-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160409 (experimental) [trunk revision 234848] (GCC)
$
$ g++-4.6 small.cpp
$
$ g++-trunk small.cpp
small.cpp: In instantiation of ‘void test() [with int = 0]’:
small.cpp:20:15: required from
-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160409 (experimental) [trunk revision 234848] (GCC)
$
$ g++-trunk -O0 small.cpp
$ g++-5.3 -O1 small.cpp
$
$ g++-trunk -O1 small.cpp
small.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
small.cpp:26:21: internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70614
Bug ID: 70614
Summary: GCC gets stuck with -O
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70613
Bug ID: 70613
Summary: -fabi-version docs don't match implementation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70603
--- Comment #4 from Marios Hadjieleftheriou ---
But of course. I am checking the alignment of the wrong things, in my
example...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70603
--- Comment #3 from Marios Hadjieleftheriou ---
I am trying to use posix_memalign and a double pointer to double, and that is
also failing. Is this an overalignment issue as well?
#include
#include
struct B {
B() {
x = new double
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30792
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Still present at revision r234859.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Domin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70607
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Voigt ---
I absolutely agree, that the definition of the std::conj() overloads in C++11
is problematic. However, in my opinion one has to be strict when implementing
the standard. Otherwise, people might accidental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
Patches are posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00929.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00995.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66402
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 66402 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 9 19:09:02 2016
New Revision: 234864
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234864&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-04-09 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/68566
* array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47040
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68600
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #8)
> Created attachment 36887 [details]
> A faster version
>
> I took the example code found in
> http://wiki.cs.utexas.edu/rvdg/HowToOptimizeGemm/ where the registe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52393
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64039
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Apr 9 17:36:24 2016
New Revision: 234863
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234863&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/64039
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2015-12-01 00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Apr 9 17:15:15 2016
New Revision: 234861
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234861&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/9
* gcc.dg/loop-8.c: Skip on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66402
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Duplicate of pr65364?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70324
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70592
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 70592, which changed state.
Bug 70592 Summary: Addressing error in dynamically-allocated character array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70592
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70612
Daniel Gutson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Daniel G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70592
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sat Apr 9 16:14:02 2016
New Revision: 234858
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234858&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-04-09 Dominique d'Humieres
PR fortran/70592
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70612
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68953
--- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
asked follow-up question (
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00444.html ), waiting for answer
before marking fixed-resolved.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Apr 9 15:55:42 2016
New Revision: 234855
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234855&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68644
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Apr 9 15:54:29 2016
New Revision: 234854
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234854&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68644
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64886
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Apr 9 15:47:50 2016
New Revision: 234853
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234853&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/64886
* gcc.dg/pr64434.c: Skip o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64886
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Apr 9 15:43:05 2016
New Revision: 234852
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234852&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/64886
* gcc.dg/pr64434.c: Skip o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70612
Bug ID: 70612
Summary: -mtune=native -maes does not detect that AES is not
present
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56149
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70584
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Gutson
---
(In reply to Daniel Gutson from comment #4)
> Thanks Martin.
>
> Andres is finishing 70210 soon next week, and he can address this after
s/70210/70201/
> solving it. Feel free to assign this issue to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70584
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Gutson
---
Thanks Martin.
Andres is finishing 70210 soon next week, and he can address this after solving
it. Feel free to assign this issue to him
(andres.tirabos...@tallertechnologies.com).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68953
--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat Apr 9 15:28:24 2016
New Revision: 234851
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234851&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix pdr accesses order
2016-04-09 Tom de Vries
PR t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70611
Bug ID: 70611
Summary: Compiling binutils with -flto -Wstack-usage fails.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63469
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The test in comment 4 works with trunk (6.0), but not with 5.3.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70583
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa*-*-* (elf)
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47469
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
PING!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57778
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58667
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Domin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58001
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #10 from Domi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51820
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Is the following patch a step in the right direction?
--- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi 2016-03-13 09:07:16.0 +0100
+++ gcc/fortran/invoke.texi 2016-04-09 15:58:43.0 +0200
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70592
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sat Apr 9 13:29:32 2016
New Revision: 234850
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234850&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-04-09 Dominique d'Humieres
PR fortran/70592
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52403
Bug 52403 depends on bug 51632, which changed state.
Bug 51632 Summary: [OOP] Bogus argument checking for generated _def_init
parameter and _copy procedure with CAF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51632
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51632
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70610
Bug ID: 70610
Summary: [6 regression] error: invalid initialization of
non-const reference of type
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63158
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159
--- Comment #17 from Marios Hadjieleftheriou ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #12)
> Confirmed. As noted in bug 67911, the solution proposed for the next
> version of C++ is the following:
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27436
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
See also pr28397.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28397
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
See also pr27436.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38979
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42478
Bug 42478 depends on bug 38979, which changed state.
Bug 38979 Summary: OpenMP extension: THREADPRIVATE for EQUIVALENCEd symbols
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38979
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62007
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70609
--- Comment #1 from furkan ---
Also worth to note that I've tested a similar program with Boost::Filesystem,
QFile and Poco::File they all worked, so I don't think there is a
system-related bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70586
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.4 |7.0
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70609
Bug ID: 70609
Summary: std::experimental::filesystem::copy fails if the file
size is 0 bytes
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70586
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Apr 9 11:23:51 2016
New Revision: 234849
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234849&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/70586
* tree-ssa-ifcombine.c (bb_no_s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70592
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I am using OSX but I agree, after building the compiler from the tip
> of gcc-5-branch, that the problem does not exist there, but is present
> at gcc-5_3_0_release.
Indeed! but nothing can be done
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21802
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70592
--- Comment #3 from Peter Knowles ---
I am using OSX but I agree, after building the compiler from the tip of
gcc-5-branch, that the problem does not exist there, but is present at
gcc-5_3_0_release.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70311
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68600
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I think you are seeing the effects of inefficiencies of assumed-shape arrays.
>
> If you want to use matmul on very small matrix sizes, it is best to
> use fixed-size explicit arrays.
Then IMO the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70516
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70573
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70573
--- Comment #11 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sat Apr 9 09:24:45 2016
New Revision: 234848
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234848&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-04-09 Dominique d'Humieres
PR sanitizer/70
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70592
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67674
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nuclearlee at gmail dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70605
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 70605, which changed state.
Bug 70605 Summary: allocatable character scalar in type empty after assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70605
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21802
--- Comment #9 from David Abdurachmanov
---
Created attachment 38230
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38230&action=edit
Failing file (pre-processed)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21802
David Abdurachmanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.abdurachmanov at gmail
dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70598
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #1)
> On trunk
Sorry, that should have been gomp-4_0-branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70598
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70608
Bug ID: 70608
Summary: Braced initializer in default argument misses
friendship
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68953
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vries at gcc dot gnu.org
78 matches
Mail list logo
