https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76732
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|GCC should warn on repeated |Improve Woverride-init
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76732
--- Comment #6 from rusty at rustcorp dot com.au ---
"manu at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76732
>
> Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77277
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77277
Bug ID: 77277
Summary: -fdiagnostics-color=always disabled on _WIN32 for no
discernible reason
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77276
Bug ID: 77276
Summary: strlen expanded inline with -Os, emits larger code
than with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67496
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.2.0 |7.0
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67496
--- Comment #11 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Still in trunk 7.0
gcc-trunk-239276/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:2243:27: runtime error: load of
value 48, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67482
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77271
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77275
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72817
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Aug 16 22:06:45 2016
New Revision: 239514
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239514&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/72817
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr72817.c (a)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77265
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77265
--- Comment #4 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Tue Aug 16 21:30:56 2016
New Revision: 239513
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239513&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Update soft-fp from glibc (PR libgcc/77265).
This patch updates soft-fp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72817
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77275
Bug ID: 77275
Summary: Description of -l option refers only to static
libraries, not dynamic/shared libraries
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77274
Bug ID: 77274
Summary: GCC uses copy constructor in member initializer list
instead of simple initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733
deller at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||deller at gmx dot de
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77260
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72104
Romain Geissler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71336
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
On a related note I noticed the final code for
int test(int a) {
return (a & CST) * 4 + 3;
}
is not optimal when CST is a power of two, e.g. when CST=8:
_Z4testi:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77270
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The problem is in the fact that for -march=native, the driver will pass
-mno-prfchw, since the relevant bit is not present in cpuid flags.
Following code in i386.c:
/* Enable prefetch{,w} instructions for -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72857
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72857
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Aug 16 18:19:34 2016
New Revision: 239510
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239510&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix caret locations in format_type_warning (PR c/72857)
gcc/c-family/C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77273
Bug ID: 77273
Summary: 1 << 31 is undefined in gcc/config/i386/cpuid.h:93
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77271
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77270
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from nightstrike
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77271
Bug ID: 77271
Summary: flag -std=c++98 cannot set _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI
properly
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71902
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71910
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Aug 16 16:50:47 2016
New Revision: 239508
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239508&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71910
* tree-cfg.c (execute_fixup_cfg): Add node
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67485
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Aug 16 16:48:16 2016
New Revision: 239507
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239507&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/67485
* expmed.c (expand_mult_const): Change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77270
Bug ID: 77270
Summary: Flag -mprftchw is shared with 3dnow for -march=k8
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-05/msg0.html
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72867
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Aug 16 16:23:46 2016
New Revision: 239505
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239505&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/72867
* gcc.target/i386/pr72867.c: Add -msse to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77269
Bug ID: 77269
Summary: __builtin_isinf_sign does not work for __float128
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77268
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77268
Bug ID: 77268
Summary: Vector erase call destructor for last element twice
and doesn't call destructor for eased element.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32187
--- Comment #10 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: emsr
Date: Tue Aug 16 14:56:55 2016
New Revision: 239504
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239504&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Commit Joseph Myers Implement C _FloatN, _FloatNx types [version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72824
mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72856
--- Comment #10 from Frédéric Buclin ---
(In reply to Frank Ch. Eigler from comment #6)
> Per-account rate limits seem so easy to overcome, with spammers already
> creating numerous verified junk accounts with ease.
I banned several ranges of IP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36412
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36412
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Aug 16 14:14:18 2016
New Revision: 239503
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239503&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcov: add new option (--hash-filenames) (PR
PR gcov-profile/36412
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77265
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
The natural fix is to the extended precision unpacking, to make it clear
the high bit so everything else can treat it like a normal IEEE format.
I'll test a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41880
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69073
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77267
Bug ID: 77267
Summary: MPX does not work in a presence of "-Wl,-as-needed"
option (Ubuntu default)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67419
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77265
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76774
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69848
--- Comment #16 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Aug 16 13:09:40 2016
New Revision: 239502
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239502&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/69848
* config/aarch64/aar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77264
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01179.html would fix
it, but I'll wait a bit to see if the committee agrees with that solution.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77265
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77262
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> It's indeed suspicious that exactly the same set of tests is affected,
> but my reghunt (and previous testresults) point at a totally different
> patch.
