[Bug libstdc++/28811] --with-pic vs static libraries and libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28811 Alec Ari changed: What|Removed |Added CC||neotheuser at ymail dot com --- Comment #25 f

[Bug c++/78004] [6/7 Regression] g++ segfaults when compiling qt 4.8.7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78004 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |7.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/77825] [7 Regression] return type deduction regression in C++17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77825 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug libgomp/67335] [6/7 Regression] ICE in compiling omp simd function with unused argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67335 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.3

[Bug c++/77591] [6/7 Regression] decltype(auto) and ternary operator allow returning local reference without a warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77591 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.3

[Bug libstdc++/68350] std::uninitialized_copy overly restrictive for trivially_copyable types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68350 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |---

[Bug libstdc++/68989] Core issue 1992 will make catching bad_new_array_length unnecessary in _M_grow_words

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68989 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |---

[Bug target/69231] rtx_cost of subreg is bad for <= wordmode integral subregs of > wordmode integral pseudos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69231 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |--- --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski -

[Bug sanitizer/69278] Confusion option handling for -sanitize-recovery=alll

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69278 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |---

[Bug libstdc++/69350] Don't define the C99 functions in -std=c++98 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69350 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |---

[Bug other/69968] RFC: Use Damerau-Levenshtein within spellcheck.c, rather than Levenshtein

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69968 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Target Milestone|7.0

[Bug c++/70277] Improve code generation for large initializer lists

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70277 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severity|n

[Bug target/69770] [ARM] -mlong-calls does not affect calls to __gnu_mcount_nc generated by -pg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug libstdc++/70560] Review configure checks for _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS and atomicity_dir

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70560 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |---

[Bug target/70721] Suboptimal code generated when using _mm_min_sd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70721 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |---

[Bug testsuite/70595] Cilk Plus testsuite needs massive cleanup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70595 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |---

[Bug target/68803] gcc.vect/powerpc/20050603-3.c failures since r230167

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68803 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |---

[Bug target/71571] [CRIS] Multiple inheritance non-virtual PIC thunk causes crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/64821] [AArch64] Improve target folding for vsqrt_f64 intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64821 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |---

[Bug c/71255] Implement #pragma may_alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |---

[Bug c/70339] Poor message for "singed" vs "signed" typo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70339 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/60421] std::this_thread::sleep_for doesn't sleep for all arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60421 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/72804] Poor code gen with -mvsx-timode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72804 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |---

[Bug tree-optimization/78428] New: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode

COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20161119

[Bug tree-optimization/78413] [7 Regression] ICE in single_pred_edge, at basic-block.h:361

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78413 Zhendong Su changed: What|Removed |Added CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- Comment #6 fr

[Bug middle-end/14060] An unused register is saved to the stack.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14060 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/39871] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Code size increase on ARM due to poor register allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39871 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kazu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #27

[Bug target/42764] Bad exit code in interrupt functions using local vars and calling a function, when compiled without optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42764 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/68733] [6/7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-29.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733 --- Comment #11 from John David Anglin --- If I change TARGET_CALLEE_COPIES to the default (false), the libgomp tests all pass on hppa-linux.

[Bug libstdc++/55394] Using call_once without -lpthread compiles without warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55394 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4) > clang's libc++.so.1 avoids the issue because it is linked with > libpthread.so.0: > [...] > libstc++ isn't: Which is by design and a very important prope

[Bug c++/70909] Libiberty Demangler segfaults (4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909 --- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #11) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #10) > > The symbol was demangled with libcxxabi's demangler. > > The other two demanglers reject it. > > T

[Bug fortran/69741] Bad error in formal with array scalar loop counters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW CC|

[Bug c++/70909] Libiberty Demangler segfaults (4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909 --- Comment #11 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #10) > The symbol was demangled with libcxxabi's demangler. > The other two demanglers reject it. Thanks. Do you know which demangler is correct for this input

[Bug target/25111] [m68k] bset is not used for A = 1 << (B & 31) on ColdFire

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25111 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/25111] [m68k] bset is not used for A = 1 << (B & 31) on ColdFire

