https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64163
Bug ID: 64163
Summary: [5 Regression] r218024 causes qt5 build failure
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
URL: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17670
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52714
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Dec 3 06:00:54 2014
New Revision: 218302
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218302&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52714
* combine.c (try_combine): Allow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28154
Sean Santos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||quantheory at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64001
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
On GNU/Linux gdb can usually print TLS variables fine. It knows how to look up
the value for the current thread. Make sure you are using a sufficiently new
version of gdb, although I think it's been supp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64017
--- Comment #5 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Do we still need to be passing -DCLOOG_INT_GMP from config/isl.m4 now that the
cloog support is fully deprecated in gcc 5.0?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64110
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
>
> Vlad, can you please have a look? Thanks.
I'll work on this. But the related code in LRA is very tricky. It can take a
few days to fix it and a lot of t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #3)
>
> Anyway it looks like this patch has triggered some complex allocation
> issues, so it seems best to revert it. I'll get someone to do that tomorrow
> unless someone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64162
Bug ID: 64162
Summary: ICE: in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:3779
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010
--- Comment #8 from Alex Mykyta ---
Also confirmed Ulrich's patch.
Thank you for taking care of this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64001
--- Comment #2 from Michael Hudson-Doyle
---
Oh, I was wrong in my initial comment. Setting a breakpoint like this:
(gdb) br *0x7971
Breakpoint 5 at 0x7971: file
../../../src/libgcc/config/i386/morestack.S, line 512.
(gdb)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64001
--- Comment #1 from Michael Hudson-Doyle
---
Created attachment 34175
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34175&action=edit
very small reproducer
Well, here is a very small reproducer indeed. gccgo-go run boom.go fails ~50%
of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64159
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5.0 regression] FAIL: |FAIL:
|gcc.dg/tree-ssa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64161
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Dec 3 01:34:03 2014
New Revision: 218300
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218300&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64161
* src/c++11/condition_variable.cc: Include .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64161
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It looks like it includes stdlib.h but not the C++ wrapper, cstdlib
I'm going to commit a patch to include cstdlib as that's correct anyway, I hope
that will fix it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64161
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2-Dec-14, at 8:26 PM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
> Actually, .cc already includes it...
Sorry, looked at wrong file.
--
John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60978
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64161
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2-Dec-14, at 8:17 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> #include in the .cc file should fix it.
Actually, .cc already includes it...
--
John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64161
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2-Dec-14, at 8:17 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> #include in the .cc file should fix it.
Thanks Jonathon, I'll give it a try.
--
John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64161
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64161
Bug ID: 64161
Summary: bootstrap error: condition_variable.cc:134:7: error:
'atexit' is not a member of 'std'
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61129
Andy Lutomirski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010
--- Comment #7 from Peter A. Bigot ---
I don't know if https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64160 is related;
it appears to be a similar problem affecting a value returned in multiple
registers. It's present both before and after the alt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64160
Bug ID: 64160
Summary: msp430 code generation error adding 32-bit integers
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010
--- Comment #6 from Peter A. Bigot ---
The alternative patch (using find_reg_fusage) does fix the problem in my
reproducing test case and in a real application. Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
--- Comment #3 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #2)
> Note, the fix proposed in PR64151 DOES NOT work on the PowerPC, so it may be
> a dup in terms of what change broke the build, but the potential fix needs
> more analys
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64159
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64159
Bug ID: 64159
Summary: [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c
scan-tree-dump optimized "return 28;"
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64158
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64158
Bug ID: 64158
Summary: [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c
scan-rtl-dump dse1 "global deletions = (2|3)"
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64157
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64157
Bug ID: 64157
Summary: [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52429.c -O2
-flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none
(internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #24 from Andreas Schwab ---
builtin-arith-overflow-14.c still fails on ppc32 as of r218249.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60978
--- Comment #11 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #10)
> Interesting, in glibc 2.18 (at least in glibc-headers-2.18-16.fc20.x86_64)
> they are in the same enum.
The in.h is actually part of kernel, not glibc itsel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64116
--- Comment #5 from hete2 at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34174
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34174&action=edit
Output of gcc -v ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57168
--- Comment #2 from hete2 at gmx dot de ---
Sorry.. should be sended to bug 64116.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57168
hete2 at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hete2 at gmx dot de
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64116
--- Comment #4 from hete2 at gmx dot de ---
I found out that -march=native is not needeed. The following prerequisites were
used: gmp-6.0.0, mpfr-3.1.2, mpc-1.0.2, isl-0.12.2, cloog-0.18.1.
pt.ii.bz2 is the compressed preprocessed source. Log is t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60978
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Paul Pluzhnikov from comment #9)
> In glibc-2.19, include/netinet/in.h:
Interesting, in glibc 2.18 (at least in glibc-headers-2.18-16.fc20.x86_64) they
are in the same enum.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64116
--- Comment #3 from hete2 at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34172
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34172&action=edit
preprozessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60978
--- Comment #9 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #8)
> You shouldn't get the warning about IPPROTO_ICMP vs IPPROTO_ICMPV66, as they
> are members of the same anonymous enum.
They are?
