https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64184
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48587
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48587
--- Comment #10 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Oct 16 06:28:15 2016
New Revision: 241211
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241211&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 48587 Newunit allocator, cleanup
Improve error message, and remove a r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77998
Bug ID: 77998
Summary: clang rejects std::thread from trunk
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71311
--- Comment #8 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #7)
> Not sure if it's the same issue, however I am seeing miscompare for
> 416.gamess again with r241197.
The above suggested workaround to disable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77996
--- Comment #10 from Yichao Yu ---
That does look like an violation (this particular one should be hidden behind
shared library boundary in the reduced case though). Reported to LLVM at
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30711 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71311
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77996
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
here is one example where LLVM could be violating C aliasing rules:
void FoldingSetNodeID::AddPointer(const void *Ptr) {
Bits.append(reinterpret_cast(&Ptr),
reinterpret_cast(&Ptr+1));
}
There
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77996
--- Comment #8 from Yichao Yu ---
> Can you try with -fno-strict-aliasing ?
That seems to fix it for both the original case (LLVM) and the reduced case
(the linked tarball). Is there a way to figure out the problematic (either bug
in LLVM's code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77996
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you try with -fno-strict-aliasing ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77996
--- Comment #6 from Yichao Yu ---
I've compiled a gcc at 951db45 using the same configuration as archlinux arm
PKGBUILD and I can reproduce the problem using the `code/` in
https://gist.github.com/yuyichao/6c24d4a4bc374425906138359a44479c/raw/f5e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77996
--- Comment #5 from Yichao Yu ---
Compiling current llvm trunk (r284322) still shows the same error. The script I
used to compile LLVM is here
https://github.com/yuyichao/arch-pkg/blob/master/pkg/all/llvm-svn/PKGBUILD.
Compiling gcc 951db45 now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77996
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
# Arch Linux installs 64bit libraries /lib
So non-standard (but that is not an issue here).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77996
--- Comment #3 from Yichao Yu ---
> What exact version of LLVM are you trying to compile? Revision of the LLVM
> sources including revision of clang, etc.
I was compiling the trunk version. The version I started reducing from was
https://githu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77997
--- Comment #2 from Yichao Yu ---
. Sorry the first submission gave me a time out so I did again..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77996
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 77997 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77997
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77996
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77997
Bug ID: 77997
Summary: Miscompilation due to LTO on aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77996
Bug ID: 77996
Summary: Miscompilation due to LTO on aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77945
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65938
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63907
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> Created attachment 39809 [details]
> Use default member initializers.
You attached the wrong patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77988
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77991
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77945
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Oct 15 21:25:55 2016
New Revision: 241204
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241204&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/77945 - constexpr and trivial copy
* constexpr.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77995
--- Comment #5 from Igor Kozhukhov ---
thanks, i'll try and let you know.
i tried search it on config.log and i can see:
configure:7076: checking for default BUILD_CONFIG
configure:7108: result:
nothing in this field.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77995
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
If BUILD_CONFIG is empty, then a possible fix is at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2016-10/msg00278.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77945
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77972
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77972
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Oct 15 18:38:54 2016
New Revision: 241201
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241201&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-15 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/77972
* scanne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77995
--- Comment #3 from Igor Kozhukhov ---
it is x86_64 - intel, 64bit bootstrap for target x86_64-pc-solaris2.11
$ ../configure --prefix=/usr/gcc/6 --build=x86_64-pc-solaris2.11
--bindir=/usr/gcc/6/bin --sbindir=/usr/gcc/6/sbin --libdir=/usr/gcc/6/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77995
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77995
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||solaris
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77995
Bug ID: 77995
Summary: gcc 6.2.0 failed on somparison stage 2 & 3
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77994
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77994
Bug ID: 77994
Summary: std::sample uses incorrect integer types internally
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48587
--- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Sat Oct 15 13:15:26 2016
New Revision: 241200
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241200&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 48587 Newunit allocator
2016-10-15 Janne Blomqvist
PR libfo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48587
--- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Sat Oct 15 13:14:15 2016
New Revision: 241199
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241199&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 48587 Newunit allocator
Currently GFortran newer reuses unit numbers al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77976
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63999
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vittorio.romeo at outlook dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77993
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 39818
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39818&action=edit
Preprocessed testcase (compressed)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77993
Bug ID: 77993
Summary: [7 regression] bootstrap failure on PowerPC/Linux
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77984
--- Comment #2 from Victor Paléologue ---
Right, thanks for the reply.
But the, may it be fixed, or did the GCC project officially announce they
stopped supporting it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77989
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
45 matches
Mail list logo