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25111 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Sat Nov 19 17:52:04 2016 New Revision: 242623 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242623&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/25111 * config/m68k/m68k.md (bsetdreg): New patte

[Bug target/25111] [m68k] bset is not used for A = 1 << (B & 31) on ColdFire

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25111 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/78379] Processor-specific versions for matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379 --- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #12) > I read some advice on the net that certain types of AMD processors > have AVX, but AVX128 is better for them. > > What exactly is your CPU model? What does /p

[Bug c++/70909] Libiberty Demangler segfaults (4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #9) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #8) > > This is what it should look like: [...] > > How did you demangle that input string? > With the propo

[Bug c++/70909] Libiberty Demangler segfaults (4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909 --- Comment #9 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #8) > This is what it should look like: [...] How did you demangle that input string? With the proposed patch the mangled string is rejected by the libiberty dem

[Bug c++/78427] missed optimization of loop condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78427 --- Comment #2 from Ivan Sorokin --- Created attachment 40086 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40086&action=edit loop-bench.cpp I uploaded my test program, so you can reproduce the issue.

[Bug c++/78427] missed optimization of loop condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78427 --- Comment #1 from Ivan Sorokin --- I wonder if it is feasible to implement this optimization in GCC.

[Bug c++/78427] New: missed optimization of loop condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78427 Bug ID: 78427 Summary: missed optimization of loop condition Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/69741] Bad error in formal with array scalar loop counters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741 --- Comment #10 from Harald Anlauf --- Updated patch posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-11/msg00189.html

[Bug c++/70909] Libiberty Demangler segfaults (4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78426] [7 Regression] wrong code with strncmp on SH

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78426 --- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Author: kkojima Date: Sat Nov 19 13:59:47 2016 New Revision: 242622 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242622&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/78426 * config/sh/sh-mem.cc (sh_expand_cmpns

[Bug c++/70909] Libiberty Demangler segfaults (4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug target/78426] New: [7 Regression] wrong code with strncmp on SH

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78426 Bug ID: 78426 Summary: [7 Regression] wrong code with strncmp on SH Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority

[Bug libfortran/78379] Processor-specific versions for matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig --- OK, I think I have a rough idea how to do this. For querying the CPU model, we need to put the interface in libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c into a separate header. Then we generate a list of matmul functions

[Bug fortran/71723] [5/6/7 Regression] [F08] ICE on invalid pointer initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71723 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #9) > [Btw, we possibly also fail to check for the SAVE attribute.] That guess was wrong. We do have such checks, as this example shows: subroutine sub inte

[Bug other/61460] Demangler crash (GDB PR 17043)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61460 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7) > Likely a duplicate of pr42359. Agreed.

[Bug libfortran/78379] Processor-specific versions for matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #11) > One could consider running a reference matrix multiply of size 32 in a loop > and do timing tests to determine whether to use -mprefer-avx128. 0n this > machine

[Bug target/77365] Wrong result with -fcaller-saves on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77365 Ole Streicher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/42359] ICEs with specification function and init expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42359 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Likely a duplicate of pr78392.

[Bug fortran/78392] ICE in gfc_trans_auto_array_allocation, at fortran/trans-array.c:5979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78392 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Likely a duplicate of pr42359.

[Bug fortran/71723] [5/6/7 Regression] [F08] ICE on invalid pointer initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71723 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Walter Spector from comment #8) > The newer F2008 data pointer initialization stuff is largely in §4.5.4.6, > paragraph 2: > > "A pointer variable or component is data-pointer-initiali

[Bug target/78417] target_clones default for powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78417 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug libstdc++/55394] Using call_once without -lpthread compiles without warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55394 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/78419] ICE with target_clone on invalid target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78419 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed on the trunk, keeping it open for backport to 6.x.

[Bug debug/78191] [7 regression] ICE in calc_die_sizes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78191 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/78424] intl reincludes sysroot into searching for ld

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78424 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---