https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697
--- Comment #19 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Justas L from comment #18)
> Out of curiosity, what could it be that makes -mincoming-stack-boundary=3
> successfully deal with rogue code while -mstackrealign fails at that?
> Shouldn't -mstackre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67879
Bug ID: 67879
Summary: unnecessary jump in ternary
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67821
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67873
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67878
Bug ID: 67878
Summary: [concepts] when processing a valid concept check, gcc
errors trying to expand variadic in unrelated code
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67816
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67816
--- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Wed Oct 7 02:25:57 2015
New Revision: 228559
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228559&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH][PR tree-optimization/67816] Fix jump threading when DOM removes
co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67810
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67810
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Oct 7 01:46:54 2015
New Revision: 228556
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228556&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67810
* parser.c (cp_parser_fold_expr_p): Remove.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67766
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65766
lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65766
--- Comment #8 from lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: lkrupp
Date: Tue Oct 6 23:47:18 2015
New Revision: 228551
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228551&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-06 Louis Krupp
PR fortran/65766
* re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697
--- Comment #18 from Justas L ---
Out of curiosity, what could it be that makes -mincoming-stack-boundary=3
successfully deal with rogue code while -mstackrealign fails at that? Shouldn't
-mstackrealign do the same job without being told what the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66145
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> The last handler matches, but it should have matched earlier.
Doh, this is expected, because the C++03 ios::failure doesn't derive from
runtime_error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67877
Bug ID: 67877
Summary: Split stack needs to be support for AARCH64
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67876
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you supply the preprocessed source?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67856
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The prologue does a lot of separate things:
- Save non-volatile registers;
- Do whatever needs to be done to be able to call things (save the
return address, align the stack, whatever; different per targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66145
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67876
Bug ID: 67876
Summary: ICE when compiling Firefox 38
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67810
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697
--- Comment #17 from Justas L ---
Yes, this one works fine too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67875
Bug ID: 67875
Summary: missing -Warray-bounds in a default placement new
expression, bogus location on an overload
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67874
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I think tilegx32 target might have the same issue as it uses the new
generic syscall interface and there is no fcntl there either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67874
Bug ID: 67874
Summary: fd_unix.go does not build when there is fcntl64 and no
fcntl syscall
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67677
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67872
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Based on bug 41935 it looks like the offsetof warning is suppressed
intentionally when the array is the last element of a struct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67794
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjambor at suse dot cz
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67872
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
Looking for existing code in place to issue -Warray-bounds warnings I came
across fold_offsetof_1 in c-family/c-common.c. The function is designed to
warn for out of bounds indices in offsetof expressions but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67873
Bug ID: 67873
Summary: ice in duplicate_ssa_name_range_info
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67794
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67872
Bug ID: 67872
Summary: missing -Warray-bounds warning, bogus
-Wmaybe-uninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871
Bug ID: 67871
Summary: LTO falis for ARM big-endian
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57112
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-04-29 00:00:00 |2015-10-6
--- Comment #2 from Manu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67856
--- Comment #4 from Andy Lutomirski ---
I don't want to comment on how code generation works in GCC, but in terms of
what works in the output:
x86_64 generally has a 16-byte stack alignment in user code, which is two
slots. (In the kernel, we u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47226
griwes at griwes dot info changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||griwes at griwes dot info
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67863
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Oct 6 17:56:23 2015
New Revision: 228540
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228540&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67863
* call.c (build_conditional_expr_1): Build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67863
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67870
--- Comment #1 from Konstantin Isakov ---
$ g++-4.9 --std=c++11 bug.cc
bug.cc: In destructor ‘Foo::~Foo()’:
bug.cc:17:3: internal compiler error: in type_throw_all_p, at cp/except.c:1306
{}
^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preproces
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67808
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Oct 6 17:20:49 2015
New Revision: 228538
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228538&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2015-10-05 Michael Meissner
Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67870
Bug ID: 67870
Summary: ICE: in type_throw_all_p, at cp/except.c:1306
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36450|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67861
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67861
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Oct 6 16:47:00 2015
New Revision: 228536
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228536&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 67861
* gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_builtin): Add brea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697
Justas L changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67865
--- Comment #2 from Kostya Serebryany ---
(In reply to dominik.strasser from comment #1)
> Host system: CentOS release 6.4 (Final)
> glibc: glibc-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64
glibc-2.12 might be a bit too old.
