https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78501
--- Comment #2 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi,
From the trace, it seems ptrdiff_type_node is set to NULL for ada ?
Either we can guard setting range for CFN_BUILTIN_STRLEN by checking
ptrtdiff_type_node is non null, or make vrp_val_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78279
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78279
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78458
--- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Thu Nov 24 02:07:51 2016
New Revision: 242818
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242818&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/78458
* config/rs6000/rs6000.h (HARD_REG
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78504
Bug ID: 78504
Summary: Bad fixit hint: '_Pragma' does not name a type; did
you mean '_Pragma'?
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnosti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78503
Bug ID: 78503
Summary: -Wint-in-bool-context false positive on unsigned
multiplication
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78500
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78501
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|*-*-solaris2.* |*-*-solaris2.*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71556
Sebastian Unger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebunger44 at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68467
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78492
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78499
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78500
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78502
Bug ID: 78502
Summary: Analyze 'final'/'override' even for uninstantiated
class templates
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78297
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78297
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Nov 23 22:48:54 2016
New Revision: 242811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/78297
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78298
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78297
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Nov 23 22:16:53 2016
New Revision: 242806
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242806&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/78297
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78501
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78501
Bug ID: 78501
Summary: [7 regression] SEGV in vrp_val_max
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78499
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78297
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Nov 23 21:44:05 2016
New Revision: 242802
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-23 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/78297
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
--- Comment #11 from Harald Anlauf ---
While reducing PR 78290, I found another example giving a similar traceback:
% gfc-trunk gfcbug136.f90
gfcbug136.f90:13:0:
ip=>ta%i !!! Works if you comment this line out !!!
internal compiler error: i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78500
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78012
Maciej W. Rozycki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthew.fortune at imgtec dot
com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69278
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 23 19:51:27 2016
New Revision: 242795
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242795&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/69278
* opts.c (parse_sanitizer_options): Fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78482
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 23 19:50:23 2016
New Revision: 242794
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242794&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78482
* gcc.dg/torture/pr78482.c (c,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78500
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Whereas :
$ cat z2.f90
type(t) function f()
f = 1
end
$ gfortran-7-20161120 -c z2.f90
z2.f90:1:0:
type(t) function f()
Error: The type for function 'f' at (1) is not accessible
z2.f90:2:3:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78500
Bug ID: 78500
Summary: ICE in gfc_check_vardef_context, at
fortran/expr.c:5289
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78499
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Whereas :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
type t
end type
type(t) :: x = 0
end
$ gfortran-7-20161120 z2.f90
z2.f90:4:17:
type(t) :: x = 0
1
Error: Can't convert INTEGER(4) to T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78499
Bug ID: 78499
Summary: ICE in gfc_typename, at fortran/misc.c:158
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69183
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 23 19:28:41 2016
New Revision: 242793
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242793&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/69183
* omp-low.c (build_outer_var_ref): Cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78230
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78230
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Wed Nov 23 19:20:33 2016
New Revision: 242792
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242792&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/78230
* gcc.dg/torture/pr66178.c (test): Use uint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498
Bug ID: 78498
Summary: valgrind conditional jump or move depends on
uninitialised value(s) in format_type_warning
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78482
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40135
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40135&action=edit
gcc7-pr78482-test.patch
Does this patch fix that?
In addition to changing char to signed char, I've changed th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78482
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #7)
> Yep, timing out on AIX also. Is this assuming signed char?
Looks like it from the code.
char c, d;
for (; c >= 0; c--)
Simple fix is to just change char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78482
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78482
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77907
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77907
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 23 18:45:27 2016
New Revision: 242790
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242790&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/77907
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_fold) : When calling cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78487
Stephan Beyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78497
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't think there is much to be done here. I doubt we care so much about
people using -save-temps and getting more warnings.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77673
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #6)
> (In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #5)
> > Got a patch, testing it now.
>
> Bootstrapped and testsuite came back clean. Trying to turn the co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57058
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78497
Bug ID: 78497
Summary: compiling with -save-temps adds -Wimplicit-fallthrough
warnings
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78153
--- Comment #1 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: prathamesh3492
Date: Wed Nov 23 18:04:14 2016
New Revision: 242786
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242786&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-23 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78362
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63250
--- Comment #5 from James Greenhalgh ---
Author: jgreenhalgh
Date: Wed Nov 23 17:36:21 2016
New Revision: 242784
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242784&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Patch ARM 17/17] Enable _Float16 for ARM and fix PR target/63250
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69278
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40134
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40134&action=edit
gcc7-pr69278.patch
Untested fix for that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69278
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
You've already changed that behavior in r240491 (but also broke
-fsanitize=undefined at the same time, will fix momentarily).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78458
--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Applying also the third patch
Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
===
--- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (revision 242751)
+++ gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78380
--- Comment #2 from Elmar ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71009 might also be related
I checked, but the workaround in bug 71009 to use -fmath-errno doesn't work for
me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69278
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7)
> Well, the actual difference is that they enabled by default
> -fsanitize-recover=address:
>
> ~/bin/llvm/bin/clang -fsanitize=address /tmp/leak.c ; grep store leak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69278
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Well, the actual difference is that they enabled by default
-fsanitize-recover=address:
~/bin/llvm/bin/clang -fsanitize=address /tmp/leak.c ; grep store leak.s
callq __asan_report_store4_noabort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66227
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66227
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Nov 23 16:46:31 2016
New Revision: 242770
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242770&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-23 Janus Weil
Backport from trunk
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78461
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78461
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Nov 23 16:44:16 2016
New Revision: 242769
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242769&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/78461 - [7 Regression] ICE: in operator+=
gcc/testsuite/Cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77739
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71450
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE on |[5/6 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66227
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Nov 23 16:26:38 2016
New Revision: 242768
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242768&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-23 Janus Weil
Backport from trunk
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69278
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Behavior was changed in between clang 3.7.1 and 3.8.1:
https://godbolt.org/g/poL2cY.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78494
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 40133
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40133&action=edit
full output for top 100 allocation points
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78390
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71450
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 23 15:59:25 2016
New Revision: 242767
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242767&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71450
* pt.c (tsubst_copy): Return error_mark_node
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78380
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77739
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 23 15:54:39 2016
New Revision: 242766
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242766&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/77739
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_gimplify_tree) : Pass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77541
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1)
> > This is RA failure, where reload tries to fix up:
>
> To be clear, it is LRA pass, not reload.
Yes, it is a LRA b
On 11/22/2016 02:26 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
template
void for2 (T &v)
{
}
void Foo ()
{
auto lam_1 = [](int &) { };
auto lam_2 = [](auto &) { }; // IIUC this is implicitly templatey
for2 (lam_1);
for2 (lam_2); // What is the lambda's argument type?
}
We get 2 instantiations of for2:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 11/22/2016 02:26 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>>
>> template
>> void for2 (T &v)
>> {
>> }
>>
>> void Foo ()
>> {
>> auto lam_1 = [](int &) { };
>> auto lam_2 = [](auto &) { }; // IIUC this is implicitly templatey
>>
>> for2 (lam_1);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78487
--- Comment #5 from Stephan Beyer ---
It crashes on run-time.
I have absolutely no experience using extended asm syntax but I
guess g++ relies on the constraints for its optimization, so I
guess the constraints are wrong.
I will port the code t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78483
--- Comment #5 from Kris ---
Fair do's. But then, IMHO, 'on_exit' shouldn't pollute the global namespace
either. Hence, it should be prefixed with '__'?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69183
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40132
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40132&action=edit
gcc7-pr69183.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71595
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c
index beb65b0..4af39fa 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c
@@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ unloop_loops (bitm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78483
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Right, on_exit is not part of the C++ standard, so it's correct that it is not
in namespace std.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78486
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Jonath
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78490
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78490
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Nov 23 15:22:35 2016
New Revision: 242762
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242762&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78490 add missing returns to propagate_const
2016-11-23 Felix Morgner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69183
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71595
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
The real reason is probably that after
if (changed)
{
unsigned i;
unloop_loops (loop_closed_ssa_invalidated, &irred_invalidated);
the loop tree is hosed. The following i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71595
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399
--- Comment #15 from Ludovic Courtès ---
Hi Jakub,
Thanks for the suggestions. Unfortunately I cannot offer to rebuild everything
with dumps right now; I'll see if I can do something later, no promise.
Hopefully, with the details and faulty co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78496
Bug ID: 78496
Summary: Missed opportunities for jump threading
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78495
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78396
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78494
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Nov 23 14:45:29 2016
New Revision: 242760
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242760&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78494 add missing returns to propagate_const
2016-11-23 Felix Morgner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78396
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 23 14:40:05 2016
New Revision: 242759
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242759&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-23 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/78396
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78305
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78477
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 23 14:33:13 2016
New Revision: 242757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242757&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Convert subreg-of-lshiftrt to zero_extract properly (PR7839
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77881
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 23 14:33:13 2016
New Revision: 242757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242757&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Convert subreg-of-lshiftrt to zero_extract properly (PR7839
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78390
--- Comment #28 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 23 14:33:13 2016
New Revision: 242757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242757&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Convert subreg-of-lshiftrt to zero_extract properly (PR783
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78228
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78438
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Nov 23 14:33:13 2016
New Revision: 242757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242757&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Convert subreg-of-lshiftrt to zero_extract properly (PR7839
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77855
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 23 14:31:16 2016
New Revision: 242756
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242756&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-23 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78482
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78472
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.2.1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78228
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 23 14:31:16 2016
New Revision: 242756
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242756&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-23 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78305
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 23 14:31:16 2016
New Revision: 242756
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242756&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-23 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78333
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 23 14:31:16 2016
New Revision: 242756
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242756&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-23 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
