https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63783
--- Comment #5 from Michael Karcher ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #4)
> I'm not sure about this. The first hunk of your patch that removes the
> example in the top comment block should be valid, as far as I can see at the
> moment. Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332
--- Comment #8 from Richard PALO ---
As far as the test as it currently is written, I now get:
>PASS: ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc (test for excess errors)
>PASS: ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc execution test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52168
Richard PALO changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard at netbsd dot org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63903
Bug ID: 63903
Summary: ICE with assignment of allocatable character array
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63902
Bug ID: 63902
Summary: ix86_valid_target_attribute_tree frees memory still
being used
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63901
Bug ID: 63901
Summary: msp430 multilib must distinguish mhwmult
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63783
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Michael Karcher from comment #3)
> Created attachment 33954 [details]
> Remove assumption that "not" is logical negate
>
> Indeed the treg combine pass is broken. Thanks to the nicely documented
> c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54272
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo ---
Recently some __builtin_*_overflow functions have been added, of which some
could utilize the addv and subv instructions. See also
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Integer-Overflow-Builtins.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63900
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63900
Bug ID: 63900
Summary: memory constrains needlessly doing memory clobber
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60324
--- Comment #10 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Nov 16 01:56:54 2014
New Revision: 217623
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217623&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 60324 VLA related fixes to random number generator.
2014-11-16 Janne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63898
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
We get an infinite recursive call:
#0 fold_binary_loc (loc=0, code=RDIV_EXPR, type=0x77df2d20,
op0=0x77c544c0, op1=0x77c54160)
at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/fold-const.c:9649
#1 0x00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63898
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 33990
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33990&action=edit
A testcase
./xgcc -B./ -O2 -ffast-math-S /tmp/pr63898.i
xgcc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63899
--- Comment #1 from Richard PALO ---
Created attachment 33989
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33989&action=edit
gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1 run output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63899
Bug ID: 63899
Summary: WARNING: Could not compile
g++.dg/compat/struct-layout-1 generator
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63898
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Where is the testcase?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808
Anthony Brandon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anthony.brandon at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63897
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63898
Bug ID: 63898
Summary: [5 Regression] r217560 caused segfault building
462.libquantum from cpu2006
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63897
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Try compiling with -march=core2, you should see it.
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56801
Tong Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ztong at vt dot edu
--- Comment #5 from Ton
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63897
--- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Configured with: ../work/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/gcc4.10w
> --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,ada,java,lto
> --with-gmp=/opt/mp -
w
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,ada,java,lto --with-gmp=/opt/mp
--with-system-zlib --with-isl=/opt/mp --enable-lto --enable-plugin
--with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20141115 (experimental) [trunk revision 217602p25] (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63897
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63897
Bug ID: 63897
Summary: [5.0 regression] gcc.dg/torture/vector-2.c fails at on
x86_64-apple-darwin14
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63884
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63884
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sat Nov 15 20:20:05 2014
New Revision: 217612
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217612&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/63884
c-family/
* array-notation-common.c (is_sec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60104
--- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat Nov 15 19:46:14 2014
New Revision: 217611
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217611&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/60104
* gcc.target/i386/sibcall-1.c: Don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63656
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
constexpr bool is_ok = true;
template>
A(T) { }
};
A p(42);
//-
For gcc 5.0.0 20141115 (experimental) using the flags
-Wall -Wextra -std=c++1y -pedantic
I get:
"prog.cc:7:21: internal compiler error: in retrieve_specialization, at
cp/pt.c:1047 template>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63896
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|g++.dg/ipa/devirt-7.C |[5 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56906
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50243
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63895
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60104
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63896
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63896
Bug ID: 63896
Summary: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-7.C produces code that trips the
darwin linker
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz, jh at
suse dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63894
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
> (gdb) p next->externally_visible
> $1 = 1
> (gdb) p define
> $2 = true
> (gdb) p next->resolution
> $3 = LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF
>
> I will try to reduce this issue.
Thanks, the inline-transform ICE is result o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63895
Bug ID: 63895
Summary: [5 Regression] r217588 miscompled 178.galgel from
cpu2000
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63879
--- Comment #6 from Sasha Levin ---
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/home/sasha/gcc-inst/ --with-arch=native
--with-tune=native --enable-languages=c --enable-lto --enab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63894
Bug ID: 63894
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in inline_call, at
ipa-inline-transform.c:339 building Firefox
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63879
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sasha Levin from comment #4)
> $ gcc -v
Please add "-v" to the gcc command line used to compile fs/ext3/namei.c
and show the whole output.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63893
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Another sequel of r216154.
Note that tests with -mcmodel=* are compiled on darwin, but produce codes that
are not accepted by as (see also pr50077).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63893
howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at bromo dot med
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63744
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I have to admit that I am unsure whether it is valid or not.
I share the same feeling, but if
use m, only: A => X
use m, only: B => X
is valid, I don't see why
use m, only: A => X
use m,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63893
--- Comment #1 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
gcc.target/i386/pr63538.c also fails, also due to -mcmodel=medium
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63744
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|bur...@net-b.de |
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63893
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63893
Bug ID: 63893
Summary: gcc.dg/pr61599-1.c fails on darwin, due to
-mcmodel=medium
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63857
Cesar Philippidis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63858
--- Comment #4 from Cesar Philippidis ---
*** Bug 63857 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60104
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Testcase gcc.target/i386/sibcall-1.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin14 (compiled
with "-O2 -m32"). Assembler code generated is:
.section __TEXT,__text_cold,regular,pure_instructions
LCOLDB0:
.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
recent trunk on linux -m32 -O -p doesn't segv
- but the stack looks odd at the mcount call.
.file"t.c"
.text
.globlmain
.typemain, @function
main:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
le
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61570
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63879
--- Comment #4 from Sasha Levin ---
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/sasha/gcc-inst/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
>From archives on x86_64-apple-darwin10, the problem was already there at
r203176.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63879
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sasha Levin from comment #2)
> $ gcc -Wp,-MD,fs/ext3/.namei.o.d -nostdinc -isystem
> /home/sasha/gcc-inst/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.0.0/include
> -I./arch/x86/include -Iarch/x86/include/gener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63891
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Dominique, could you check whether both appeared at the same time?
Yes: r216154.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63891
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
This same bug may also be the root for:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-self.c -O0 scan-assembler-not \\tcall
which is also a 5.0 regression, due to the extra "call
___x86.get_pc_thunk.ax". Do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63879
--- Comment #2 from Sasha Levin ---
$ gcc -Wp,-MD,fs/ext3/.namei.o.d -nostdinc -isystem
/home/sasha/gcc-inst/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.0.0/include
-I./arch/x86/include -Iarch/x86/include/generated -Iinclude
-I./arch/x86/include/uapi -I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> possibly? more fallout from the EBX changes? (maybe not, but worth a look).
I doubt it: r203168 (2013-10-03) is OK, r203190 (2013-10-03) is not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
Bug ID: 63892
Summary: [5.0 regression] gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c fails on darwin
with -m32
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63744
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Can you quote the standard which permits this? My feeling is that the code
> is invalid, but I have to admit that it is only a feeling.
How do you read the following?
> 11.2.2 The USE statement and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||evstupac at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61053
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63891
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This is probably more fallout from the EBX changes.
Yep! I see the failure with r216154 but not with 216153.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #55 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Derrick Kay from comment #53)
If you just want the gfortran compiler for Yosemite, either install the gcc49
package under the fink (http://www.finkproject.org), MacPorts
(http:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63891
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||evstupac at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63744
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63891
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63891
Bug ID: 63891
Summary: [5.0 regression] Failure of darwin-weakimport-3.c
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
Bug ID: 63890
Summary: [4.9/5.0 regression] Compiling trivial program with -O
-p leads to misaligned stack
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63744
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63889
Bug ID: 63889
Summary: Ice with redundant static in class scope constexpr
variable template.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #54 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Derrick Kay from comment #53)
I've redirected that question to the mailing list (and answered it):
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-11/msg00088.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63857
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Isn't it a duplicate of pr63858?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63886
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
float f = 3.1f;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Derrick Kay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||derrick.k at gmx dot de
--- Comment #53 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
Bug ID: 63888
Summary: [5 Regression] bootstrap failed when configured with
-with-build-config=bootstrap-asan --disable-werror
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63887
Bug ID: 63887
Summary: abi_tag confuses demangler
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63886
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #2)
> Given the obscurity of -Wfloat-conversion, maybe it is time for it
> to be included in -Wall, where more folks will notice it ?
Scratch that. While -Wfloat-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63886
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1)
> warning: conversion to ‘int’ from ‘float’ may alter its value
> [-Wfloat-conversion]
Thanks for that.
Given the obscurity of -Wfloat-conversion, maybe it is ti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63886
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
warning: conversion to ‘int’ from ‘float’ may alter its value
[-Wfloat-conversion]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63886
Bug ID: 63886
Summary: float will fit into int with abs - possible missing
warning Wabsolute-value
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18135
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56634
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29404
--- Comment #12 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Still present on trunk (5.0, end of stage 1).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29404
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42308
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14608
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|ia64-hp-hpux11.23,*-*-darwi |ia64-hp-hpux11.23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32719
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
Bug 63773 depends on bug 63622, which changed state.
Bug 63622 Summary: [5.0 Regression] Bootstrap fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1[34]
after revision r216305
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63622
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63622
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63837
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> I bet this is really the same as bug 63881. The kernel is using /dev/null
> for both the input and output when testing if the options work.
Andrew, could
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63837
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> I bet this is really the same as bug 63881. The kernel is using /dev/null
> for both the input and output when testing if the options work.
No. From scrip
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
