https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72824
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72824
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.3
Summary|Signed fl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72824
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65070
--- Comment #6 from Nadav Har'El ---
Andrew, the syscall instruction may indeed be the only ABI of the Linux kernel.
But I didn't create this issue on the Linux kernel mailing list, rather on the
libgomp library's issue tracker. Looking a the li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43817
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this has been fixed in either 6.1.0 or on the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72826
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
You can find out when things go wrong by using something like
-fdump-tree-all-all-lineno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72826
--- Comment #2 from Zack Weinberg ---
I can persuade it to print instead
test2.cc:6:9: warning: ‘timer.countdownTimer::started’ is used
uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
by using -O1 instead of -O2 or by removing the line `st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70946
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72823
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I guess the thing is that ENABLE_ASSERT_CHECKING is never defined while
building libcpp, it is simply not handled by libcpp/configure* and not stored
in libcpp/config*. So, either it could use CHECKING_P ins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19986
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2007-07-01 00:35:18 |2016-8-6
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72826
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36823
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Summary|miss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72823
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Should now be fixed. Keeping open for now, in the hope of addressing libcpp's
gcc_assert.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72823
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Sat Aug 6 18:06:30 2016
New Revision: 239211
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239211&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix crash in selftest::test_lexer_string_locations_ucn4 (PR bootstrap/7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72823
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72823
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> Not sure why I'm not seeing it fail; am investigating further.
Looks like gcc_assert in libcpp was doing nothing on my box. The code i
libcpp/system.h has:
/*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72823
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Sorry about this.
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Created attachment 39062 [details]
> gcc7-pr72823.patch
>
> Untested fix.
Thanks. ppalka on IRC said that this fixed it for him.
> IMHO eit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72826
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72826
Bug ID: 72826
Summary: Poor diagnostic for uninitialized structure field
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71936
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56701
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to TC from comment #3)
> This still breaks:
>
> struct A
> {
> void f(){ A*&& a = &*this; }
> };
> int main(){}
Jason, should this be reopened?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67626
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think the issue here is simply that ubsan isn't used to compile the code in
libstdc++.so where the facets are created, so the vtable is not instrumented.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56158
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69373
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68740
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Is this still failing?
The file was replaced with testsuite/experimental/memory_resource/1.cc but that
now has:
// { dg-require-atomic-builtins "" }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71313
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72825
Bug ID: 72825
Summary: ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal
compiler error: tree check: expected array_type, have
error_mark in array_ref_low_bound, at tree.c:13013)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72817
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69243
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |5.5
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69293
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oops I did it again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72741
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 39064
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39064&action=edit
Fortran routine directive with a name
Cesar, thanks for your initial fix.
Please have a look at the new file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70940
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |7.0
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71964
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69293
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Aug 6 12:21:42 2016
New Revision: 239205
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239205&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix construction of std::function from null pointer-to-member
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71964
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Aug 6 12:21:51 2016
New Revision: 239207
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239207&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Move allocator in RB tree move constructors
Backport from mainline
2016-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70940
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Aug 6 12:20:31 2016
New Revision: 239199
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239199&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/70940 Start fixing polymorphic memory resources
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71964
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Aug 6 12:20:41 2016
New Revision: 239201
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239201&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Move allocator in RB tree move constructors
Backport from mainline
2016-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72824
Bug ID: 72824
Summary: [7 Regression] Signed floating point zero semantics
broken at optimization level -O3
(tree-loop-distribute-patterns)
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72821
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72741
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72823
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70389
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60421
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72816
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72820
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Aug 6 10:21:07 2016
New Revision: 239191
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239191&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use ::new to avoid finding overloaded operator new
PR libstdc++/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72821
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r239190 FAIL
r239091 FAIL
r239090 PASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72698
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70389
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72698
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72746
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
50 matches
Mail list logo
