[Bug target/65153] New: sh: "insn does not satisfy its constraints" when compiling libmcrypt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65153 Bug ID: 65153 Summary: sh: "insn does not satisfy its constraints" when compiling libmcrypt Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/65150] bootstrap failure at r220878 on x86_64 darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150 --- Comment #3 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- Also verified that r220886 bootstraps fine on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with r220875 reverted.

[Bug c/64862] printf attribute should accept other string types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64862 --- Comment #5 from Tom Tromey --- I have a patch for this. I think it fixes bug 38308 and bug 20110 as well. It works by adding a new function to libcpp to convert a string back to the source charset. I still have to get a new copyright assig

[Bug c++/65152] New: Several friend function definitions break lookup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65152 Bug ID: 65152 Summary: Several friend function definitions break lookup Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/65151] New: Internal compiler error when trying to build libav 11.2 on sh4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65151 Bug ID: 65151 Summary: Internal compiler error when trying to build libav 11.2 on sh4 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/65134] gccgo ignores the attribute "constructor" in a subdirectory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65134 --- Comment #4 from Tatsushi Inagaki --- I see. Thanks a lot!

[Bug go/65134] gccgo ignores the attribute "constructor" in a subdirectory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65134 --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor --- In principle, sure. In practice, since it's an exported variable, the compiler would have to see the entire program, which can't happen at present. If it ever can, then something else would have to be do

[Bug bootstrap/65150] bootstrap failure at r220878 on x86_64 darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150 --- Comment #2 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- Caused by... r220875 | jakub | 2015-02-20 11:44:37 -0500 (Fri, 20 Feb 2015) | 8 lines PR target/63892 * ipa-icf.c (sem_function::merge): If DECL_COMDAT_GROUP (alias->decl),

[Bug go/65134] gccgo ignores the attribute "constructor" in a subdirectory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65134 --- Comment #2 from Tatsushi Inagaki --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #1) > It's pretty ugly, but a workaround is to drop something like this into > sub.go: > > var AlwaysFalse bool > func init() { > if AlwaysFalse { >

[Bug debug/58315] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Excessive memory use with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315 --- Comment #15 from Aldy Hernandez --- And annoyingly, even stuff as repetitive like this (notice, the same exact `di' register, no offset or anything): (note 11470254 74094 11470255 6371 (var_location this(0x7fffeeac8bd0) (reg:DI 5 di [17204]

[Bug debug/58123] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] debug line not tracked for last autovariable dtor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58123 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/58123] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] debug line not tracked for last autovariable dtor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58123 --- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Sat Feb 21 00:27:05 2015 New Revision: 220886 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220886&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/58123 * gimplify.c (gimplify_expr): Prefer location of

[Bug testsuite/65107] FAIL: gfortran.dg/eof_4.f90, runtime error: File 'test.dat' already exists

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65107 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/65141] ISO_10646 constant parameters convert kind when used with substring references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65141 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/65150] bootstrap failure at r220878 on x86_64 darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150 --- Comment #1 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- Failed for bootstrap using... ../gcc-5-20150220/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc5.0 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc5.0/info --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto

[Bug bootstrap/65150] New: bootstrap failure at r220878 on x86_64 darwin

++/.libs -I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/prev-x86_64-apple-darwin14.3.0/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-apple-darwin14.3.0 -I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/prev-x86_64-apple-darwin14.3.0/libstdc++-v3/include -I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/gcc-5-20150220

[Bug c/65145] size of atomic object is not correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65145 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/65146] alignment of _Atomic structure member is not correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65146 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- It's quite possible there are x86 struct bugs, cf. and .

[Bug tree-optimization/65084] Lack of type narrowing/widening inhibits good vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65084 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Some of the stuff you're doing in that patch matches what I was poking at as well (for a different BZ). There's clearly much room for improvement here and if we weren't in stage4, I'd be pushing harder on e

[Bug c/65145] size of atomic object is not correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65145 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, alexey.lapshin at oracle dot com wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > Could you help me with a link to the correct description of atomic ABI, > which in fact used by gcc/g++, pl

[Bug rtl-optimization/64317] [5 Regression] Ineffective allocation of PIC base register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317 --- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Just trying to help out where I can. It's similar to the round robin use of reload regs we've had in reload for a while. THe idea was to hopefully have reloaded values lying around in a useful place more

[Bug target/65109] [5 Regression] r220674 causes FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc64-abi-1.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65109 --- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Martin, Looks good to me. Can you write a quick ChangeLog for the patch, then post it to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org Something like PR target/65109 * gcc.target/powerpc/ppc64-abi-1.c: Split

[Bug debug/58315] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Excessive memory use with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/65109] [5 Regression] r220674 causes FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc64-abi-1.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65109 --- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Martin, Looks good to me. Can you write a quick ChangeLog for the patch, then post it to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org Something like

[Bug rtl-optimization/65123] [5 regression] lra remat places insn which breaks data flow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65123 Vladimir Makarov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug c/65146] alignment of _Atomic structure member is not correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65146 --- Comment #2 from Alexey Lapshin --- if alignment of atomic object less then it`s size then it could not be lock-free on x86 32. If that object would split across cache lines then the operation would not be atomic. At the same time compiler re

[Bug target/65109] [5 Regression] r220674 causes FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc64-abi-1.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65109 --- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor --- Created attachment 34821 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34821&action=edit Patch to make the test less subject to register clobbering. FWIW, I agree with Richard that the test is overly

[Bug fortran/64432] [5 Regression] SYSTEM_CLOCK(COUNT_RATE=rate) wrong result for integer(4)::rate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64432 --- Comment #27 from Harald Anlauf --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #26) > Created attachment 34819 [details] > Updated full patch. > > Revised to fix error shown in Comment #22 The new patch does indeed fix the error in comment #22,

[Bug c/65145] size of atomic object is not correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65145 --- Comment #2 from Alexey Lapshin --- Hi Joseph, Could you help me with a link to the correct description of atomic ABI, which in fact used by gcc/g++, please ? Thank you, Alexey.

[Bug c++/65147] alignment of std::atomic object is not correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65147 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, alexey.lapshin at oracle dot com wrote: > According to the documentation - > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic/GCCMM/UnalignedPolicy alignment of atomic > object should ma

[Bug c/65146] alignment of _Atomic structure member is not correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65146 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, alexey.lapshin at oracle dot com wrote: > Alignment of single _Atomic object match with documentation : > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic/GCCMM/UnalignedPolicy . That'

[Bug c/65145] size of atomic object is not correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65145 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, alexey.lapshin at oracle dot com wrote: > The size of atomic object does not match with documentation - > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic/GCCMM/UnalignedPolicy specifica

[Bug c++/65149] unaligned atomic object causes Bus Error on SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65149 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Related to PR 62259 -- maybe even a dup.

[Bug libstdc++/64467] [5 Regression] 28_regex/traits/char/isctype.cc and wchar_t/isctype.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- In the POSIX (i.e. "C") locale it should only be space and tab, but implementing that when the target only has 8-bits for the ctype mask and doesn't have a blank class is very difficult. For other locales

[Bug libstdc++/64467] [5 Regression] 28_regex/traits/char/isctype.cc and wchar_t/isctype.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65149] New: unaligned atomic object causes Bus Error on SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65149 Bug ID: 65149 Summary: unaligned atomic object causes Bus Error on SPARC Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/65109] [5 Regression] r220674 causes FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc64-abi-1.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65109 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- The test failure can be avoided by using -fstore-float. The failure is caused by comparing f4 and f9 after f9 has been read from a stack location that hasn't been written to 0x1bac <+92>:

[Bug target/65109] [5 Regression] r220674 causes FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc64-abi-1.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65109 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Yea, I should have realized you'd try that. The other thought that comes to mind is __builtin_saveregs, but that doesn't seem to be implemented on PPC, and even if it was implemented we'd need some way to f

[Bug target/62253] gcc incorrectly mixes direct atomic instructions with calls to atomic library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62253 Alexey Lapshin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexey.lapshin at oracle dot com --- C

[Bug sanitizer/65148] New: ICE: in get_biv_step, at loop-iv.c:823

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65148 Bug ID: 65148 Summary: ICE: in get_biv_step, at loop-iv.c:823 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer

[Bug c++/65147] New: alignment of std::atomic object is not correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65147 Bug ID: 65147 Summary: alignment of std::atomic object is not correct Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c+

[Bug c/65146] New: alignment of _Atomic structure member is not correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65146 Bug ID: 65146 Summary: alignment of _Atomic structure member is not correct Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c/65145] New: size of atomic object is not correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65145 Bug ID: 65145 Summary: size of atomic object is not correct Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug rtl-optimization/30957] Misscompare with variable expansion optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30957 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/64172] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong code with GCC vector extensions on ARM when compiled without NEON

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64172 --- Comment #14 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Feb 20 18:59:02 2015 New Revision: 220877 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220877&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-20 Vladimir Makarov PR target/64172 * ira-color

[Bug target/65109] [5 Regression] r220674 causes FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc64-abi-1.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65109 --- Comment #7 from Richard Henderson --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #6) > Does the test pass if the schedulers are turned off? No. That was the first thing I tried when investigating it.

[Bug target/62251] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62251 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5 Regression] FAIL:|FAIL: |gfortran.dg

[Bug target/65109] [5 Regression] r220674 causes FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc64-abi-1.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65109 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #6 fr

[Bug fortran/65144] New: Problems printing, reading and accessing substrings of ISO_10646 character variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65144 Bug ID: 65144 Summary: Problems printing, reading and accessing substrings of ISO_10646 character variables Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug tree-optimization/65136] [5 Regression] VRP inserts unnecessary constant copy in the loop

20 18:50:30.939970811 +0100 +++ pr65136_5.s 2015-02-20 18:50:36.860907527 +0100 @@ -31,5 +31,5 @@ .LCOLDE0: .text .LHOTE0: - .ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.9.3 20150204 (prerelease) [gcc-4_9-branch revision 220411]" + .ident "GCC: (GNU) 5.0.0 20150220 (experimental)

[Bug c++/65143] [C++11] missing devirtualization for virtual base in "final" classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65143 Balakrishnan B changed: What|Removed |Added CC||balakrishnan.erode at gmail dot co

[Bug c++/65143] New: [C++11] missing devirtualization for virtual base in "final" classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65143 Bug ID: 65143 Summary: [C++11] missing devirtualization for virtual base in "final" classes Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/63888] [5 Regression] bootstrap failed when configured with -with-build-config=bootstrap-asan --disable-werror

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888 --- Comment #35 from Yury Gribov --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #34) > Frankly, I am not at all motivated to do any significant surgery in the llvm > compiler instrumentation because for me everything works fine. Hm, is this re

[Bug c++/65140] crash with function multiversioning and LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65140 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/58315] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Excessive memory use with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315 --- Comment #13 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12) > Just checked r220835 from today and it still takes more than 2GB of virtual > memory. (the compiler has checking enabled, but I doubt that makes a > differen

[Bug lto/64373] [4.9 regression] ICE with lto related to variably modified type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64373 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jens.maurer at gmx dot net --- Comment

[Bug debug/58315] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Excessive memory use with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Just checked r220835 from today and it still takes more than 2GB of virtual memory. (the compiler has checking enabled, but I doubt that makes a difference?)

[Bug target/64331] regcprop propagates registers noted as REG_DEAD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64331 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/64432] [5 Regression] SYSTEM_CLOCK(COUNT_RATE=rate) wrong result for integer(4)::rate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64432 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #34798|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/65136] [5 Regression] VRP inserts unnecessary constant copy in the loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65136 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 20 16:58:11 2015 New Revision: 220876 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220876&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-20 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/65136 * tree

[Bug tree-optimization/65136] [5 Regression] VRP inserts unnecessary constant copy in the loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65136 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/65142] std::random_device Ignores Read Return Code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65142 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- We should do the same, [rand.device] says: Throws: A value of an implementation-defined type derived from exception if a random number could not be obtained.

[Bug debug/58315] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Excessive memory use with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #10) > Is your attached testcase ./cc1plus-ing unmodified? With -O2 -g -fpermissive, yes.

[Bug libstdc++/65142] std::random_device Ignores Read Return Code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65142 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/63892] [5 Regression] gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c fails on darwin with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/63892] [5 Regression] gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c fails on darwin with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 20 16:44:37 2015 New Revision: 220875 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220875&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/63892 * ipa-icf.c (sem_function::merge): If DECL_COMDAT

[Bug tree-optimization/62630] [5 regression] gcc.dg/graphite/vect-pr43423.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62630 --- Comment #17 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, mircea.namolaru at inria dot fr wrote: > Yes, but it seems to me that the cast (not in the original code) should > not be generated at all if it could not be guarantee

[Bug testsuite/64158] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c scan-rtl-dump dse1 "global deletions = (2|3)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64158 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/64158] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c scan-rtl-dump dse1 "global deletions = (2|3)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64158 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Feb 20 16:40:09 2015 New Revision: 220873 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220873&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR testsuite/64158 * gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c: Add two extra {} pairs to

[Bug bootstrap/63888] [5 Regression] bootstrap failed when configured with -with-build-config=bootstrap-asan --disable-werror

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888 --- Comment #34 from Kostya Serebryany --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #31) > Any progress on this? > > If not, I'm considering doing: > --- libsanitizer/asan/asan_globals.cc.jj 2014-11-14 00:10:34.0 > +0100 > +++ libsa

[Bug libstdc++/65142] New: std::random_device Ignores Read Return Code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65142 Bug ID: 65142 Summary: std::random_device Ignores Read Return Code Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lib

[Bug debug/58315] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Excessive memory use with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315 --- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > Hmm, I still see >2GB of memory - just checked with ulimit -v 200 where > 4.7 > succeeds but 4.8, 4.9 and 5 (r220758). > > Thus, re-confirmed. Without va

[Bug fortran/65141] New: ISO_10646 constant parameters convert kind when used with substring references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65141 Bug ID: 65141 Summary: ISO_10646 constant parameters convert kind when used with substring references Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/65140] New: crash with function multiversioning and LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65140 Bug ID: 65140 Summary: crash with function multiversioning and LTO Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug rtl-optimization/65135] [5 Regression] Performance regression in pic mode after r220674.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65135 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug libstdc++/64467] [5 Regression] 28_regex/traits/char/isctype.cc and wchar_t/isctype.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- Is this fixed at r220682 ?

