https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64423
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64423
Bug ID: 64423
Summary: Incorrect column number of -Wchar-subscripts
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64422
--- Comment #1 from Bernd Edlinger ---
with -std=gnu++03 we get
call
_ZNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEE5eraseEN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPKcS4_EES9_
aka std::__cxx11::basic_string,
std::allocator >::erase(__gnu_cxx::__n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64422
Bug ID: 64422
Summary: basic_string::erase is unresloved
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64410
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64418
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60414
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It seems the ICE is fixed on trunk. Can we close this PR?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59103
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #4)
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> > Isn't this PR related to the patch at
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-12/msg00098.html?
>
> Yes,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54756
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54756
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Dec 27 22:40:21 2014
New Revision: 219085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219085&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-27 Janus Weil
PR fortran/54756
* resolve.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64421
Bug ID: 64421
Summary: Incorrect vector function name generated for log
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64419
--- Comment #3 from Jason Pyeron ---
Sorry, I just assumed that I did not need to mention that I had set
LD_LIBRARY_PATH (at least so says history).
Thanks.
Off to other problems now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64385
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
As a workaround you can simply instantiate the trait before it is used in the
function template.
Here's a reduced version of the test, which breaks when A is defined, but is
fixed by defining B:
#include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64385
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The problem is due to one of the bugs that PR 59002 depends on.
Prior to GCC 5 the stream classes have private copy constructors to make them
non-copyable. Normally (as you see when A is not defined) this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64420
Bug ID: 64420
Summary: LTO can miscompile IFUNCs designated via top-level asm
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64418
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64419
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is a FAQ: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#configure_suffix
Most search engines should be able to direct you straight to that page if you
search for the error.
Also, don't use ./configure as explained at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64419
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64419
Bug ID: 64419
Summary: ./configure --prefix /root/bin/gcc-4.9.2
--with-mpc=/root/mpc/ --disable-multilib
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64414
--- Comment #3 from Jason Pyeron ---
I am building gcc 4.9.2 presently, I will test afterwards.
Distro bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177458 in case of
patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64409
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64409
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Dec 27 16:35:41 2014
New Revision: 219083
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219083&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Issue an error for ms_abi attribute with x32
There is no counter p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64409
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Dec 27 16:26:55 2014
New Revision: 219082
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219082&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Issue an error for ms_abi attribute with x32
There is no counter p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64409
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Dec 27 16:14:59 2014
New Revision: 219081
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219081&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Issue an error for ms_abi attribute with x32
There is no counter p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64418
Bug ID: 64418
Summary: User-defined conversion not properly suppressed in
certain cases of list-initialisation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64414
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64412
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to iverbin from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > (In reply to iverbin from comment #0)
> > > To reproduce using Intel Xeon Phi emulation:
> > > 1. Build offload and host compilers a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54429
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo ---
BTW, the problem is also there when using LRA.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64417
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |c
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54429
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo ---
Another minimal test case:
int var;
int test (void)
{
return var;
}
mov.l r14,@-r15
mov r15,r14
mov.l .L3,r1
mov.l @r1,r1
lds r1,fpul
fstsfp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64417
Bug ID: 64417
Summary: [SH] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr28865.c -O0
(test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
31 matches
Mail list logo
