https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67665
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67820
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #2)
> >I have almost always seen people use -Wall -W
>
> Doubtful. Looking at a bunch of recent Fedora package builds
>
> $ fgrep -l Wextra fedora/pass78/201512*/*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67820
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
>I have almost always seen people use -Wall -W
Doubtful. Looking at a bunch of recent Fedora package builds
$ fgrep -l Wextra fedora/pass78/201512*/* | wc -l
35
$ fgrep -l Wall fedora/pass78/201512*/*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67395
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67665
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
For C++ we produce:
foo.c:1:0: fatal error: inter-module optimizations not implemented for C++
but really this should also be done for C now too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67665
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67665
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This looks like a left over from --combine where cc1 does not reject more than
one file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67820
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67809
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69068
Bug ID: 69068
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in bb_contains_loop_phi_nodes, at
graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1279
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69067
Bug ID: 69067
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in get_def_bb_for_const, at
graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1995
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65412
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64615
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66264
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66264
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
enum Foo { A,B,C,D };
int square(Foo f) {
switch (f) {
case A: return 33;
case B: return 24;
case C: return 857;
case D: return 980;
//default: return 0;
};
//return 0; // uncommen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67532
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|middle-end
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66521
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65128
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65467
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67461
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, I think there needs to be a barrier between each store as each store needs
to be observed by the other threads.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66657
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
You can use -save-temps and look at the .s files.
>To identify errant calls to printf and puts.
For this you can also do use the attribute warning and do it at compile time
rather than assembly time. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66657
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
You can use -save-temps and look at the .s files.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44577
tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69066
Bug ID: 69066
Summary: SFINAE compilation error on lambda with trailing
return type
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67533
tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] ICE: in|[5/6 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #46 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Reverting revision r229287 removes the ICE and restores the error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465
--- Comment #34 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Wrote more details on how exactly things were broken:
http://trofi.github.io/posts/189-glibc-on-ia64-or-how-relocations-bootstrap.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68926
Grygoriy Fuchedzhy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68926
--- Comment #3 from Grygoriy Fuchedzhy ---
Created attachment 37173
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37173&action=edit
patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64402
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 37172
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37172&action=edit
Patch to fix ICE and make interrupt restore r0
This patch fixes the ICE and makes interrupt functions
also res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67710
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #4)
> > Unfortunately, it doesn't work on Mac OS X 10.11.2: every link test
> > FAILs with
> >
> > FAIL: 17_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #45 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Backtrace
frame #10: 0x00010014c798
f951`gfc_typenode_for_spec(spec=0x000142203940) + 136 at trans-types.c:1062
frame #11: 0x00010014cb00 f951`gfc_sym_type(sym=0x000142203920)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #43 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> why the torrent of emails (spam)
No spam, but not the best use of bugzilla!-(those who never sin can throw the
first stone).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #42 from graham.stott at btinternet dot com ---
why the torrent of emails (spam)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Unhelpful error message |ICE: in
|when a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #40 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
I attached calc_param_mod.f90 (it's just a bunch of variable declarations).
The missing variable declartion is commented out on line 2648 it's
max_line_len2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #39 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37171
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37171&action=edit
calc_param_mod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #38 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Yeah that's what the bug is. The only problem with the file or at least
> what prevents it from compiling is the missing variable declaration
> on line 2648, but instead of saying there is a missin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #37 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Yeah that's what the bug is. The only problem with the file or at least what
prevents it from compiling is the missing variable declaration on line 2648,
but instead of saying there is a missing va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #36 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> read_input_mod is built from the source file read_input_mod.f90.
> It's the one with the bug
I get an ICE when compiling this file
SUBROUTINE READ_INPUT(s,input,inp_lines)
1
internal compiler e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #35 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
read_input_mod is built from the source file read_input_mod.f90. It's the one
with the bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
No read_input_mod.mod. Please work on a reduced test showing the issue. If you
cannot do it at least provide a compressed tar of you project. So far we are
both wasting our time!-(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #33 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
I uploaded soln_struct_mod.mod
I don't want to spend a lot of time on this either, and it's a complicated
project and figuring out the minimal code to reproduce the error is likely to
take a long t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #32 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37170
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37170&action=edit
m26
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #31 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Sorry but what you provide is useless for the time I want to spend on this PR
(you should use 'tar' for many files, so far son_struct_mod.mod is missing).
Please provide a reduced test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #30 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Okay, I uploaded files for a working eaxmple.
Trying to compile with:
gfortran -I/usr/lib/openmpi/include -pthread -I/usr/lib/openmpi/lib -L/usr//lib
-L/usr/lib/openmpi/lib -lmpi_f90 -lmpi_f77 -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #29 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37169
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37169&action=edit
source file with missing variable from only list
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
kottinge at utk dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37141|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #27 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37167
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37167&action=edit
driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #26 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37166
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37166&action=edit
lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #25 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37165
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37165&action=edit
m22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #22 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37162
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37162&action=edit
m19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #24 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37164
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37164&action=edit
m21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #23 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37163
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37163&action=edit
m20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #21 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37161
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37161&action=edit
m18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #20 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37160
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37160&action=edit
m17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #19 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37159
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37159&action=edit
m16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #18 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37158
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37158&action=edit
m15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #16 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37156
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37156&action=edit
m13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #17 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37157
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37157&action=edit
m14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #15 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37155
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37155&action=edit
m12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #13 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37153
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37153&action=edit
m10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #14 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37154
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37154&action=edit
m11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #12 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37152
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37152&action=edit
m9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #11 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37151
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37151&action=edit
m8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #10 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37150
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37150&action=edit
m7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #9 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37149
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37149&action=edit
m6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #8 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37148
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37148&action=edit
m5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #6 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37146
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37146&action=edit
m3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #7 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37147
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37147&action=edit
m4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #5 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37145
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37145&action=edit
m2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #4 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37144
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37144&action=edit
m1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
--- Comment #3 from kottinge at utk dot edu ---
Created attachment 37143
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37143&action=edit
mod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68265
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69055
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Similar(?) ICE with C
[Book15] f90/bug% gcc
/opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c
-fsanitize=float-cast-overflow
/opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69033
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69065
Bug ID: 69065
Summary: [C++11] multiple alignas specifiers
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69055
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Reduced test
subroutine tstd
implicit none
integer n
real(8) :: b
b = huge(1.0D0)
n = b
end subroutine tstd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69055
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69063
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66605
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||physiker at toast2 dot net
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69038
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Ugh. The nohalo_subdivision function has 37 parameters, among which 21 are
double's so this really stretches the register allocator...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69038
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 37142
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37142&action=edit
Reduced testcase
To be compiled with -m64 -mcpu=ultrasparc -O.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69038
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69038
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou -
88 matches
Mail list logo
