[Bug c++/77477] error recovery for explicit qualification

2016-09-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77477 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- part makes this code invalid. Basically you are not specializing a template but just declaring one.

[Bug tree-optimization/72866] Compile time hog w/ -O3 (-Ofast)

2016-09-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72866 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #7) > I have another snippet that works w/ 7.0.0-alpha20160731 snapshot, but still > takes indefinite time to compile even by 7.0.0-alpha20160904, i.e. after the > fix

[Bug tree-optimization/72866] Compile time hog w/ -O3 (-Ofast)

2016-09-04 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72866 --- Comment #7 from Arseny Solokha --- I have another snippet that works w/ 7.0.0-alpha20160731 snapshot, but still takes indefinite time to compile even by 7.0.0-alpha20160904, i.e. after the fix. Should I file another PR for it? void vr (int o

[Bug c++/77477] error recovery for explicit qualification

2016-09-04 Thread jmichae3 at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77477 --- Comment #3 from Jim Michaels --- oh, and the error messages do not fit the problem.

[Bug c++/77477] error recovery for explicit qualification

2016-09-04 Thread jmichae3 at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77477 --- Comment #2 from Jim Michaels --- I don't believe this answer. to my knowledge the syntax is OK for c++11. I was even told once that is not needed, which was wrong. you did not state exactly what was wrong, only that "your code is wrong." ple

[Bug c++/77477] error recovery for explicit qualification

2016-09-04 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77477 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug c/77478] New: Incorrect code generated with -O3, m32, -msse2 and -ffast-math

2016-09-04 Thread gcc_bugzilla at appletonaudio dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77478 Bug ID: 77478 Summary: Incorrect code generated with -O3, m32, -msse2 and -ffast-math Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/77477] New: template functions don't seem to work

2016-09-04 Thread jmichae3 at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77477 Bug ID: 77477 Summary: template functions don't seem to work Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug driver/77475] unnecessary or misleading context in reporting command line problems

2016-09-04 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77475 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||easyhack CC|

[Bug target/77476] New: [Regression 7] [AVX-512] illegal kmovb instruction on KNL

2016-09-04 Thread babokin at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77476 Bug ID: 77476 Summary: [Regression 7] [AVX-512] illegal kmovb instruction on KNL Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug web/50642] onlinedocs formated text too small to read

2016-09-04 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642 --- Comment #20 from Gerald Pfeifer --- Created attachment 39553 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39553&action=edit Firefox font configuratoin (In reply to Jon Grant from comment #18) > Just looking at this page: > > https:/

[Bug target/70341] [5/6/7 Regression] cost model for addresses is incorrect, slsr is using reg + reg + CST for arm

2016-09-04 Thread fredrik.hederstie...@securitas-direct.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70341 --- Comment #8 from Fredrik Hederstierna --- Could it be something in tree-ssa-forwprop pass? This pass is executed 4 times in -Os, and starting with GCC-4.9 it seems like statements that seems to generate instructions that are hard to eliminat

[Bug web/50642] onlinedocs formated text too small to read

2016-09-04 Thread jg at jguk dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642 --- Comment #19 from Jon Grant --- Created attachment 39552 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39552&action=edit Firefox screenshot 4 September 2016 Shows the small text visible still.

[Bug web/50642] onlinedocs formated text too small to read

2016-09-04 Thread jg at jguk dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642 --- Comment #18 from Jon Grant --- Just looking at this page: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Enumerator-Attributes.html#Enumerator-Attributes The "deprecated" word appears to be smaller (like 9pt, compared to 11pt regular I estimate). I', u

[Bug c++/77474] sizeof and function template don't work properly together

2016-09-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77474 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||29143 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug fortran/77391] gfortran allows CHARACTER(LEN=:),PARAMETER:: STRING='constant' buts does not report it as an extension

2016-09-04 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77391 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug web/56736] Broken link in http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/changes.html

2016-09-04 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56736 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/77469] std::regex x("[b\\-a]") throws with message "Invalid range in bracket expression."

