https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66104
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68622
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
http://llvm.org/devmtg/2014-10/Slides/Morisset-AtomicsPresentation.pdf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68622
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68794
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't we want to warn or error out if the library is not exits as someone
could implement their own runtime library which they install separately from
GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52217
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58446
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847
--- Comment #23 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to mwahab from comment #22)
> I believe that this patch is the cause of compilation failures for a number
> of tests on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and arm-none-eabi.
>
> E.g. arm-none-linux-gnuea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69008
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|middle-end
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68894
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, TREE
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69191
Kristian Spangsege changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kristian.spangsege at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68894
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this is fixed on the trunk now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68703
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68762
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68103
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||6.1.0
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68180
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack, ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
When -mno-powerpc64, I see. Thanks. Yeah this needs some untangling.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
wY is using mem_operand_gpr which is designed for gpr loads/stores. When -m32,
mem_operand_gpr does not enforce multiple-of-4 offsets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71869
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72808
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72808
Bug ID: 72808
Summary: [6/7 Regression] ICE on valid c++ code in verify_type
(gcc/tree.c:14047)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66426
James Almer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72806
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72805
--- Comment #6 from Wenzel Jakob ---
awesome, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72805
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70361
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72805
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Aug 4 21:25:33 2016
New Revision: 239155
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239155&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/72805
* config/i386/avx512fintrin.h (_mm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71869
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Aug 4 21:25:05 2016
New Revision: 239154
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239154&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-08-04 Michael Meissner
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72805
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Aug 4 21:22:06 2016
New Revision: 239153
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239153&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/72805
* config/i386/avx512fintrin.h (_mm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72807
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72805
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Aug 4 21:14:39 2016
New Revision: 239152
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239152&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/72805
* config/i386/avx512fintrin.h (_mm
st_int -59 [0xffc5])
(nil)))
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 7.0.0 20160804 (experimental) [trunk revision 239146] (arm-linux-gnueabihf)
GCC error:|
| in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2211 |
| Erro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72805
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71078
--- Comment #9 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8)
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71078
> >
> > --- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69601
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72806
Bug ID: 72806
Summary: Extra note/missing not location for __builtin_va_list
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72805
Bug ID: 72805
Summary: AVX512: invalid code generation involving masks
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72800
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE on |[5/6 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72800
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Aug 4 19:22:58 2016
New Revision: 239148
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239148&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2016-08-04 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/72800
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72759
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Thu Aug 4 19:14:32 2016
New Revision: 239147
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239147&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE on invalid variable template instantiation (PR c++/72759)
gcc/cp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72804
Bug ID: 72804
Summary: Poor code gen with -mvsx-timode
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72803
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72803
Bug ID: 72803
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE on invalid code in
linemap_position_for_loc_and_offset, at
libcpp/line-map.c:891
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71696
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71696
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Aug 4 16:53:18 2016
New Revision: 239143
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239143&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-04 Marcel Böhme
PR c++/71696
* cplus-dem.c: Pre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53915
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70254
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55121
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57015
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67542
Gerhard Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on initializing type|ICE in
|variable w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72800
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|paolo.carlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847
mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72415
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72796
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71451
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-06-08 00:00:00 |2016-8-4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72415
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 4 16:06:59 2016
New Revision: 239139
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239139&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/72415 - member template with fold-expression constraint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72415
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 4 16:06:22 2016
New Revision: 239138
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239138&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/72415 - member template with fold-expression constraint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72796
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 4 16:06:09 2016
New Revision: 239136
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239136&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/72796 - wrong resolution of scoped method call.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72763
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Depends
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72764
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72775
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58001
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72802
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Why is "wY" wrong for 32-bit? I don't see it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72800
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57165
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67542
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Is not this PR fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58667
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58001
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47879
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71779
--- Comment #21 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Thu Aug 4 13:23:36 2016
New Revision: 239123
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239123&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
016-08-04 Bernd Edlinger
PR rtl-optimization/71779
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918
Bug 18918 depends on bug 25830, which changed state.
Bug 25830 Summary: [libgfortran] Optionally support multi-process locking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70903
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Thu Aug 4 13:20:57 2016
New Revision: 239122
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239122&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-04 Bernd Edlinger
PR rtl-optimization/70903
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
AFAICT this PR is now fixed on trunk (7.0) and the gcc-5 and 6 branches. Likely
r238822.
I'll close the PR as FIXED in the coming days unless someone object.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71807
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 70842, which changed state.
Bug 70842 Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error with character
members within a polymorphic pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68147
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> With one thing and another, I completely forgot about the backport.
> Yes, please do. I am not able to do commits fo the next week.
Upon further investigation revision r233797 caused the pr70040 re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58544
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59735
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72791
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrick.seewald at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71078
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71078
>
> --- Comment #7 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to prat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60171
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60321
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794
--- Comment #6 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Thanks for clarification.
This bug can be closed as user misunderstanding.
2016-08-04 14:08 GMT+03:00 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794
>
> --- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72772
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030714-2.c scan-tree-dump-times dom2 "if " 3
is because jump-threading doesn't want to thread to a loop header and w/o the
patch we have a pre-header with the degenerate PHI which ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65831
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71078
--- Comment #7 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #6)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> > On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71078
--- Comment #6 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71078
> >
> > mwahab at gcc dot g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004
--- Comment #25 from PeteVine ---
In that case, it might be relevant to note the x86 build succeeded on a 32-bit
**single-core** Athlon XP.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72772
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
A more light-weight fix for the specific issue would be
Index: gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c
===
--- gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c (revision 239117)
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
No, it's not a bug in the LTO phase - C99 inline simply does _not_ emit a
out-of-line copy. You have to add a extern declaration to force that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72795
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67097
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Gilles Gouaillardet from comment #3)
> Shall I try again with the latest snapshot instead ?
> I am not very familiar with building from svn...
What was the original version you tested?
Maybe just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67097
--- Comment #3 from Gilles Gouaillardet
---
Shall I try again with the latest snapshot instead ?
I am not very familiar with building from svn...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71078
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71078
>
> mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71078
mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org
---
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo