https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69740
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
The testcase in c#3 is another instance of this problem, but triggered by
sinking. I'd already been pondering the benefit/risk of attacking this at a
higher level (like in delete_basic_block) and seeing ano
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69564
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69899
David changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugzilla@limegreensocks.
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69952
Bug ID: 69952
Summary: ICE with a long double vector
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21106
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
t-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160224 (experimental) [trunk revision 233678] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk abc.c
$ ./a.out
$ gcc-trunk -O1 abc.c
$ ./a.out
Aborted (core dumped)
$ cat abc.c
int a = 1, c = 1;
extern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69736
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69736
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Thu Feb 25 01:14:27 2016
New Revision: 233691
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233691&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/69736
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/69736
* cp-tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69910
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Patch submiited:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-02/msg00095.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23093
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49459
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2011-06-17 18:56:47 |2016-2-24
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51147
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51147
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Feb 24 23:26:42 2016
New Revision: 233686
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233686&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/51147 - attribute((mode(byte))) on an enum generates wrong code
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69950
Bug ID: 69950
Summary: Allow more than one exit phi for reduction in
try_create_reduction_list
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69949
Bug ID: 69949
Summary: Optimally handle case that outer phi res is not used
in a phi in gather_scalar_reductions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69945
--- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard ---
See also this valgrind bug: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345307
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69948
Bug ID: 69948
Summary: Parallelize loops containing phis with addr_exprs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] segfault |[5 Regression] segfault in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 24 22:04:09 2016
New Revision: 233685
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233685&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/69705
* dwarf2out.c (gen_variable_die): Work arou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69922
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 24 22:01:24 2016
New Revision: 233684
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233684&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69922
* class.c (build_base_path): Set TREE_NO_WARN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69819
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69819
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Feb 24 21:47:59 2016
New Revision: 233683
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233683&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/69819
* c-decl.c (finish_decl): Don't update the c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68049
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69125
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69839
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Likely a bug on the Gentoo side.
The linker handles differently libraries specified on the command line and
libraries that are needed by those shared libraries, but are not mentioned on
the command line. See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69323
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Status|N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60126
--- Comment #4 from Harald Anlauf ---
For a simple testcase that can be added to the trunk see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-02/msg00092.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69947
Bug ID: 69947
Summary: [6 Regression] DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer broken on
the trunk
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69947
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69323
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 24 19:56:09 2016
New Revision: 233682
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233682&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69323 - errors
* friend.c (make_friend_class): Lik
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69740
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69323
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 24 19:56:03 2016
New Revision: 233681
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233681&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69323 - valid
* pt.c (instantiate_class_template_1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69323
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 24 19:55:45 2016
New Revision: 233679
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233679&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69323 - valid
* pt.c (instantiate_class_template_1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69811
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69920
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chengniansun at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69936
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69924
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69920
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69938
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69927
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69868
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37759|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69924
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69938
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So we have these statements during SRA:
_4 = e[d.1_3];
_5 = (int) _4;
We delete the first statement, presumably because we're going to apply SRA to
the RHS of that statement. That releases _4 back to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69946
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69938
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
The released name comes from tree-ssa:
{
if (access_has_children_p (racc)
&& !racc->grp_unscalarized_data)
{
if (dump_file)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69938
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69946
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
To me this looks like the bug is in the analysis function not matching what the
output function does.
rs6000_is_valid_shift_mask
has code like:
17346 /* Convert any shift by 0 to a rotate, to simplify bel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69884
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
The compiler is letting you know that within A<__m128> the __may_alias__
attribute is discarded, which may lead to unexpected results. Since that
attribute doesn't affect type identity, so it isn't reflected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69927
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Should be:
markus@x4 tmp % /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.9.3/gcc -w -march=haswell
-m32 -O3 -c vf_dejudder.i
vf_dejudder.i: In function ‘filter_frame’:
vf_dejudder.i:16:1: internal compiler error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69927
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69912
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69912
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Wed Feb 24 17:23:35 2016
New Revision: 233678
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233678&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/69912 - [6 regression] ICE in build_ctor_subob_ref initializing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69946
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69946
Bug ID: 69946
Summary: [6 Regression] Invalid ppc64 assembly emitted starting
with r226005
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69945
Bug ID: 69945
Summary: Provide an equivalent of __libc_freeres to release
emergency EH pool memory
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69839
--- Comment #4 from Joakim Tjernlund ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> That is the bug then. The linker doesn't search for DT_NEEDED shared
> libraries in the -L directories, but in the -rpath{,-link} ones, or in the
> standard d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69927
--- Comment #2 from jb999 at gmx dot de ---
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /tmp/gcc-4.9.3//configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc
--sharedstatedir=/var/state --localstatedir=/var/state --enable-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69839
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is the bug then. The linker doesn't search for DT_NEEDED shared libraries
in the -L directories, but in the -rpath{,-link} ones, or in the standard
directories (which for the sysroot would be /usr/power
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61033
--- Comment #15 from Maxim Kuvyrkov ---
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Wed Feb 24 16:41:52 2016
New Revision: 233675
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233675&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/61033
* g++.dg/pr61033.C: Add a regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69839
--- Comment #2 from Joakim Tjernlund ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Are you using a sysroot for this? If not, you should.
Yes, the toolchain is sysrooted at /usr/powerpc-g2.20-linux-gnu/
(toolchain built with Gentoo's crossde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69666
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Feb 24 16:20:00 2016
New Revision: 233674
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233674&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-24 Martin Jambor
revert:
2016-02-23 Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69944
Bug ID: 69944
Summary: ctype::widen issue, use self-define do_widen, get
unexpected result.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69839
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Are you using a sysroot for this? If not, you should.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61949
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61949
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69924
derrick at ca dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69943
--- Comment #3 from Peter Cordes ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #2)
> On second thought, reassociating signed addition is not legal in general
> because we might introduce signed overflow where one didn't exist before.
In an intermediat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69943
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
On second thought, reassociating signed addition is not legal in general
because we might introduce signed overflow where one didn't exist before.
Changing your integer example to use unsigned in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.0
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69607
--- Comment #23 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
pinged patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01632.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69927
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Can't reproduce - please show output with -v appended to the compiler command.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69943
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69898
--- Comment #3 from wander ---
Created attachment 37786
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37786&action=edit
A more detailed testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69935
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69705
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69943
Bug ID: 69943
Summary: expressions with multiple associative operators don't
always create instruction-level parallelism
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69942
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67854
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69710
--- Comment #13 from Doug Gilmore ---
I think this should be fairly straightforward to fix in the
autovectorization pass. Hopefully I should be able to post a patch
in the next few days.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-*-*, arm*-*-*, |powerpc-*-*, arm*-*-*,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69942
Bug ID: 69942
Summary: gcc.dg/ifcvt-5.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 37783
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37783&action=edit
sparcv9 ifcvt-4.c.227r.ce1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa64-hp-hpux11.11,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69936
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 24 14:54:01 2016
New Revision: 233669
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233669&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-24 Richard Biener
Jakub Jelinek
PR middl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69938
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69919
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69919
>
> --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
> Created attachment 37782
> --> https://gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69224
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
It miscompiles gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr23391.c and more
(gcc.c-torture/execute/2422-1.c is another example).
Looks like latch vs. stmt execution issues to me as the affected stmts
are only after the IV exit t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69919
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 37782
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37782&action=edit
Suggested patch
Well, the situation is not so easy. Ideally, I would set m_reverse_map = NULL
in
mem_alloc_descr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69939
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|5.4.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69939
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Feb 24 13:59:29 2016
New Revision: 233666
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233666&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/69939 Qualify get and forward
PR libstdc++/69939
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69939
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Feb 24 13:58:07 2016
New Revision: 233665
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233665&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/69939 Qualify get and forward
PR libstdc++/69939
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69915
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69915
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 24 13:54:39 2016
New Revision: 233664
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233664&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/69915
* tree.c (build_vector_from_ctor): Fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69936
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Verified it is r233626.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37780|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69916
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Feb 24 13:38:20 2016
New Revision: 233663
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233663&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR other/69916
* omp-low.c (struct oacc_loo
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
