[Bug go/63731] Fallback to netgo does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731 --- Comment #25 from Tatsushi Inagaki --- What is the most recommended way when we want to use the net package in a statically linked binary? My impression is that a statically linked binary also should call dlopen() (and thus we should export LD

[Bug target/65249] unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS' when compiling protobuf on sh4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65249 --- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Created attachment 34898 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34898&action=edit Preprocessed source file for protobuf 2.6.1 (gzipped)

[Bug target/65249] New: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS' when compiling protobuf on sh4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65249 Bug ID: 65249 Summary: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS' when compiling protobuf on sh4 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug testsuite/63175] [4.9/5 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-bb-slp-9a.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2" basic block vectorized using SLP" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175 --- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor --- Richard, thank you for the patch. It resolves the regression in the quality of the code generated for the test on ppc64 (I am yet to test other ppc variants). Unfortunately, while working on an improved tes

[Bug bootstrap/65232] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure (ICE in change_symbol_block, at varasm.c:1230) on arm-linux-gnueabihf, in libstdc++ stage1

-save-temps, and post the .ii file? /build/buildd/gcc-5-5-20150227/build/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/build/buildd/gcc-5-5-20150227/build/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/build/buildd/gcc-5-5-20150227/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/src -L/build/buildd/gcc-5-5-20150227/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3

[Bug target/65248] New: [5 Regression] Copy relocation in PIE against protected symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 Bug ID: 65248 Summary: [5 Regression] Copy relocation in PIE against protected symbol Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug rtl-optimization/65247] [missed optimisation] Reading a callee-saved register writes to the stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65247 --- Comment #1 from Adam Warner --- CLANG bug report:

[Bug rtl-optimization/65247] New: [missed optimisation] Reading a callee-saved register writes to the stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65247 Bug ID: 65247 Summary: [missed optimisation] Reading a callee-saved register writes to the stack Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhance

[Bug c/65244] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244 --- Comment #12 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- The issue also exists in current gcc-4_9-branch but applying r217317 doesn't eliminate it there.

[Bug c/65244] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|manu at gcc

[Bug target/65242] [5 Regression] ICE (in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4761) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242 --- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner --- The debugger shows: #1 0x10d0d2ec in gen_add2_insn (x=0x3fffb57ddf08, y=0x3fffb57dded8) at /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-PR65242/gcc/optabs.c:4761 4761 gcc_assert (insn_operand_matches

[Bug ipa/65236] [5 Regression]: IPA ICF causes miscompilation in Chromium built with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- This is the code generated for thunk: _Z5test11A: .LFB12: .c

[Bug ipa/65236] [5 Regression]: IPA ICF causes miscompilation in Chromium built with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/65244] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- This works in GCC 5.0.

[Bug rtl-optimization/64317] [5 Regression] Ineffective allocation of PIC base register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317 --- Comment #16 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Feb 27 22:02:05 2015 New Revision: 221070 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221070&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-27 Vladimir Makarov PR target/64317 * params.de

[Bug ipa/65245] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in address_matters_p, at symtab.c:1908

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65245 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/65244] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244 --- Comment #9 from Ulf Magnusson --- Created attachment 34897 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34897&action=edit Reduce testcase using __builtin_posix_memalign(). The warning goes away with -fno-builtin. I didn't realize pos

[Bug fortran/61960] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_component_ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61960 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #3 from Domin

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug ipa/65245] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in address_matters_p, at symtab.c:1908

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65245 --- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Created attachment 34893 [details] > Suggested patch > > I've been testing following patch. FYI: I tested this patch on MIPS and it works for me.

[Bug c/65244] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244 --- Comment #8 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- I wonder if this is the same issue as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63748 which was fixed in trunk by r217317... 2014-11-10 Patrick Palka gcc/ PR middle-end/63748

[Bug c/65244] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244 --- Comment #7 from Ulf Magnusson --- Created attachment 34895 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34895&action=edit Headerless version Sorry -- thought my previous action would edit the attachment directly. I've now attached a

[Bug c/65244] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244 --- Comment #6 from Ulf Magnusson --- Comment on attachment 34894 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34894 -Wmaybe-uninitialized-warning with -Og with GCC 4.9.1 void exit(int __status) __attribute__ ((__noreturn__)); int posix_

[Bug c/65244] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Ulf Magnusson from comment #4) > Created attachment 34894 [details] > -Wmaybe-uninitialized-warning with -Og with GCC 4.9.1 > > The testcase was in the comment. I'm attaching it. Please r

[Bug ipa/65245] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in address_matters_p, at symtab.c:1908

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65245 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- Hi, why do you try to merge aliases? Those should be filtered out - it is enough to merge the actual definitions (with a body) Honza

[Bug c/65244] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244 --- Comment #4 from Ulf Magnusson --- Created attachment 34894 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34894&action=edit -Wmaybe-uninitialized-warning with -Og with GCC 4.9.1 The testcase was in the comment. I'm attaching it. I don

[Bug c/65244] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244 howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at bromo dot med

[Bug c/65244] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/65246] New: [5 Regression] libstdc++ pretty printers don't work anymore with Python3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65246 Bug ID: 65246 Summary: [5 Regression] libstdc++ pretty printers don't work anymore with Python3 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/65233] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233 --- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez --- FWIW, I also ran valgrind on cc1plus just for good measure, to see if we were hitting some uninitialized memory issues, but I came out empty handed: reynosa:/dev/shm/t/gcc$ valgrind --leak-check=no --track-

[Bug ipa/65245] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in address_matters_p, at symtab.c:1908

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65245 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 34893 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34893&action=edit Suggested patch I've been testing following patch.

[Bug ipa/65245] New: [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in address_matters_p, at symtab.c:1908

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65245 Bug ID: 65245 Summary: [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in address_matters_p, at symtab.c:1908 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug libfortran/65234] Output descriptor (*(1E15.7)) not accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65234 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/65128] remove "linux" and "unix" from preprocessor macros from cpp-5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65128 --- Comment #3 from Shawn Landden --- Created attachment 34892 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34892&action=edit remove legacy includes

[Bug target/65233] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65233 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/65242] [5 Regression] ICE (in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4761) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- shorter testcase from another package: $ g++ -c -g -O3 -Wno-write-strings Channel.ii Channel.ii: In member function 'void C::m_fn2()': Channel.ii:46:1: internal compiler error: in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/65244] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244 --- Comment #1 from Ulf Magnusson --- This warning did not occur for GCC 4.8.2 (or whatever the most recent GCC version is on Ubuntu 14.04) by the way.

[Bug c/65244] New: Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244 Bug ID: 65244 Summary: Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with posix_memalign() and -Og Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/65242] [5 Regression] ICE (in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4761) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- > > > > On Darwin we also see: > > gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c (all cases fail) > > Didin't Martin analyze this failure as the test case just needing "/* { > dg-require-alias "" } */"? > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bu

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Feb 27 16:56:57 2015 New Revision: 221065 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221065&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/65237 * gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c: Add -fno-ipa-icf * gc

[Bug preprocessor/65238] [5 Regression] __has_attribute is not handled properly with -traditional-cpp.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug lto/65243] New: [5 Regression] lto1 ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65243 Bug ID: 65243 Summary: [5 Regression] lto1 ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug target/65242] New: [5 Regression] ICE (in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4761) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65242 Bug ID: 65242 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4761) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- > > FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-cp-1.c scan-ipa-dump cp "Alignment 2" > FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-cp-2.c scan-ipa-dump cp "Alignment 8, misalignment 4" Sorry, these was unintentinal commits, I will revert them soon. > FA

[Bug middle-end/65241] New: [5 Regression] ICE (in remove_local_expressions_from_table, at tree-ssa-dom.c:1081) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65241 Bug ID: 65241 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (in remove_local_expressions_from_table, at tree-ssa-dom.c:1081) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 5.0

[Bug target/65240] New: [5 Regression] ICE (insn does not satisfy its constraints) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65240 Bug ID: 65240 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (insn does not satisfy its constraints) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Hmmm... fine line, but maybe this isn't a regression? I guess it isn't a regression in the release branches, but it is wrong-code

[Bug lto/65239] New: typeinfo / VTT for some classes not visibile in shared library when LTO is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65239 Bug ID: 65239 Summary: typeinfo / VTT for some classes not visibile in shared library when LTO is used Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34891 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34891&action=edit Self-contained testcase Here's a testcase with the relevant parts of arm_neon.h extracted. This a

[Bug ipa/65236] [5 Regression]: IPA ICF causes miscompilation in Chromium built with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- There's generated assembly: 0045faa0 <_ZNK6google8protobuf11MessageLite24SerializePartialAsStringEv>: 45faa0:53 push %rbx 45faa1:48 89 fb mov%rd

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez --- --target ?? Could you post a preprocessed source code? Hmmm... fine line, but maybe this isn't a regression?

[Bug c/39438] Can't compile a wrapper around strftime with -Werror=format-nonliteral

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39438 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCO

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- gah, sorry, the field is not wide enough to show the output of git blame properly...

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #1) > Hi. The known to work field is empty. Is this a regression? > > I can't reproduce on a cross build to --target=aarch64-linux by running cc1. > Wh

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > (In reply to howarth from comment #2) > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1) > > > > > > > > On Darwin we also see: > > > gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c (all cases

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Yes, I think the test should be decoared with dg-require-alias. Well, the test used to pass.

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- ((In reply to howarth from comment #2) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1) > > > > > On Darwin we also see: > > gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c (all cases fail) > > Didin't Martin analyze this failure as the

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to howarth from comment #2) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1) > > > > > On Darwin we also see: > > gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c (all cases fail) > > Didin't Martin analyze this failure as the

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at bromo dot med

[Bug preprocessor/65238] [5 Regression] __has_attribute is not handled properly with -traditional-cpp.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/65223] Regresion on elemental type-bound procedure's passed object with INTENT(OUT)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65223 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/65150] [5 Regression] r220875 causes bootstrap failure on x86_64 darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150 --- Comment #25 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- Bootstrap completed at r221041 on x86_64-apple-darwin14 for c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++,java language set.

[Bug c/60296] Confusing -Wformat warning on invalid format string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60296 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/65220] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] integer division in stack alignment for VLA allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/65220] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] integer division in stack alignment for VLA allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220 --- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Fri Feb 27 15:01:57 2015 New Revision: 221064 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221064&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/65220 * config/i386/i386.md (*udivmod4_pow2):

[Bug c/64955] RFE: have -Wformat suggest the correct format string to use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64955 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/64955] RFE: have -Wformat suggest the correct format string to use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64955 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCO

[Bug middle-end/65048] [5 Regression] ICE in add_phi_args_after_copy_edge, at tree-cfg.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65048 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 27 14:34:18 2015 New Revision: 221063 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221063&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/65048 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-9.c: A

[Bug target/65032] [5 Regression] ICE in reload_combine_note_use, at postreload.c:1556 on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65032 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/65223] Regresion on elemental type-bound procedure's passed object with INTENT(OUT)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65223 --- Comment #2 from John --- Changing the ELEMENTAL attribute to PURE produces the same error. If that's the intended behavior, then that's the same as saying type-bound procedures cannot be pure. The thread mentioned by Dominique d'Humieres see

[Bug c/65040] [5 Regression] gcc-5 -Wformat broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65040 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65032] [5 Regression] ICE in reload_combine_note_use, at postreload.c:1556 on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65032 --- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Feb 27 14:15:02 2015 New Revision: 221062 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221062&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-27 Vladimir Makarov PR target/65032 * lra-remat.

[Bug c/65040] [5 Regression] gcc-5 -Wformat broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65040 --- Comment #19 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Feb 27 14:11:53 2015 New Revision: 221061 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221061&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/65040 * doc/invoke.texi: Update to reflect that -Wformat=

[Bug libstdc++/65101] cppcheck for vector.tcc: Variable '__new_finish' is reassigned a value before the old one has been used.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65101 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/64812] [4.9 regression] x86 LibreOffice Build failure: undefined reference to acquire

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64812 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Michael Stahl from comment #9) > interesting ... you are building LO 4.4.1.1 or older? 4.4.1.2

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/64812] [4.9 regression] x86 LibreOffice Build failure: undefined reference to acquire

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64812 Michael Stahl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dtardon at redhat dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug c/65238] New: [5 Regression] __has_attribute is not handled properly with -traditional-cpp.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238 Bug ID: 65238 Summary: [5 Regression] __has_attribute is not handled properly with -traditional-cpp. Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug ipa/65237] New: [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 Bug ID: 65237 Summary: [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa

[Bug ipa/65087] [5 Regression] r220742 causes: ICE: in ipcp_verify_propagated_values, at ipa-cp.c:1057

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65087 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- -fno-ipa-icf fixes the issue from comment 6.

[Bug libgcc/65038] [regression 5] Unable to find ftw.h for libgcov-util.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65038 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/65038] [regression 5] Unable to find ftw.h for libgcov-util.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65038 --- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz --- Author: ktietz Date: Fri Feb 27 13:19:38 2015 New Revision: 221059 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221059&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/65038 * config.in: Regenerated. * configure

[Bug ipa/65236] [5 Regression]: IPA ICF causes miscompilation in Chromium built with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 34889 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34889&action=edit RTL dumps with ICF

[Bug ipa/65236] [5 Regression]: IPA ICF causes miscompilation in Chromium built with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 34888 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34888&action=edit RTL dumps without ICF

[Bug ipa/65236] New: [5 Regression]: IPA ICF causes miscompilation in Chromium built with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236 Bug ID: 65236 Summary: [5 Regression]: IPA ICF causes miscompilation in Chromium built with -Os Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/65228] ICE: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in start_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228 --- Comment #8 from Jan Kratochvil --- Great, thanks.

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.0 |4.8.5

[Bug target/43701] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV (too deep recursion) with -mno-sse and __float128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43701 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libgcc/65038] [regression 5] Unable to find ftw.h for libgcov-util.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65038 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0 Summary|[4.8, 4.9, 5 Reg

[Bug c/65228] ICE: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in start_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/65235] New: [4.8, 4.9, 5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65235 Bug ID: 65235 Summary: [4.8, 4.9, 5 Regression] Simplifying vec_select of vec_concat miscompiles when first element of vec_concat is const_int Product: gcc Versio

[Bug c/65228] ICE: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in start_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Feb 27 12:24:02 2015 New Revision: 221057 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221057&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/65228 * c-decl.c (start_decl): Return NULL_TREE if decl is

[Bug c/65228] ICE: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in start_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Feb 27 12:18:57 2015 New Revision: 221056 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221056&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/65228 * c-decl.c (start_decl): Return NULL_TREE if decl is

[Bug libgcc/65038] [regression 5] Unable to find ftw.h for libgcov-util.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65038 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >