https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64704
--- Comment #9 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
>what can i do to make the ptr aligned by 16-byte.
Well, you may skip first few bytes (of course not just discard them, but
process one-by-one).
Fortunately, you don't need to do it manually, it can be don
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928
--- Comment #15 from DJ Delorie ---
The binutils team has been working a lot on patching vulnerabilities in the
binutils tools. The m32c, however, has a 3-byte reloc that might occur at the
end of a section, and was implemented as three bytes of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64713
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
It is failing this check:
/* Make sure that the value that is to be substituted for the register
does not use any registers whose values alter in between. However,
If the insns are adjacent, a us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64713
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a testcase which shows one of the issues with removing the optimization
inside expand:
int foo_c (int a, int b)
{
if (a > 9 && b < 34)
return 4;
else
return 26;
}
if the code was:
int foo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64761
--- Comment #4 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Created attachment 34562
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34562&action=edit
patch for dbr_schedule
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64761
--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Even after these changes,
Error: displacement to defined symbol .L59 overflows 12-bit field
remains for va-arg-pack-1.c and a new failure
Error: displacement to defined symbol .L31 overflows 8-bit fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64761
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Created attachment 34561
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34561&action=edit
patch for crossing jump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64761
--- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Created attachment 34560
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34560&action=edit
Update of Joern's patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64761
Bug ID: 64761
Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] -freorder-blocks-and-partition
causes some failures on SH
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64760
Bug ID: 64760
Summary: [SH] Avoid multiple #imm,r0 insns with the same #imm
value
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64751
--- Comment #3 from zzt ---
Created attachment 34559
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34559&action=edit
Add a test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63565
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63565
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Sat Jan 24 00:02:55 2015
New Revision: 220070
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220070&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/63565
* gccgo.texi (Invoking gccgo): Mention that Go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64759
--- Comment #2 from Lakshay Garg ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> !x is the same as x == 0.0 and yes sometimes it make sense to compare
> against zero.
It makes sense to compare against 0 but not 0.0 . NOT operation makes sense
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64510
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64510
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 23 23:52:36 2015
New Revision: 220069
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220069&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/64510
* go.test/go-test.exp (go-gc-tests): Skip nilpt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64573
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64759
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.2 |unknown
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64573
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 23 23:45:04 2015
New Revision: 220068
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220068&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/64573
syscall: Restore line somehow lost in libgo merge.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64759
Bug ID: 64759
Summary: The compiler does NOT show a warning in a case where
it is reasonable to expect a warning message.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64725
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64725
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 23 23:22:29 2015
New Revision: 220067
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220067&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/64725
runtime: Disable tests that require that a finalize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64738
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64738
--- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 23 23:11:59 2015
New Revision: 220066
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220066&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/64738
* Makefile.am (AM_LDFLAGS): Remove -static-libg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64758
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Ridge ---
By comparison, clang's error is:
test.cpp:1:14: error: unknown type name 'uint32_t'
enum Waldo : uint32_t {
^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64758
Bug ID: 64758
Summary: [C++11] Give better error message when name of enum's
base type cannot be resolved
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64754
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02141.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64257
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757
Bug ID: 64757
Summary: internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at
fold-const.c:2353
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #20 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 23 22:26:41 2015
New Revision: 220064
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220064&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/64595
* go-lang.c (go_langhook_init_options_struct):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64756
Bug ID: 64756
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64722
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64340
tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64727
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64754
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64755
Bug ID: 64755
Summary: Error in optimization with std::array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64754
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64722
--- Comment #14 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #13)
>
> Ilya: I can't speak to the correctness of the above code or patch, but
> r220044 fixes the original issue I ran into. Do you want me to keep this
> bug open
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64342
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64754
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
The function in question is
ipa_icf::sem_function::bb_dict_test(auto_vec, int, int) [clone .1]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Jan 23 20:15:56 2015
New Revision: 220060
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220060&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-23 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/64317
* lra-lives.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64754
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
The difference is
--- ipa-icf.s2015-01-23 12:03:20.086849827 -0800
+++ ../stage1-gcc/ipa-icf.s2015-01-23 12:03:14.307833745 -0800
@@ -10348,43 +10348,45 @@
.ascii"\322\306L\372\225Mi\361\0373\342\
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63637
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] CSE on |[4.9 Regression] CSE on x86
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64727
--- Comment #16 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #15)
> Should be fixed now.
Confirmed on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with...
make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg-torture.exp=darwin-cfstring-3.C
--target_boar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64737
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64734
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60663
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 23 19:55:16 2015
New Revision: 220059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220059&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/63637
PR rtl-optimization/60663
* cse.c (m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63637
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 23 19:55:16 2015
New Revision: 220059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220059&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/63637
PR rtl-optimization/60663
* cse.c (m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #19 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Jan 23 19:49:53 2015
New Revision: 220057
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220057&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/64595
runtime: Don't crash in runtime_callers if no debu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64474
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The ICE has been fixed between revisions r197010 (2013-03-23, ICE) and r197238
(2013-03-29, compile), likely the monster commit r197053 for a lot of PRs
(pr38536, ..., pr56378). AFAICR this commit is t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64739
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64737
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 23 18:33:31 2015
New Revision: 220055
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220055&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR driver/64737
* gcc.c (print_configuration): Don't print a blank
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64734
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 23 18:30:51 2015
New Revision: 220054
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220054&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/64734
* omp-low.c (scan_sharing_clauses): Don't igno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64734
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jan 23 18:19:50 2015
New Revision: 220053
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220053&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/64734
* omp-low.c (scan_sharing_clauses): Don't igno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64557
--- Comment #4 from wmi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wmi
Date: Fri Jan 23 17:55:32 2015
New Revision: 220051
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220051&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from trunk.
