f2() int main() int D::f1() [with int N = 4] int
D::f2() [with int N = 4] int D::f1() [with int N = 8] int D::f2()
[with int N = 8]
Analyzing compilation unit
#0 _Z11fancy_abortPKciS0_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78589
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #4)
> I am testing a patch for gcc/cp/error.c that (apart from guarding
> against infinite recursion in some cases) should make g++ produce the
> same output as gcc doe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hi,
here is patch adding the polymorphic case, too.
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78235
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn ---
This fails in dbxout.c:dbxout_type_fields()
/* Output the name, type, position (in bits), size (in bits) of each
field that we can support. */
for (tem = TYPE_FIELDS (type); tem; tem = DECL_CHAIN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Yes that's it, a single run shows 12% speedup with this patch!
Looks promising. We probably should try to differentiate from polymorphic
calls
as virtual methods are also used in different patterns.
let m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
--- Comment #7 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6)
> Created attachment 40216 [details]
> predict
>
> Aha, indirect calls should probably be treated separately as their use cases
> are quite
> special. What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78635
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78635
Bug ID: 78635
Summary: [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in
output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4989
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Aha, indirect calls should probably be treated separately as their use cases
are quite
special. What about this patch? (Maritn, it would be great if you can run the
analyze_brprob
for it)
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78598
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77693
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #4 from Domin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78598
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Thu Dec 1 14:59:03 2016
New Revision: 243113
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243113&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR tree-optimization/78598 - tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c:835:16:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
--- Comment #21 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Why doesn't a mark/walk/unmark idiom when walking a potentially circular data
structure work here? I.e. add a mutable counter to demangle_component.
Inc/dec at start/end of d_print_comp? IIUC if it gets t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
--- Comment #14 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Dec 1 14:48:49 2016
New Revision: 243112
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243112&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Import libcilkrts Build 4467 (PR target/68945)
PR target/68945
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78634
Bug ID: 78634
Summary: [7 Regression] 30% performance drop after r242832.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Hmm, why is this even being considered on ARM?
arm.h:#define NO_FUNCTION_CSE 1
doc/tm.texi
@defmac NO_FUNCTION_CSE
Define this macro to be true if it is as good or better to call a constant
function addr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to wilco from comment #5)
> (In reply to avieira from comment #4)
> > OK so after some extra debugging and digging I found that the postreload
> > pass is basically turning the direct s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70322
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
--- Comment #7 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #6)
> (In reply to wilco from comment #5)
> > (In reply to avieira from comment #4)
> > > OK so after some extra debugging and digging I found that the postreload
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49726
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255
wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64516
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
--- Comment #20 from Mark Wielaard ---
Created attachment 40213
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40213&action=edit
Add is_cyclic check to d_lookup_template_argument
The patch that Marcel originally proposed tried to catch any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66598
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78633
Bug ID: 78633
Summary: [7 Regression] [SH] libgcc/fp-bit.c:944:1: error:
invalid rtl sharing found in the insn
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67288
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67410
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68390
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69019
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71415
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69311
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70778
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71195
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71506
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71875
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72707
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78596
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72716
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72717
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72816
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78596
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Thu Dec 1 14:04:13 2016
New Revision: 243111
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243111&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix rtl-optimization/78596 - combine.c:12561:14: runtime error: l
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
