https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65797
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65828
--- Comment #11 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Sorry I am traveling now I cannot help you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77641
--- Comment #4 from Tim Shen ---
Author: timshen
Date: Thu Sep 22 03:15:58 2016
New Revision: 240340
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240340&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/77641
* include/std/variant (_Variant_storage::_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77675
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65643
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64*-*-linux-*|powerpc64-*-linux-*
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61367
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60433
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does this work now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65643
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does this work now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77685
Bug ID: 77685
Summary: rs6000 target has builtin expansion for memcpy but not
memcmp
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61839
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61837
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77683
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Summary|ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor ---
A sightly modified version of the attached patch has been posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01475.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77682
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77670
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Sep 21 22:12:13 2016
New Revision: 240336
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240336&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-21 Michael Meissner
PR target/77670
* co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77670
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Sep 21 22:11:42 2016
New Revision: 240335
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240335&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-21 Michael Meissner
PR target/77670
* co
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160921 (experimental) [trunk revision 240310] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -Os small.c
small.c:15:1: internal compiler error: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:361
}
^
0xe70f86
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77537
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77537
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ville.voutilainen at
gmail do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77537
--- Comment #5 from Ville Voutilainen ---
There's a fairly decent chance, sure. :) I'll cook up a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77537
--- Comment #4 from Casey Carter ---
Any chance of applying this to 6-branch as well? This is breaking both range-v3
and cmcstl2 in a nasty and hard-to-workaround way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77485
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77684
Bug ID: 77684
Summary: many tree-prof testsuite failures in parallel make
check
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71363
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53991
--- Comment #11 from Paul Clarke ---
We use TM for a multi-producer-multi-consumer queue implementation, and ran
into the issue reported in this bug. (I had opened bug 77681 before
discovering this report.) This report is surprisingly old. Is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77683
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77681
Paul Clarke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53991
Paul Clarke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pc at us dot ibm.com
--- Comment #10 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77681
--- Comment #1 from Paul Clarke ---
shoot. this may be a dup of bug 53991
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49905
--- Comment #22 from Martin Sebor ---
I've raised bug 77683 for the ICE on %lf.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77683
Bug ID: 77683
Summary: ICE on %lf directive in format_floating in
/src/gcc-svn/gcc/gimple-ssa-sprintf.c:1163
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49905
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77682
Bug ID: 77682
Summary: GCC crashes while compiling OpenAL-Soft 1.17.2
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71501
Bug 71501 depends on bug 49905, which changed state.
Bug 49905 Summary: Better sanity checking on sprintf src & dest to produce
warning for dodgy code ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49905
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77681
Bug ID: 77681
Summary: failing to inline simple function when using -fgnu-tm
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71395
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Sep 21 20:17:32 2016
New Revision: 240332
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240332&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add PR target/71395 marker to 71395 fix
Modified:
trunk/gcc/Cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71395
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71501
Bug 71501 depends on bug 49905, which changed state.
Bug 49905 Summary: Better sanity checking on sprintf src & dest to produce
warning for dodgy code ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49905
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49905
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77680
Bug ID: 77680
Summary: ICE in ctor_for_folding, at varpool.c:419
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
Created attachment 39670
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39670&action=edit
Patch under test.
The patch should resolve all the issues discussed in this bug. I don't have
access to Darwin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77679
Bug ID: 77679
Summary: ICE in fold_array_ctor_reference, at
gimple-fold.c:5586
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77678
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Slightly modified :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
character(3) :: c = 'abc'
character(1) :: z
integer :: i
! i = 2
z = c(i:i)
print *, z
end
$ gfortran-7-20160918 -O2 -finit-integer=-1 z2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77678
Bug ID: 77678
Summary: ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at
fold-const.c:13706
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77669
wgh at beyondunreal dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66008
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288
--- Comment #10 from Ville Voutilainen ---
And yes, I plan to port this fix to experimental::optional on trunk and then
backport that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288
--- Comment #9 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77288
--- Comment #8 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Wed Sep 21 17:37:17 2016
New Revision: 240324
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240324&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/77288
* include/std/optional (__is_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038
--- Comment #42 from Andrew Pinski ---
Closing astatement invalid then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77464
--- Comment #11 from Balint Reczey ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #10)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #3)
> > > Or at least give a clearer error that mentions -fP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038
--- Comment #41 from Joshua Kinard ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #38)
> Does this work now?
