[Bug fortran/70215] segmentation fault with allocate on assign; 32 bit version, not 64 bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70215 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/70215] segmentation fault with allocate on assign; 32 bit version, not 64 bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70215 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- A bunch of deferred parameter length bugs were fixed 3 days ago on the 5-branch. Please update your version of gfortran and try again.

[Bug target/70216] [SH] Implement __builtin_trap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70216 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aurelien at aurel32 dot net,

[Bug target/70216] New: [SH] Implement __builtin_trap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70216 Bug ID: 70216 Summary: [SH] Implement __builtin_trap Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assi

[Bug c++/70207] use of causes segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70207 --- Comment #2 from katayama.hirofumi.mz at gmail dot com --- https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages/issues/1104

[Bug fortran/69520] Implement reversal of -fcheck options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/70215] segmentation fault with allocate on assign; 32 bit version, not 64 bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70215 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/69520] Implement reversal of -fcheck options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Mar 13 00:19:08 2016 New Revision: 234167 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234167&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-03-12 Jerry DeLisle Harold Anlauf PR fo

[Bug fortran/70215] segmentation fault with allocate on assign; 32 bit version, not 64 bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70215 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/70171] Poor code generated when return struct using ternary operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70171 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug driver/70192] -fno-pic doesn't work with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70192 --- Comment #4 from psturm at computervoice dot com --- The errors are in the test suite summary attachment above.

[Bug driver/70192] -fno-pic doesn't work with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70192 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to psturm from comment #2) > I applied the patch for 70192 and rebuilt gcc and reran the test suite. gcc > had 46 errors and g++ had 26. Please upload your errors here.

[Bug testsuite/68232] gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c fails on some arm configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68232 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm, powerpc64le-linux-gnu |arm, powerpc64le-linux-gnu,

[Bug fortran/70215] New: segmentation fault with allocate on assign; 32 bit version, not 64 bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70215 Bug ID: 70215 Summary: segmentation fault with allocate on assign; 32 bit version, not 64 bit Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug driver/70192] -fno-pic doesn't work with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70192 --- Comment #2 from psturm at computervoice dot com --- I applied the patch for 70192 and rebuilt gcc and reran the test suite. gcc had 46 errors and g++ had 26.

[Bug driver/70192] -fno-pic doesn't work with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70192 psturm at computervoice dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||psturm at computervoice

[Bug target/70210] -march=native and -mcpu=native do not detect ARM cortex-a53 in 32 bit mode on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70210 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-linux-gnueabihf

[Bug middle-end/70199] Crash at -O2 when using labels.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70199 --- Comment #2 from Sam Ellis --- Yes, I have made an attempt at reducing the original code to a small subset that still reproduces the crash. Now that you mention it, it is possible I reduced it too far to the extent that it won't compile or run

[Bug ipa/70188] [4.9,5 Regression] gcc 4.9+ miscompiles code on hppa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70188 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- Maybe related to .

[Bug ipa/70188] [4.9,5 Regression] gcc 4.9+ miscompiles code on hppa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70188 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/69307] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fselective-scheduling @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69307 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Summar

[Bug rtl-optimization/69307] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fselective-scheduling @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69307 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Sat Mar 12 17:12:29 2016 New Revision: 234163 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234163&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/69307 * sel-sched.c (choose_best_pseudo

[Bug target/69614] [6 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-expensive-optimizations -fschedule-insns -mtpcs-leaf-frame -fira-algorithm=priority @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 --- Comment #25 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Sat Mar 12 14:56:24 2016 New Revision: 234162 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234162&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-03-12 Vladimir Makarov PR target/69614 * l

[Bug target/69614] [6 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-expensive-optimizations -fschedule-insns -mtpcs-leaf-frame -fira-algorithm=priority @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 --- Comment #24 from Vladimir Makarov --- I have a patch and will commit it today.

