https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68062
Bug ID: 68062
Summary: ICE when comparing vectors
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #25 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #24)
> (In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #23)
> > Created attachment 36563 [details]
> > possible patch
> >
> > Certainly this fixes the executable te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68061
Bug ID: 68061
Summary: Can't use [[deprecated]] with requires clause
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68058
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Morilha ---
Created attachment 36564
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36564&action=edit
regex patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #24 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #23)
> Created attachment 36563 [details]
> possible patch
>
> Certainly this fixes the executable test case from #c13.
This patch could be a solution to gene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62109
--- Comment #10 from David ---
(In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #5)
> This patch is clear stage 1 material.
We're in stage 1. Is it time?
The patch adds the memory clobber, but I think the conclusion here was to
remove __gthr_i486_lock_cmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67968
--- Comment #4 from gong_su at hotmail dot com ---
Hi Dominik, here is the output after making the changes you asked. It looks the
same as adding "-x" to the "go" command. I will email all the .go files under
.../rpc/api.
root@linux05:~/Downloads
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68060
Bug ID: 68060
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in
vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:1413
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68043
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Oct 22 23:48:17 2015
New Revision: 229205
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229205&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-10-22 Martin Sebor
PR driver/68043
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68059
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #23 from Richard Henderson ---
Created attachment 36563
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36563&action=edit
possible patch
Certainly this fixes the executable test case from #c13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68052
--- Comment #3 from Olivier Blin ---
Quoting Martin Sebor's answer from the gcc-help mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2015-10/msg00128.html
> I'm inclined to say it's a bug. I recommend opening it in Bugzilla.
> The only way I was a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68052
Olivier Blin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #22 from Richard Henderson ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #21)
> So going back to the original problem, for a subreg of a multi-word reg,
> why can't we simplify that down to a suitably sized reg?
Because we're dealing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68059
Bug ID: 68059
Summary: [arm] libgcc uses __write to report error
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68058
Bug ID: 68058
Summary: _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION breaks regex
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68052
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56856
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at blino dot org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68057
Bug ID: 68057
Summary: [6 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to
build
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68056
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #21 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
On 10/22/2015 07:40 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
>
> --- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
> (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #19)
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68055
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Simplified. Still different behaviour :
$ cat z3.f90
!program p
integer*3 c
print *, c
end
$ gfortran -g -O0 -Wall -fcheck=all z3.f90
z3.f90:2:0:
integer*3 c
1
internal compiler error: Segm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67805
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68056
Bug ID: 68056
Summary: can use keyword as " _Atomic" as an identifier
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58754
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67870
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58754
--- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Oct 22 18:08:31 2015
New Revision: 229180
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229180&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-22 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/58754
* gfortran.dg/p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58754
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Oct 22 18:05:21 2015
New Revision: 229179
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229179&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-22 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/58754
* trans-stmt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68055
Bug ID: 68055
Summary: ICE on using unsupported kinds in program without
program statement
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68054
Bug ID: 68054
Summary: ICE on using protected attribute in program without
program statement
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66583
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akju at mailinator dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68051
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67989
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Proposed patch at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg02299.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68053
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Accepted and correct, if scalar parameter n is used instead :
$ cat z1s.f90
program p
integer, parameter :: n = -1
integer, parameter :: x(1) = 7
integer, parameter :: z(n:*) = x
print *, z
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68052
Bug ID: 68052
Summary: No printf format warnings in C++ code for macro in
system headers
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68053
Bug ID: 68053
Summary: lower bound of implied shape array restricted too much
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68051
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67845
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Created attachment 36562 [details]
> Draft patch.
>
> Here an expected patch for memcmp-1.c and sanity-check-pure-c-1.c output
> patterns. > > Does it fix the problem?
>From a quick test, yes. Than
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68051
Bug ID: 68051
Summary: copy constructor does not copy default initialized
union member
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67838
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67838
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Oct 22 14:55:14 2015
New Revision: 229175
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229175&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-22 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/67838
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68016
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67838
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
I'm going to add a testcase to trunk and close the bug, then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042
--- Comment #3 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Created attachment 36562
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36562&action=edit
Draft patch.
Here an expected patch for memcmp-1.c and sanity-check-pure-c-1.c output
patterns. Does it fix t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67829
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68038
Daniel U. Thibault changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d.u.thibault at bigfoot dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60618
Mike Frysinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #19)
> Preserving the upper part when setting the low part would be expressed via
> STRICT_LOW_PART. At least that's what I'd expect to see.
According to documenta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58497
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 22 13:36:46 2015
New Revision: 229173
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229173&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-22 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/58497
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58497
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 22 13:36:46 2015
New Revision: 229173
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229173&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-22 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/58497
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65962
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 22 13:33:17 2015
New Revision: 229172
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229172&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-22 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/19049
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19049
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 22 13:33:17 2015
New Revision: 229172
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229172&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-22 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/19049
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19049
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 65962, which changed state.
Bug 65962 Summary: Missed vectorization of strided stores
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65962
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65962
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67989
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #19 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Preserving the upper part when setting the low part would be expressed via
STRICT_LOW_PART. At least that's what I'd expect to see.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67989
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also, fails only for the arm-linux targets. arm-none-eabi compiles fine.
Also, needs an -march option of armv6z or lower. armv6kz, armv7-a and higher
don't ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56956
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Yeah, unfortunately that doesn't look correct :(
I've always wanted to have an ABS_EXPR variant that returns an unsigned value
(so with no undefined behavior). Maybe just overload ABS_EXPR in this way.
You
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67989
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67989
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36561
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36561&action=edit
Reduced testcase
Attaching reduced testcase, here's the full ICE backtrace.
Can be reproduced wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61893
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Note only the non-constant-folding part is fixed (the REG_EQUAL notes which
enable combine to remove the trapping).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61893
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 22 11:44:11 2015
New Revision: 229170
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229170&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-22 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/68046
PR mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68046
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 22 11:44:11 2015
New Revision: 229170
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229170&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-22 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/68046
PR mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67354
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
No, the statement is correct:
markus@x4 tmp % echo | g++ -fabi-version=9 -dM -E - | grep -i abi
#define __GXX_ABI_VERSION 1009
markus@x4 tmp % echo | g++ -fabi-version=0 -dM -E - | grep -i abi
#define
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67354
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56956
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67354
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
It was fixed on trunk by r228017.
And indeed -fabi-version=5 ICEs, 6 or higher is fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65962
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67354
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Works for me in trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67989
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37021
Bug 37021 depends on bug 56902, which changed state.
Bug 56902 Summary: Fails to SLP with mismatched +/- and negatable constants
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56902
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56902
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68050
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 56902, which changed state.
Bug 56902 Summary: Fails to SLP with mismatched +/- and negatable constants
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56902
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68050
Bug ID: 68050
Summary: SLP vectorization should negate constants to match up
+ vs -
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041
--- Comment #12 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Should be fixed on trunk. Dominique, let me know if the issue still occurs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041
--- Comment #11 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Oct 22 09:47:17 2015
New Revision: 229168
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229168&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin14 after r229119.
libsanitizer/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67968
--- Comment #3 from Dominik Vogt ---
To narrow down where the problem happens please try this:
1. Edit the first line of the file build/env.sh and append "-a":
#!/bin/sh -a
2. Locate the gccgo executable (whould be in the path GOBIN that is se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041
--- Comment #10 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9)
> > Created attachment 36556 [details]
> > The patch I've posted to gcc-patches ML for review.
>
> I have not tested the part "removes -lc++abi flag for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58309
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Another testcase:
int *
fn (int *A, int n, int m)
{
A[n:m] *= 2;
return A;
}
I think this is about missing mark_exp_read in c_parser_array_notation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67249
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67248
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68049
Bug ID: 68049
Summary: template instantiation involving may_alias defines
symbol twice
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65106
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66322
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67488
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68039
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67989
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm*
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68046
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Note that -fsanitize-undefined doesn't properly handle
volatile int x = __INT_MAX__ + 1;
which is in PR61893, it handles the case in this PR fine and with
trap-on-error more efficiently than -ftrapv:
ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68015
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Oct 22 08:28:57 2015
New Revision: 229165
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229165&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
S/390: PR68015 Fix ICE in s390_emit_compare
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-10-2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68015
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Oct 22 08:24:01 2015
New Revision: 229163
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229163&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
S/390: PR68015 Fix ICE in s390_emit_compare
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-10-2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #16)
> reload has traditionally removed subregs of hardregs and passes after reload
> have depended on that behaviour. Doing something similar in lra is
> obviously
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68046
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
