https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983
--- Comment #8 from lucdanton at free dot fr ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #7)
> (In reply to lucdanton from comment #6)
> > I've independently run into this bug and applying this patch to HEAD doesn't
> > help on my end, the same IC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to lucdanton from comment #6)
> I've independently run into this bug and applying this patch to HEAD doesn't
> help on my end, the same ICE happens (except it is now pointing to line 6660
> of
> co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62273
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983
lucdanton at free dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lucdanton at free dot fr
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66735
Zhihao Yuan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lichray at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192
--- Comment #4 from Zhihao Yuan ---
(In reply to Zhihao Yuan from comment #3)
> Confirmed, please fix. As the standardization of `std::as_const`, this bug
> becomes significant.
Never mind, I will create another bug report to demonstrate my iss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63192
Zhihao Yuan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lichray at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62273
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69179
Bug ID: 69179
Summary: undocumented darwin attributes
"apple_kext_compatibility" and "weak_import"
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68813
--- Comment #5 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Thu Jan 7 03:28:05 2016
New Revision: 232121
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232121&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/68813
gcc/
* omp-low.c (is_oac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
It does fix it for arm-none-eabi targets, the test is now unsupported. I should
have done it myself. Jakub was talking about moving it in the cilk-plus
directory. Do you think it's still necessary?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38866
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69092
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.3
Summary|basic_string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45927
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does this still happen in GCC 5?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51049
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this has been fixed or at least for most cases. That is the & part is
redone during the combineif pass.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69178
--- Comment #1 from Ville Voutilainen ---
This check happens in check_bases(), which doesn't take complain flags, so
wherever that check fails, it's always a hard error. I suppose the checking
function call chains that go to that function should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60890
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69178
Bug ID: 69178
Summary: [concepts] An invalid expression in a
requires-expression is evaluated too eagerly
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68983
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 37245
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37245&action=edit
possible patch
Would this be an appropriate fix? It seems that if the source is a ref we
won't copy anything o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69176
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note -g is not needed to reproduce the bug and speeds up the compiling a lot.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67755
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67824
--- Comment #1 from Erich Keane ---
I just reconfirmed this in 5.3.1 on Fedora:
gcc (GCC) 5.3.1 20151207 (Red Hat 5.3.1-2)
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69092
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 6 20:34:41 2016
New Revision: 232112
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232112&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove noexcept from function template that can throw
PR libstdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69140
--- Comment #17 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Jan 6 20:19:04 2016
New Revision: 232111
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232111&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/69140
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69154
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||37131
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69176
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Happens with r231970 also.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69032
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68819
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||69177
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68998
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69177
Bug ID: 69177
Summary: Bit-packing optimization makes it too easy to have
location_t >= LINE_MAP_MAX_LOCATION_WITH_COLS
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69029
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69171
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 37244
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37244&action=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68976
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68979
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69176
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69176
Bug ID: 69176
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in in final_scan_insn, at
final.c:2981 on aarch64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69158
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Is this valid code? That is IdHdr is used during the initialization of itself.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69158
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69154
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69175
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69173
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69171
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
Target Mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69172
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le-linux-gnu |powerpc64le-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69170
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69175
Bug ID: 69175
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in haifa_luid_for_non_insn, at
haifa-sched.c:7895
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69169
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le-linux-gnu |powerpc64le-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69168
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le-linux-gnu |powerpc64le-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69167
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le-linux-gnu |powerpc64le-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69167
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69174
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
r231970 I get a different ICE:
t99.c: In function ‘fn1’:
t99.c:8:6: internal compiler error: in operator[], at vec.h:714
void fn1() {
^~~
0xd2868f vec::operator[](unsigned int)
/home/apinski/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69174
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69174
Bug ID: 69174
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in operand_equal_p
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69171
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin15, between r232062 and r232092, when compiling
gcc.c-torture/compile/SFset.c with -O1 I get
opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/SFset.c: In function
'indreg0limm1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69082
--- Comment #6 from PeteVine ---
The two lines read:
movwr0, #:lower16:.LANCHOR0+32768
movtr0, #:upper16:.LANCHOR0+32768
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69173
Bug ID: 69173
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in vinfo_for_stmt
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69171
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68911
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-01-04 00:00:00 |2015-12-15 0:00
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69080
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69172
Bug ID: 69172
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at
tree-ssanames.c:266
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
k dated 20160106, revision 232102,
says this:
$ ../results/bin/gcc -c -O2 bug261.c
./argus_util.c: In function ‘ArgusPrintSum’:
./argus_util.c:5856:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 213 212 36 6 (set (reg:V4SF 21 xmm0 [122])
(vec_merge:V4SF (vec_duplicate:V4SF (float:SF (mem:SI (plus:DI
(reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67627
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67627
--- Comment #4 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nsz
Date: Wed Jan 6 17:43:24 2016
New Revision: 232107
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232107&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-06 Szabolcs Nagy
Backport from mainline:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69170
Bug ID: 69170
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in
find_uses_to_rename_use
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67627
--- Comment #3 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nsz
Date: Wed Jan 6 17:32:41 2016
New Revision: 232105
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232105&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-06 Szabolcs Nagy
Backport from mainline:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66856
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23087
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63218
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> > X32 also wants long long.
>
> Is there a good way to ask for the longest of the integer types that are
> fast? stdint.h has thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69169
Bug ID: 69169
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69168
Bug ID: 69168
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in vect_analyze_loop_2, at
tree-vect-loop.c:2182
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69080
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #11 from k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69080
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69167
Bug ID: 69167
Summary: [6 Regression] internal compiler error: SSA corruption
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69164
Bug ID: 69164
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at
gimple-expr.c:468
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69053
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69166
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69166
Bug ID: 69166
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in get_initial_def_for_reduction,
at tree-vect-loop.c:4188
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69163
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69164
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 69165 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69165
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69164
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69165
Bug ID: 69165
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at
gimple-expr.c:468
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69154
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69163
Bug ID: 69163
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in rewrite_use_nonlinear_expr, at
tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:7086
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69154
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63218
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> X32 also wants long long.
Is there a good way to ask for the longest of the integer types that are fast?
stdint.h has things like int_fastN_t (btw, I don't like some of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67627
--- Comment #2 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nsz
Date: Wed Jan 6 14:51:35 2016
New Revision: 232102
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232102&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix libatomic multilib parallel build (PR other/67627)
The all-mult
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69162
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66856
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66856
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 37241
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37241&action=edit
reduced testcase
Compile command line:
gcc -O3 tc.ii -march=bdver1 -mmmx -mno-3dnow -msse -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69162
Bug ID: 69162
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at
gimple-expr.c:468
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66856
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> Created attachment 37239 [details]
> unreduced testcase
>
> Compile with
> gcc -O3 pix.i -flto -r -nostdlib -std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline
> -fno-strict-aliasing -ffunc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63218
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69154
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69161
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.3.1
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69161
Bug ID: 69161
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation,
at simplify-rtx.c:1633
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66856
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 37239
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37239&action=edit
unreduced testcase
Compile with
gcc -O3 pix.i -flto -r -nostdlib -std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline -fno-strict-aliasing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66856
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo