https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61602
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61324
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61283
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61324
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64282
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64298
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61602
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Dec 15 06:19:51 2014
New Revision: 218731
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218731&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/61602
* gcc.dg/torture/pr61602.c: New testcase.
* cgr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61558
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61602
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
OK, the problem is that the variable becomes unreachable after other variable
is declared writeonly and its constructor is killed. I am testing:
Index: ipa.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64139
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61602
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61324
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63313
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61558
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Dec 15 03:44:58 2014
New Revision: 218729
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218729&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/61558
* symtab.c (symbol_table::insert_to_assembler_name_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Dec 15 03:41:41 2014
New Revision: 218727
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218727&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/64043
* tree.c (virtual_method_call_p): Return false when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64304
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64309
Bug ID: 64309
Summary: if (1 & (1 << n)) not simplified to if (n == 0)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61524
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63649
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64218
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
I guess the problem is that we inline function but do not eliminate its (now
dead) alias. Probably it is better to do so in inline-transform like this:
Index: ipa-inline-transform.c
===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63259
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to thopre01 from comment #7)
> (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #6)
> > With r218705 on SH (-O2 -m4 -ml) I get the following:
> >
> > unsigned short test_099 (unsigned short a, unsigned short b)
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64023
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
Bug 63773 depends on bug 64023, which changed state.
Bug 64023 Summary: [5 Regression] r216964 breaks bootstrap on darwin when using
gcc as the bootstrap compiler.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64023
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901
--- Comment #9 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
By the way, the patch of comment 8 bootstraps and regtests OK
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901
paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com
changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.richard.thom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63259
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab ---
(a & 0xFF00) >> 8 with short a = 0x8001 evaluates to 0x80, since all operands
are first promoted to int.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63259
--- Comment #7 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #6)
> With r218705 on SH (-O2 -m4 -ml) I get the following:
>
> unsigned short test_099 (unsigned short a, unsigned short b)
> {
> return (((a & 0xFF00) >>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64308
Bug ID: 64308
Summary: Missed optimization: 64-bit divide used when 32-bit
divide would work
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
nt/ --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--enable-plugin=yes --enable-static
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20141214 (experimental) [trunk revision 218716] (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64307
Bug ID: 64307
Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid argument to gimple
call with -fPIC -fipa-icf
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61491
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60679
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60742
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60760
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60798
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60799
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60803
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037
--- Comment #25 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Dec 14 16:07:03 2014
New Revision: 218721
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218721&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Pass unpromoted argument to promote_function_mode
This patch upda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037
--- Comment #24 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Dec 14 16:04:11 2014
New Revision: 218720
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218720&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Pass unpromoted argument to promote_function_mode
This patch upda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63259
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo ---
With r218705 on SH (-O2 -m4 -ml) I get the following:
unsigned short test_099 (unsigned short a, unsigned short b)
{
return (((a & 0xFF00) >> 8) | ((a & 0xFF) << 8));
}
compiles to:
extu.wr4,r4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60842
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64305
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
Also related: PR 29969, which could be done once FPSCR.SZ mode switching is
there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60786
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60860
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|visibility |rejects-valid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64306
Bug ID: 64306
Summary: [SH] Improve unaligned loads
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54442
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot
com
--disable-libitm --disable-libquadmath --disable-libatomic --disable-libssp
--disable-multilib --disable-libsanitizer --disable-libvtv --disable-libcilkrts
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20141214 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-shared-libgcc' '-mtun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61670
--- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen ---
This doesn't crash on my local compiler, which is 20141212.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61457
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60927
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57854
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61490
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59988
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54890
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61103
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60767
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61198
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61260
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61351
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60009
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60177
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61670
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513
--- Comment #45 from Oleg Endo ---
>From my point of view, this PR can be closed as fixed. The ISR related
failures were just issues w.r.t. how the the expected code sequences are
matched in the test cases.
I've created followup PR 64305 and PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64305
Bug ID: 64305
Summary: [SH] Add support for fschg insn and 64 bit FP moves
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13423
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo ---
Note:
For things like:
#pragma pack (4)
struct x
{
int a;
v4sf b;
};
vec_load_lanesmn and vec_store_lanesmn patterns should probably also be
implemented.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64200
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |4.9.3
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
Fixed f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64200
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Dec 14 13:05:06 2014
New Revision: 218718
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218718&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't assert "alg != libcall" for -minline-stringops-dynamically
B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64300
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62207
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61281
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63674
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63674
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Sun Dec 14 12:04:49 2014
New Revision: 218717
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218717&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-14 Janus Weil
PR fortran/63674
* resolve.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64304
Bug ID: 64304
Summary: AArch64 miscompilation with -mgeneral-regs-only
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64303
Bug ID: 64303
Summary: The regex_token_iterator's copy constructor creates an
incorrect iterator
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61281
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I can confirm the misbehavior with 4.9.1, but it seems that the problem
> is gone on current trunk:
Confirmed. Likely fixed by r 216427 (pr63553).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62207
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Ville Voutilainen from comment #1)
> Current trunk doesn't ICE.
Yes it does. Is your compiler built with checking disabled?
$ g++ x.c
[many errors]
x.c:16:3: internal compiler error: tree check:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64302
Bug ID: 64302
Summary: The match_results::cbegin()/cend() return incorrect
results
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61281
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can confirm the misbehavior with 4.9.1, but it seems that the problem is gone
on current trunk:
$ ./a.out
rob
rob
gcc version 5.0.0 20141213 (experimental) [trunk revision 218705] (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63674
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63727
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
80 matches
Mail list logo