Whatever the issue on MIPS/N32 was, it's resolved by dropping -Wl,-z,now. So
no longer an issue AFAICT.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77537
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77537
--- Comment #2 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Wed Sep 21 16:48:35 2016
New Revision: 240322
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240322&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/77537
Implement LWG 2729 for pair.
++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160921 (experimental) [trunk revision 240316] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c
small.c: In function ‘fn1’:
small.c:2:5: warning: type of ‘p1’ defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
int fn1(p1) { retu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
I found the problem responsible for the incorrect code generation but I have
disabled the optimization until I have a robust solution. The ILP32 warning in
comment #6 is a separate issue. I'm looking into it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71363
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71363
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 04:25:00PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> I will try to study the script some more later today. Changing status to
> unconfirmed while we look into this a bit.
>
I clo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77326
--- Comment #6 from Matthijs Kooijman ---
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71363
--- Comment #3 from Paul Mustiere ---
In the script:
possible_real_kinds="4 8 10 16" i.e. it tries them all
In the for loop, when it tries to compile the dummy Fortran program to check
each kind=k existance, only 4, 8 & 16 exists.
kind=4 is def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Sep 21 16:13:12 2016
New Revision: 240321
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240321&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/77676 - powerpc64 and powerpc64le stage2 bootstrap fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71363
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298
--- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 39669
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39669&action=edit
Revised patch for review/testing
This revised patch speeds up execution on non DTIO internal units by saving a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77567
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus ---
For completeness, upstream review is at https://reviews.llvm.org/D24771
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72828
jim at meyering dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jim at meyering dot net
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77651
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 21 15:13:46 2016
New Revision: 240317
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240317&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/77651
c-family/
* c.opt (Waligned-new=): Add Reject
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77478
--- Comment #7 from Alexander Monakov ---
Richard, I don't believe this is a dup. According to my git-bisect, this was
fixed or made latent during gcc-6 development by your patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00120.html
[PATCH]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77567
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 21 14:40:30 2016
New Revision: 240316
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240316&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/77567
* asan/asan_new_delete.cc: Cherry-pick
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77326
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77326
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Sep 21 14:11:59 2016
New Revision: 240315
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240315&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2016-09-21 trunk r240306.
PR target/77
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Perhaps it would be enough to just disable the pass for now (comment out in the
gate), so that the whole file isn't reverted.
It breaks i686-linux bootstrap as well, on the following testcase reduced from
ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77648
--- Comment #10 from Raymond Fontenot ---
Yeah I'll see what I can do about simplifying the test case.
~Raymond
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Could this be reverted for now please, until the bootstrap errors are fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Bisect points to git commit b9833bfd, svn r240298.
It also breaks bootstrap on i386, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2016-09/ and x86_64-apple-darwin15:
../../work/gcc/varasm.c: In functi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71348
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77318
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Bisect points to git commit b9833bfd, svn rev 240298.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77648
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Contains two C testcases -- the Fortran bug is in another code path,
> a Fortran testcase suitable for the testsuite would be appreciated
> (single-file, runtime, fails without, passes with the patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77657
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77550
--- Comment #17 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Wed Sep 21 13:03:59 2016
New Revision: 240313
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240313&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc:
2016-09-21 Bernd Edlinger
PR tree-optimization/77550
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
--- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #22)
> When a fix is designed, could you please backport it to the 6 branch (so it
> can make it into 6.3 for example)? It is also affected.
sure, "all open b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77674
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
Bug ID: 77676
Summary: powerpc64 and powerpc64le stage2 bootstrap fail
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77665
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71767
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77675
Bug ID: 77675
Summary: optimization level==number of -Wformat-length warnings
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77644
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Well, even generally sqrt (X) CMP sqrt (Y) -> X CMP Y at least if there are no
NaNs and with -funsafe-math-optimization (because rounding effects could make
sqrt (X) == sqrt (Y) when X != Y).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72774
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77674
Bug ID: 77674
Summary: ICE in binds_to_current_def_p with
-fkeep-inline-functions
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77664
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77326
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Sep 21 09:31:38 2016
New Revision: 240308
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240308&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from 2016-09-21 trunk r240306.
PR target/77326
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77651
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66012
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-12-23 00:00:00 |2016-9-21
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pin
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
