[Bug c++/68383] Demangler stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68383 --- Comment #14 from fiesh at zefix dot tv --- It appears to be correct, as far as one can safely judge this by eye examination.

[Bug middle-end/65950] exit in main is causing the path to it to become unlikely.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65950 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/67571] Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing .cfi_endproc directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67571 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67545] [concepts] Failure to properly substitute template parameters into requires-clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67545 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal

[Bug c++/67692] [concepts] ICE when using requires in non-concept contexts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67692 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNC

[Bug middle-end/65950] exit in main is causing the path to it to become unlikely.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65950 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- Basically this code in predict.c: if ((gimple_call_flags (stmt) & ECF_NORETURN) && has_return_edges) predict_paths_leading_to (bb, PRED_NORETURN,

[Bug middle-end/65950] exit in main is causing the path to it to become unlikely.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65950 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|function becomes unlikely |exit in main is causing the

[Bug middle-end/65950] function becomes unlikely with -fwhole-program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65950 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|lto |middle-end Summary|Loop is no

[Bug c++/72768] Potential bug about the order of destructors of static objects and atexit() callbacks in C++?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72768 --- Comment #3 from lh_mouse --- > 15.2 Constructors and destructors [except.ctor] > 3 For an object of class type of any storage duration whose initialization or > destruction is terminated by an > exception, the destructor is invoked for each

[Bug target/72771] New: powerpc64le ICE with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72771 Bug ID: 72771 Summary: powerpc64le ICE with -mcpu=power9 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug rtl-optimization/68898] [6 Regression] ICE if rtl if-conversion is off.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68898 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNC

[Bug debug/55641] debug info for the type of a reference declared with a typedef has spurious 'const'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55641 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug debug/49366] pointer-to-member-function not given value in DW_TAG_template_value_param

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49366 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org As

[Bug c++/72768] Potential bug about the order of destructors of static objects and atexit() callbacks in C++?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72768 --- Comment #2 from lh_mouse --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > Arguably the object is not completely initialized until the principal > constructor returns. I doubt it. If an exception is thrown inside the principal ctor which d

[Bug c++/68159] Demangler crash (GDB PR 19190)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68159 --- Comment #13 from Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > Created attachment 39042 [details] > A patch to avoid stack oveflow This fixes the issue with the previous test case. However, this other one (obtained

[Bug c++/68383] Demangler stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68383 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug c++/68383] Demangler stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68383 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 39044 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39044&action=edit A patch This gives: Write::DataMapGrammar, std::allocator > > >::DataMapGrammar()::{lambda()#1} const& std::forward

[Bug debug/63240] DWARF does not represent C++ defaulted methods

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63240 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/64396] Missed optimization in post-loop register handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64396 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severity|m

[Bug c++/68159] Demangler crash (GDB PR 19190)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68159 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 39042 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39042&action=edit A patch to avoid stack oveflow

[Bug c++/68383] Demangler stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68383 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68159] Demangler crash (GDB PR 19190)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68159 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- *** Bug 68383 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/68159] Demangler crash (GDB PR 19190)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68159 --- Comment #10 from Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez --- It seems c++filt also crashes with the very same test case: $ echo '_ZSt7forwardIRKZN5Write14DataMapGrammarISt20back_insert_iteratorISsEEC4EvEUlRT_E_EOS5_RNSt16remove_referenceIS5_E4typeE'|c++f

[Bug c++/72768] Potential bug about the order of destructors of static objects and atexit() callbacks in C++?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72768 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to lh_mouse from comment #0) > Notwithstanding the vagueness of 'the completion of the initialization of an > object', The question hinges entirely on the definition of that term. Arguably the o

[Bug fortran/72770] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:263

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72770 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Compiles and works without character branch (type is). $ cat z3.f90 program p type t class(*), allocatable :: q(:) end type type(t) :: z integer :: a(3) = [1, 2, 3] real :: c(3) =

[Bug fortran/72770] New: ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:263

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72770 Bug ID: 72770 Summary: ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:263 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: for

[Bug gcov-profile/69004] Building t-engine on ARM fails during -fprofile-use stage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004 --- Comment #18 from PeteVine --- Great, thanks! Now, as I mentioned in one of previous comments, the same t-engine build procedure works fine on x86, so we can be fairly certain I didn't break anything. The large amount of physfs/luajit profile

[Bug rtl-optimization/69847] Spec 2006 403.gcc slows down with -mlra vs. reload on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847 --- Comment #16 from Bill Schmidt --- Hi Vlad, I need to re-run my tests one more time because I goofed up the build on a few of them; however, I was able to verify that the degradation on 403.gcc has now gone away (I saw a slight improvement wi

[Bug target/71948] [avr] Make progmem work on reduced Tiny cores by adding 0x4000 to symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71948 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Aug 1 17:12:32 2016 New Revision: 238961 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238961&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/71948 * config/avr/avr.c (AVR_SYMBOL_FLAG_TINY_

[Bug c/7652] -Wswitch-break : Warn if a switch case falls through

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652 --- Comment #55 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Aug 1 16:03:41 2016 New Revision: 238958 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238958&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/7652 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_args_builti

[Bug c++/72769] ifstream Optimed Out ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72769 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/72769] New: ifstream Optimed Out ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72769 Bug ID: 72769 Summary: ifstream Optimed Out ? Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: un

[Bug c++/72766] [7 Regression] tree check fail in get_len, at tree.h:5303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72766 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/72752] [6 Regression] ICE: in retrieve_specialization, at cp/pt.c:1183

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72752 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Yeah, that work isn't safe enough to backport.

[Bug c++/72766] [7 Regression] tree check fail in get_len, at tree.h:5303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72766 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Aug 1 15:01:03 2016 New Revision: 238957 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238957&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/72766 - ICE with VLA * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_point

[Bug c++/72768] New: Potential bug about the order of destructors of static objects and atexit() callbacks in C++?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72768 Bug ID: 72768 Summary: Potential bug about the order of destructors of static objects and atexit() callbacks in C++? Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/72748] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 with -g enabled in 64-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5952

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72748 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/72748] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 with -g enabled in 64-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5952

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72748 --- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Aug 1 14:46:01 2016 New Revision: 238956 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238956&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Convert V1TImode register to TImode in debug insn TImode register

[Bug tree-optimization/71818] [7 Regression] ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:192 w/ -O2 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71818 alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug tree-optimization/71818] [7 Regression] ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:192 w/ -O2 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71818 --- Comment #1 from alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: alahay01 Date: Mon Aug 1 14:33:23 2016 New Revision: 238955 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238955&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-08-01 Alan Hayward gcc/ PR tree-optimizat

[Bug gcov-profile/69004] Building t-engine on ARM fails during -fprofile-use stage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69004 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #17

[Bug c++/72766] [7 Regression] tree check fail in get_len, at tree.h:5303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72766 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- #11 0x00a7d226 in cxx_eval_pointer_plus_expression ( ctx=0x7fffd200, t=, lval=false, non_constant_p=0x7fffd237, overflow_p=0x7fffd236) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/c

[Bug c++/72766] [7 Regression] tree check fail in get_len, at tree.h:5303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72766 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/71857] [7 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopt_mult_4.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71857 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/72766] [7 Regression] tree check fail in get_len, at tree.h:5303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72766 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/71857] [7 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopt_mult_4.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71857 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Aug 1 13:31:24 2016 New Revision: 238953 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238953&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Change dump expectation in PR71857 PR tree-optimization/71857

[Bug target/72767] [avr] Some branches report too small insn length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72767 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Version|5.2.0

[Bug target/72767] [avr] Some branches report too small insn length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72767 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Aug 1 12:44:18 2016 New Revision: 238950 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238950&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from 2016-08-01 trunk r238948. PR target/72767

[Bug target/71722] incorrect code for test pr64252.c for -mcpu=power9 -mpower9-vector -ftree-vectorize -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71722 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/71805] incorrect code for test pr45752.c with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71805 --- Comment #8 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 71722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/72767] [avr] Some branches report too small insn length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72767 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Aug 1 12:40:41 2016 New Revision: 238949 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238949&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from 2016-08-01 trunk r238948. PR target/72767

[Bug c++/72766] [7 Regression] tree check fail in get_len, at tree.h:5303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72766 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/72767] [avr] Some branches report too small insn length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72767 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Aug 1 12:36:11 2016 New Revision: 238948 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238948&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/72767 * config/avr/avr.md (length) [branch]: Co

[Bug target/72767] [avr] Some branches report too small insn length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72767 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Priority|P3

[Bug target/72767] New: [avr] Some branches report too small insn length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72767 Bug ID: 72767 Summary: [avr] Some branches report too small insn length Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/63886] float will fit into int with abs - possible missing warning Wabsolute-value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63886 --- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #10) > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #8) > > (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #4) > > > float f = 3.1f; > > > > Isn't there already -Wunsuffix

[Bug c++/72766] New: tree check fail in get_len, at tree.h:5303

k dated 20160801, does this: samplv1_jack.cpp: In member function ‘void samplv1_jack::alsa_capture(snd_seq_event_t*)’: samplv1_jack.cpp:563:66: internal compiler error: tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5303 0x1132d5c tree_check_failed(tree_node const*, char const*, in

[Bug sanitizer/71042] libtsan requires __pointer_chk_guard@GLIBC_PRIVATE (6)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71042 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Thanks, I think I'll follow suit for the time being.

[Bug sanitizer/71042] libtsan requires __pointer_chk_guard@GLIBC_PRIVATE (6)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71042 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Btw, the solution for me was to disable tsan for aarch64.

[Bug sanitizer/71042] libtsan requires __pointer_chk_guard@GLIBC_PRIVATE (6)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71042 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/65391] missed store motion for conditionally updated pointer in loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65391 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Note the easiest way out is to use the existing infrastructure to avoid store-data-races. But that only works when there is no (possibly trapping) load as we need to materialize a value for the register on

[Bug driver/72765] New: Dynamic stack buffer overflow in GCC driver with -save-temps switch.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72765 Bug ID: 72765 Summary: Dynamic stack buffer overflow in GCC driver with -save-temps switch. Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/58693] GCC aarch64 arm_neon.h missing intrinsics from ACLE 2.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58693 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71151] [avr] -fmerge-constants and -fdata-sections/-ffunction-sections results in string constants in .progmem.gcc_sw section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151 --- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Aug 1 09:15:24 2016 New Revision: 238935 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238935&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ Backport from 2016-06-16 trunk r237536. 2016-06-16

[Bug tree-optimization/72746] [5/6/7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O2 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72746 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCO

[Bug target/72749] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong amount of branch edges after conditional jump in bb 5) w/ -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72749 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/72764] ICE on invalid C++11 code instantiating an alias template: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in typedef_variant_p, at tree.c:12660

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72764 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|UN

[Bug c++/72763] incorrectly accepts invalid C++11 code that instantiates a non-template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72763 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Status|UNCONF

[Bug c++/72760] incorrectly rejects valid C++ code that invokes __typeof__ on a specialized template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72760 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/72759] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, tree_class_check, ocp_convert)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72759 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|UN

[Bug c/7652] -Wswitch-break : Warn if a switch case falls through

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652 --- Comment #54 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Ozkan Sezer from comment #53) > (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #52) > > Author: mpolacek > > Date: Fri Jul 29 12:39:25 2016 > > New Revision: 238864 > > > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/vie

[Bug tree-optimization/64464] Optimization for reusing values in loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64464 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|U

[Bug middle-end/64463] Add warning: returns_nonnull attribute on a function compared against NULL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64463 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Severity|normal