https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64300
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64610
Bug ID: 64610
Summary: No -Wbool-compare warning on "(0 != a) >= 0"
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64609
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||49706
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64609
Bug ID: 64609
Summary: No -Wbool-compare warning on "(a = 0 && 0) <= 4"
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64559
--- Comment #3 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> Seems to be fixed by same patch as PR64068
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 64068 ***
Jan, strictly speaking, this cannot be a duplicate of PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64559
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64068
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61632
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #26 from Jerry D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64068
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jan 15 04:06:02 2015
New Revision: 219632
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219632&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Jerry DeLisle
PR target/61933
* gfortran.dg/inq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jan 15 03:57:29 2015
New Revision: 219631
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219631&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/61933
* io/inquire
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jan 15 03:51:16 2015
New Revision: 219630
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219630&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/61933
* io.c (gfc_matc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #21 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
One potential issue could be that src/x86/ffitarget.h has changed
FFI_TRAMPOLINE_SIZE from 10 to 12 for X86_DARWIN which is used in darwin.S...
#define RAW_CLOSURE_CIF_OFFSET ((FFI_TRAMPOLI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64593
--- Comment #3 from Jacek Sieka ---
I've run a few more tests, and it turns out the culprit is profiledbootstrap.
'make profiledbootstrap' fails even when bootstrap-lto is taken out from the
configure line.
Plain 'make' works both with and wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #19 from Richard Henderson ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #18)
> Those are files specific to darwin, but I don't think they are the only one
> used to build libffi.
99%.
Anyway, it doesn't matter. One of you fol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53987
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo ---
Another related issue is this example function:
unsigned char h (unsigned char a, int b)
{
return (unsigned char)(a + b);
}
compiling with -O2 -mrenesas (which allows undefined high bits in the return
value):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63522
tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44982
tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64608
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
But @ and $ aren't part of the basic source character set. See 2.3
[lex.charset].
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > What about the other files used by darwin?
>
> darwin.S is also unchanged.
Those are files specific to darwin, but I don't think they are the only one
used to build libffi.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #17 from Richard Henderson ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #15)
> What about the other files used by darwin?
darwin.S is also unchanged.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64608
Bug ID: 64608
Summary: Raw string delimiter fails to allow @ or $
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
This may be a dup of PR 64607 or PR 64581.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64314
--- Comment #2 from Lars Gullik Bjønnes ---
I still see this, but with current gcc5 the call stack has become a bit
deeper, instead of 5 calls to walk_tree_1 I now see 9 calls.
(with -std=gnu++14 in this case.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64607
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64218
Lars Gullik Bjønnes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||larsbj at gullik dot net
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64581
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53988
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed Jan 14 23:46:34 2015
New Revision: 219623
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219623&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/53988
* config/sh/sh-protos.h (sh_find_set_of_reg):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64300
--- Comment #4 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
I think this has been addressed with r218760 by Makarov. Can we
close this as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Running target unix-m64
> ERROR: couldn't load description file for unix-m64
I think it is pr64607.
> Well, then you'll have to figure out what else could have changed
> between r219474 and r21947
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64607
Bug ID: 64607
Summary: [5 Regression] Multilib test stops working in libffi
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64607
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64606
Bug ID: 64606
Summary: multiple warnings in arm target code
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58671
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59994
Bug 59994 depends on bug 58671, which changed state.
Bug 58671 Summary: [c++11] ICE with thread_local and self-referential variable
initialization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58671
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58671
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jan 14 22:28:07 2015
New Revision: 219621
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219621&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-01-14 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58671
* decl2.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64605
Bug ID: 64605
Summary: [5 Regression] ERROR: (DejaGnu) proc
"libatomic_target_compile lto1738.c lto1738.o object
additional_flags=-flto" does not exist.
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64513
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 14 22:04:49 2015
New Revision: 219618
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219618&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-01-12 Jakub Jelinek
PR targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64603
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17836
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jan 14 21:51:09 2015
New Revision: 219616
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219616&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Correct target selector in -mfentry tests
-fprofile -mfentry works
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64604
Bug ID: 64604
Summary: [5 Regression] r212194 causes zsh miscompilation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64520
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 58777, which changed state.
Bug 58777 Summary: Taking address of variant/union member is not always a
constant expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58777
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58777
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64356
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64603
Bug ID: 64603
Summary: [5 Regression] bogus error "no matching function for
call to ..." with templates
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64602
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill ---
Created attachment 34451
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34451&action=edit
Preprocessed source of libssp/ssp.c that trips error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64602
Bug ID: 64602
Summary: h8300 ICE building libssp/ssp.c ICE, in
maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2308
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64586
--- Comment #5 from Aaron Sawdey ---
This is also fixed by 219556.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64578
paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.richard.thom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64286
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 14 20:24:05 2015
New Revision: 219614
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219614&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-01-13 Jakub Jelinek
PR rtl-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64528
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 14 20:22:47 2015
New Revision: 219613
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219613&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-01-13 Jakub Jelinek
PR fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64563
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 14 20:21:49 2015
New Revision: 219612
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219612&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-01-12 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64600
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill ---
(In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #1)
> Created attachment 34450 [details]
> Preprocessed RTEMS source which produces the error
Attached test case compiles at -Os but not -O1 or -O2.
-O2 without -mcpu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64601
Bug ID: 64601
Summary: Missed PRE on std::vector move assignment
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #14 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64599
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64600
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill ---
*** Bug 64599 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64600
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill ---
Created attachment 34450
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34450&action=edit
Preprocessed RTEMS source which produces the error
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: joel at gcc dot gnu.org
$ arm-rtems4.11-gcc --version
arm-rtems4.11-gcc (GCC) 5.0.0 20150114 (experimental)
Last hash per git: commit d4cbe45aae70e38c12f3cd7430427c98289d7882
The fix for 64460 is in place.
Attached test case
cc (GCC) 5.0.0 20150114 (experimental)
Last hash per git: commit d4cbe45aae70e38c12f3cd7430427c98289d7882
The fix for 64460 is in place.
Attached test case compiles at -Os but not -O1 or -O2.
-O2 without -mcpu=xscale also works.
arm-rtems4.11-gcc --pipe -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I..
-I../..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #13 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8)
>
> === libffi Summary for unix/-m32 ===
>
> # of expected passes 1870
> # of unexpected failures 20
> # of u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64350
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
--- Comment #5 from hayder.alkhalissi at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> What options are you using to configure GCC? What target are you trying to
> compile for? What version of GCC are you starting with?
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
--- Comment #4 from hayder.alkhalissi at googlemail dot com ---
Created attachment 34448
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34448&action=edit
configuration file for crosstoll-ng-1.20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
What options are you using to configure GCC? What target are you trying to
compile for? What version of GCC are you starting with?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
--- Comment #2 from hayder.alkhalissi at googlemail dot com ---
Created attachment 34447
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34447&action=edit
Screen shot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
--- Comment #1 from hayder.alkhalissi at googlemail dot com ---
Hi,
I am trying to create cross compiler by using gcc-4.9.1.
During the procdure, I got this error:
/crosstool-ng-1.20.0/.build/src/gcc-4.9.1/gcc/var-tracking.c:5824:1: internal
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64598
Bug ID: 64598
Summary: var-tracking.c has internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64350
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64592
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
With help of Jakub we managed to figure out that on my setup it is because GCC
5.0 defaults to no .cfi directives, while GCC 4.9 uses them.
This seems to be because cfi working advance test, but we do not see h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62066
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64545
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
Curious it happens only with FDO... I am looking into that now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64592
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
> accumulate-outgoing-args default setting change?
Nope, 4.9 already had -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args with -Os.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870
--- Comment #6 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There is still a lot to do. I have patches in progress for Aarch64 loads and
stores. Aarch64 shifts still need doing, and everything for ARM.
ng shows my
compiler version and compiling the original test case.
Thanks.
$ arm-rtems4.11-gcc --version
arm-rtems4.11-gcc (GCC) 5.0.0 20150114 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64498
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Should be fixed now.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 64415 ***
I can confirm that it works for me.
Thanks,
Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64353
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Right, wrong const attribute causes no VUSE for calls to the function which
leads to # VUSE <.MEM> generated for added loads and requires SSA update.
We may actually call update_ssa only in case of missing V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64340
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
ISTR that preloading pid_t was necessary for ada (basically all types required
from some builtins are required to be preloaded).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64353
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Note the testcase is bogus because xx is clearly loading from global memory and
thus should be pure only.
Of course we should still not ICE here and treat xx as if it were const.
One possibility is to simp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64498
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64528
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
To invoke cgo, put this code in a file foo.go and type "go run foo.go" (or "go
build foo.go && ./foo").
package main
// #include
// void cprintln(const char *s) { puts(s); }
import "C"
func main() {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24161
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
EDG gives the same error as GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64509
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24161
Cameron changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cameron314 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64515
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64597
Bug ID: 64597
Summary: ICE when optimizing with AutoFDO annotation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59354
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
Summary|[4.8/4.9/5 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59354
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 14 14:06:07 2015
New Revision: 219603
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219603&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/59354
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59448
--- Comment #24 from Andrew Macleod ---
Author: amacleod
Date: Wed Jan 14 13:58:35 2015
New Revision: 219601
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219601&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Andrew MacLeod
PR middle-end/59448
* builtins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64386
--- Comment #3 from tocarip at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tocarip
Date: Wed Jan 14 13:55:06 2015
New Revision: 219600
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219600&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64386
gcc/
PR target/64386
* config/i386/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64393
--- Comment #3 from tocarip at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tocarip
Date: Wed Jan 14 13:49:58 2015
New Revision: 219599
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219599&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64393
gcc/
* common/config/i386/i386-common.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64387
--- Comment #3 from tocarip at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tocarip
Date: Wed Jan 14 13:45:49 2015
New Revision: 219598
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219598&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64387
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md (vec_unpacks_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, ian at airs dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64595
>
> --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
> Right, cgo is not run directly. It is run by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64365
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
ICK. Data-ref analysis issue with respect to how we handle pointer IVs
in dr_analyze_indices. This results in
(compute_affine_dependence
stmt_a: MEM[(int *)vectp_in.21_137] = vect__12.23_139;
stmt_b:
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
