https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65507
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509
Bug ID: 65509
Summary: [C++11] GCC rejects operator== with two distinct
pointers as not constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65502
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
The following patch makes ipa-pure-const to detect these functions as
pure/const.
There are two issues
1) I think we should preserve clobber semantic when removing a call to
pure/const
destructor. I wonde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65460
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat Mar 21 22:22:52 2015
New Revision: 221562
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221562&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Mark offloaded functions as parallelized
2015-03-21 Tom de Vri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65458
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat Mar 21 22:22:44 2015
New Revision: 221561
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221561&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Mark omp thread functions as parallelized
2015-03-21 Tom de Vr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27557
--- Comment #16 from Matthew Krafczyk ---
I've just checked this bug again with ubuntu 14.10. This is with glibc 2.19,
and with the master branch of gcc (commit
3c4e189973c43b7f3c2ebb27abf32e9cb175ba82).
The first fragment succeeds, but the seco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65508
Bug ID: 65508
Summary: ICE: in initialize_inlined_parameters, at
tree-inline.c:3305 with -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx
and nested function
Product: gcc
Version: 5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65507
--- Comment #1 from Johannes Bauer ---
Created attachment 35089
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35089&action=edit
Preprocessed file (-save-temps)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65507
Bug ID: 65507
Summary: avr-gcc -f-merge-all-constants causes internal
compiler error in get_section, at varasm.c:312
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le |powerpc64-*-*
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58684
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60939
--- Comment #9 from David Edelsohn ---
-bkeepfile probably will produce more SVR4-like semantics, but I suspect the
-bkeepfile and replicating each object file name probably can blow out the
argument list length limit. The object files can be fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65506
Bug ID: 65506
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr29215.c scan-tree-dump-not gimple
"memcpy"
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
--- Comment #12 from Sebastian Beyer ---
Hi, I'm the author of the original post on stackoverflow.
I am not sure if this is relevant, but I can suppress the error if I add an
arbitrary print statement at the end of the function.
Also changing the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
--- Comment #11 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Created attachment 35087
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35087&action=edit
diff of assembly from reduced testcase at -O2 -mtune=core2 and -O2
-mtune=generic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
--- Comment #10 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Created attachment 35086
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35086&action=edit
assembly from reduced testcase at -O2 -mtune=core2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
--- Comment #9 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Created attachment 35085
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35085&action=edit
assembly from reduced testcase at -O2 -mtune=generic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61138
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61138
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Morin ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sat Mar 21 15:45:13 2015
New Revision: 221556
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221556&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from trunk:
2015-03-14 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65505
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65505
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sh*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65505
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
Created attachment 35084
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35084&action=edit
possible patch
The problem here is that sh_disp_addr_displacement gets an address that looks
like:
(plus:SI (subreg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Reduced test case:
program testbug
implicit none
integer, parameter :: STRLEN = 256
type :: ncVarnames_t
! variables names for the different ice models
character (len=STRLEN) :: surf
charac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61138
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sat Mar 21 15:15:19 2015
New Revision: 221555
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221555&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/61138
fortran/
* trans-expr.c (gfc_trans_pointer_assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
@@ -6930,7 +6931,9 @@ resolve_allocate_expr (gfc_expr *e, gfc_
goto failure;
}
- if (code->ext.alloc.ts.type == BT_CHARACTER && !e->ts.deferred)
+ /* Check F08:C632. */
+ if (code->ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
--- Comment #56 from doug mcilroy ---
(In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #55)
Comment #55 overlooks the Standard's translation phase 1, which replaces an
implementation-defined end-of-line indicator with a new-line character. GCC's
convention of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65505
Bug ID: 65505
Summary: [5 Regression][SH] ICE in sh_disp_addr_displacement
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
--- Comment #6 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to howarth from comment #5)
Also, as on linux, using '-O2 -mtune=generic -fsanitize=address' suppresses the
error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at bromo dot med
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
... and -fsanitize=address also makes the bug go away. Seems to be quite
picky.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
It may be target dependent. I can reproduce this on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu .
By the way, -fno-gcse cures it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I don't see it on x86_64-apple-darwin14: I get
hello
surf
bed
bed
surf
with all the revisions and options I have tested.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #1 from Tho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65492
--- Comment #10 from Allan Jensen ---
Just make things more complicated, I just tried the test on a Haswell, and
surprisingly disabling if-convert or tree-vectorize on -O3 has no effect on
performance, but activating tree-vectorize on -O2 does.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
Bug ID: 65504
Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] select case with strings and -fgcse
-O
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65458
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65458
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat Mar 21 10:14:10 2015
New Revision: 221551
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221551&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Mark omp thread functions as parallelized
2015-03-21 Tom de Vr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65503
Bug ID: 65503
Summary: g++ string array in struct crash
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
Also the number of statements is about the same at .cfg dump, so it is .ssa
that introduces all the differences. Why?
43 matches
Mail list logo