Well, I have r237556 reverted in my working t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77264
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77263
--- Comment #4 from Jo ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jo from comment #2)
> > /* and */ as part of a C-string literal should not interfere with /* */ in
> > the code.
>
> They are no part of a string-literal, t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77264
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> We end up in the new replace() overload when we should be in the const char*
> one here:
>
> basic_string&
> replace(size_type __pos, size_type __n,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77264
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Reduced:
#include
int main () {
std::string str("xyz");
char c = 'Y';
str.replace(1, 1, &c, 1);
if (str[1] != 'Y')
__builtin_abort();
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77266
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 39464
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39464&action=edit
test1
test2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77266
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Next comment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77266
Bug ID: 77266
Summary: test mark_spam.py
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
Assignee: unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77264
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77265
Bug ID: 77265
Summary: Casting an extended precision long double "inf" to
__float128 results in "nan"
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77263
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77263
Jo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72847
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74585
--- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
>
> You mean stores like the following?
>
> (insn 13 12 14 2 (set (mem/c:V4SI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 150 virtual-stack-vars)
> (const_int 112 [0x70]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72847
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Aug 16 11:33:16 2016
New Revision: 239497
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239497&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 72847 Prevent double-free in std::vector
PR libstdc++/72847
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77262
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Duplicate of/related to pr71682?
It's indeed suspicious that exactly the same set of tests is affected,
but my reghunt (and previous tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71885
--- Comment #26 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
For future reference here is a nice, short example from Bernd Edlinger:
markus@x4 tmp % cat lifetime-dse.cpp
#include
#include
#include
struct A {
A() {}
void *operator new(size_t s) {
voi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76783
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Component|tree-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76783
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Component|tree-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76783
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Aug 16 11:22:47 2016
New Revision: 239496
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239496&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-16 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/76783
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73350
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 39462
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39462&action=edit
gcc7-pr73350-wip.patch
Untested patch with what I had in mind for the mask operands. Perhaps some
extra arch s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77262
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Duplicate of/related to pr71682?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77264
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77264
Bug ID: 77264
Summary: [7 Regression] std::string's replace gives wrong
results with C++17, works with C++11
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76774
--- Comment #4 from Peter Sewell ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> What code were you expecting anyways?
I hadn't noticed how recent the other-size LL/SC were. But then I would have
expected a 4-byte representation for _Atomic(_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71042
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71042
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67410
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] |[5 Regression] c/c-typeck.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50406
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.0 |7.0
--- Comment #4 from Vittorio Zecca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77263
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77263
Bug ID: 77263
Summary: comment /* */ is ignored in some cases
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77259
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 39461
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39461&action=edit
gcc7-pr77259.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72847
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77262
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77262
Bug ID: 77262
Summary: [7 regression] Several libjava tests FAIL on 32-bit
Solaris/x86
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75402
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I can't reproduce this with any version of GCC, so either you have a weird
config, or a weird kernel, or something else that is impossible to tell without
the requested info.
I see a single futex wait and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73450
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Aug 16 09:13:50 2016
New Revision: 239494
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239494&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/72817
PR tree-optimization/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72817
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Aug 16 09:13:50 2016
New Revision: 239494
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239494&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/72817
PR tree-optimization/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75402
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77261
Bug ID: 77261
Summary: gfortran.dg/random_3.f90 FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76262
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77260
Bug ID: 77260
Summary: bogus warning with ENTRY in a function
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76262
--- Comment #3 from TC ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> In which case both EDG and Clang get this wrong, as they print "12"
I know that Clang 3.7+ implemented DR1467 without 2137 (in which case "12"
would be the right output)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77259
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77259
Bug ID: 77259
Summary: [6/7 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn since r232167
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76262
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
In which case both EDG and Clang get this wrong, as they print "12"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74585
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #11)
> With the original test case, -mcpu=power8 is problematic because of the use
> of the "swapping stores," whose RHS is a vec_select rather than a register
> or su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76957
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77034
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77034
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Aug 16 07:15:00 2016
New Revision: 239493
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239493&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/77034
Backported from mainline
2016-0
100 matches
Mail list logo
