https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71418
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71426
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71426
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Jun 8 06:41:55 2016
New Revision: 237196
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237196&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/71426
* c-decl.c (get_parm_info): Don't crash on a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71418
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Jun 8 06:39:10 2016
New Revision: 237195
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237195&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/71418
* c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): Check TYPE_P.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70816
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160607 (experimental) [trunk revision 237165] (GCC)
$
$ g++-trunk -std=c++11 small.cpp
small.cpp:6:39: error: parameter packs not expanded with ‘...’:
template < typen
-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160607 (experimental) [trunk revision 237165] (GCC)
$
$ g++-6.1 small.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71199
Yu Xuanchi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yuxuanchiadm at 126 dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57433
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71448
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
I can (partially) reproduce on Solaris:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/double-int.o differs
make[2]: *** [compare] Error 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71449
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Most likely __builtin_parity (0) got folded to 0 for the first case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71449
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.3
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71449
Bug ID: 71449
Summary: builtins accepted in default template arguments but
rejected when explicitly specified
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71448
--- Comment #1 from Adam Simpkins ---
Created attachment 38657
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38657&action=edit
gcc 5.3 configuration options used during repro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71448
Bug ID: 71448
Summary: pointer relational comparison fails inside constant
expression
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
--- Comment #25 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #23)
> (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #22)
> > (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #21)
> > > The testcase in Comment 14 should now compile fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
--- Comment #24 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #23)
> (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #22)
> > (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #21)
> > > The testcase in Comment 14 should now compile f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60512
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61564
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
--- Comment #22 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #21)
> The testcase in Comment 14 should now compile fine.
What's the best way to detect that a compiler has this fix? We cannot use a
configure check. Is there an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71445
Adhemerval Zanella changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adhemerval.zanella at linaro
dot o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71445
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71389
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71389
--- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jun 7 16:01:50 2016
New Revision: 237179
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237179&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71389
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_avx256
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71389
Kenneth Zadeck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71389
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jun 7 15:23:42 2016
New Revision: 237178
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237178&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71389
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_avx256_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69526
--- Comment #17 from rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #16)
> (In reply to rdapp from comment #15)
> > Is there a simple method to access @inner when
> > capturing
> > (outer_op (convert (inner_op SSA_NAME@0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71447
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71255
--- Comment #21 from Marek Polacek ---
The testcase in Comment 14 should now compile fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71389
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jun 7 15:16:44 2016
New Revision: 237177
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237177&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71389
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_avx256_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71447
--- Comment #2 from Johannes Janssens ---
I must apolagize, the bug is mine!!! I just discovered why.
So sorry.
Johannes
Op 7/06/2016 om 17:12 schreef mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71447
>
> Marek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71447
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71447
Bug ID: 71447
Summary: problem with pointer arythmetic?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69526
--- Comment #16 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to rdapp from comment #15)
> Is there a simple method to access @inner when
> capturing
> (outer_op (convert (inner_op SSA_NAME@0 INTEGER_CST@1)) INTEGER_CST@2))
>^---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71446
Bug ID: 71446
Summary: Incorrect overload resolution when using designated
initializers
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71445
Bug ID: 71445
Summary: libsanitizer build failure on aarch64-linux-gnu with
recent glibc
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69526
--- Comment #15 from rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
Thanks for the suggestions. The omission of the inner op was actually more or
less on purpose as I intended to capture the
(convert @inner)
in order to access @inner's value range as a whole
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71414
--- Comment #7 from Yichao Yu ---
If I add `-fvariable-expansion-in-unroller` (omg this options is like half the
command line ;-p ...), the performance matches the clang one after the clang
3.8 regression.
```
% gcc -funroll-loops -fvariable-exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70729
--- Comment #21 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Richard!
Are you planning to prepare the second part of the patch (zeroing safelen and
testing it in loop invariant motion phase as you proposed)?
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71414
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707
John Lindgren changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||6.1.1
--- Comment #8 from John Lindgren
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61564
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71444
Bug ID: 71444
Summary: Error code on MinGW-w64
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71443
Bug ID: 71443
Summary: [7 regression] test case
gcc.dg/plugin/must-tail-call-2.c reports error
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61564
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 7 12:41:46 2016
New Revision: 237174
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237174&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-07 Richard Biener
PR c/61564
* c-common.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71442
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38655
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38655&action=edit
gcc7-pr71442.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71442
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71442
Bug ID: 71442
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] r232569 breaks -Wunused-*
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71441
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71441
Bug ID: 71441
Summary: [7 regression] gcc.dg/pr44023.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71432
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #4)
> Most likely a dup of bug 71413.
Likely as the suggested patch is effectively the same. This one comes with test
case, consider to include it in the final patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The issue with the optimization opportunity is that IPA reference does not
compute that GetIN does not modify pL because its analysis is restricted
to variables local to the compilation unit. Using -fwhole-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Created attachment 38653 [details]
> A patch
>
> Please try this.
The patch fixes the issue, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71432
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Most likely a dup of 71413.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Oops, sorry, wrong bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435
--- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Most likely a dup of 71413.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71414
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71432
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
The code in handle_builtin_memcmp looks as follows:
FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_FAST (use_p, iter, res)
{
gimple *ustmt = USE_STMT (use_p);
if (gimple_code (ustmt) == GIMPLE_ASSIGN)
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71432
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
The difference between the two insns-dumps is the "_eq":
0: extern int __builtin_memcmp_eq (const void *, const void *, long unsigned
int);
vs.
0: extern int __builtin_memcmp (const void *, const void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71419
--- Comment #2 from Hans Buchmann ---
The code is produced in arm mode:
.file "irq.cc"
.text
.align 2
.global _Z5_irq_v
.syntax unified
.arm <--- here
.fpu softvfp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71433
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sparc-linux
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61564
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71438
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71428
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71423
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] wrong|[5/6 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71428
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 7 07:31:40 2016
New Revision: 237167
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237167&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-07 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/71428
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71423
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 7 07:30:47 2016
New Revision: 237166
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237166&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-07 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/71423
* mat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71440
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71438
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71439
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71440
Bug ID: 71440
Summary: ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in
instantiate_type, at cp/class.c:8247
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
76 matches
Mail list logo
