https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63278
Leon Winter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||winter-...@bfw-online.de
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760
--- Comment #14 from Dominik Vogt ---
The regression is fixed with the latest patch for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69983
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69983
--- Comment #8 from Dominik Vogt ---
Successfully bootstrapped and regression tested on s390x (biarch).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65178
--- Comment #5 from Leon Winter ---
Still persists.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196
--- Comment #16 from Dominik Vogt ---
(In the ChangeLog entry, the "-1" is missing from the name of the new
testfile.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70038
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to kenlon from comment #2)
> call to stat with a null argument is not the matter,it will return -1,that
> is ok.
> the matter code is:
> (prevlinkname ? "TRUE":"NULL");
>
> if (prevlinkname) {
> ..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196
Dominik Vogt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70038
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70038
kenlon <366899789 at qq dot com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70025
--- Comment #10 from Dominik Vogt ---
Successfully bootstrapped and regression tested on s390x (-m31 and -m64).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70038
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67854
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70038
Bug ID: 70038
Summary: [5.3.0 and 4.9.1]Wrong optimization with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67854
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Mar 2 07:24:19 2016
New Revision: 233891
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233891&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/67854
* gimplify.c (gimplify_va_arg_expr): Use exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70025
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70025
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 2 06:58:05 2016
New Revision: 233889
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233889&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/70025
* gcc.dg/torture/pr70025.c: New test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69601
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele
---
same issue for March
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68621
--- Comment #6 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vekumar
Date: Wed Mar 2 06:14:43 2016
New Revision: 233888
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233888&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Adjust test case in PR68621 to compile with -fpic.
2016-03-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
--- Comment #13 from Fritz Reese ---
I actually have a fairly in-depth set of testcases as part of the patch (based
on lots of legacy code). More are of course welcome, but check out what I've
already added as a starting point.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
--- Comment #12 from Joel Matz ---
I'll see if I can put together some unit tests. Thanks for the effort,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70036
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70036
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 2 02:55:23 2016
New Revision: 233886
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233886&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70036
* parser.c (cp_parser_requires_clause): Call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68998
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69261
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 2 02:46:12 2016
New Revision: 233883
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233883&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69261
* constexpr.c (find_array_ctor_elt): Handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68087
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 2 02:45:45 2016
New Revision: 233882
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233882&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68087
2016-03-01 Markus Trippelsdorf
Paolo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51489
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 2 02:44:58 2016
New Revision: 233880
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233880&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/51489
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_binary_expression):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67104
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 2 02:45:04 2016
New Revision: 233881
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233881&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67104
* constexpr.c (array_index_cmp, find_array_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 2 02:44:46 2016
New Revision: 233879
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233879&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69995
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_call_expression): Un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51489
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 2 02:32:44 2016
New Revision: 233878
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233878&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/51489
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_binary_expression):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 2 02:32:38 2016
New Revision: 233877
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233877&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69995
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_call_expression): Un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037
--- Comment #1 from Ville Voutilainen ---
The trace:
error: Two symbols with same comdat_group are not linked by the
same_comdat_group list.
"tuple<> is eligible for EBO" );
^
_ZNSt5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037
Bug ID: 70037
Summary: [concepts] comdat group error and an ICE with a
conceptified tuple implementation
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70036
Bug ID: 70036
Summary: [concepts] ICE with a dependent sizeof in a concept
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70025
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Mar 2 01:39:30 2016
New Revision: 233876
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233876&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-03-01 Vladimir Makarov
PR middle-end/70025
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69997
--- Comment #4 from Liu Qiang ---
Hello everybody.
I build the powerpc64 crosstoolchain with removing the
'gcc_assert(code==URC_NO_REASON)', and run the new system built by it. The
program (python3 with thread exiting) terminated by SIGSEGV ins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70035
Bug ID: 70035
Summary: [5.3 regression] Calling a non-virtual member in
base-class constructor call with ubsan causes segfault
when superclass has virtual member with same name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Mar 1 23:12:10 2016
New Revision: 233870
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233870&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/69196
* tree-ssa-threadbackward.c (fs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70007
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70007
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Mar 1 22:36:15 2016
New Revision: 233869
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233869&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/70007
* gcse.c (compute_ld_motion_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
--- Comment #10 from russelljbrennan at gmail dot com ---
Thanks for this Fritz! Should make a lot of people's lives much easier.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70007
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Mar 1 22:34:40 2016
New Revision: 233868
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233868&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/70007
* gcse.c (compute_ld_motion_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70007
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Mar 1 22:31:52 2016
New Revision: 233867
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233867&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/70007
* gcse.c (compute_ld_motion_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70034
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I actually think three is more correct. The issue is column for where the VLA
is referenced is incorrect.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68187
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Confirmed.
This bug is arguably two different issues: the one in comment #0 and the one in
comment #1.
Richi: I see that you confirmed this and raised the prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70034
Bug ID: 70034
Summary: repetitive -Wvla warning for each non-constant
dimension of a VLA
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
--- Comment #9 from Fritz Reese ---
I've finally submitted my patches for a -fdec-structure option which enables
STRUCTURE/RECORD and UNION/MAP support:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-03/msg2.html
I have (4) patches, and had to submit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Mar 1 21:46:58 2016
New Revision: 233866
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233866&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/69196
* tree-ssa-threadbackward.c (fs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70033
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70033
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 37836
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37836&action=edit
Patch that was checked in to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70033
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Mar 1 21:31:47 2016
New Revision: 233865
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233865&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-03-01 Michael Meissner
PR target/70033
* gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44281
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67278
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> CCing Uros for the followup ICE. Apply
Following patch should fix the ICE:
--cut here--
Index: config/i386/i386.c
==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70033
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70033
Bug ID: 70033
Summary: PowerPC power9 tests don't have guard for power9
support
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70027
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70017
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ---
> We have zero test failures with the patched code. Is that good enough or
> should I still take a closer look?
Good enough if you have no failures. You'll get the warning I just reinstated
in corner cases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70017
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Mar 1 20:04:01 2016
New Revision: 233862
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233862&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/70017
* ira.c (do_reload): Issue warning for ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70027
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Mar 1 20:11:19 2016
New Revision: 233864
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233864&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70027
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_output_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70024
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70028
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70024
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69203
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70032
Bug ID: 70032
Summary: tree-ssa-tail-merge engine replacement
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69796
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69993
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69974
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 1 18:27:21 2016
New Revision: 233861
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233861&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/69796
PR c/69974
* c-parser.c (c_parser_trans
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69796
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 1 18:27:21 2016
New Revision: 233861
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233861&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/69796
PR c/69974
* c-parser.c (c_parser_trans
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70021
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 37834
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37834&action=edit
gcc6-pr70021-wip.patch
But that would mean we don't vectorize the loop.
I see 2 cases here, one where we look u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70026
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
unsigned int a[64], b[64], c[64], d[64], e[64];
void
foo ()
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 64; i++)
{
d[i] = a[i];
e[i] = ((b[i] < e[i]) != !c[i]) && !a[i];
}
}
-O3 is enough on x86_64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60743
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70026
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69845
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69740
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614
--- Comment #14 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm not currently looking into this as I'm rather stumped by regalloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69315
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69052
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69052
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68695
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68621
--- Comment #5 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Adding visibility to hidden helps.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ifc-8.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ifc-8.c
index 89a3410..7519a61 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ifc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68187
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67278
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67278
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48778
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69987
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Mar 1 16:22:51 2016
New Revision: 233857
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233857&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/69987
* gfortran.dg/pr69987.f90: New t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69963
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69989
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Mar 1 16:22:51 2016
New Revision: 233857
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233857&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/69987
* gfortran.dg/pr69987.f90: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67278
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69798
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
No, that wouldn't allow e.g. _Cilk_spawn (*fn)();.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69983
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 1 15:58:25 2016
New Revision: 233856
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233856&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-03-01 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/69983
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69983
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70030
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Please attach the local change plus a testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70021
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Testing this fix:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c
index 95ce38d..1812742 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c
@@ -2084,6 +2084,10 @@ vect_reco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67922
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakel
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