2015-01-22 Wei Mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #9 from venture37 at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to torvald from comment #8)
> Can somebody with access to a powerpc-apple-darwin8 check whether this bug
> is still present in SVN trunk? Thanks!
Sure thing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173
--- Comment #16 from Jiong Wang ---
After some work on this issue, things have gone beyond my expectations. To
summarize my understanding of this issue and what I have got:
Reason of regression
==
the testcase contains a loop which is hotc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29842
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #4)
> >
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10373
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10378
>
> These two issues have been now been fixed in b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52695
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64603
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64701
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64314
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928
--- Comment #14 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Fri Jan 23 16:32:34 2015
New Revision: 220048
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220048&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-23 Bernd Edlinger
PR target/50928
* confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64727
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64721
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57510
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 23 16:30:00 2015
New Revision: 220047
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220047&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/64314
PR c++/57510
* typeck2.c (split_nonconstant_init_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64314
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 23 16:30:00 2015
New Revision: 220047
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220047&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/64314
PR c++/57510
* typeck2.c (split_nonconstant_init_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64721
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64701
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 23 16:29:46 2015
New Revision: 220046
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220046&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/64701
* constexpr.c (maybe_constant_value): Just hand back
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64751
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64722
--- Comment #13 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Ilya Enkovich from comment #11)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #10)
> > which led to investigating this code in ix86_conditional_register_usage:
> > 4394 j = PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64722
--- Comment #12 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Jan 23 15:57:42 2015
New Revision: 220044
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220044&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/64722: fix corruption of %ebx on 32-bit i386 with libgccjit
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64672
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Status|ASSIGNE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Bastiaan Jacques from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> > i.e. it's not broken, it's missing, and that's by design.
>
> So is it the intention of the GCC developers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64707
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, lto,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64754
Bug ID: 64754
Summary: [5 Regression] bootstrap with
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64752
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #0)
> Some hosts won't have "file" installed, and the output of "file" seems to
> vary enough from host to host that this test can never be made sane.
For example, on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64421
Andrew Senkevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61594
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Marlier ---
GCC 4.8.3 and 4.9.1 still fail with an ICE. Please adjust the version in the PR
and change the status.
(I did not test 4.8.4 and 4.9.2 but I can test it).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64753
Bug ID: 64753
Summary: Redundant cmp instruction on x86_64
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52695
--- Comment #8 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can this bug be closed? It sounds as if this has been fixed in 4.8 already;
given that TM is experimental, backporting the fix is probably not worth it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64727
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 23 14:59:10 2015
New Revision: 220041
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220041&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/64727
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_constant_expression): Allow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61594
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56801
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64752
Bug ID: 64752
Summary: Eliminate use of "file" from the jit testsuite
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: jit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64751
--- Comment #1 from zzt ---
*** Bug 64750 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64750
zzt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62286
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64751
Bug ID: 64751
Summary: internal compiler error: in gen_type_die_with_usage,
at dwarf2out.c:19486
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64734
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #18 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to David Woodhouse from comment #17)
> unsigned or(struct pkt *p)
gcc 5.0 optimizes the above case ...
> unsigned add(struct pkt *p)
... but not this one. Probably just the case of missing match
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62286
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #2)
> (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #1)
> > Because the Cortex-M3 doesn't have those instructions ? It's a testism
> > probably fixed by an appropria
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #17 from David Woodhouse ---
Er, yes. Sorry, I originally tried it with uint16_t but it wasn't even using
movbe for the pointer_abuse() function then, so I made it 32-bit instead.
Badly. Come to think of it, the lack of movbe in the 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64744
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Alexander Basov from comment #4)
> (In reply to ktkachov from comment #3)
> > Confirmed as well on all release branches.
>
> Ok, If you have no any objections, I'd like to fix it.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64750
Bug ID: 64750
Summary: internal compiler error: in gen_type_die_with_usage,
at dwarf2out.c:19486
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64741
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The C FE does for vars with flexible array members with initializers:
DECL_SIZE (decl)
= size_binop (PLUS_EXPR, DECL_SIZE (decl), TYPE_SIZE (type));
DECL_SIZE_UNIT (decl)
= size_bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #16 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to David Woodhouse from comment #15)
> {
> return (p->data[0] << 24) | (p->data[1] << 16) | (p->data[2] << 8) |
> p->data[1];
> }
p->data[3] ?
> unsigned add(struct pkt *p)
> {
> retur
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
