[Bug target/65810] powerpc64 libgfortran alignment issue?

2015-04-19 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65810 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/65801] [5/6 Regression] Allow -Wno-narrowing to silence stricter C++11 narrowing rules

2015-04-19 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65801 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Comm

[Bug target/65810] powerpc64 libgfortran alignment issue?

2015-04-19 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65810 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- amodra@bns:~/build/gcc-5-virgin> gcc/gfortran -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc/gfortran Target: powerpc64-linux Configured with: /home/amodra/src/gcc-5-virgin/configure --build=powerpc64-linux --with-cpu

[Bug target/65810] powerpc64 libgfortran alignment issue?

2015-04-19 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65810 --- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #1) > I am not seeing it show up on any of the automatic testers. I tried to > access the Power7 machine I usually use and can't get in (comm problems). There is the

[Bug target/65810] powerpc64 libgfortran alignment issue?

2015-04-19 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65810 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

2015-04-19 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #35196|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/65810] New: powerpc64 libgfortran alignment issue?

2015-04-19 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65810 Bug ID: 65810 Summary: powerpc64 libgfortran alignment issue? Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug rtl-optimization/65805] [5/6 Regression] Chromium gets miscompiled

2015-04-19 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65805 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Sun Apr 19 23:48:24 2015 New Revision: 23 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=23&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-04-19 Vladimir Makarov PR rtl-optimization/65805 *

[Bug other/62279] Demangler crash

2015-04-19 Thread jon.turney at dronecode dot org.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 jon.turney at dronecode dot org.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jon.turney at droneco

[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

2015-04-19 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Before the patch series, at 011.cfg we had this representation: ... ;; basic block 2, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 0, maybe hot ;;prev block 0, next block 3, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE) ;;pred:

[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

2015-04-19 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- The assert triggering is: ... (gdb) #5 0x011325fe in redirect_eh_edge_1 (edge_in=0x764af4d0, new_bb=0x764ae4e0, change_region=true) at src/gcc/tree-eh.c:2335 2335 gcc_assert (

[Bug debug/65809] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/pr65771.c -gstabs+* -O* (test for excess errors)

2015-04-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65809 Bug ID: 65809 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/pr65771.c -gstabs+* -O* (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/65808] New: -pedantic -std=gnu11 results in warning for transparent_union usage

2015-04-19 Thread equinox-gccbugs at diac24 dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65808 Bug ID: 65808 Summary: -pedantic -std=gnu11 results in warning for transparent_union usage Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug rtl-optimization/65805] [5/6 Regression] Chromium gets miscompiled

2015-04-19 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65805 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3) > It is clearer to see the issue if one compiles the whole file with > -fno-lra-remat: > > markus@x4 Release % g++ -S -fno-lra-remat -fPIC -fvisibility=hi

[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

2015-04-19 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- This patch allows the example to pass: ... diff --git a/gcc/passes.def b/gcc/passes.def index ffa63b5..041197c 100644 --- a/gcc/passes.def +++ b/gcc/passes.def @@ -344,7 +344,6 @@ along with GCC; se

[Bug rtl-optimization/65805] [5/6 Regression] Chromium gets miscompiled

2015-04-19 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65805 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- It is clearer to see the issue if one compiles the whole file with -fno-lra-remat: markus@x4 Release % g++ -S -fno-lra-remat -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pthread -march=x86-64 -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno-rt

[Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian

2015-04-19 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian

2015-04-19 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787 --- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Sun Apr 19 16:53:22 2015 New Revision: 22 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=22&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc] 2015-04-18 Bill Schmidt Jakub Jelinek Backport

[Bug target/65787] [5 Regression] Miscompile due to bad vector swap optimization for little endian

2015-04-19 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65787 --- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Sun Apr 19 16:51:12 2015 New Revision: 21 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=21&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc] 2015-04-18 Bill Schmidt Jakub Jelinek Backport

[Bug target/65807] [5 Regression] ICE () on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

2015-04-19 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65807 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65807] New: [5 Regression] ICE () on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

2015-04-19 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
model: posix gcc version 5.0.1 20150419 (prerelease) [gcc-5-branch revision 222064] (Ubuntu 5.1~rc1-0ubuntu12)

[Bug libstdc++/65806] NetBSD's expects __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS and __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS

2015-04-19 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65806 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- It's fixed in NetBSD 7: http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/stdint.h?rev=1.7&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&only_with_tag=MAIN

[Bug libstdc++/65806] New: NetBSD's expects __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS and __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS

2015-04-19 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65806 Bug ID: 65806 Summary: NetBSD's expects __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS and __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgcc/62097] mipsel-sde-elf build fails on OS X 10.7 host

2015-04-19 Thread Anders.Montonen at iki dot fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62097 --- Comment #2 from Anders Montonen --- Behaviour is the same with GCC 4.9.2 and GCC 5.0.1 RC-20150418, on OS X 10.10 with Xcode 6.3 tools (clang --version: Apple LLVM version 6.1.0 (clang-602.0.49) (based on LLVM 3.6.0svn))

[Bug rtl-optimization/65805] [5/6 Regression] Chromium gets miscompiled

2015-04-19 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65805 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- markus@x4 Release % g++ -S -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pthread -march=x86-64 -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -std=gnu++11 -Wall -c file_util.ii -o ass_good markus@x4 Release % diff -u ass_good ass

[Bug rtl-optimization/65805] [5/6 Regression] Chromium gets miscompiled

2015-04-19 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65805 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/65802] [6 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2335

2015-04-19 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65802 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/61135] It seems to be not able to call virtual method of literal object in lambda expression

2015-04-19 Thread lc289dafd7ybme05se at softbank dot ne.jp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61135 --- Comment #9 from lc289dafd7ybme05se at softbank dot ne.jp --- right. i don't know why, but template is also needed, to invoke the error.

[Bug c++/61135] It seems to be not able to call virtual method of literal object in lambda expression

2015-04-19 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61135 --- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to lc289dafd7ybme05se from comment #7) > 仮想継承の時もエラーになるみたいですね。 To save some clicking, Google translate said: "It seems to be an error even when the virtual inheritance."

[Bug tree-optimization/65805] New: [5/6 Regression] Chromium gets miscompiled

2015-04-19 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65805 Bug ID: 65805 Summary: [5/6 Regression] Chromium gets miscompiled Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-opt