We don't test with it, and this code is v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
--- Comment #21 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Oct 6 15:31:11 2015
New Revision: 228527
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228527&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/65345
* config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_atomic_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67861
--- Comment #3 from jim at meyering dot net ---
Created attachment 36452
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36452&action=edit
wc.i
Attaching wc.i:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
--- Comment #20 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Oct 6 15:09:43 2015
New Revision: 228526
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228526&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c/65345 for AArch64
2015-10-06 Ramana Radhakrishnan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67683
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67869
Bug ID: 67869
Summary: [SH] Expand some dynamic shifts inline
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65889
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67868
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
However the ICE is specific to the VTV feature I think and not generally
applicable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67849
Alexander Fomin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67849
--- Comment #1 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Tue Oct 6 13:49:30 2015
New Revision: 228525
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228525&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
AVX-512. Avoid upper-bank registers when splitting vec_extract_lo instru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
--- Comment #19 from David Edelsohn ---
Author: dje
Date: Tue Oct 6 13:46:34 2015
New Revision: 228524
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228524&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/65345
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_atomic_assign_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Justas L from comment #12)
> This one does not apply neatly on 5.2.0 and I have trouble getting the dev
> version to compile, so I can't test it. Any chance of a backport?
Sent via private mail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67868
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67868
Bug ID: 67868
Summary: [4.9/5/6 regression] ICE on targets with section
anchors.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67863
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67867
--- Comment #2 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Created attachment 36451
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36451&action=edit
Reprocase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67867
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
gcc version 6.0.0 20151006 (experimental) (GCC)
I'm also attaching preprocessed source as bug.i.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67866
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67859
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 6 12:34:15 2015
New Revision: 228519
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228519&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-06 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/67859
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697
--- Comment #12 from Justas L ---
This one does not apply neatly on 5.2.0 and I have trouble getting the dev
version to compile, so I can't test it. Any chance of a backport?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67859
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67480
--- Comment #6 from Kirill Yukhin ---
This bug is reproducible on gcc-5-branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67866
Bug ID: 67866
Summary: False positive -Wshift-count-overflow on template code
that checks for shift count overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67865
dominik.stras...@onespin-solutions.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-unknown-li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm, aarch64, x86_64,i386,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67865
Bug ID: 67865
Summary: ASAN crashes on thread creation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67864
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67864
Bug ID: 67864
Summary: [6 Regression] CSiBE size regression
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67848
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67863
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67863
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67863
Bug ID: 67863
Summary: -Wtautological-compare warns when it shouldn't
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67563
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67699
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 6 10:19:54 2015
New Revision: 228517
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228517&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-06 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67563
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 6 10:19:54 2015
New Revision: 228517
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228517&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-06 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67764
--- Comment #4 from Marcin Ślusarz ---
The issue is similar. However what I described in this bug can be considered a
regression, because gcc 4.9 behaves correctly. Bug 40752 is 6 years old.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36445|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697
--- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Version 2 patch to be attached. For the following testcase:
--cut here--
typedef float __v4sf __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16)));
__v4sf
__attribute__((force_align_arg_pointer, ms_abi))
test_ms (__v4sf a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Oct 6 09:14:48 2015
New Revision: 228516
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228516&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/65345
* config/sparc/sparc.c (sparc_atomic_assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67859
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67861
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |6.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67859
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67861
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67828
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Use ssa_undefined_value_p (..., true), otherwise looks sensible. I suppose
we could unswitch on the value if the condition is always executed in the loop
but then that's hardly a useful optimization (on und
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67862
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927
--- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
More elaborate patch available at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-09/msg00142.html
This patch also handles functions for source= that return a class object.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67862
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67828
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
96 matches
Mail list logo
