https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70650
--- Comment #18 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
[...]
> Just for the record, with your patch a sparc-sun-solaris2.12 bootstrap
> is well into stage2, so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70494
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70494
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 15 04:02:49 2016
New Revision: 235003
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235003&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70494
* decl.c (cxx_maybe_build_cleanup): Handle n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70674
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70674
Bug ID: 70674
Summary: [4.9/5/6 regression] S/390: Memory access below stack
pointer in epilogue
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critica
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70528
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] bogus |[5 Regression] bogus error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70528
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 15 02:23:05 2016
New Revision: 235002
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235002&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70528
* class.c (type_has_constexpr_default_const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66033
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
Comment #4 was added to the wrong bug. Not fixed on gcc-5 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
--- Comment #2 from David Kinniburgh ---
Ah, maybe I reduced this too far as a1 and a2 are obviously uninitialized...
Is this better - it also produces an ICE?
module m
contains
subroutine s(in)
character(*), intent(in) :: in
character(:), al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70672
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
*** Bug 70672 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
--- Comment #1 from David Kinniburgh ---
Ah, maybe I reduced this too far as a1 and a2 are obviously uninitialized, but
still...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
Bug ID: 70673
Summary: ICE with module containing functions with allocatable
character scalars
Product: gcc
Version: fortran-dev
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70669
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70669
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Apr 14 23:21:30 2016
New Revision: 234995
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234995&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-04-14 Michael Meissner
PR target/70669
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70669
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Fixed in subversion id 234995.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70360
ctice at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ctice at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70672
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70669
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 38275
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38275&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
AFAICT tree-ssa-uninit won't look at the predicate associated with an undefined
PHI argument and test it against the predicate for the actual use.
ie, given this PHI from the testcase:
;; basic block 6,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70647
--- Comment #4 from Matt Godbolt ---
Agreed re: cast/FE.
I couldn't quite get your example to fail as the "o" parameter is unusued
(which would be a good clue!
#include // for std::move
struct B {
int a; int b;
B(B &&o)
: a(b),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65083
Chris Quenelle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chris.quenelle at oracle dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70647
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
> --- Comment #2 from Matt Godbolt ---
> Thanks Manuel. Interestingly this does elicit a warning:
>
> struct B {
> int a; int b;
> B(B &&o)
> : a(static_cast(a)),
> b(std::move(o.b)) {}
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70652
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Created attachment 38274
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38274&action=edit
Patch to replace C++ VLAs with alloca.
For future reference, the attached patch gets around the problem by repla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70528
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 70588, which changed state.
Bug 70588 Summary: SIGBUS on a VLA larger than SIZE_MAX / 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 70019, which changed state.
Bug 70019 Summary: VLA size overflow not detected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5 regression] SEGV on a|[5/6 regression] SEGV on a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70672
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70672
Bug ID: 70672
Summary: [5] Wrong code for little endian bitfield modification
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70648
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70622
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 14 20:14:49 2016
New Revision: 234991
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234991&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70622
* parser.c (cp_parser_init_declarator): Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70543
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70648
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 14 20:14:38 2016
New Revision: 234989
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234989&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70648
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_store_expression): A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70543
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 14 20:14:44 2016
New Revision: 234990
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234990&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70543
* pt.c (value_dependent_expression_p) [VAR_D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70622
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70543
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70640
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70640
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Apr 14 20:05:58 2016
New Revision: 234988
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234988&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-04-14 Michael Meissner
PR target/70640
* gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70652
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #49 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 14 19:21:31 2016
New Revision: 234987
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234987&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70594
* ipa-utils.h (polymorphic_ctor_dtor_p): New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70671
Bug ID: 70671
Summary: Wrong column number shown for "error: cannot take
address of bit-field"
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
--- Comment #13 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
So if I understand correctly, some reachable code is incorrectly getting marked
unreachable and then getting discarded.
Interestingly, the function's epilogue (frame pointer restore) and return
instruction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70670
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70670
Bug ID: 70670
Summary: Duplicate code in rs6000_secondary_reload_direct_move
in rs6000.c
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70669
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70669
Bug ID: 70669
Summary: PowerPC __float128 does not support direct move
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70653
--- Comment #2 from waleed ---
can you recommend me which tool we should use for bug tracking
> From: gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
> To: waleed-ri...@hotmail.com
> Subject: [Bug c++/70653] bubble sorting algorithm fail to run on the compiler
> givi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650
--- Comment #60 from Roger Orr ---
Thanks; I can now confirm that a full build of our application with distcc
works without problems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70668
Stefan Reinauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|nds32-elf toolchain fails |nds32-elf toolchain fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70668
Stefan Reinauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||nds32le-elf
Host|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70668
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Reinauer ---
Created attachment 38273
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38273&action=edit
minimal example
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70652
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Apr 14 17:35:23 2016
New Revision: 234981
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234981&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70652 - [6 Regression] r234966 causes bootstrap to fail
Revert pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70668
Bug ID: 70668
Summary: nds32-elf toolchain fails to compile on OSX"
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70650
--- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
[...]
> This fixes the reduced testcase for me on sparc, does it fix bootstrap on the
> various targets?
Just for the record, with your patch a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70652
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70543
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70648
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70029
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |7.0
Summary|[6 Regression] IC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70029
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Apr 14 16:51:16 2016
New Revision: 234979
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234979&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70029
* tree.c (verify_type): Disable the canoni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70667
Bug ID: 70667
Summary: SFINAE error disambiguating using alignas
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70649
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70650
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70649
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 38272
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38272&action=edit
fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70650
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #14)
> (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #13)
> Is darwin the only target using TREE_TYPE rather than DECL_ARG_TYPE?
No, that should be the same for all targets;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70651
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, the assertions are clearly bogus.
Though perhaps it would be better to just error out at those spots instead of
ignoring it and hoping we'll error out later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #48 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38271
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38271&action=edit
gcc6-pr70594.patch
Untested fix.
So the other issue is that noncall_stmt_may_be_vtbl_ptr_store looks for BLOC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70650
--- Comment #14 from Jack Howarth ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #13)
Is darwin the only target using TREE_TYPE rather than DECL_ARG_TYPE?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70650
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
The darwin problem is with an ipa-icf thunk trying to pass the parameter on
directly, which breaks because it's using the parameter's TREE_TYPE rather than
DECL_ARG_TYPE. expand_call handles this transparen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #47 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ok, found one bug in the unused block pruning:
--- gcc/ipa-polymorphic-call.c.jj 2016-03-30 16:00:17.0 +0200
+++ gcc/ipa-polymorphic-call.c 2016-04-14 16:45:45.407754387 +0200
@@ -479,16 +479,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
--- Comment #29 from Pat Haugen ---
Verified the patch also fixes the problem with h264ref benchmark.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70650
--- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Shorter testcase:
> struct A {};
>
> void
> foo (struct A a, int b)
> {
> }
> compiles with sparc-solaris C, but doesn't with C++.
This test case doesn't trigge
`fancy_abort(file="../../gcc-6-20160414/gcc/expr.c", line=3546,
function="emit_move_insn") + 19 at diagnostic.c:1329, queue =
'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
* frame #0: 0x0001018798f3
cc1plus`fancy_abort(file="../../gcc-6-201604
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70666
Bug ID: 70666
Summary: SLP vectorization opportunity to use load element +
splat
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70650
--- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #8)
> Created attachment 38269 [details]
> patch
>
> This fixes the reduced testcase for me on sparc, does it fix bootstrap on
> the various targets?
The proposed pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #46 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, it seems the ctor BLOCKs are preserved, but others are removed.
So, with -g we get:
(gdb) p debug_generic_stmt (block_ultimate_origin ($29))
BLOCK #0
SUPERCONTEXT: assign
(gdb) p debug_generic_stmt (b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nathan at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70643
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70044
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70650
--- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth ---
Created attachment 38270
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38270&action=edit
bzip2 compressed preprocessed source for libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/string-inst.cc
on x86_64-apple-darwin15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70044
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Thu Apr 14 13:45:34 2016
New Revision: 234974
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234974&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[AArch64] Backport of PR target/70044 fix to GCC 5
2016-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70643
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Thu Apr 14 13:44:17 2016
New Revision: 234973
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234973&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/70643
gcc/
* omp-low.c (l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70650
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 38269
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38269&action=edit
patch
This fixes the reduced testcase for me on sparc, does it fix bootstrap on the
various targets?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #44 from Richard Biener ---
Index: gcc/ipa-polymorphic-call.c
===
--- gcc/ipa-polymorphic-call.c (revision 234971)
+++ gcc/ipa-polymorphic-call.c (working copy)
@@ -485
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70645
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70665
--- Comment #2 from Phillipi Susi ---
Yes, so why is there an implicit conversion that does not cause a warning when
called directly, but not when called via pointer?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #43 from Richard Biener ---
Same walking of BLOCKs in noncall_stmt_may_be_vtbl_ptr_store.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70665
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #42 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I see a difference when tree-ssa-pre.c calls
context.get_dynamic_type (instance, OBJ_TYPE_REF_OBJECT (fn), otr_type, stmt);
in get_dynamic_type, right after the first walk_aliased_vdefs in there, in one
invo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
--- Comment #28 from Alan Modra ---
Bootstrapped and regression testing now completed on both powerpc64le-linux and
-m64/-m32 on a power7 powerpc64-linux host, all langs. No regressions found,
and it seems this also fixes gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70614
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Apr 14 13:21:40 2016
New Revision: 234972
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234972&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-04-14 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/70614
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70614
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70665
Bug ID: 70665
Summary: Seemingly incorrect warning for being const correct
with function pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