[Bug libstdc++/64695] [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64695 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/64695] [5 Regression] FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64695 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Feb 20 14:40:00 2015 New Revision: 220871 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220871&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/64695 * python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py (StdTuplePri

[Bug target/65138] [5 Regression] testsuite ICEs on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug libstdc++/65122] std::vector doesn't honor element alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65122 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- Oh, and I wonder if there is an aligned realloc (though C++ doesn't define sth like realloc and thus std::vector can't optimize the copy when reallocating?!). But for a C program using posix_memalign or an

[Bug libstdc++/65122] std::vector doesn't honor element alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65122 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Benoit Jacob from comment #13) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12) > > (In reply to Benoit Jacob from comment #11) > > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > > > > But ::

[Bug libstdc++/65122] std::vector doesn't honor element alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65122 --- Comment #13 from Benoit Jacob --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12) > (In reply to Benoit Jacob from comment #11) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > > > But ::operator new(std::size_t) could always return memory a

[Bug target/65139] Improve register allocation for aarch64_*_sisd_or_int3 patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65139 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65139] New: Improve register allocation for aarch64_*_sisd_or_int3 patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65139 Bug ID: 65139 Summary: Improve register allocation for aarch64_*_sisd_or_int3 patterns Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug sanitizer/65112] [5 Regression] -fsanitized=thread Fortran program crashes at startup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65112 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Can't reproduce, works just fine here.

[Bug ipa/65028] [5 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65028 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65138] New: [5 Regression] testsuite ICEs on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138 Bug ID: 65138 Summary: [5 Regression] testsuite ICEs on powerpc64le Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c++/65127] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'addr_expr' in parsing_nsdmi, at cp/parser.c:18311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65127 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/65135] [5 Regression] Performance regression in pic mode after r220674.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65135 --- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- This patch improves performance of almost all benchmarks in pic-mode for 32-bit target, but we have the only huge degradation on benchmark from eembc1.1 suite. I mentioned that the innermost loop has one m

[Bug ipa/65028] [5 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65028 --- Comment #59 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #36) > We end up with algnment unkonwn instead of a. (did not managed to reproduce > the wrong alignment here). What about the following: It is certainly better than w

[Bug middle-end/65082] Wasted cycles when using a register based varible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65082 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target|AVR-GCC |avr Priority|P3

[Bug c++/65137] New: wrong line for missing semicolon after expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65137 Bug ID: 65137 Summary: wrong line for missing semicolon after expression Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug libstdc++/65122] std::vector doesn't honor element alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65122 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Benoit Jacob from comment #11) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > > But ::operator new(std::size_t) could always return memory aligned for the > > most over-aligned type? Thus o

[Bug target/63892] [5 Regression] gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c fails on darwin with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- Thanks for cooperation, I'm going to bootstrap and run regression tests on x86_64-linux-pc and I'm going to clone these tests too. Martin

[Bug libstdc++/65122] std::vector doesn't honor element alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65122 --- Comment #11 from Benoit Jacob --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > But ::operator new(std::size_t) could always return memory aligned for the > most over-aligned type? Thus our default new implementation could use > posix_mema

[Bug c++/65132] diagnostics: missing: bitfield member cannot have an in-class initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65132 --- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #1) > Probably it is just a matter of calling cp_parser_constant_expression with > the right parameters to not emit errors, then checking after it returns t

[Bug libstdc++/65131] Integer overflow in .size() for std::vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65131 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > The ABI says for all 32bit ABIs you cannot allocate more than half of the > address space. X32 can allocate more than 2GB via malloc and ILP32 on ARM64 may also be abl

[Bug rtl-optimization/65135] [5 Regression] Performance regression in pic mode after r220674.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65135 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/65135] [5 Regression] Performance regression in pic mode after r220674.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65135 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- The assembly code generates by r220674 is much shorter: bar: call__x86.get_pc_thunk.ax addl$_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_, %eax movlFPtr@GOTOFF(%eax), %edx movlinc@GOTOFF(%eax), %ecx le

[Bug testsuite/64158] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c scan-rtl-dump dse1 "global deletions = (2|3)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64158 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- It's a restriction of the selector expression parser.

  1   2   >