https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
--- Comment #11 from marcus at jet dot franken.de ---
Created attachment 35984
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35984&action=edit
707.c
delta reduced testcase.
gcc -O2 -fPIC -c 707.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66872
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Bonzini ---
> left shift of negative value is undefined behavior in C
It's not in any of GCC's intermediate representations, though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66873
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #5)
> Does the loop ordering matter? Fortran is a column major language,
> so your nested loops are backwards. One would normally write.
>
> do jj = 0, n - 1
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66874
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66850
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66850
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66872
James Almer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamrial at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66850
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Wed Jul 15 00:01:21 2015
New Revision: 225801
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225801&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/66850
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/66850
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66874
Bug ID: 66874
Summary: RFE: x86_64_fallback_frame_state more robust
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66873
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66873
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35983
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35983&action=edit
Tentative patch
Using this tentative patch, we use graphite analysis (if available) by default
for pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66873
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The fortran example succeeds when floop-parallelize-all is used.
Even though the access function in graphite seems the same:
...
Access function 0: {{0, +, 1}_3, +, 500}_4
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
--- Comment #10 from marcus at jet dot franken.de ---
Created attachment 35982
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35982&action=edit
sec.s.bad
bad assembly. %rsi not restored with formatW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
--- Comment #9 from marcus at jet dot franken.de ---
Created attachment 35981
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35981&action=edit
sec.s.good
good assembly (with TRACE)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
--- Comment #8 from marcus at jet dot franken.de ---
FWIW, it seems it is thinking that %rsi stays alive over sprintfW calls.
leaqformatW.23952(%rip), %rsi #,
movzbl (%r14), %edx# MEM[(const struct SID *)pSid_9(D)].
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
--- Comment #7 from marcus at jet dot franken.de ---
(can continue to work on this tomorrow. good night)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
--- Comment #6 from marcus at jet dot franken.de ---
Created attachment 35980
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35980&action=edit
foo.patch
the comment out TRACE() makes the function RtlConvertSidToUnicodeString build
correctly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66873
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Another obvious difference is that the fortran 2-dimensional array access is
rewritten into a single dimension array access:
...
:
# ii_7 = PHI <0(2), ii_16(7)>
pretmp_52 = (integer(kind=8)) i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
austinenglish at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6 Regression] wine |[6 Regression] wine64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ok, I downloaded wine-1.7.47.tar.bz2 and built it with trunk gcc. What do I
have to do to reproduce this please?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66873
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66873
Bug ID: 66873
Summary: fortran variant of outer-1.c not parallelized by
autopar
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65071
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65071
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jul 14 22:36:50 2015
New Revision: 225793
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225793&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-07-14 Andrea Azzarone
PR c++/65071
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
> (past a few statements)
Huh?
@@ -158,10 +158,6 @@ go_langhook_init_options_struct (struct gcc_options *opts)
@@ -295,6 +291,11 @@ go_langhook_post_options (const char **pfilename
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
--- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu ---
Testcase in comment #1 still fails with r225789.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
--- Comment #3 from marcus at jet dot franken.de ---
dlls/ntdll/sec.c, and probably RtlConvertSidToUnicodeString is miscompiled...
looking further.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66175
Louis Krupp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t56xjcu6dh at snkmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66864
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:31:11PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 07:02:32PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
> apl.washington.edu wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66864
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66854
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 35978
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35978&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
I believe this patch fixes the problem. I was able to build libgcc with t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65091
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
--- Comment #19 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Jul 14 20:54:00 2015
New Revision: 225789
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225789&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-14 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/66626
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870
--- Comment #5 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #4)
> > past a few statements
>
> Huh??
Here is your patch
diff --git a/gcc/go/go-lang.c b/gcc/go/go-lang.c
index ce4dd9b..d952e0f 100644
--- a/gcc/go/go-l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66861
--- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Fixed on trunk. I'm not sure if the milestone thing implies an Ok to commit to
the gcc-5 branch, as we're already on 5.2 rc2, I'll ask explicitly for an Ok.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66861
--- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Tue Jul 14 20:26:06 2015
New Revision: 225788
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225788&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 66861 Fix null pointer crash on mingw.
2015-07-14 Janne Blomqvist
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
> past a few statements
Huh??
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66864
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 07:02:32PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66864
>
> --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl ---
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66864
--- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 05:03:55PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> It seems constant folding in simplify.c may be broken. Here's
> a testcase suit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
> In gcc.c there is STACK_SPLIT_SPEC which sets --wrap=pthread_create in the
> LINK_COMMAND_SPEC if -fsplit-stack is set. Is there a reason there are 2
> different split stack dependent link options are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66872
Bug ID: 66872
Summary: fold a & ((1 << b) - 1) to a & ~(-1 << b)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66871
--- Comment #2 from David Woodhouse ---
It would still be extremely useful for it to emit dependencies on those files
which are actually included (after preprocessing).
Otherwise we end up screwing around with preprocessing it and then looking f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66864
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66871
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66871
Bug ID: 66871
Summary: .incbin in .S files does not appear in automatically
generated dependencies
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870
--- Comment #2 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #1)
> The various issues in this bug are in different parts of the code base. The
> bug is assigned to me, but, to be clear, I have no plans to work on any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66854
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18355
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jul 14 15:03:11 2015
New Revision: 225776
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225776&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Sync toplevel files binutils-gdb
Sync with binutils-gdb:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
The various issues in this bug are in different parts of the code base. The
bug is assigned to me, but, to be clear, I have no plans to work on anything in
the PPC-specific code.
For x86, TARGET_CAN_SPLI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66834
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Andrew Sutton from comment #12)
> I don't think that's a good idea. It means the template-id would be
> characterized as an atomic constraint for purposes of partial
> ordering. You lose the abi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870
Bug ID: 66870
Summary: split stack issues on ppc64le and ppc64
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66869
Bug ID: 66869
Summary: [6 regression] -Wunused-function no longer warns for
static declarations without definition
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66840
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66840
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose ---
Author: doko
Date: Tue Jul 14 13:50:01 2015
New Revision: 225772
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225772&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-14 Matthias Klose
PR target/66840
* config/rs6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66840
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
Author: doko
Date: Tue Jul 14 13:47:21 2015
New Revision: 225771
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225771&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-14 Matthias Klose
PR target/66840
* config/rs6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66834
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Sutton ---
> So it seems that applying the DR 1430 tentative resolution to concepts
> severely
> limits the usability of variadic concepts, and we should reconsider that, so
> that instead we delay normalization of te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #12 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35976
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35976&action=edit
patch for tree-ssa-reassoc
Here is a prototype patch (to fix comment 9) that makes tree-ssa-reassoc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66854
Sebastian Huber changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66868
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
the testsuite passes with -fsanitize=undefined (no additional output) and both
-fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error doesn't abort either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66868
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66866
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
"Safe" fix:
Index: gcc/config/i386/i386.c
===
--- gcc/config/i386/i386.c (revision 225768)
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c (working copy)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66866
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
bool
ix86_expand_pinsr (rtx *operands)
{
...
if (GET_CODE (src) == SUBREG)
src = SUBREG_REG (src);
and lost SUBREG_OFFSET.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66866
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #9 from Salvatore Filippone ---
(In reply to Salvatore Filippone from comment #8)
> (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #7)
> Salvatore
Spoke too quickly: I get this linker error
ppde3d.f90:(.text+0x9d0): undefined reference to
`_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66861
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Emrich ---
(In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #3)
> Or rather, also fixing another similar potential issue, you might instead
> want to test this:
>
> diff --git a/libgfortran/io/unix.c b/libgfortran/io/unix.c
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66868
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66866
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
More reduced, fails at -O1:
extern "C" void abort (void);
typedef long long __m128i __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16),
__may_alias__));
typedef short A __attribute__((__may_alias__));
__m128i __attribute
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66866
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66868
Bug ID: 66868
Summary: [5/6 Regression] wrong code generated with -O3 (dead
code removal?)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66863
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 14 11:39:14 2015
New Revision: 225768
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225768&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-14 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/66863
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66863
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
ize f, .-f
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 6.0.0 20150714 (experimental)"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66866
Bug ID: 66866
Summary: [miscompile] incorrect load address on manual vector
shuffle
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66763
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> The reduced testcase fails on all targets
... with any -std option, at least as far back as GCC 4.3.6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66763
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |c++
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66763
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The difference is that we include ::remove in C++11 and later.
Reduced:
namespace std
{
template
_FIter
remove(_FIter, _FIter, const _Tp&);
}
extern "C" {
extern int remove (const char *_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66840
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 35974
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35974&action=edit
patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66763
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't see any problem in libstdc++, the function is right there in the
preprocessed output starting at line 34472
# 891
"/tmp/20150703/powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.0.0/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algo.h" 3
tem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61321
--- Comment #8 from Pedro Alves ---
The patch was meanwhile approved:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg01247.html
I'm afraid I won't have time to get back to this for at least a few weeks.
If someone else could push it, I'd apprec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58446
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66763
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
This is an old issue. It also fails with gcc-4.9 and std=c++11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66763
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-ibm-aix*|powerpc-ibm-aix*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65186
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991
Pierre Ossman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ossman at cendio dot se
--- Comment #19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58446
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lu_zero at gentoo dot org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55807
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66862
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66861
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66862
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
store data-races
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |rtl-optimization
Version|unk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66863
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66863
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64327
--- Comment #4 from Vittorio Zecca ---
For your convenience I repeat here the reproducer:
/* from gcc file fixopts.c */
/* must be compiled with -O2 */
/*gcc-5.1.0/gcc/rtlanal.c:4911:48: runtime error: shift exponent
4294967295 is too large for 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
--- Comment #1 from austinenglish at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35973
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35973&action=edit
revert patch
These two patches get wine working in trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
Bug ID: 66865
Summary: wine segfaults from gcc in trunk (r225757)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
97 matches
Mail list logo