[Bug fortran/69524] [6 Regression] [F08] Compiler segfaults on "module subroutine"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69524 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Mar 12 13:59:10 2016 New Revision: 234161 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234161&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-03-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/70031 * decl.c (gfc_ma

[Bug fortran/70031] Error in recursive module subroutine declaration if declared as "module recursive"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70031 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Mar 12 13:59:10 2016 New Revision: 234161 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234161&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-03-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/70031 * decl.c (gfc_ma

[Bug c++/70213] Not all ambiguous cases of method constraint overloading caught?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70213 --- Comment #2 from xyzdragon at fastmail dot fm --- to bool( isConst() ) even though this shouldn't be necessary, because isConst already has return type bool. (Sorry for split post, I accidentally pressed the send button)

[Bug c++/70213] Not all ambiguous cases of method constraint overloading caught?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70213 --- Comment #1 from xyzdragon at fastmail dot fm --- I just noticed, that as a workaround the it works to change isConst()

[Bug c/70214] New: external call is not considered a barrier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70214 Bug ID: 70214 Summary: external call is not considered a barrier Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/70213] New: Not all ambiguous cases of method constraint overloading caught?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70213 Bug ID: 70213 Summary: Not all ambiguous cases of method constraint overloading caught? Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/69735] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in harmful_loop_in_region, at graphite-scop-detection.c:1045

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69735 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70212] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when compiling easylogging++.h v9.80

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70212 Bug ID: 70212 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when compiling easylogging++.h v9.80 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug bootstrap/70211] New: gcc-6-20160306 fails to build on ARM Linux with in tree ISL due to undefined GMP symbol __gmpn_invert_limb in isl_test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70211 Bug ID: 70211 Summary: gcc-6-20160306 fails to build on ARM Linux with in tree ISL due to undefined GMP symbol __gmpn_invert_limb in isl_test Product: gcc Version

[Bug ada/70017] c52103x and c52104x test failure on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70017 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Sat Mar 12 11:32:54 2016 New Revision: 234160 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234160&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ada/70017 * calls.c (emit_library_call_value_1): C

[Bug target/69988] libgo.so: undefined reference to `__unorddf2'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69988 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/70208] [6 Regression] Operand size mismatch for `vpextrb' w/ -O3 -mavx -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70208 --- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha --- Must be a duplicate of PR70049, though.

[Bug c/70210] -march=native and -mcpu=native do not detect ARM cortex-a53 in 32 bit mode on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70210 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Roberts --- Note this was causing bug 70132 (ARM -mcpu=native can cause a double free abort). A patch as been subitted to fix the double free, but doesn't address the failure to detect the CPU

[Bug c/70210] New: -march=native and -mcpu=native do not detect ARM cortex-a53 in 32 bit mode on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70210 Bug ID: 70210 Summary: -march=native and -mcpu=native do not detect ARM cortex-a53 in 32 bit mode on Linux Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug driver/70132] ARM -mcpu=native can cause a double free abort.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Roberts from comment #5) > Do I need to raise another bug report to get the march=native to actually > generate native code, or has one already been raised? > > My original

[Bug fortran/70198] simple test floating point sequence gives incorrect values-- optimizer changes them

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70198 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > If the code is compiled with the -fno-automatic option, > one generates the desired result. Note I said desired, > not correct, because the code has a significant bug. > When m=2 (see comment #4), t

[Bug c++/70209] [5/6 Regression] ICE in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1377

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70209 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/70209] New: [5 Regression] ICE in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1377

Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- seen for several packages, fails with the gcc-5-branch on 20160312, not yet checked with a recent trunk: class Vector { public: typedef float

[Bug inline-asm/70184] Explicit register variables holding function arguments overwritten by conversion libcall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70184 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug target/70208] New: [6 Regression] Operand size mismatch for `vpextrb' w/ -O3 -mavx -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70208 Bug ID: 70208 Summary: [6 Regression] Operand size mismatch for `vpextrb' w/ -O3 -mavx -masm=intel Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: assem