[Bug testsuite/65785] libgo TestIPv4MulticastListener test fails on machine with no network connection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65785 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- ran into this again with new build and test

[Bug c++/65936] [6 Regression] ICE building libboost_log.so.1.58.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65936 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/65936] New: [6 Regression] ICE building libboost_log.so.1.58.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65936 Bug ID: 65936 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE building libboost_log.so.1.58.0 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/65337] [5/6 Regression] bootstrap-lto gnat1 linktime ICE: gcc/ada/exp_aggr.adb:6570:0: internal compiler error: in forward_edge_to_pdom, at tree-ssa-dce.c:1086

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65337 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-03-13 00:00:00 |2015-4-30 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka

[Bug tree-optimization/65935] [6 Regression] 433.milc in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65935 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/62234] warnings/errors from LTO cannot be tested

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62234 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg01538.html has a testcase that should be added once this is fixed.

[Bug tree-optimization/65935] New: [6 Regression] 433.milc in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65935 Bug ID: 65935 Summary: [6 Regression] 433.milc in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug target/64835] -fno-ipa-cp is inconsitently supported when attributes optimize or target are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/61683] decltype-specifier not accepted as mem-initializer-id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61683 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug libstdc++/65839] xmethods need updating once gdb decides how to fix 18285

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65839 --- Comment #4 from devans at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: devans Date: Wed Apr 29 22:50:31 2015 New Revision: 222599 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222599&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/65839 * python/libstdcxx/v6/xmeth

[Bug target/65871] bzhi builtin/intrinsic wrongly assumes bzhi instruction doesn't set the ZF flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65871 --- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Apr 29 20:58:25 2015 New Revision: 222592 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222592&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/65871 * config/i386/i386.md (*bmi_bextr_

[Bug c++/50800] Internal compiler error in finish_member_declarations, possibly related to may_alias attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50800 --- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Apr 29 20:51:05 2015 New Revision: 222591 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222591&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/50800 * tree.c (apply_identity_attributes): Fix ha

[Bug lto/65559] [5/6 Regression] lto1.exe: internal compiler error: in read_cgraph_and_symbols, at lto/lto.c:2947

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559 --- Comment #18 from Kai Tietz --- Does the following patch fixes your problem? Index: lto-wrapper.c === --- lto-wrapper.c (Revision 69) +++ lto-wrapper.c (Arbeitsko

[Bug lto/65559] [5/6 Regression] lto1.exe: internal compiler error: in read_cgraph_and_symbols, at lto/lto.c:2947

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559 Daniel Starke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de --- C

[Bug other/65933] final.c:2239:8: error: 'vector_type_mode' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65933 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- Seems like stor-layout.h needs to be included somewhere.

[Bug target/65886] [5/6 Regression] Copy reloc in PIE incompatible with DSO created by -Wl,-Bsymbolic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886 --- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 35427 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35427&action=edit A patch to enable -fsymbolic in LTO if -Bsymbolic is used This patch improves LTO when -Bsymbolic is used.

[Bug target/65886] [5/6 Regression] Copy reloc in PIE incompatible with DSO created by -Wl,-Bsymbolic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886 --- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19) > I know it isn't the same. But, IMHO this isn't worth adding another knob > which will be a maintainance nightmare. Performance difference between -fsymbolic -fPIE a

[Bug target/65871] bzhi builtin/intrinsic wrongly assumes bzhi instruction doesn't set the ZF flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65871 --- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Apr 29 18:53:19 2015 New Revision: 222588 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222588&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/65871 * config/i386/i386.md (*bmi_bextr_

[Bug debug/65934] objdump can't print correct DW_AT_encoding name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65934 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/65934] New: objdump can't print correct DW_AT_encoding name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65934 Bug ID: 65934 Summary: objdump can't print correct DW_AT_encoding name Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug other/65933] New: final.c:2239:8: error: 'vector_type_mode' was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65933 Bug ID: 65933 Summary: final.c:2239:8: error: 'vector_type_mode' was not declared in this scope Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/64610] No -Wbool-compare warning on "(0 != a) >= 0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64610 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/52830] ICE: "canonical types differ for identity types ..." when attempting SFINAE with member type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52830 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- Created attachment 35426 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35426&action=edit gzipped C++ source code gcc trunk dated 20150427 ices in the same way on the attached code.

[Bug c/64610] No -Wbool-compare warning on "(0 != a) >= 0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64610 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Apr 29 18:13:44 2015 New Revision: 222587 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222587&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/64610 * c-common.c (maybe_warn_bool_compare): Warn

[Bug libstdc++/65760] invalid use of incomplete type with std::is_convertible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65760 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/65760] invalid use of incomplete type with std::is_convertible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65760 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Apr 29 16:07:47 2015 New Revision: 222581 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222581&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/65760 * include/std/functional (__check_func

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #47 from Andrew Macleod --- Created attachment 35425 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35425&action=edit potential patch to add MEMMODEL_SYNC I don't know where we've finally settled on this, but I did prototype ou

[Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968 --- Comment #26 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "christian.eggers at kathrein dot de" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.bugs

[Bug target/65932] New: [5.1 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s does not boot due to wrong code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932 Bug ID: 65932 Summary: [5.1 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s does not boot due to wrong code generation Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug libstdc++/64657] Support iterators with overloaded operator-comma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64657 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/64657] Support iterators with overloaded operator-comma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64657 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Apr 29 15:22:13 2015 New Revision: 222579 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222579&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/64657 * include/bits/basic_string (basic_str

[Bug tree-optimization/51513] Only partially optimizes away __builtin_unreachable switch default case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51513 --- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Steven Bosscher from comment #4) > This should be solved by allowing labels in trivially_empty_bb_p. I tried the following, but it doesn't fix the problem. --- cfgcleanup.c(revision 222

[Bug c++/64667] -Winit-self ignored for reference fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64667 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/64667] -Winit-self ignored for reference fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64667 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Apr 29 14:06:27 2015 New Revision: 222577 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222577&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2015-04-29 Paolo Carlini PR c++/64667 *

[Bug preprocessor/52899] tabstop has no effect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52899 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/55095] Wshift-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55095 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/55080] -pedantic produces error: floating-point literal cannot appear in a constant-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55080 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||easyhack --- Comment #3 from Manue

[Bug c++/55080] -pedantic produces error: floating-point literal cannot appear in a constant-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55080 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- This should be an easy fix once a solution and the text is agreed.

[Bug libstdc++/65928] std::find_if compilation errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- The code is invalid. No amount of fiddling about with headers will change that. Even if you manage to find some combination that works today, it might not work tomorrow or with a different compiler. Fix the

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #46 from mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #45) > (In reply to mwahab from comment #44) > > And this final sentence is buggy by omission of a mention of memory writes: > > but following memory

[Bug libstdc++/65928] std::find_if compilation errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928 --- Comment #6 from david.claessens at tomra dot com --- Apparently it is not (only) included from string. Changing to a char array and removing that include doesn't change anything.

[Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548 --- Comment #34 from Jürgen Reuter --- Andre, I checked your patch with r222305 of the gcc 6.0 trunk. Our complete code (without workarounds for the two remaining cases reported) compiles, and our complete testsuite works. Thanks for the patch.

[Bug libstdc++/65928] std::find_if compilation errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- More precisely, includes which declares (but does not define) the overload of std::isblank.

[Bug libstdc++/65928] std::find_if compilation errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- It's unspecified whether any of your headers includes , and in our implementation includes it.

[Bug libstdc++/65928] std::find_if compilation errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928 --- Comment #3 from david.claessens at tomra dot com --- To be honest, I would have expected that since only is included and not where the other version of isblank is defined, there would be no confusion.

[Bug target/65931] [5/6 regression] dsymutil assertion failure building libgnat-5.dylib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.2

[Bug target/65931] New: [5/6 regression] dsymutil assertion failure building libgnat-5.dylib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931 Bug ID: 65931 Summary: [5/6 regression] dsymutil assertion failure building libgnat-5.dylib Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/65930] Reduction with sign-change not handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- More "correct" would be to replace the reduction in sum with one using an unsigned int type. Not sure where this kind of transform would fit best, but as it's an enablement for vectorization I suppose the v

[Bug web/64968] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968 --- Comment #25 from Frédéric Buclin --- Did this problem disappear? Or are there still some bugmails today with a wrong timestamp?

[Bug libstdc++/65928] std::find_if compilation errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #45 from James Greenhalgh --- (In reply to mwahab from comment #44) > (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #43) > > (In reply to torvald from comment #37) > > > > > > I'm not worried about __sync_lock_release, I think the docum

[Bug c++/65923] False positive for warning about literal operator suffix and using

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug libstdc++/65927] cppcheck: bits/locale_facets_nonio.h (_M_am_pm_format): Assignment of function parameter has no effect outside the function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65927 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/65930] Reduction with sign-change not handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/65930] New: Reduction with sign-change not handled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65930 Bug ID: 65930 Summary: Reduction with sign-change not handled Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Prior

[Bug tree-optimization/61171] vectorization fails for a reduction in presence of subtraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/57634] Missed vectorization for a "fixed point multiplication" reduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57634 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/51996] ICE in extract_insn gcc.dg/pr48335-5.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51996 Stuart Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shenders at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug gcov-profile/65929] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65929 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- The difference between new (zzz.s) and previous (yyy.s) asm dumps is: --- yyy.s 2015-04-29 13:44:03.870706031 +0200 +++ zzz.s 2015-04-29 13:26:41.812887199 +0200 @@ -99,7 +99,10 @@ $L17: b

[Bug gcov-profile/65929] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65929 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- Created attachment 35423 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35423&action=edit gcda file

[Bug gcov-profile/65929] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65929 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- Created attachment 35422 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35422&action=edit Preprocessed source

[Bug target/65924] [6 Regression] ICE const_int_operand failed on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65924 --- Comment #3 from Yvan Roux --- Author: yroux Date: Wed Apr 29 11:31:40 2015 New Revision: 222572 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222572&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ 2015-04-29 Yvan Roux PR target/65924 * config/arm/thu

[Bug gcov-profile/65929] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65929 Bug ID: 65929 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #25 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com --- On 29/04/15 09:09, rguenther at suse dot de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 > > --- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de --- > On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, ram

[Bug libstdc++/65928] std::find_if compilation errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- It seems normal to me. There are now several functions called isblank in namespace std, and the compiler doesn't know which one to pick when you don't give it a hint (like you do for myblank). A more explicit d

[Bug ada/65476] Long_Float array does not byte-swap correctly with reverse Scalar_Storage_Order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65476 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- > When an array of Long_Floats is set to a scalar_storage_order of > High_Order_First, only the two 32 bit words that make up the 64 bit value > are swapped with each other but the bytes under those words are

[Bug ada/65476] Long_Float array does not byte-swap correctly with reverse Scalar_Storage_Order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65476 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug ada/65476] Long_Float array does not byte-swap correctly with reverse Scalar_Storage_Order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65476 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/65928] New: std::find_if compilation errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65928 Bug ID: 65928 Summary: std::find_if compilation errors Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug tree-optimization/65791] Postpone expand_ifn_va_arg till after optimize_va_list_gpr_fpr_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65791 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hopefully, after implementing this todo we can revert this change in tree-ssa/stdarg-2.c: - https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blobdiff;f=gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-2.c;h=5a74280f7281814

[Bug libstdc++/65927] New: cppcheck: bits/locale_facets_nonio.h (_M_am_pm_format): Assignment of function parameter has no effect outside the function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65927 Bug ID: 65927 Summary: cppcheck: bits/locale_facets_nonio.h (_M_am_pm_format): Assignment of function parameter has no effect outside the function Product: gcc Ve

[Bug tree-optimization/65893] ifcombine not done anymore on expansion of va_arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65893 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug tree-optimization/65893] ifcombine not done anymore on expansion of va_arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65893 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Wed Apr 29 09:13:49 2015 New Revision: 222567 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222567&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Move pass_stdarg to after pass_dce in pass_all_optimizations 20

[Bug libgcc/65902] GCC-5.1 fails to bootstrap for eCos/arm-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65902 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/65893] ifcombine not done anymore on expansion of va_arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65893 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from vrie

[Bug tree-optimization/65917] [6 Regression] XFAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030922-2.c scan-tree-dump-times dom1 "if " 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65917 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization, xfail

[Bug tree-optimization/65917] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030922-2.c scan-tree-dump-times dom1 "if " 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65917 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 29 08:51:08 2015 New Revision: 222562 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222562&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-04-29 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/65917

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #44 from mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #43) > (In reply to torvald from comment #37) > > > > I'm not worried about __sync_lock_release, I think the documentation is > > > strong enough and un

[Bug tree-optimization/65917] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030922-2.c scan-tree-dump-times dom1 "if " 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65917 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|law at redh

[Bug target/65924] [6 Regression] ICE const_int_operand failed on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65924 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548 --- Comment #33 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- I can only work on the issue, not do magic. When you have issues with svn checkout try the gitmirror: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GitMirror

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, ramana at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 > > --- Comment #23 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de fro

[Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548 --- Comment #32 from Jürgen Reuter --- With gcc-6.0 trunk I cannot test our complete code because of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 For gcc 5 trunk I have massive problems in checking out the svn at the moment, always getting

[Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #31 from

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #23 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #20) > On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 > > > > --- Comment #17 from

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #22 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #18) > Created attachment 35420 [details] > patch to override default options by options in object file > > Hi, > > The following untested patch gives prefer

[Bug c/65926] New: MinGW-W64, xmmintrin.h, error: can't convert between vector values of different size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65926 Bug ID: 65926 Summary: MinGW-W64, xmmintrin.h, error: can't convert between vector values of different size Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug target/65924] [6 Regression] ICE const_int_operand failed on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65924 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 Summary|[6.0 Regression]

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #21 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #18) > Created attachment 35420 [details] > patch to override default options by options in object file > > Hi, > > The following untested patch gives preference t

[Bug target/65924] [6.0 Regression] ICE const_int_operand failed on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65924 Yvan Roux changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 > > --- Comment #17 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to c

[Bug fortran/65925] New: Memory leak with source allocation nested inside the source of another source allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65925 Bug ID: 65925 Summary: Memory leak with source allocation nested inside the source of another source allocation Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se