https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71588
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
attribute pure on strcpy looks invalid to me. (we still shouldn't ice)
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160619 (experimental) [trunk revision 237580] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -Os -c small.c
$ gcc-6.1 -O2 -c small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c
small.c: In function ‘foo’:
small.c:7:7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71375
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn ---
Author: dje
Date: Mon Jun 20 02:25:50 2016
New Revision: 237587
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237587&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71375
* config/rs6000/aix51.h (TARGET_EXTRA_BUILT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71587
Bug ID: 71587
Summary: missed inlining extern template function
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to David B. Robins from comment #0)
> Runs of "make check-gcc-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=cris-sim"
> with/without the fix do not differ in passes/failures.
But that doesn't use -fpic or -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 38728
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38728&action=edit
fix to be committed, pending test
Here's the patch I'll eventually test and commit.
Unfortunately, it may
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71586
--- Comment #1 from M K ---
the following error occurs:
main.cpp:20:18: error: no matching function for call to 'foo(unsigned char:1&)'
foo(s2.sa); //error
^
main.cpp:4:6: note: candidate: void foo(a)
void foo(a e) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71586
Bug ID: 71586
Summary: type confusion when bitfields are accessed from
templates
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71585
--- Comment #2 from Julian Stecklina ---
I can reproduce this on Fedora 24 with GCC 6.1:
gcc (GCC) 6.1.1 20160510 (Red Hat 6.1.1-2)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71577
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71583
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71549
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38725|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71549
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 38725
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38725&action=edit
A patch
I am testing this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71585
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71585
Bug ID: 71585
Summary: Cannot selectively disable stack protector with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69507
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sun Jun 19 16:11:40 2016
New Revision: 237582
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237582&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/69507 - bogus warning: ISO C does not allow ‘__alignof__ (expression)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69507
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69507
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sun Jun 19 16:10:04 2016
New Revision: 237581
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237581&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/69507 - bogus warning: ISO C does not allow ‘__alignof__ (expression)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71470
Anton Mitrokhin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
--- Comment #13 from Carlos Tripiana Montes ---
The code you are referring to (ix86_fp_compare_mode) is an old, well-stablish,
one:
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c?r1=38978&r2=38979&pathrev=38979&;
(line 4653 enum m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66343
Simon Lindholm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon.lindholm10 at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71500
--- Comment #11 from Michael Duggan ---
"timshen at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> (In reply to Michael Duggan from comment #9)
>> I will make two suggestions. The initial suggestion is simple enough:
>> Given that regex_traits is mandated to be i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71318
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 38724
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38724&action=edit
A patch to show the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66508
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71584
Bug ID: 71584
Summary: Internal Error compiling LMMS on ARM (Endian Little)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71581
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71558
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71445
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71318
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Do you have an example?
29 matches
Mail list logo