2016-09-04 Thread timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77469 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timshen at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution

[Bug libstdc++/77356] regex error for a ECMAScript syntax string

2016-09-04 Thread timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77356 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alban...@baker-research.com --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug web/50642] onlinedocs formated text too small to read

2016-09-04 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/61139] missed fma/reassoc optimization

2016-09-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61139 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/63586] x+x+x+x -> 4*x in gimple

2016-09-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63586 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 61139 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/77391] gfortran allows CHARACTER(LEN=:),PARAMETER:: STRING='constant' buts does not report it as an extension

2016-09-04 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77391 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Sep 4 20:00:48 2016 New Revision: 239982 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239982&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-09-04 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/77391

[Bug web/50642] onlinedocs formated text too small to read

2016-09-04 Thread gerald at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642 --- Comment #16 from gerald at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: gerald Date: Sun Sep 4 19:38:05 2016 New Revision: 239981 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239981&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR documentation/50642 * update_web_docs_sv

[Bug driver/77475] unnecessary or misleading context in reporting command line problems

2016-09-04 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77475 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug driver/77475] New: unnecessary or misleading context in reporting command line problems

2016-09-04 Thread drepper.fsp+rhbz at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77475 Bug ID: 77475 Summary: unnecessary or misleading context in reporting command line problems Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug fortran/77460] ICE when summing an overflowing array

2016-09-04 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77460 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug c++/77474] sizeof and function template don't work properly together

2016-09-04 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77474 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug fortran/77460] ICE when summing an overflowing array

2016-09-04 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77460 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Sep 4 18:43:40 2016 New Revision: 239979 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239979&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-09-04 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/77460

[Bug web/50642] onlinedocs formated text too small to read

2016-09-04 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/77474] New: sizeof and function template don't work properly together

2016-09-04 Thread michele.caini at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77474 Bug ID: 77474 Summary: sizeof and function template don't work properly together Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug preprocessor/71681] header.gcc file lookup is broken for -remap

2016-09-04 Thread andris.pavenis at iki dot fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71681 --- Comment #2 from Andris Pavenis --- Created attachment 39551 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39551&action=edit Test script to reproduce problem

[Bug fortran/71902] [5/6/7 Regression] Unneeded temporary on reallocatable character assignment

2016-09-04 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71902 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Sep 4 16:17:55 2016 New Revision: 239977 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239977&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-09-04 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/71902 * frontend

[Bug lto/77472] __attribute__((flatten)) when used with -flto can lead to extreme number of inlined functions

2016-09-04 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77472 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- > I'm not sure what is the best way forward. > Maybe gcc should ignore __attribute__((flatten)) when using LTO > unconditionally? Well, I am not sure - flatten can make compiler explode without LTO, too, and I

[Bug ipa/77472] build of intel_drv.so (xf86-video-intel) takes over 13GB+ memory during lto1

2016-09-04 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77472 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- I'm not sure what is the best way forward. Maybe gcc should ignore __attribute__((flatten)) when using LTO unconditionally?

[Bug ipa/77472] build of intel_drv.so (xf86-video-intel) takes over 13GB+ memory during lto1

2016-09-04 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77472 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Ah this is an old issue. Martin reported it a while ago: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77580

[Bug ipa/77472] build of intel_drv.so (xf86-video-intel) takes over 13GB+ memory during lto1

2016-09-04 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77472 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3) > Looks like GCC is trying to satisfy the flatten attribute at link time which > is ignored by clang? Yes, you're right: % grep -D skip -R -i "flatten" sna_gl

[Bug ipa/77472] build of intel_drv.so (xf86-video-intel) takes over 13GB+ memory during lto1

2016-09-04 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77472 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/53659] ARM: Using -mcpu=cortex-a9 option results in bad performance for Cortex-A9 processor in C-Ray phoronix benchmark

2016-09-04 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53659 --- Comment #3 from PeteVine --- Curiously, up to gcc 6, targeting Cortex-A5 made virtually no difference, but in gcc 7, generic codegen takes an 8% hit while -mcpu=cortex-a5 produces roughly the same performance as before. (but that's a differen

[Bug c/77464] gcc -no-pie breaks -shared

2016-09-04 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77464 --- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #3) > > Or at least give a clearer error that mentions -fPIC ... > > Actually this is not a driver issue jus

[Bug libfortran/77473] New: New PRNG causes regressions on DragonFly BSD

2016-09-04 Thread rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77473 Bug ID: 77473 Summary: New PRNG causes regressions on DragonFly BSD Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfor

[Bug middle-end/77468] C-ray regression on Aarch64

2016-09-04 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77468 --- Comment #2 from PeteVine --- Created attachment 39549 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39549&action=edit Annotated assembly files

[Bug middle-end/77468] C-ray regression on Aarch64

2016-09-04 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77468 --- Comment #1 from PeteVine --- GCC 5.3's profile (./c-ray-mt -t 64 -s 1600x1200 -r 8 -i sphfract -o output.ppm): CPU: ARM Cortex-A53, speed 1536 MHz (estimated) Counted CPU_CYCLES events (Cycle) with a unit mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 10

[Bug ipa/77472] build of intel_drv.so (xf86-video-intel) takes over 13GB+ memory during lto1

2016-09-04 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77472 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Created attachment 39548 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39548&action=edit unreduced testcase % gcc -flto -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -shared -fPIC intel_module.i gen7_render.i gen8_e

[Bug target/71399] [5/6/7 Regression] 5.3.0 bootstrap comparison failure on arm-linux-gnueabihf

2016-09-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, wrong-code Component|boo

[Bug ipa/77472] build of intel_drv.so (xf86-video-intel) takes over 13GB+ memory during lto1

2016-09-04 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77472 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog, lto,

[Bug other/68610] configure failure in libssp

2016-09-04 Thread gccbugzilla at limegreensocks dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68610 --- Comment #2 from David --- Yes, this still occurs with trunk Revision 239974. I'm using MSYS2 under Windows and my current configure line is: ../gcctrunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --target=x86_64-w64-mingw32 --build=x86_64-w64-mingw

[Bug lto/77472] New: build of intel_drv.so (xf86-video-intel) takes over 13GB+ memory during lto1

2016-09-04 Thread sverd.johnsen at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77472 Bug ID: 77472 Summary: build of intel_drv.so (xf86-video-intel) takes over 13GB+ memory during lto1 Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug target/77452] [7 Regression] ICE: in plus_constant, at explow.c:87 with -fno-split-wide-types -mavx512f --param=max-combine-insns=2

2016-09-04 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77452 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/71399] GCC 5.3.0 bootstrap comparison failure on arm-linux-gnueabihf

2016-09-04 Thread ludo at gnu dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399 --- Comment #9 from Ludovic Courtès --- GCC 4.9.4 exhibits the same bootstrapping failure (again on arm-linux-gnueabihf). I reverted the ARM-specific changes made between 4.9.3 and 4.9.4 by applying the result of "diff -ur gcc-4.9.{4,3}/gcc/conf

[Bug bootstrap/71399] GCC 5.3.0 bootstrap comparison failure on arm-linux-gnueabihf

2016-09-04 Thread ludo at gnu dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399 --- Comment #8 from Ludovic Courtès --- Created attachment 39547 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39547&action=edit Revert ARM-specific 4.9.3-to-4.9.4 changes

[Bug tree-optimization/41244] "&data[i] - data" isn't converted to "i"

2016-09-04 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41244 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > On the trunk (on aarch64) we get: Yes, on I32P64 platforms we still have a chance to prove that the multiplication doesn't overflow. > long int _4; > long int

[Bug debug/77471] -O3 -g compile time hog on ppc64le

2016-09-04 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77471 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol 34.45% cc1 cc1[.] canonicalize_values_star 20.56% cc1 cc1[.