[Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968 --- Comment #37 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #36) > mpolacek isn't a valid bugzilla user by itself. You always need to type the > whole email, or wait for the completion to appear and select it. Yes when

[Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968 --- Comment #36 from Andreas Schwab --- mpolacek isn't a valid bugzilla user by itself. You always need to type the whole email, or wait for the completion to appear and select it.

[Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968 --- Comment #35 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- CCing people doesn't work anymore. For example on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66066 when I click edit in the CC List, and add "mpolacek" and then hit save changes immediately. On the n

[Bug c/66066] New: [6 Regression] r222889 causes bogus error: initializer element is not constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66066 Bug ID: 66066 Summary: [6 Regression] r222889 causes bogus error: initializer element is not constant Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug c/66064] under O2 level ，x86-64 compiler ICE，informance：internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1894

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66064 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 --- Comment #28 from Jürgen Reuter --- Dominique, comment #27 looks perfect. That would be great for us with the upcoming revision of gfortran 6.0.0.

[Bug fortran/66065] New: ICE on assignment to deferred-length character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66065 Bug ID: 66065 Summary: ICE on assignment to deferred-length character array Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c++/59012] alignas does not support parameter pack expansions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59012 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri May 8 04:42:06 2015 New Revision: 222902 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222902&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/59012 * parser.c (cp_parser_std_attribute_list): Ha

[Bug c++/60277] Bogus "inline function virtual ..." used but never defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60277 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/66064] New: under O2 level ，x86-64 compiler ICE，informance：internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1894

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66064 Bug ID: 66064 Summary: under O2 level ，x86-64 compiler ICE，informance：internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1894 Product: gcc Version: 4.7

[Bug c/66063] New: under O2 level ,compiler ICE: internal compiler error: in build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:1222

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66063 Bug ID: 66063 Summary: under O2 level ,compiler ICE: internal compiler error: in build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:1222 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/66062] New: under O2 optimization level , aarch64 compiler give informance : internal compiler error: in expand_assignment, at expr.c:4838

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66062 Bug ID: 66062 Summary: under O2 optimization level , aarch64 compiler give informance : internal compiler error: in expand_assignment, at expr.c:4838 Product: gcc

[Bug middle-end/192] String literals don't obey -fdata-sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192 --- Comment #17 from Matt Whitlock --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #16) Thanks for the fix, Segher. Your patch seems more "right" than mine, although I will point out that it doesn't precisely address this bug report, as it places

[Bug c++/66061] New: Internal Compiler Error when specializing a variable template when the specialization is variadic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66061 Bug ID: 66061 Summary: Internal Compiler Error when specializing a variable template when the specialization is variadic Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/66043] ICE on storage_size of null or output of null array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66043 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 05:39:44PM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > > The above patch is good enough to catch the direct use > of NULL() in storage_size. The following should also > be

[Bug lto/66029] Build error compiling gcc5.1 using LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66029 --- Comment #11 from JD --- Yes, it's non-empty: $ ar --help | grep plugin Usage: ar [emulation options] [-]{dmpqrstx}[abcDfilMNoPsSTuvV] [--plugin ] [member-name] [count] archive-file file... --plugin - load the specified plugin ar: supporte

[Bug tree-optimization/66013] Missed optimization after inlining va_list parameter, -m32 case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66013 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Tentative patch: ... diff --git a/gcc/tree-stdarg.c b/gcc/tree-stdarg.c index efabda7..b334e79 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-stdarg.c +++ b/gcc/tree-stdarg.c @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file C

[Bug c/64918] invalid (?) warning when initializing structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64918 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu May 7 22:14:27 2015 New Revision: 222894 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222894&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/64918 * c.opt (Woverride-init-side-effects): New o

[Bug lto/66027] lto1: internal compiler error: in odr_types_equivalent_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66027 --- Comment #5 from JD --- Created attachment 35492 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35492&action=edit output of gcc -march=native -Q --help=target

[Bug lto/66027] lto1: internal compiler error: in odr_types_equivalent_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66027 --- Comment #4 from JD --- Removing the -O3 flag from the first two invocations changes the behavior: g++ -std=c++14 -c -fPIC -march=native -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects ASTContext_preproc.cpp -o ASTContext_preproc.o g++ -std=c+

[Bug fortran/66041] [6 Regression] Matmul ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66041 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 35491 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35491&action=edit Patch When calling lbound for the lower bound of an array section, a reference to the full array was built. Th

[Bug c/66060] New: struct member allocation off.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66060 Bug ID: 66060 Summary: struct member allocation off. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assig

[Bug libstdc++/66059] make_integer_sequence should use a log(N) implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66059 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/65664] ARM bootstrap fails with --with-fpu=neon-vfpv4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65664 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/66027] lto1: internal compiler error: in odr_types_equivalent_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66027 --- Comment #3 from JD --- Created attachment 35490 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35490&action=edit preprocessed sources and makefile

[Bug lto/66027] lto1: internal compiler error: in odr_types_equivalent_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66027 --- Comment #2 from JD --- I managed create a minimal example. bug66027 $ make -j g++ -std=c++14 -c -fPIC -march=native -O3 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects ASTContext_preproc.cpp -o ASTContext_preproc.o g++ -std=c++14 -c -fPIC -m

[Bug rtl-optimization/48442] ICE: in init_seqno, at sel-sched.c:6767 with -Os -fselective-scheduling2 --param max-sched-extend-regions-iters=100

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48442 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug rtl-optimization/48302] ICE: SIGSEGV in reposition_prologue_and_epilogue_notes (function.c:5662) with -fcrossjumping -fselective-scheduling2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48302 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/48052] loop not vectorized if index is "unsigned int"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48052 --- Comment #12 from zaafrani --- Thank you for the feedback. We excluded start value that is constant because it is already working. To our knowledge, only when the start value is unknown and the loop index type is of unsigned type that we fail

[Bug libstdc++/66059] New: make_integer_sequence should use a log(N) implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66059 Bug ID: 66059 Summary: make_integer_sequence should use a log(N) implementation Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: compile-time-hog

[Bug fortran/66058] Backslash in comment kills compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66058 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/65179] Introduce new C warning: -Wshift-negative-value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65179 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/65179] Introduce new C warning: -Wshift-negative-value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65179 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu May 7 19:36:31 2015 New Revision: 222889 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222889&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/65179 * c-common.c (c_fully_fold_internal): Warn w

[Bug target/66015] align directives not propagated after __attribute__ ((__optimize__ ("O2")))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66015 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu May 7 19:35:45 2015 New Revision: 222888 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222888&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/66015 * config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_over

[Bug fortran/66058] Backslash in comment kills compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66058 --- Comment #1 from Matt Thompson --- Addendum, I've tried various gfortran flags, but for the life of me, none seem to get this to work. Matt

[Bug fortran/66058] New: Backslash in comment kills compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66058 Bug ID: 66058 Summary: Backslash in comment kills compile Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 --- Comment #26 from Dominique d'Humieres --- With Andre's patch on top of a clean tree at r222878, I get Testsuite summary for WHIZARD 2.2.6 ==

[Bug rtl-optimization/65862] [MIPS] IRA/LRA issue: integers spilled to floating-point registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65862 --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Matthew Fortune from comment #6) > (In reply to Robert Suchanek from comment #5) > > > I am not sure, that the result code is better as we access memory 3 > > > times instead of access to $f20

[Bug rtl-optimization/65862] [MIPS] IRA/LRA issue: integers spilled to floating-point registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65862 --- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Robert Suchanek from comment #5) > Sorry for late reply, I was on vacation. > > > The costs are equal if cost of moving general regs to/from fp regs or > > memory are equal. So it looks ok t

[Bug fortran/66057] ICE for incomplete generic statement (gfc_match_generic)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66057 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/58616] [meta-bug] nsdmi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616 Bug 58616 depends on bug 60125, which changed state. Bug 60125 Summary: [DR 1351] defaulted constructor with throwing NSDMI still declared as noexcept https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60125 What|Removed

[Bug c++/60125] [DR 1351] defaulted constructor with throwing NSDMI still declared as noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60125 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug debug/61352] gcc 4.9.0 fails to execute dsymutil when linking executables on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352 Joel Brobecker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brobecker at gnat dot com --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/66056] Segmentation fault for lonely label in type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66056 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/66043] ICE on storage_size of null or output of null array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66043 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 03:52:24PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > Index: check.c > === > --- check.c (revision 222869) > +++ chec

[Bug fortran/66057] New: ICE for incomplete generic statement (gfc_match_generic)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66057 Bug ID: 66057 Summary: ICE for incomplete generic statement (gfc_match_generic) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug fortran/66056] New: Segmentation fault for lonely label in type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66056 Bug ID: 66056 Summary: Segmentation fault for lonely label in type Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: for

[Bug libstdc++/66055] hash containers missing required reserving constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66055 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/66055] hash containers missing required reserving constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66055 ncm at cantrip dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #35487|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/51747] [DR 1467] [C++11] cannot call defaulted copy constructor using list-initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51747 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/51747] [DR 1467] [C++11] cannot call defaulted copy constructor using list-initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51747 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 7 16:46:49 2015 New Revision: 222881 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222881&root=gcc&view=rev Log: DR 1467 PR c++/51747 * typeck2.c (digest_init_r):

[Bug c++/51747] [DR 1467] [C++11] cannot call defaulted copy constructor using list-initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51747 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 7 16:46:58 2015 New Revision: 222882 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222882&root=gcc&view=rev Log: DR 1467 PR c++/51747 * typeck2.c (digest_init_r):

[Bug libstdc++/66055] New: hash containers missing required reserving constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66055 Bug ID: 66055 Summary: hash containers missing required reserving constructors Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug jit/66054] New: bootstrap comparison failure with --enable-host-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66054 Bug ID: 66054 Summary: bootstrap comparison failure with --enable-host-shared Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: minor Prio

[Bug c++/66053] New: openmp target data mappings containing this pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66053 Bug ID: 66053 Summary: openmp target data mappings containing this pointers Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc, openmp Severity: normal

[Bug c++/62212] ICE compiling template function with array reference parameter whose size depends on a template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62212 --- Comment #2 from Lewis Hyatt --- Hello- FYI, I have located the commit which broke this testcase, it is this one: == Author: jason Date: Fri Oct 15 21:15:13 2010 New Revision: 165521 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=

[Bug fortran/66043] ICE on storage_size of null or output of null array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66043 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/192] String literals don't obey -fdata-sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192 --- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Thu May 7 15:51:01 2015 New Revision: 222880 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222880&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/192 PR middle-end/54303 * varas

[Bug middle-end/54303] -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections and -fmerge-constants do not work well together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54303 --- Comment #17 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Thu May 7 15:51:01 2015 New Revision: 222880 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222880&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/192 PR middle-end/54303 * var

[Bug fortran/66050] ICE: FORALL with operation on matrix columns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66050 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/66044] ICE on misplaced entry statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66044 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/66045] ICE on incorrect code with null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66045 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug lto/66029] Build error compiling gcc5.1 using LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66029 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Is the output of the following commands non-empty? % ar --help | grep plugin % echo "int main () {}" | gcc -x c++ -O2 - -flto -v 2>&1 | grep "collect2 -plugin"

[Bug fortran/66052] Segmentation fault for misplaced protected statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66052 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/66046] UBSan output pattern tests fail on target ARM board.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66046 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/66046] UBSan output pattern tests fail on target ARM board.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66046 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu May 7 14:44:26 2015 New Revision: 222878 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222878&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR testsuite/66046 * c-c++-common/ubsan/align-6.c: Don'

[Bug fortran/66050] ICE: FORALL with operation on matrix columns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66050 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Dominique

[Bug c++/66042] Implicitly converts lvalue to rvalue when returning reference parameter in function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66042 David Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/66052] New: Segmentation fault for misplaced protected statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66052 Bug ID: 66052 Summary: Segmentation fault for misplaced protected statement Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug fortran/66050] ICE: FORALL with operation on matrix columns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66050 --- Comment #2 from Mianzhi Wang --- I may have made some mistake on the original example. This should trigger the ICE (in some conditions, see below) program test double precision::a(3,3),b b=1d0 forall(i=1:3) a(:,i)=b*[1d0,2d0,3d0]

[Bug tree-optimization/66051] New: can't vectorize reductions inside an SLP group

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66051 Bug ID: 66051 Summary: can't vectorize reductions inside an SLP group Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/66051] can't vectorize reductions inside an SLP group

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66051 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/66050] ICE: FORALL with operation on matrix columns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66050 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- What collect2 is looking for is configured during build, see the gcc/collect-ld script in the build directory.

[Bug fortran/66050] New: ICE: FORALL with operation on matrix columns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66050 Bug ID: 66050 Summary: ICE: FORALL with operation on matrix columns Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fort

[Bug lto/66029] Build error compiling gcc5.1 using LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66029 --- Comment #9 from JD --- I reconfigured and recompiled binutils 2.25 with the --enable-plugins and --enable-lto flags. But I'm afraid I must be missing something: Linking with the newly compiled ld 2.25 works fine without lto but using it with

[Bug rtl-optimization/66048] [i386] ICE in create_pre_exit when both AVX and MPX are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66048 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Ilya Enkovich from comment #0) > Created attachment 35485 [details] > reproducer > > >gcc mode-switch.cc -march=corei7-avx -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds -O2 -c > > mode-switch.cc: In function 'c1

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #53 from mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #50) > Created attachment 35478 [details] > implement SYNC flag for memory model > > This compiles on all targets, but is only runtime tested on > x86_64-

[Bug sanitizer/64839] libsanitizer shouldn't require

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839 Thierry Reding changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thierry.reding at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug fortran/50539] Internal error gfc_match_entry(): Bad state (r178939)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50539 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t

[Bug fortran/66044] ICE on misplaced entry statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66044 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/66018] opendir configure test not working when GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018 --- Comment #3 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- having ld in the $(prefix)/$(triplet)/bin fixes the issue. it seems that collect2 doesn't look for $(prefix)/bin/$(triplet)-ld as before

[Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 --- Comment #25 from Jürgen Reuter --- Just do the configuration without the --disable-ocaml flag (the default is that OCaml is enabled). The configure should show then something like that (Ocamlweb is not needed): configure: ---

[Bug target/66049] Few AArch64 extend and add with shift tests generates sub optimal code with trunk gcc 6.0.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66049 --- Comment #1 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org --- We need patterns based on shifts to match with combiner generated. Below patch fixes them. diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md index 1c2c5fb..c5a640d 10064

[Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 --- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > That would be cool. If you have OCaml installed (version 3.12 or newer, > and as a French you couldn't complain about that^^) you could run a lot more > from the test suite. I have The OCaml tople

[Bug target/66049] New: Few AArch64 extend and add with shift tests generates sub optimal code with trunk gcc 6.0.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66049 Bug ID: 66049 Summary: Few AArch64 extend and add with shift tests generates sub optimal code with trunk gcc 6.0. Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 --- Comment #23 from Jürgen Reuter --- That would be cool. If you have OCaml installed (version 3.12 or newer, and as a French you couldn't complain about that^^) you could run a lot more from the test suite.

[Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 --- Comment #22 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > No this is not expected. There seems to be another problem inside > gfortran 6.0.0 trunk. I cannot test things before tomorrow/weekend. I will try with a tree with less patches.

[Bug fortran/66041] [6 Regression] Matmul ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66041 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- Workaround: Use -finline-matmul-limit=0.

[Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 --- Comment #21 from Jürgen Reuter --- No this is not expected. There seems to be another problem inside gfortran 6.0.0 trunk. I cannot test things before tomorrow/weekend.

[Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Patch submitted at: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-05/msg00025.html > > This patch also fixes the issue in comment #15. With the submitted patch I have been able to build the whizard packa

[Bug target/65326] LRA missing a Thumb optimization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65326 renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/192] String literals don't obey -fdata-sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192 --- Comment #15 from Matt Whitlock --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14) > This doesn't really look like a good idea to me. Instead, perhaps ld's > --gc-sections or new special option should just remove unused string > literals from mer

[Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 --- Comment #19 from Jürgen Reuter --- Of course, we are fine (or even happy) if you take our code examples for your regression tests.

[Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 --- Comment #18 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, it also fixes the ICE in #11. The code example is part of the regression test added. I hope you don't mind. Most parts of the regression test added base on your reported issues. Additionally

[Bug fortran/66041] [6 Regression] Matmul ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66041 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug bootstrap/66038] SIGSEGV at stage 2 build/genmatch --gimple ../../gcc-5.1.0/gcc/match.pd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc-darwin Status|UNCON

[Bug fortran/66041] [6 Regression] Matmul ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66041 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 Summary|[6.0 Regression]

[Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 --- Comment #17 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to vehre from comment #16) > Patch submitted at: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-05/msg00025.html > > This patch also fixes the issue in comment #15. First of all, thanks for the efforts

  1   2   >