https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69133
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65421
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
See also bug 69143.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69134
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69153
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> You are leaking a target specific configure option to the configure script.
> This seems wrong. Can't you set target_header_dir in config.gcc instead?
As the c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69116
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to TC from comment #2)
> Deduction for this operator<< function template succeeds: `T` is deduced to
> be `x` from the left operand; the right operand is a non-deduced context
> because the supplie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69116
--- Comment #2 from TC ---
I don't think this has anything to do with `end`. Consider the following code:
#include
template struct foo {
T f();
void g(T);
};
template void operator<<(const T&, const foo&) {}
struct x : public std::ost
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46555
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am going to try to work on this so it can be in for stage 1 of 7.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68398
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|coremark regressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69116
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47466
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69128
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69129
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|boo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69131
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69133
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69133
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
The code included here is undefined due to ODR violations.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69136
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69137
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69082
--- Comment #5 from PeteVine ---
I got "lucky" with a single cpp file from dosbox:
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-D' 'HAVE_CONFIG_H' '-I' '.' '-I' '../..' '-I'
'../../include' '-I' '/usr/include/SDL' '-D' '_GNU_SOURCE=1' '-D' '_REENTRANT'
'-mcpu=cortex-a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69082
--- Comment #4 from PeteVine ---
Created attachment 37233
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37233&action=edit
Preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69146
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69147
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69125
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69124
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23087
Keith Thompson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.0.0 |5.3.0
--- Comment #13 from Keith Thomps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69116
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
It is trying to instantiate one of the std::end with valarray
Like:
template
inline const _Tp*
end(const valarray<_Tp>& __va)
{ return std::__addressof(__va[0]) + __va.size(); }
This does not l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69102
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69135
--- Comment #4 from cctsai57 ---
Following
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/{lceil-vcvt_1.c,lfloor-vcvt_1.c,lround-vcvt_1.c},
suggest:
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_v8_vfp_ok } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -march=armv8-a -f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69098
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://melpon.org/wandbox/p |
|ermlink/DShqHOBBMDx3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69071
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69068
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69067
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69052
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69053
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69044
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69042
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68886
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69042
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68767
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68525
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69129
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69036
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 69036 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10)
> This change makes it to compile:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/var-tracking.c b/gcc/var-tracking.c
> index 07eea84..43a85b7 100644
> --- a/gcc/var-tracking.c
> +++ b/gcc/var-tracki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123
Gary Funck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gary at intrepid dot com
--- Comment #11 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host|hppa*-*-hpux* |
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781
--- Comment #13 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Patch passed bootstrap and regtest on sparc64-linux. No regressions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69153
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
You are leaking a target specific configure option to the configure script.
This seems wrong. Can't you set target_header_dir in config.gcc instead?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68525
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |
Last reconfirmed|2015-11-25 00:00:00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69153
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc*-linux
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68049
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-12-08 00:00:00 |2016-1-5
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69153
Bug ID: 69153
Summary: --with-advance-toolchain configure option does not
correctly set configure variable target_header_dir
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69108
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 37232
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37232&action=edit
tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67755
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.4
Summary|[5 Regression] Ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66944
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6 regression] ICE on |ICE on static thread_local
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62254
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49358
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|optimization regr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46555
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Last reconfirmed|2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69152
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
This macro is about the typedef _WordT in bitset (currently "long", so
__SIZEOF_LONG__ is exactly what we want), not about the compiler notion of
"word". Using "long" for that typedef is suboptimal on x32, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45390
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45389
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69098
--- Comment #3 from hir...@trash-mail.com ---
Your testcase is really quite a bit smaller still – impressive skills! :)
Thanks for confirming and since 5.1.0 works for you, on Wandbox and
additionally your testcase doesn’t fail locally, I guess I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67973
--- Comment #17 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A back port is Ok.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69139
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #12 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Tue Jan 5 20:51:48 2016
New Revision: 232092
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232092&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-05 Sandra Loosemore
PR 1078
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69152
Bug ID: 69152
Summary: _GLIBCXX_BITSET_BITS_PER_WORD is wrong for x32
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69104
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jan 5 20:24:02 2016
New Revision: 232090
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232090&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/69104
* builtins.c (get_memmodel): Use expansion p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69148
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68991
--- Comment #19 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jan 5 20:19:16 2016
New Revision: 232088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232088&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use vector_operand on SSE with 16b memory operand
Add vector_oper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68991
--- Comment #18 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jan 5 20:17:26 2016
New Revision: 232087
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232087&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add vector_memory_operand and "Bm" constraint
SSE vector arithmet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #11 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Tue Jan 5 19:45:43 2016
New Revision: 232085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232085&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-05 Sandra Loosemore
PR 1078
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68232
--- Comment #6 from Pat Haugen ---
(In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #5)
> "Fixed" with the testsuite skips. Feel free to add any other target triplets
> for which this test is unreliable.
I was going to modify the powerpc64le triplet t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
--- Comment #40 from Mike Frysinger ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #39)
we should at least do gcc-5. i'm guessing there won't be another 4.9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66460
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hauf.johannes at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69149
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69140
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69140
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 37231
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37231&action=edit
Reduced testcase
To be compiled with -O2 -mincoming-stack-boundary=3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69149
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65996
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69140
--- Comment #9 from Justas L ---
Yes, forced stack alignment on x86_64 was introduced after 5.2, in r228728 for
pr66697. Also, I can confirm that adding -fno-omit-frame-pointer allows Wine to
compile normally.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
This change makes it to compile:
diff --git a/gcc/var-tracking.c b/gcc/var-tracking.c
index 07eea84..43a85b7 100644
--- a/gcc/var-tracking.c
+++ b/gcc/var-tracking.c
@@ -4968,7 +4968,7 @@ dataflow_set_different (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1078
--- Comment #10 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Tue Jan 5 18:04:01 2016
New Revision: 232081
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232081&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-05 Sandra Loosemore
PR 1078
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69124
--- Comment #11 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #9)
> So I did a bisection between 4.9 and 5.
> The offending commit is r217624:
> Author: vmakarov
> Date: Sun Nov 16 05:00:30 2014 +
>
> 2014-11-15 Vladi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(insn:TI 248 289 246 8 (set (reg:V2DI 21 xmm0 [130])
(mem/c:V2DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 7 sp)
(const_int 16 [0x10])) [9 %sfp+-32 S16 A128])) /tmp/x.ii:24
1215 {*movv2di_internal}
(nil))
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression]|[4.9/5 Regression]
|C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
--- Comment #38 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Jan 5 17:57:05 2016
New Revision: 232080
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232080&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH v2] ia64: don't use dynamic relocations for local symbols
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69143
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69124
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69140
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Sorry, I indeed made a mistake - r230176 makes compilation fail with a
> different error than the one I get with 5.3 release. However, after
> rerunning git bisect and manually checking these revisions I ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69124
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
A small testcase:
[hjl@gnu-mic-2 i386]$ cat /tmp/x.ii
struct xxx_def;
typedef xxx_def *xxx;
union rtxxx
{
const char *rt_str;
xxx rt_xxx;
};
struct xxx_def {
union u {
rtxxx fld[1];
} u;
};
extern x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68770
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68770
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton ---
Patch applied. (Unfortunately I cannot close this BZ...)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69151
Bug ID: 69151
Summary: missing docs for H8/3000 monitor/OS_Task attributes
and related breakage in -mexr/-mno-exr options
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66223
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Frey ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> The advantage of __builtin_unreachable () is that it allows better
> optimizations, at the expense of the invalid code not being so nicely
> reported.
> With -fsani
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69148
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.4
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69148
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And
union U { int r; float f; };
struct A {
int a;
union U b[64];
};
double foo (double);
void
bar (struct A *z, int x)
{
union U y;
y.f = foo (z->b[x].f);
z->a = y.r ? 4 : y.r;
}
too (to make it C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69108
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68651
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo