https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65855
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Version|5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65855
Bug ID: 65855
Summary: missing optimization: triangular numbers
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65848
Tom Honermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65854
Bug ID: 65854
Summary: [c++-concepts] Type constraint satisfaction error for
type aliases; regression from r211824
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65852
--- Comment #10 from Paul Robinson
---
I thought I had heard your name before! Howdy...
Granted this is an obscure corner case, but they are legal filenames,
using a leading # is less horrifying than a leading space, and the
depfile that gcc p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65757
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I am thinking its not working, but maybe I do not understand the function. I
created a loop like this (with the patch):
q1 = 233181505644407.q0
q2 = anint (q1)
q3 = 233181505644408.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65757
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:19:13PM +, bugs at dhbailey dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65757
>
> --- Comment #3 from dhbbugs ---
> Has anyone else been able to confirm that S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65757
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456
--- Comment #17 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu Apr 23 00:21:39 2015
New Revision: 222349
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222349&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2015-04-22 Bill Schmidt
PR target/65456
* config/rs6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65853
Bug ID: 65853
Summary: Casting operator is missing ambiguity error (and
happily compiles)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65852
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Paul Robinson from comment #8)
> Admittedly the gcc I have on Windows is *very* old, but it does not
> normalize \ to / before writing the depfile.
I know it is very old, I worked on it before l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Reso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65852
--- Comment #8 from Paul Robinson
---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> Hmm, I thought \ would be converted into / by the time we reach here for
> windows. I wonder if that is the better fix.
Admittedly the gcc I have on Windows is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65852
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, I thought \ would be converted into / by the time we reach here for
windows. I wonder if that is the better fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65757
--- Comment #3 from dhbbugs ---
Has anyone else been able to confirm that Steve Kargl's fix will work? What
has to happen to move this fix into the production code?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65852
--- Comment #6 from Paul Robinson
---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Really for portability using \ and/or # should be avoided.
I accept that, however we do have Windows clients trying to use Make,
so \ is a fact of life.
These a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65852
--- Comment #5 from Paul Robinson
---
Compare how space and # are handled, to see the problem.
They need to be handled the same way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65429
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65852
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Really for portability using \ and/or # should be avoided.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65429
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Apr 22 23:12:30 2015
New Revision: 222343
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222343&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-04-22 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/65429
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65852
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is what the comment says in the source:
/* Given a filename, quote characters in that filename which are
significant to Make. Note that it's not possible to quote all such
characters - e.g. \n, %,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65852
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This was bug 35458 which says it was fixed in 4.4.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65852
Paul Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.8.2
--- Comment #1 from Paul Robinson
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54773
--- Comment #3 from chihin ko ---
g++ 4.8.2 on intel-Linux regress again. DW_TAG_rvalue_reference_type did not
get generated.
g++ 4.8.2 on intel Solaris is broken too.
g++ 4.9.0 works on intel-Linux but not on intel Solaris.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65429
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Apr 22 22:43:46 2015
New Revision: 222342
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222342&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-04-22 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/65429
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65852
Bug ID: 65852
Summary: Incorrect escaping in depfiles
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #3)
> Hi,
> I tried to reproduce the error with a reduced test-case:
>
> #include "arm_neon.h"
>
> float32x2_t a, b, c, e;
>
> int main()
> {
> e = __built
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Created attachment 35386
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35386&action=edit
gzipped C++ source code
The attached code, when compiled by gcc trunk dated 20150422,
with flag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65721
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 22 20:52:57 2015
New Revision: 222338
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222338&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/65721
* name-lookup.c (do_class_using_decl): Complain about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65695
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 22 20:53:02 2015
New Revision: 222339
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222339&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/65695
* cvt.c (cp_fold_convert): Avoid wrapping PTRMEM_CST
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59766
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65727
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 22 20:53:07 2015
New Revision: 222340
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222340&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/65727
* lambda.c (maybe_resolve_dummy): Handle null return.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59766
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 22 20:52:52 2015
New Revision: 222337
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222337&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59766
* decl.c (grokdeclarator): Do not flag friends with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi,
I tried to reproduce the error with a reduced test-case:
#include "arm_neon.h"
float32x2_t a, b, c, e;
int main()
{
e = __builtin_neon_vmls_lanev2sf (a, b, c, 0);
return 0;
}
ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60758
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65304
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65326
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65711
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65767
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48904
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2013-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65067
--- Comment #13 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #12)
> fixed ?
yes, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65067
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65778
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65850
--- Comment #2 from Dâniel Fraga ---
Without graphite optimization, it compiles fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65850
--- Comment #1 from Dâniel Fraga ---
Created attachment 35385
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35385&action=edit
Unified_cpp_layout_base0.ii
I had to bzip2 it because of the size. Sorry.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65850
Bug ID: 65850
Summary: 5.1 regression [graphite]: isl_constraint.c:625:
expecting integer value
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65849
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65849
Bug ID: 65849
Summary: Add missing tuning knobs to #pragma target/attribute
target support
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65818
--- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-04-22 12:40 PM, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> this patch is more conservative
Restarted test with updated patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59970
--- Comment #4 from Mike Crowe ---
The test case in comment #3 shows the same problem in gcc-5-branch r222333.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59971
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65818
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmm, this patch has failures for x86_64:
- va_arg (ap, void):
gcc.c-torture/compile/pr48767.c
- vla:
gcc.c-torture/execute/20020412-1.c
gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-22
gcc.dg/lto/20090706
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65846
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65296
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Apr 22 16:14:50 2015
New Revision: 222333
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222333&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from trunk r222179.
2015-04-17 Sivanupandi Pitchumani
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
--- Comment #7 from Manue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65848
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Sutton ---
Here's the result of the latest commit (r222332) on my system. test.cpp is the
program in the bug report.
Command being timed: "~/opt/bin/g++ -std=c++1z -c test.cpp"
User time (seconds): 0.04
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65848
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Sutton ---
This is caused by the use of a concept outside of a requires clause -- it's
still a bug though. The TS doesn't actually include wording that would allow
this program to be valid.
Unfortunately, the first thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65841
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I confirm the segfault with my clean trees for all variants (4.8 and 4.9 give
an ICE).
However I don't see them on my patched trees having Mikael's patch for pr65792
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65848
Bug ID: 65848
Summary: [c++-concepts] High memory usage and compilation times
for subsuming concept chains; regression from r211824
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65847
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65836
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64905
Ruben Ayrapetyan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
20150422 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59970
Mike Crowe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mac at mcrowe dot com
--- Comment #3 from M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65836
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Bisection confirmed that it's r222173:
Author: vries
Date: Fri Apr 17 09:26:59 2015 +
Postpone expanding va_arg until pass_stdarg
2015-04-17 Tom de Vries
Michael M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65846
Bug ID: 65846
Summary: Optimize data access in PIE with copy reloc
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64916
--- Comment #9 from Alex Velenko ---
Jeff, thank you for noticing this. I don't mind this time, I just hope this
would not happen next time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64916
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Alex, you're right. It's just an artifact which patch I pulled out of my todo
list. Your patches are effectively doing the same thing. If you'd like I can
add you to the ChangeLog entry for the fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65845
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65841
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61551
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |6.0
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65845
Bug ID: 65845
Summary: typeid doesn't work consistently on pure virtual
classes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65844
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63256
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56974
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62211
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65501
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64099
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65717
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64132
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59971
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64022
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64905
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64785
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65737
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #58 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51747
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63782
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65689
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64289
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
