https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65958
Bug ID: 65958
Summary: -fstack-check breaks __builtin(alloca)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65957
Bug ID: 65957
Summary: Loop with if-statement yields different results for
-O3 vs -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65950
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This vectorized for me with GCC 5.1.0 on aarch64-linux-gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65956
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Untested fix:
--- gcc/tree-sra.c.jj 2015-04-20 14:35:47.0 +0200
+++ gcc/tree-sra.c 2015-05-01 01:08:34.092636496 +0200
@@ -4427,7 +4427,11 @@ turn_representatives_into_adjustments (v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Apr 30 22:12:31 2015
New Revision: 222661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-04-30 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/37131
* simplif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65898
stanley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #29 from Rainer Emrich ---
(In reply to Matt Breedlove from comment #28)
> If you don't mind, what were the failures you were getting on this one or
> did the original reported errors simply return?
The failures are different now, fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65956
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65956
Bug ID: 65956
Summary: [5/6 Regression] Another ARM overaligned arg passing
issue
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidxl at google dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
$ build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=build/./prev-gcc/xgcc
Target: arm-linux-gnueabihf
Configured with: src/configure --prefix=install --with-cloog=infra
--with-ppl=infra --w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35433
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35433&action=edit
Sources in tgz
Using these sources, I can reproduce using just this command line:
...
build/./prev-gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
Bug ID: 65955
Summary: [arm] ICE during movcond_addsi split
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #29 from Frédéric Buclin ---
One more, at :45:
Matt Breedlove 2015-04-30 20:45:32 UTC
I now have no doubt that this is not a coincidence.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #28 from Matt Breedlove ---
(In reply to Rainer Emrich from comment #26)
> (In reply to Rainer Emrich from comment #25)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #24)
> > > Note that the issue should only cause option merging to be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65945
--- Comment #8 from npl at chello dot at ---
@Andrew Pinski: The code in question was compiled for arm4t.
The toolchain is not configured for arm7, but has a multilib-configuration for
arm4/armv5te/thumb. No defaults where touched in any way, cor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65858
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is a better example for AARCH64 due to ILP32 using long as 32bits:
void
foo (long long *arr)
{
for (int i = 0; i < 256; i++)
arr[i] *= 19594LL;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
if we use -mabi=ilp32, we can see it is vectorized:
loop:
adrpx0, array
adrpx1, ptrs
ldr q1, .LC0
add x3, x1, :lo12:ptrs
ldr w2, [x0, #:lo12:array]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||65951
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65953
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Looks like a Mono bug to me. mono_jit_tls isn't __attribute__((used)), and
> the compiler determines it is a write-only variable (doesn't know the asm
> uses it)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551
--- Comment #17 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Apr 30 18:41:33 2015
New Revision: 222653
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222653&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
* g++.dg/ipa/pr63551.C: New test.
Backported from mai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Apr 30 18:41:33 2015
New Revision: 222653
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222653&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
* g++.dg/ipa/pr63551.C: New test.
Backported from main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65954
Bug ID: 65954
Summary: gcc segfaults on the following input with a syntax
error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #27 from Matt Breedlove ---
The primary differences between the 4.9 branch and 5.1.0 are only that the
underlying issue now results in a fatal error. In the 4.9 branch, the objects
and archives (even "-fresolution=libarchive.res" ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551
--- Comment #16 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Apr 30 18:05:34 2015
New Revision: 222652
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222652&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/63551
* g++.dg/ipa/pr63551.C: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65953
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551
--- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Apr 30 18:03:53 2015
New Revision: 222651
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222651&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/63551
* g++.dg/ipa/pr63551.C: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551
--- Comment #14 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Apr 30 18:01:07 2015
New Revision: 222650
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222650&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/63551
* g++.dg/ipa/pr63551.C: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65929
--- Comment #4 from ctice at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ctice
Date: Thu Apr 30 17:49:02 2015
New Revision: 222643
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222643&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Define & use special macros to record the name & size of cold
pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65953
Bug ID: 65953
Summary: [5/6 Regression] undefined reference to static
__thread variable
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952
Bug ID: 65952
Summary: [AArch64] Will not vectorize copying pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932
Christian Eggers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ceggers at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951
Bug ID: 65951
Summary: [AArch64] Will not vectorize multiplication by long
constant
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #26 from Rainer Emrich ---
(In reply to Rainer Emrich from comment #25)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #24)
> > Note that the issue should only cause option merging to be skipped for files
> > in archives (and that, too, o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65950
--- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Created attachment 35432
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35432&action=edit
test-case to reproduce
Must be compiled with -Ofast and -fopenmp options.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65950
Bug ID: 65950
Summary: Loop is not vectorized with lto.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65185
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #28 from Frédéric Buclin ---
Maybe is this a coincidence, but all bugmails I found which have a wrong
timestamp have something in common. First of all, the offset is *always* the
same: -05:30. Then, it seems the problem only happens w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65801
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65801
--- Comment #21 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Apr 30 16:31:36 2015
New Revision: 222636
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222636&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-04-30 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/65801
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65858
--- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #2)
> Hi,
> Sorry for late response, I applied your patch and got the following ICE:
> -std=gnu++11 -flto --param lto-partitions=1
> Full command li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65935
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Building rephase.c:rephase with -fno-tree-slp-vectorize makes it succeed.
The loop is basically
register int i,j,k,dir;
register site *s;
for(i=0,s=lattice;ilink[dir].e[j][k].real *= s->phase[dir];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65873
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Apr 30 15:09:19 2015
New Revision: 222634
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222634&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65873
* ipa-inline.c (can_inline_edge_p): It is sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #25 from Rainer Emrich ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #24)
> Note that the issue should only cause option merging to be skipped for files
> in archives (and that, too, on x86_64-linux). Though compared to the 4.9
> bran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65949
Bug ID: 65949
Summary: Compiler can not deduce auto type in lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65476
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65476
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Apr 30 15:01:49 2015
New Revision: 222633
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222633&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/65476
* fold-const.c (native_encode_int): Rever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64729
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64729
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Apr 30 14:59:21 2015
New Revision: 222632
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222632&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add missing PR middle-end/64729 reference.
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65936
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65935
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Also fails with the test input.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64729
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Apr 30 14:50:26 2015
New Revision: 222631
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222631&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add missing PR middle-end/64729 reference.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
Note that the issue should only cause option merging to be skipped for files in
archives (and that, too, on x86_64-linux). Though compared to the 4.9 branch
we do
fd = open (argv[i], O_RDONLY);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener ---
The patch looks pretty obvious to me - though I wonder if archives still work
on x86_64-linux after it (or rather I wonder how they worked before...).
I'm not aware of @ doing any magic for filenames - do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65945
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
How did you configure your gcc? If it is configured for armv7 or above, gcc
defaults to assuming unaligned accesses can be done. This is a faq.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65876
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] [C++11]|[6 Regression] [C++11] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65876
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 30 14:19:24 2015
New Revision: 222628
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222628&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/65876
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_call_expression): Fai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65939
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #22 from Kai Tietz ---
I will be able to test this tomorrow (or this evening) for a linux bootstrap.
Patch tested is:
Index: lto-wrapper.c
===
--- lto-wrapper.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65945
--- Comment #6 from npl at chello dot at ---
btw... there seems to be a logical fallacy in the way gcc produces stores
anyway.
if a type has size 4 and alignment 1 (like a struct with 4 chars), shouldn`t
the compiler generate byte-writes?
Just cu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835
--- Comment #5 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #1)
> The problem is that in the testcase iinline-1.c as it is in the
> testsuite, we use -fno-ipa-cp on the command line so that the
> interprocedural phase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835
--- Comment #4 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
yes, I thought that this test was target independent. tested on x86, arm, sh4.
I'll checking what happens with aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #27 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de"
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65945
--- Comment #5 from npl at chello dot at ---
making nullptr_t "similar" to void* would sound very reasonable to me. I tested
clang and it seems to behave that way.
Whatever the C++ ABI group comes up with, the unaligned accesses have to be
fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #21 from Rainer Emrich ---
*** Bug 65582 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65582
Rainer Emrich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #20 from Rainer Emrich ---
Kai,
(In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #18)
> Does the following patch fixes your problem?
>
> Index: lto-wrapper.c
> ===
> --- lto-wrapper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65874
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65948
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Apr 30 13:18:22 2015
New Revision: 222621
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222621&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/65948
* ipa-devirt.c (odr_types_equivalent_p): NUL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65205
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65205
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Thu Apr 30 12:44:39 2015
New Revision: 222620
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222620&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR testsuite/65205] Fix dg-shouldfail usage in OpenACC libgomp test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65935
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65935
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Also reproduces with -Ofast -march=bdver2 -m32 so I suppose -O3 -ffast-math
-m32 -msse2 should also reproduce it.
I wont get to look into this before Monday, any help in bisecting
(-fno-tree-vectorize for w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65948
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|hubicka at ucw dot cz |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65948
Bug ID: 65948
Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101010-4
cp_lto_20101010-4_0.o-cp_lto_20101010-4_0.o link
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65947
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65947
Bug ID: 65947
Summary: Vectorizer misses conditional assignment of constant
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65935
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> I suppose r222514.
Yes, it is.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65946
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65946
Bug ID: 65946
Summary: Simple loop with if-statement not vectorized
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65945
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35226
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043
--- Comment #27 from John Dallman ---
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65944
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
The testcase is about not ICEing - eventually adding -nostdlib -r will still
reproduce the original issue.
Otherwise the fix is to properly "complete" the header parts of std::exception,
maybe simply by inc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37954
Bug 37954 depends on bug 36043, which changed state.
Bug 36043 Summary: gcc reads 8 bytes for a struct of size 6 which leads to
sigsegv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58744
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65408
Bug 65408 depends on bug 36043, which changed state.
Bug 36043 Summary: gcc reads 8 bytes for a struct of size 6 which leads to
sigsegv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65408
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58744
Bug 58744 depends on bug 36043, which changed state.
Bug 36043 Summary: gcc reads 8 bytes for a struct of size 6 which leads to
sigsegv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043
--- Comment #25 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Apr 30 11:11:34 2015
New Revision: 222616
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222616&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/65408
PR target/58744
PR middle-end/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65408
--- Comment #9 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Apr 30 11:11:34 2015
New Revision: 222616
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222616&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/65408
PR target/58744
PR middle-end/3
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
