[Bug target/54412] Request for 32-byte stack alignment with -mavx on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54412 --- Comment #10 from Roland Schulz --- Created attachment 33520 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33520&action=edit Slightly modified testcase This slightly modified testcase in which the return value isn't stored, still segfa

[Bug c++/17480] collect2 on AIX calls static constructors of unreferenced object modules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17480 Lőrinczy Zsigmond changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lzsiga at axelero dot hu --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/61511] [5 Regression] ICE: in vect_can_force_dr_alignment_p, at tree-vect-data-refs.c:5320 with -fno-toplevel-reorder -ftree-slp-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61511 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/63255] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/ipareference2 c_lto_ipareference2_0.o-c_lto_ipareference2_1.o execute -O1 -flto -flto-partition=1to1 -fwhole-program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63255 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Sep 20 02:58:42 2014 New Revision: 215415 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215415&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/63255 * ipa.c (symbol_table::remove_unreacha

[Bug c++/61392] internal compiler error: in write_template_arg_literal, at cp/mangle.c:3072

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61392 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61392] internal compiler error: in write_template_arg_literal, at cp/mangle.c:3072

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61392 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Sat Sep 20 00:55:14 2014 New Revision: 215414 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215414&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/61392 * mangle.c (write_expression): Use unresolved-name ma

[Bug c++/61465] Bogus parameter set but not used warning in constructor initialization list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61465 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Sat Sep 20 00:54:55 2014 New Revision: 215413 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215413&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/61465 * call.c (convert_like_real) [ck_identity]: Call mark

[Bug c++/61825] [5 regression] g++.dg/cpp0x/static_assert9.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61825 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Sep 19 23:56:52 2014 New Revision: 215409 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215409&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/61825 * c-family/c-common.c (handle_alias_ifunc_attribute)

[Bug rtl-optimization/63259] Detecting byteswap sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63259 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/63314] valarray mask/indices refers to temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63314 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wa

[Bug tree-optimization/62053] [5 Regression] ICE: in remap_type_1, at tree-inline.c:540

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62053 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka --- I am looking into it now...

[Bug middle-end/63186] [4.9 Regression] Undefined .L* symbols because of fnsplit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63186 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] |[4.9 Regression] Undefined

[Bug c++/61825] [5 regression] g++.dg/cpp0x/static_assert9.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61825 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- Hi, this patch implements necessary bits to record what symbols was declared nonzero and refuse visibility changes that would change the difference (i.e. turn it into alias, weakref or weak). Possibly we will w

[Bug ipa/61283] [5 regression] SEGV in pass_ipa_comdats::execute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61283 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka -

[Bug regression/62102] [5 Regression]: gcc.dg/torture/pr48953.c -O2 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62102 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- I think that would be rather symptomatic fix and I plan to push out the type verifier soon that will ICE without the patch on all targets. I failed to reproduce this on x86 (I thought originally I have reproduc

[Bug lto/63166] [5 Regression] ICE (LTO): ipa_intraprocedural_devirtualization, at ipa-prop.c:2611

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63166 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/63186] [4.9/5 Regression] Undefined .L* symbols because of fnsplit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63186 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- Yes, this patch should apply to 4.9 as well.

[Bug lto/63226] [5 Regression] ICE with -flto-odr-type-merging

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63226 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka -

[Bug lto/63286] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63286 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/63255] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/ipareference2 c_lto_ipareference2_0.o-c_lto_ipareference2_1.o execute -O1 -flto -flto-partition=1to1 -fwhole-program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63255 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- This is ordering issue in node removal (there is code to read constructor from file before removing the symbol for symbol table, but it is executed after the symbol is marked removed). I am testing: Index: ipa

[Bug c++/61392] internal compiler error: in write_template_arg_literal, at cp/mangle.c:3072

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61392 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ABI, ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug c++/61392] internal compiler error: in write_template_arg_literal, at cp/mangle.c:3072

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61392 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #2 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/63315] -fcompare-debug bootstrap issue in libjava (fixup_abnormal_edges related)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63315 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- We have: (insn 10025 3 10026 2 (set (reg:SI 85 [ D.39608 ]) (mem/u/j:SI (const:DI (plus:DI (symbol_ref:DI ("_otable_gnu_xml_util_XCat$Catalog") [flags 0x2] ) (const_int 68 [0x44

[Bug c/63178] Missed "incorrect-type-passed-to-function warning"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63178 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/60100] warning disappears when preprocessed source is compiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60100 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gccbugs at dima dot secretsauce.ne

[Bug rtl-optimization/63315] New: -fcompare-debug bootstrap issue in libjava (fixup_abnormal_edges related)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63315 Bug ID: 63315 Summary: -fcompare-debug bootstrap issue in libjava (fixup_abnormal_edges related) Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/63178] Missed "incorrect-type-passed-to-function warning"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63178 Dima Kogan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug lto/63286] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63286 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Sep 19 18:54:23 2014 New Revision: 215403 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215403&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/63286 * tree.c (need_assembler_name_p): Do not mangle vari

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|WONTFIX

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 Venkataramanan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug debug/63300] 'const volatile' sometimes stripped in debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63300 --- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard --- Sorry about that. I added an explicit testcases (gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/const-volatile.c and gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/restrict.c) explicitly to catch such issue. But apparently they didn't trigger t

[Bug libstdc++/63314] New: valarray mask/indices refers to temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63314 Bug ID: 63314 Summary: valarray mask/indices refers to temporary Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: libstd

[Bug middle-end/63244] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 --- Comment #9 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz --- > See what I wrote, any object size bigger than half of address space really > isn't supportable, because then (char *) (P) - (char *) (Q) might not fit into > ptrdiff_t. There is no

[Bug lto/63286] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63286 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I am testing: > Index: tree.c > ... AFAICT the patch in comment 1 does not fix the PR.

[Bug ada/63310] Ada bootstrap error with -fcompare-debug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63310 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/63312] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/float128-exact-underflow.c -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63312 --- Comment #1 from Joseph S. Myers --- Created attachment 33519 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33519&action=edit Untested patch Please try this patch. As I noted in my patch posting, the issue is that there is no ia64 def

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to mikulas from comment #6) > Regarding pointer difference, the C standard says this: > > When two pointers are subtracted, both shall point to elements of the same > array object, or one past the

[Bug debug/63300] 'const volatile' sometimes stripped in debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63300 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 --- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Yes, I consider it a bug in malloc that it produces objects 2GB or more in size on 32-bit systems (because of the one-past-end address, the largest size that can't produce undefined behavio

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 --- Comment #6 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz --- "you really can't have an object bigger than half of the address space in C/C++" - where does the standard claim this? If this is true, we should change malloc so that it doesn't allo

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to mikulas from comment #4) > ... and another related problem (try this on 32-bit system): > > #include > #include > > int main(void) > { > short *a = malloc(0x5000 * sizeof(short));

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 --- Comment #4 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz --- ... and another related problem (try this on 32-bit system): #include #include int main(void) { short *a = malloc(0x5000 * sizeof(short)); short *b = a + 0x500

[Bug testsuite/63305] ASan reported heap-buffer-overflow in gcc.target/i386/avx256-unaligned-load{store}-7.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63305 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/63313] New: ICE in ipa-comdats.c:371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63313 Bug ID: 63313 Summary: ICE in ipa-comdats.c:371 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa Assignee

[Bug target/56993] power gcc built 416.gamess generates wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56993 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 33517 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33517&action=edit Here is my spec 2006 patch I need this patch on x86.

[Bug target/63312] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/float128-exact-underflow.c -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63312 Bug ID: 63312 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/float128-exact-underflow.c -O0 execution test Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/63311] New: [4.9/5 Regression] -O1 optimization introduces valgrind warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63311 Bug ID: 63311 Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] -O1 optimization introduces valgrind warning Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/61998] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wsuggest-final-types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61998 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/61998] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wsuggest-final-types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61998 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Author: trippels Date: Fri Sep 19 14:44:09 2014 New Revision: 215392 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215392&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/61998 Fix crash -Wsuggest-final-types crash -Wsuggest-fin

[Bug c/63301] inconsistency on wchar_t and wint_t types and sizes for diverse architectures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63301 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug c++/58192] G++ emits incorrect code when passing enum classes as function parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58192 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- When I compile: #ifdef CHAR typedef unsigned char Foo; #else enum class Foo : unsigned char { FOO }; #endif unsigned int v1, v2; __attribute__((noinline, noclone)) static void foo (Foo a) { v1 = (unsigned

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #5 from Venkataramanan --- We got inspired by this bug. https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400 It happens at -O0 now.

[Bug c++/62219] [c++11] Spurious error for lambda in a friend function of a class template with a default template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62219 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- I think I had in mind c++/60605

[Bug libstdc++/60555] std::system_category().default_error_condition() doesn't map system errno values to std::generic_category()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug libstdc++/60940] general operations on atomic types do not work with atomic integral typedefs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60940 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/63306] [4.9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in analyze_functions()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63306 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 --- Comment #2 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz --- Jakub Jelinek: I know, but the problem happened in perfectly valid program. Suppose that you do: char *p = malloc(0x2000); - the allocator allocates the array at 0x7000. The

[Bug target/56993] power gcc built 416.gamess generates wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56993 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/48101] obscure error message with std::set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48101 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||corey at octayn dot net --- Comment #2

[Bug libstdc++/55963] std::vector fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55963 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/53874] -Wswitch-enum not properly working with bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53874 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/58968] Powerpc -mlra cannot compile ormas1.f in gamess Spec 2006 with -m32 -mcpu=power7 -O3 -mlra -w -ffast-math -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58968 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from Domin

[Bug libstdc++/61458] std::aligned_storage is bigger than expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61458 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/53221] [C++11] basic_string lacks "copy/move constructors" with allocator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53221 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||24882 Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/54392] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] std::string::assign() fails to update length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54392 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||24882 Target Milestone|4.8.4

[Bug fortran/44882] Bogus types in references with mismatched commons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #14 from Domi

[Bug libstdc++/62169] map iterators under _GLIBCXX_DEBUG diverge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62169 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/61426] [C++11] std::deque requires more from allocator than the standard provides.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61426 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/61041] Cannot create std::tr1::variate_generator from variate_generator::engine(); engine_value_type error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61041 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/60662] simple use of call_once throws a system_error exception, but not if sleep_for is called beforehand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60662 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Probably related to PR 55394

[Bug libstdc++/58266] gcc-4.7.3: memleaks reported by valgrind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58266 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/63301] inconsistency on wchar_t and wint_t types and sizes for diverse architectures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63301 --- Comment #2 from Marcos Diaz --- Sorry, I expressed wrong the issue I was reporting, What I want to ask is the following: Is it ok that the wchar_t is a long int and the wint_t is just an int?

[Bug c++/58192] G++ emits incorrect code when passing enum classes as function parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58192 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak --- Looking at dumps, obtained with -m32 -O1, we have following sequence before the call to _ZN2S1Ut_3setE3Foo: _.dfinit: (insn 7 3 8 2 (parallel [ (set (reg:SI 88) (lshiftrt:SI (reg/v

[Bug libstdc++/54354] TODO extended iomanip manipulators std::get_time and std::put_time (C++11, section 27.7.5)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54354 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug ada/63310] New: Ada bootstrap error with -fcompare-debug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63310 Bug ID: 63310 Summary: Ada bootstrap error with -fcompare-debug Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug ada/63310] Ada bootstrap error with -fcompare-debug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63310 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2

[Bug c++/58192] G++ emits incorrect code when passing enum classes as function parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58192 --- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > That is to be determined. Either it might be an x86_64 bug in passing such > types, or FE issue, middle-end. Please note that the error also occurs with -m32, so

[Bug libstdc++/31247] std::vector::iterator::value_type is accessible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31247 --- Comment #16 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #15) > I'm still not motivated to implement this request though. It would break too much code. If people really insisted (which they don't), I believe it would be sa

[Bug c++/63308] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63308 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/63309] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63309 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 63308 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/63309] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63309 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/60333] type_traits make_signed, make_unsigned missing support for long long enumerations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60333 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/60278] string::erase() (and other containers) does not take const_iterators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60278 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/60396] Missing time_get<>::get() functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60396 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/60176] [C++11] void return value in std::list<>::insert() c++1 should be an iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60176 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Version|unknown

[Bug libstdc++/59987] [C++11]: Missing ios_base::hexfloat format specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59987 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59192 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #7 from Jonath

[Bug target/60624] creation of working linux sparc32 kernel fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60624 Waldemar Brodkorb changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/58929] condition_variable does not wait without -pthread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58929 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- related to PR 55394

[Bug libstdc++/55394] Using call_once without -lpthread compiles without warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55394 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- related to PR 58929

[Bug libstdc++/57953] no C++11 compliant std::ios_base::failure found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57953 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/56785] std::tuple of two elements does not apply empty base class optimization when one of its elements is a std::tuple with two elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56785 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/56437] basic_string assumes that allocators are default-constructible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56437 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/53626] [C++11] move assignment for ifstream

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53626 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/62046] A catch in a class, without any try, compiles fine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62046 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini --- I think it can be reduced like this: void foo() { } catch (...); class bar { void foo() { } catch (...); }; we reject only the former.

[Bug libstdc++/51618] synchronous futures are slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51618 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug libstdc++/51008] GTHR - extend interface with __gthread_recursive_mutex_destroy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51008 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >