https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66826
Bug ID: 66826
Summary: Unused dlsym return results in segfault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64848
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 64848, which changed state.
Bug 64848 Summary: G++ internal compiler error with templated lambdas capturing
variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64848
What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64848
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jul 10 02:44:39 2015
New Revision: 225648
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225648&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-09 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/64848
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66169
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64848
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is fixed for 5.2. I'm adding a testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66092
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66822
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> X86_TUNE_USE_BT also reduces code size:
>
> [hjl@gnu-tools-1 pr66822]$ cat y.i
> void bar (void);
>
> void
> foo (int x)
> {
> if (x != 2 && x != 3 && x != 10 && x != 11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66822
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
X86_TUNE_USE_BT also reduces code size:
[hjl@gnu-tools-1 pr66822]$ cat y.i
void bar (void);
void
foo (int x)
{
if (x != 2 && x != 3 && x != 10 && x != 11 && x != 17 && x != 18 && x != 23)
bar ();
}
[hjl@gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66822
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Turn off|Turn -mtune=iamcu for size
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #52 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #51)
BTW, I've already committed the patch in c#37 for gcc-5 for this PR.
The backport patch for PR/66780 is still in test for gcc-5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #51 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #49)
> Kaz, please could you propose these patches for 5.2 too, even if the branch
> is currently frozen?
It's too late, I think.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65636
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65634
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66812
--- Comment #10 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch posted as:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/jit/2015-q3/msg00060.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #50 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #49)
> Kaz, please could you propose these patches for 5.2 too, even if the branch
> is currently frozen?
Btw, the main reason for most of these segfault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66633
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 9 21:14:11 2015
New Revision: 225638
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225638&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/66633
* tree-nested.c (get_static_chain): O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66718
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 9 21:11:28 2015
New Revision: 225637
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225637&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/66718
* tree-vect-stmts.c (struct sim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #49 from Matthias Klose ---
Kaz, please could you propose these patches for 5.2 too, even if the branch is
currently frozen?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66812
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
Notes to self:
For the given stmt, fre1's call to:
val = vn_reference_lookup (gimple_assign_lhs (stmt),
gimple_vuse (stmt), VN_WALK, NULL);
is returning NULL for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66825
Bug ID: 66825
Summary: RFE: Add attributes for symbol versioning.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66812
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
Root cause found: it's because of the langhook:
LANG_HOOKS_GET_ALIAS_SET
which it looks like I need to implement for libgccjit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66783
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> Root cause found: it's because of the langhook:
> LANG_HOOKS_GET_ALIAS_SET
> which it looks like I need to implement for libgccjit.
Ooops, wrong bug; ignore th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66812
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66783
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Root cause found: it's because of the langhook:
LANG_HOOKS_GET_ALIAS_SET
which it looks like I need to implement for libgccjit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66812
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias, wrong-code
--- Comment #6 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66821
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66821
--- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Jul 9 20:35:56 2015
New Revision: 225635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225635&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Adjust variable shift costs for IA MCU
We reduce code size for IA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66822
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Please hold a bit with this change, I have a patch that improves generation of
zero_extend substantially.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523
--- Comment #21 from Jack Howarth ---
(In reply to m...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #15)
> Jack, can you spin a gcc-4.9 test?
Regression test results for current gcc-4_9-branch with patch applied posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66812
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4)
> Created attachment 35946 [details]
> Equivalent C code
>
> (generated using gcc_jit_context_dump_to_file and lightly editing until
> valid C)
Compiling this wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66812
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 35946
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35946&action=edit
Equivalent C code
(generated using gcc_jit_context_dump_to_file and lightly editing until valid
C)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66824
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00809.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66812
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2)
> Output from fre1 dump (at e.g. optlevel 3) (with TDF_DETAILS enabled) is:
(snip)
> Removing dead stmt MEM[(struct value *)arr_2(D) + 16B].union_field.i_field =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66812
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Output from fre1 dump (at e.g. optlevel 3) (with TDF_DETAILS enabled) is:
;; Function test_pr66812 (test_pr66812, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=56,
cgraph_uid=0, symbol_order=0)
Setting value number of .MEM_4(D) t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66812
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 35945
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35945&action=edit
Minimal reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14940
--- Comment #50 from Martin Richter ---
The following patch fixes segfault when gt_pch_use_address fails (returns -1).
fatal_error now correctly shows an error message and terminates the program.
I have basicly only reordered reads, and placed th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66822
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Yulia Koval from comment #1)
> I think it's a good idea.
If we do that, we may also adjust iamcu_cost:
COSTS_N_INSNS (3),/* cost of movsx */
COSTS_N_INSNS (2),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66821
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523
--- Comment #19 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Thu Jul 9 17:56:23 2015
New Revision: 225624
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225624&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-09 Iain Sandoe
PR target/66523
* confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523
--- Comment #18 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Thu Jul 9 17:50:58 2015
New Revision: 225623
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225623&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-09 Iain Sandoe
PR target/66523
* confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66633
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523
--- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth ---
Any response on the request for RM approval for adding this to 5.2.0?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66782
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Jul 9 15:39:53 2015
New Revision: 225618
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225618&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-09 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/66782
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66814
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Jul 9 15:18:44 2015
New Revision: 225616
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225616&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/66814
* config/i386/predicates.md (nonim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, this is unrelated to PR66633, that one even after the fix is a bug
somewhere in tree-nested.c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61491
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, the problem is that the fold_stmt folding added in that revision creates
new decls that it doesn't put into the current gimplification context vars, but
instead creates whole function temporaries.