In glibc-2.19, include/netin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60978
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64151
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64151
--- Comment #2 from Wilco ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> Revert the reg_class change:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/ira-costs.c b/gcc/ira-costs.c
> index 72c00cc..16fd6e8 100644
> --- a/gcc/ira-costs.c
> +++ b/gcc/ira-costs.c
> @@ -1466,7 +1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Actually my tree has flag_devirtualize marked as Optimization, as a separate
problem I need to figure out how it happens to be true.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
I've posted the patch to the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00205.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Note, the fix proposed in PR64151 DOES NOT work on the PowerPC, so it may be a
dup in terms of what change broke the build, but the potential fix needs more
analysis.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64113
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64113
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Dec 2 19:29:28 2014
New Revision: 218282
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218282&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64113
* config/alpha/alpha.md (call_value_osf_tl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
Bug ID: 64156
Summary: Subversion id 218266 breaks the big-endian 64-bit
PowerPC build (wilco.dijkstra at arm dot com's mod to
ira-costs.c)
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 34171
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34171&action=edit
Untested fix
I'm testing this fix - but on a x86_64-linux, together with other stuff, just
to be sure, I have d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010
--- Comment #5 from Ulrich Weigand ---
Created attachment 34170
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34170&action=edit
Do not clobber function argument registers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010
Ulrich Weigand changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64068
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64155
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64155
Bug ID: 64155
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in remove_unreachable_nodes, at
ipa.c:546
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> That's the conclusion that I'm leaning towards. Reading
> section 16 of the standard always makes my head hurt, so
> I'm being caution while looking for some subtle point
> that I may have missed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 05:13:09PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
>
> To conclude I think this PR should be closed as INVALID.
>
That's the conclusion that I'm leaning towards. Reading
section 16 o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #18 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Joey Ye from comment #17)
> A new PR is expected to open for
> a complete solution.
PR 64154 - enable fuse-caller-save for Thumb1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64154
Bug ID: 64154
Summary: enable fuse-caller-save for Thumb1
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I was sure to have seen discussions about such issues: pr33997 and
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.lang.fortran/GIcxE7GM1ek/aP7eJpQ-T7QJ
AFAIU the discussions, the relevant point for this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64103
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64103
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64103
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
Author: doko
Date: Tue Dec 2 16:32:24 2014
New Revision: 218278
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218278&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-02 Matthias Klose
PR libstdc++/64103
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64003
--- Comment #12 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to dmalcolm from comment #11)
> Running valgrind with vgdb to get the precise location of its
> warnings indicates they are here within get_attr_length_nobnd in
> insn-attrtab.c:19152:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Alex,
This appears to be a reload bug. Before reload we have:
(call_insn 12 (call:HI (mem:HI (mem:HI (plus:HI (reg:HI R14)
(const_int 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64003
--- Comment #11 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Investigating the backtrace at the point of the uninit read shows that
the issue occurs in shorten_branches here:
#5 0x006f3263 in shorten_branches (first=0x71687700) at
../../src/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:37:19PM +, wong.david-c at epa dot gov wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138
>
>What is your fix?
>
I meant I fixed the code you posted. It was missi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64003
--- Comment #10 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34167
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34167&action=edit
Log from gdb session, with a conditional breakpoint to trap uninitialized reads
This is a log of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64003
--- Comment #9 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34166
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34166&action=edit
Dump of RTL from the reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64003
--- Comment #8 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34165
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34165&action=edit
Patch to add instrumentation to final.c to track the reads/writes of
insn_lengths
The attached pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138
--- Comment #5 from david ---
Hi,
What is your fix?
In the original code, c_sub_cr and c_sub_rc are distinct because the
sequence of argument type are different. Other compilers have no problem to
distinguish them. Please advise.
Cheers,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64152
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2014-12-2
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64152
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153
Bug ID: 64153
Summary: [5.0 regression] r218205 miscompiles libgomp
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64151
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64115
Ulrich Weigand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64115
--- Comment #8 from Ulrich Weigand ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Tue Dec 2 14:33:00 2014
New Revision: 218275
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218275&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64115
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_delegitimize_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64115
--- Comment #7 from Ulrich Weigand ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Tue Dec 2 14:30:47 2014
New Revision: 218274
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218274&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64115
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_delegitimize_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64115
--- Comment #6 from Ulrich Weigand ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Tue Dec 2 14:27:46 2014
New Revision: 218273
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218273&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64115
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_delegitimize_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64152
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Compile with cc1plus, it's a C++ testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64151
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
Joey Ye changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64108
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Dec 2 14:10:23 2014
New Revision: 218272
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218272&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Stop only if there aren't any usable algorithms
When searching for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64152
Bug ID: 64152
Summary: internal compiler error: in gen_add2_insn
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ra
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64129
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64151
Bug ID: 64151
Summary: [5 Regression] r2182676caused many regressions
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #16 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Dec 2 13:35:10 2014
New Revision: 218271
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218271&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-02 Tom de Vries
PR rtl-optimization/63718
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64096
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
For completeness, the error for std::list now shows:
a.cc: In instantiation of ‘void my_allocator::construct(U*, Args&& ...)
[with U = int; Args = {int}; T = std::_Rb_tree_node]’:
which is consistent with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64129
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> > Please submit a full bug report,
> > with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> > Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
> > See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64149
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63569
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo