[Bug preprocessor/70518] Conditional compilation of #line directives

2016-04-02 Thread elyk03 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70518 --- Comment #1 from Kyle Guinn --- Created attachment 38168 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38168&action=edit generated code

[Bug preprocessor/70518] New: Conditional compilation of #line directives

2016-04-02 Thread elyk03 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70518 Bug ID: 70518 Summary: Conditional compilation of #line directives Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: prepr

[Bug target/67391] [SH] Convert clrt addc to normal add insn

2016-04-02 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67391 --- Comment #34 from Oleg Endo --- The patches for this PR (r228176, r228201) have triggered PR 70416.

[Bug tree-optimization/70509] wrong code with extract from a v64qi

2016-04-02 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70509 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #2) > (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #0) > > First broken dump seems to be .forwprop, where is: > > .forwprop4 , that is. The problem might be that simplify_bitfi

[Bug target/70416] [SH]: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload when building ruby2.3

2016-04-02 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416 --- Comment #23 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #21) > I'll see if there's some other way... With the patch below, I get sum: 3342539 -> 3342639+100 / +0.002992 % for the CSiBE set. The increases are because r14 is

[Bug bootstrap/70173] make distclean: leaves stage_final and libcc1/compiler-name.h

2016-04-02 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70173 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/70509] wrong code with extract from a v64qi

2016-04-02 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70509 --- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #0) > First broken dump seems to be .forwprop, where is: .forwprop4 , that is. The problem might be that simplify_bitfield_ref() does: tree-ssa-forwprop.c ... 1793:

[Bug c++/70514] Variable length arrays lead to garbage in another array

2016-04-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70514 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/61627] specification expression ICE with version 4.7.1 and 4.8.2, incorrect output with 4.4.7 and 4.9.0

2016-04-02 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61627 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug c++/70228] insufficient detail in diagnostics for a constexpr out of bounds array subscript

2016-04-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70228 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

2016-04-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 70172, which changed state. Bug 70172 Summary: incorrect reinterpret_cast from integer to pointer error on invalid constexpr initialization https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70172 What|Removed

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

2016-04-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 70170, which changed state. Bug 70170 Summary: [6 regression] bogus not a constant expression error comparing pointer to array to null https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70170 What|Removed

[Bug c++/70172] incorrect reinterpret_cast from integer to pointer error on invalid constexpr initialization

2016-04-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70172 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70170] [6 regression] bogus not a constant expression error comparing pointer to array to null

2016-04-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70170 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67376] [5/6 regression] Comparison with pointer to past-the-end of array fails inside constant expression

2016-04-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376 --- Comment #18 from Martin Sebor --- The outstanding problems mentioned in comment #10 have been fixed in 6.0 via r234698.

[Bug c++/70170] [6 regression] bogus not a constant expression error comparing pointer to array to null

2016-04-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70170 --- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Sat Apr 2 17:14:48 2016 New Revision: 234698 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234698&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67376 - [5/6 regression] Comparison with pointer to past-the-end

[Bug c++/67376] [5/6 regression] Comparison with pointer to past-the-end of array fails inside constant expression

2016-04-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376 --- Comment #17 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Sat Apr 2 17:14:48 2016 New Revision: 234698 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234698&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67376 - [5/6 regression] Comparison with pointer to past-the-end

[Bug c++/70172] incorrect reinterpret_cast from integer to pointer error on invalid constexpr initialization

2016-04-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70172 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Sat Apr 2 17:14:48 2016 New Revision: 234698 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234698&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67376 - [5/6 regression] Comparison with pointer to past-the-end

[Bug c++/70228] insufficient detail in diagnostics for a constexpr out of bounds array subscript

2016-04-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70228 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Sat Apr 2 17:14:48 2016 New Revision: 234698 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234698&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67376 - [5/6 regression] Comparison with pointer to past-the-end

Re: [BUG] Crash when demangling with libiberty

2016-04-02 Thread Philippe Daouadi
Filed here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70517 On 2016-03-31 15:52, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: Philippe Daouadi writes: I have been given these e-mail addresses by Nick Clifton after reporting a bug on binutils here: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19877 . The bug

[Bug other/70517] c++filt crashes when demangling a symbol

2016-04-02 Thread blastrock at free dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70517 --- Comment #2 from blastrock at free dot fr --- Created attachment 38166 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38166&action=edit preprocessed file by gcc 5.3.1

[Bug other/70517] c++filt crashes when demangling a symbol

2016-04-02 Thread blastrock at free dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70517 --- Comment #1 from blastrock at free dot fr --- Created attachment 38165 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38165&action=edit preprocessed file by clang 3.8

[Bug other/70517] New: c++filt crashes when demangling a symbol

2016-04-02 Thread blastrock at free dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70517 Bug ID: 70517 Summary: c++filt crashes when demangling a symbol Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug c++/70514] Variable length arrays lead to garbage in another array

2016-04-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70514 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This works for me on aarch64-linux-gnu with the trunk as of two days ago.

[Bug target/70464] [arch64] create a self hosting compiler

2016-04-02 Thread ge...@schorsch-tech.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70464 ge...@schorsch-tech.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/70516] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Regtesting acats hangs on x86_64-apple-darwin15.4

2016-04-02 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70516 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression]|[4.9/5/6 Regression]

[Bug testsuite/70516] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression] Regtesting acts hangs on x86_64-apple-darwin15.4

2016-04-02 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70516 Bug ID: 70516 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] Regtesting acts hangs on x86_64-apple-darwin15.4 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/70515] Nested lambdas causing invalid captured pointers on some platforms

2016-04-02 Thread gcc at norgg dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70515 --- Comment #1 from Norgg --- Created attachment 38164 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38164&action=edit Preprocessed file

[Bug c++/70515] New: Nested lambdas causing invalid captured pointers on some platforms

2016-04-02 Thread gcc at norgg dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70515 Bug ID: 70515 Summary: Nested lambdas causing invalid captured pointers on some platforms Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug c++/70514] New: Variable length arrays lead to garbage in another array

2016-04-02 Thread kwpolska at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70514 Bug ID: 70514 Summary: Variable length arrays lead to garbage in another array Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug libstdc++/70511] tuple constructor from elements hides copy constructor

2016-04-02 Thread ivan.lelann at free dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70511 --- Comment #1 from Ivan Le Lann --- After a quick look, I'm not sure this can be called a bug. It looks like a very unfortunate consequence of library specification. From the mess here http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/tuple/tuple