https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63252
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63254
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61848
--- Comment #12 from Alan Modra ---
extern char foo;
char foo __attribute__ ((__section__(".machine.desc")));
char foo __attribute__ ((__section__(".mymachine.desc")));
It looks like we should take out the DECL_SECTION_NAME (olddecl) == NULL
che
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63254
Bug ID: 63254
Summary: elfos.h missing space between literal and identifier.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61848
--- Comment #11 from Alan Modra ---
It boots
Linux version 3.17.0-rc4-00222-gc73f6fd-dirty (anton@tul181p1) (gcc version
5.0.0 20140912 (experimental) (GCC) ) #23 SMP Fri Sep 12 21:19:06 UTC 2014
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63253
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-09/msg00161.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63253
Bug ID: 63253
Summary: boot strap failure due to ODR warnings
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63252
Bug ID: 63252
Summary: [5 Regression] tree_class_check_failed
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63251
Bug ID: 63251
Summary: tsan: corrupted shadow stack
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59500
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63250
Bug ID: 63250
Summary: Complex fp16 arithmetic uses nonexistent libgcc
functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63235
--- Comment #10 from Andi Kleen ---
Ok fair enough.
Can do the runtime check in the else of the ifdef then.
Then at least x86_64 or 32bit with SSE would work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63235
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Andi Kleen from comment #8)
> Yes it doesn't happen when compiling with 4.8 branch tip. So has been fixed.
>
> Anyways i'm still going to submit the patch to make the opensuse 13.1 build
> work again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63235
--- Comment #8 from Andi Kleen ---
Yes it doesn't happen when compiling with 4.8 branch tip. So has been fixed.
Anyways i'm still going to submit the patch to make the opensuse 13.1 build
work again. I don't think it should hurt anything here to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62052
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56193
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61909
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63246
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59500
--- Comment #4 from Andy Lutomirski ---
Created attachment 33485
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33485&action=edit
Output from g++ -O2 -Wall -fdump-tree-all-all-lineno pr59500.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59500
--- Comment #3 from Andy Lutomirski ---
Created attachment 33484
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33484&action=edit
Headerless reproducer (c++ only)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
When one uses a naive test script one arrives at the testcase
from comment 4. Using a differential script (-O2 vs. -flto -O2 -g)
one gets:
markus@x4 /tmp % cat context2.ii
namespace std {
template
_Tp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244
--- Comment #6 from David Kredba ---
For the record only, git version of c-reduce returned
namespace std {
template struct less;
template struct add_rvalue_reference;
template typename add_rvalue_reference<_Tp>::type declval();
template stru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63247
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63235
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Andi Kleen from comment #6)
> Created attachment 33483 [details]
> Preprocessed file from the cilk runtime library
>
> I'm not sure it'll help you because you would likely need a compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34777
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||55212
--- Comment #12 from Oleg Endo ---
(I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63249
Bug ID: 63249
Summary: [OpenMP] Spurious »set but not used« warnings when
actually used in OpenMP target's array section's
lower-bound and length
Product: gcc
Ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.3 |4.9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(gdb) bt
#0 analyze_functions () at ../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1042
#1 0x006e03f0 in finalize_compilation_unit () at
../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2326
#2 0x00594dd4 in cp_write_global_d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60894
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|4.10.0 |5.0
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63248
Bug ID: 63248
Summary: Crash when OpenMP target's array section handling is
used with templates
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59400
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||55212
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
I'v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63235
--- Comment #6 from Andi Kleen ---
Created attachment 33483
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33483&action=edit
Preprocessed file from the cilk runtime library
I'm not sure it'll help you because you would likely need a compil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||55212
--- Comment #36 from Oleg Endo ---
(I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63247
Bug ID: 63247
Summary: fortran array alignment in omp target map
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63235
--- Comment #5 from Andi Kleen ---
Created attachment 33482
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33482&action=edit
use ifdef instead of builtin_cpu_supports
This patch fixes the problem for me.
Just use an ifdef instead of built
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63246
Bug ID: 63246
Summary: OpenMP target: gimplifier produces unsuitable implicit
map clauses if inside a data region
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61142
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
I've tried the above test case with LRA on (sh-lra branch, not fully working
yet) and it produces the following code:
mov r5,r0
mov.b @(r0,r4),r0
cmp/eq #92,r0
bt .L3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244
--- Comment #3 from David Kredba ---
C-Reduce in progress.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654
--- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Sep 12 16:52:24 2014
New Revision: 215228
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215228&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-12 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/61654
* cgraph.h (cgraph_an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63245
Bug ID: 63245
Summary: renderMemorySnippet shouldn't show more bytes than the
underlying type
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244
--- Comment #2 from David Kredba ---
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -m32 -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -flto=4
-fuse-linker-plugin -O2 -ggdb -pipe -march=core2 -mtune=core2 -mno-3dnow
-mno-sse4.2 -mno-avx -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-sse4a -Wall -fno-strict
--disable-isl-version-check
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.2-alpha20140911 20140912 (prerelease) [gcc-4_9-branch revision
215199] (Gentoo 4.9.2_alpha20140911)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244
Bug ID: 63244
Summary: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63243
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62265
Teresa Johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tejohnson at google dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63242
--- Comment #2 from wbrana ---
How I can create such testcase?
I can reproduce it on Gentoo by adding -flto to /etc/portage/make.conf
and running: emerge xf86-video-intel
but can't reproduce from command-line
gcc -std=gnu99 -O3 -shared -fPIC -f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63242
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63226
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #5)
> Created attachment 33478 [details]
> Second test file pair (1/2): one37.ii
Mixed up the fields ... That should have been the attachment - and the
attachment shou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63201
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|jason at red
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61848
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63226
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 33479
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33479&action=edit
Second test file pair (1/2): two22.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63226
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 33478
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33478&action=edit
Second test file pair (1/2): one37.ii
namespace std {
template struct unary_function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63201
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 12 14:39:25 2014
New Revision: 215226
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215226&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/63201
* decl.c (start_decl): Handle specialization of membe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62084
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||addr-space,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57832
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59500
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56654
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63224
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63243
Bug ID: 63243
Summary: [meta-bug] RH GDB project tracker
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59603
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59603
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Sep 12 13:30:35 2014
New Revision: 215219
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215219&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/59603
* include/bits/stl_algo.h (random_shuffle): Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63242
Bug ID: 63242
Summary: memory starvation caused by flatten attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|tree-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63241
Bug ID: 63241
Summary: Internal error in gimplify_init_constructor when using
constexr and multidimensional arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16063
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59603
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jörg Richter from comment #2)
> Seems like we have hit this bug too. It happens not only in debug mode. We
> have a testcase that triggers valgrind errors in non-debug mode while
> calling ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16063
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63240
Bug ID: 63240
Summary: DWARF does not represent C++ defaulted methods
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63237
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63237
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 12 11:06:49 2014
New Revision: 215212
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215212&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-12 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/63237
* gimple-fold
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239
Bug ID: 63239
Summary: DWARF does not represent C++ deleted methods
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
>> I think that's easiest for Eric to say.
>
> Not really, I guess you want to debug the function and replay the computation
> since the cost is s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63238
Bug ID: 63238
Summary: DWARF does not represent _Alignas
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56974
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63172
--- Comment #4 from Dominik Vogt ---
On s390x, the option -fcx-limited-range "fixes" the deviation in the C test
program (tried with -O0 and -O3), but it has no effect for the Go test program.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63220
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to davidxl from comment #2)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > First of all you should mark the functions 'inline' as well.
>
> This does not help.
>
> Then the issue
> > is tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63229
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63237
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63237
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63224
--- Comment #8 from Sebastian Huber ---
Actually the for loop is not necessary.
int bar(int s, int *a)
{
int c;
int r;
r = s != 0 && (c = a[s]);
if (s == 2 && c == 0) {
} else if (s != 0) {
return 0;
}
retu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63237
Bug ID: 63237
Summary: [5 Regression] error: invalid operand in unary
operation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63224
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Huber ---
I reduced the test case using the delta tool to:
void foo(void);
void bar(int s, int *a)
{
int i;
int c;
for (i = 0; s != 0 && (c = a[i]); ++i) {
}
if (s == 2 &&
87 matches
Mail list logo