So we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65790
--- Comment #5 from Akira Takahashi ---
Thanks Paolo!!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66821
--- Comment #8 from Yulia Koval ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> (In reply to Yulia Koval from comment #6)
> > msticlxl58$ size miam
> >textdata bss dec hex filename
> > 72 0 0 72 48 miam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Ok, then I'll try to fix it up there.
A testcase:
/* PR middle-end/66313 */
/* { dg-do run } */
/* { dg-options "-fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error" } */
int __attribute__ ((__noinline_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66821
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Yulia Koval from comment #6)
> msticlxl58$ size miam
>textdata bss dec hex filename
> 72 0 0 72 48 miam
> msticlxl58$ size march
>textdata bss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I'm actually testing a patch that moves all of this to match.pd (without
fixing this, that said)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66821
--- Comment #6 from Yulia Koval ---
msticlxl58$ size miam
textdata bss dec hex filename
72 0 0 72 48 miam
msticlxl58$ size march
textdata bss dec hex filename
81 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66821
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Yulia Koval from comment #4)
> The issue remains for -march=iamcu but not for -miamcu.
Let's fix -march=iamcu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66821
--- Comment #4 from Yulia Koval ---
The issue remains for -march=iamcu but not for -miamcu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65534
--- Comment #2 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
> > #ifndef OPTIMIZE_MANUALLY
> > void setutent(void) {
> > ((void)0);
> > __setutent_unlocked();
> > ((void)0);
> > }
> > #else
> > extern __t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66813
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66823
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66824
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
",@progbits,4
.align 4
.LC0:
.long 1077936128
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 6.0.0 20150709 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$
We should generate "mov $1077936128 %eax".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
--- Comment #17 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Nothing helps; neither -fno-ipa-cp-alignment, nor -fno-tree-vectorize,
nor disabling the pattern above.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66821
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Yulia Koval from comment #2)
> Well, second one looks better, but first one generates 9b smaller code.
> Can we disable this test for this target if it is not an issue?
This is a tuning issue. We wan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66823
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 35943
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35943&action=edit
patch triggering fails without -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores
Discovered while testing attached patch to improv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66822
Yulia Koval changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66823
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
And with -m64/-ftree-loop-if-convert-stores
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51933.c -O1 execution test
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51933.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr51933.c -O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66823
Bug ID: 66823
Summary: -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores miscompiles
gfortran.dg/elemental_optional_args_3.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66821
--- Comment #2 from Yulia Koval ---
Well, second one looks better, but first one generates 9b smaller code.
Can we disable this test for this target if it is not an issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66522
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #3)
> New patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg02085.html
Pinged: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00729.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66822
Bug ID: 66822
Summary: Turn off X86_TUNE_ZERO_EXTEND_WITH_AND for IAMCU
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66741
--- Comment #7 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ---
folding tolower (and toupper while at it) gives:
for i in 0 1 2;do
gcc -o tolower_strcpy-$i tolower_strcpy-$i.c -Ofast -W -Wall -Wextra -pedantic
-DMAIN -msse4.2
done
/tmp/inp is 200MB random bin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59767
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66741
--- Comment #6 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ---
Created attachment 35942
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35942&action=edit
Variant demonstrating strcpy+tolower fused loop, vectorized, SSE4.x
Code like this should be emitted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66741
--- Comment #5 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ---
Created attachment 35941
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35941&action=edit
Variant perusing builtins
This is (essentially) the motivating real-world example
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66741
--- Comment #4 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ---
Created attachment 35940
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35940&action=edit
Manually expanded variant
expanding builtins early should arrive at that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951
vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66821
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Which code is better?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66642
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
So, if it is related to vectorization (if I ever get to reproduce it I'll try
-fno-tree-vectorize) then it might be the
/* If arg0 is derived from the address of an object or function, we may
be able to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66714
--- Comment #19 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00711.html ) patch fixes
the ICE (perhaps without fixing the root cause).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66578
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58586
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66775
--- Comment #2 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This bug is somehow related with pr55603.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66775
--- Comment #1 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This bug is somehow related with 55603.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
--- Comment #15 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
For x86_64 additional --with-arch=native (sandybridge) is needed during
configuration.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
I guess related to PR66633.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62265
Yulia Koval changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||julia.koval at intel dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Last reconfirmed|2015-07-09 00:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r213753.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65790
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66821
Bug ID: 66821
Summary: reassoc-37.c fails on -march=pentium
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65790
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Jul 9 09:51:09 2015
New Revision: 225607
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225607&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-09 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/65790
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
--- Comment #1 from Simon Conseil ---
Created attachment 35939
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35939&action=edit
Preprocessed source from -freport-bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
Bug ID: 66820
Summary: internal compiler error: in get_expr_operands, at
tree-ssa-operands.c:910
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65790
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is fixed for 5.2. Let's add the testcase and close the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66817
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66818
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
