[Bug c++/66270] New: ICE: canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66270 Bug ID: 66270 Summary: ICE: canonical types differ for identical types Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/58175] [OOP] Incorrect warning message on scalar finalizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58175 Casey Webster changed: What|Removed |Added CC||casey.webster at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug middle-end/66269] Issues with mixing strict aliasing (verify_type ICE with Ada)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66269 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka --- Actually this reproduce very easily with mixing two units with -fstrict-aliasing and -fno-strict-aliasing.

[Bug middle-end/66269] New: Issues with mixing strict aliasing (verify_type ICE with Ada)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66269 Bug ID: 66269 Summary: Issues with mixing strict aliasing (verify_type ICE with Ada) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/66259] Combined gcc and binutils build from git-master fails, with gas/as-new not existing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66259 --- Comment #4 from Michael Darling --- symlinking binutils source first, and overwriting symlinks with gcc source did not help - same error. Have to run out for a bit, but I almost have this narrowed down to the exact commit that caused this.

[Bug fortran/44054] Handle -Werror, -Werror=, -fdiagnostics-show-option, !GCC$ diagnostic (pragmas) and color

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44054 --- Comment #26 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Author: manu Date: Sat May 23 23:02:52 2015 New Revision: 223614 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223614&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2015-05-24 Manuel López-Ibáñez P

[Bug c++/66268] New: struct { volatile int x; } should not be trivially copyable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66268 Bug ID: 66268 Summary: struct { volatile int x; } should not be trivially copyable Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/65936] [6 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65936 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66267] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66267 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/65936] [6 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65936 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Sat May 23 22:28:54 2015 New Revision: 223613 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223613&root=gcc&view=rev Log: cp/ PR c++/65936 * pt.c (lookup_template_class_1

[Bug c++/66267] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66267 Bug ID: 66267 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug ipa/65873] Failure to inline always_inline memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65873 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5 Regression] Failure to |Failure to inline |inlin

[Bug c++/66266] Abbreviated function template does not behave as expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66266 --- Comment #1 from Bruno Manganelli --- Probably another symptom of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64969 as inverting the arguments for auto_sum does not cause the assertion to fail. Apologies for the duplicate.

[Bug c++/66254] Member function shadowing enum classes

. ||com --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler --- The problem seems to be fixed in gcc HEAD 6.0.0 20150523 (experimental)

[Bug c++/66266] New: Abbreviated function template does not behave as expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66266 Bug ID: 66266 Summary: Abbreviated function template does not behave as expected Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c/66265] New: strict aliasing with O2 fails to generate correct code and gives no warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66265 Bug ID: 66265 Summary: strict aliasing with O2 fails to generate correct code and gives no warnings Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug c++/66264] New: [untaken optimization] switch & enums without default-case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66264 Bug ID: 66264 Summary: [untaken optimization] switch & enums without default-case Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c/66263] Performance regression from gcc-4.8 and up (trivial sudoku program)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66263 --- Comment #1 from EyalBD --- Created attachment 35606 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35606&action=edit Input file for running

[Bug c/66263] New: Performance regression from gcc-4.8 and up (trivial sudoku program)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66263 Bug ID: 66263 Summary: Performance regression from gcc-4.8 and up (trivial sudoku program) Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/66259] Combined gcc and binutils build from git-master fails, with gas/as-new not existing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66259 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2) > For files that exist in the GCC and binutils source trees both, > you should take the one in the GCC tree (you do it the other way > around). Does that work

[Bug other/66259] Combined gcc and binutils build from git-master fails, with gas/as-new not existing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66259 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug c/24016] Missing warning for unspecified evaluation order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24016 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/66153] Internal compiler error in nested template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66153 Peter Boyle changed: What|Removed |Added Version|5.1.0 |6.0 --- Comment #4 from Peter Boyle --- A

[Bug fortran/66082] memory leak with automatic array dummy argument with derived type array constructor actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66082 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/66153] Internal compiler error in nested template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66153 --- Comment #3 from Peter Boyle --- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30411079/counting-template-recursion-nest-depth Appears to affect all versions of g++ with various errors. Used: http://melpon.org/wandbox/permlink/eK2AVfZXXss0ZDu6 All ver

[Bug libstdc++/64657] Support iterators with overloaded operator-comma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64657 --- Comment #4 from François Dumont --- Author: fdumont Date: Sat May 23 11:17:38 2015 New Revision: 223605 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223605&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-05-23 François Dumont fdum...@gcc.gnu.org> PR libstdc+

[Bug fortran/66082] memory leak with automatic array dummy argument with derived type array constructor actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66082 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/66262] [REGRESSION] testsuite failure with libstdc++ (gcc-5) and g++-4.9 together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Gianfranco from comment #2) > I mentioned a testcase in the Debian bug report. > Unfortunately I'm not the upstream developer, I might find difficult to > extract what you exactly need...

[Bug libstdc++/66262] [REGRESSION] testsuite failure with libstdc++ (gcc-5) and g++-4.9 together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262 --- Comment #2 from Gianfranco --- I mentioned a testcase in the Debian bug report. Unfortunately I'm not the upstream developer, I might find difficult to extract what you exactly need...

[Bug libstdc++/66262] [REGRESSION] testsuite failure with libstdc++ (gcc-5) and g++-4.9 together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/66262] New: [REGRESSION] testsuite failure with libstdc++ (gcc-5) and g++-4.9 together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262 Bug ID: 66262 Summary: [REGRESSION] testsuite failure with libstdc++ (gcc-5) and g++-4.9 together Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug libstdc++/53477] pretty printer fails with: Python Exception list index out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477 --- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Tomasz Gajewski from comment #22) > In comment #10 I've provided test patch to test case that exposed a problem > (and in comment #11 some fix to all those tests). Currently I can't check if >

[Bug tree-optimization/65752] Too strong optimizations int -> pointer casts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752 --- Comment #33 from Chung-Kil Hur --- Dear Richard, Thanks for the detailed response. I have a suggestion for a solution of the problem, which is based on my paper to appear at PLDI 2015. * A Formal C Memory Model Supporting Integer-Pointer C

[Bug tree-optimization/66261] New: operations that simplify whether the pointers are the same or not (++p;++q;--p;--q)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66261 Bug ID: 66261 Summary: operations that simplify whether the pointers are the same or not (++p;++q;--p;--q) Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keyword