[Bug middle-end/63186] [4.9/5 Regression] Undefined .L* symbols because of fnsplit

2014-09-10 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63186 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Sep 11 06:46:23 2014 New Revision: 215149 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215149&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/63186 * ipa-split.c (test_nonssa_use): Skip

[Bug tree-optimization/62631] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c FAILs

2014-09-10 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug middle-end/61848] [5 Regression] a previous declaration causes the section attribute to be lost

2014-09-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61848 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.co

[Bug middle-end/63221] symbol with section attribute ends up in common

2014-09-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63221 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin

[Bug middle-end/63221] symbol with section attribute ends up in common

2014-09-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63221 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/63221] New: symbol with section attribute ends up in common

2014-09-10 Thread jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63221 Bug ID: 63221 Summary: symbol with section attribute ends up in common Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: mid

[Bug middle-end/63220] New: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline

2014-09-10 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63220 Bug ID: 63220 Summary: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: mid

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch from IRA to LRA

2014-09-10 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo --- Created attachment 33465 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33465&action=edit problematic libgcc divsc3 function

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch from IRA to LRA

2014-09-10 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/63215] LTO causes symbols for builtin functions to be omitted from object files

2014-09-10 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63215 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- > Hmm, we can easily distinguish them by seeing whether a definition is > available. Well, what happens in this testcase is that we see ABS at LTO time, we promote it to static (because no one uses it outside)

[Bug libstdc++/63219] New: Superfluous template parameter in match_result::format overload

2014-09-10 Thread ofv at wanadoo dot es
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63219 Bug ID: 63219 Summary: Superfluous template parameter in match_result::format overload Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/63209] [ARM] Wrong conditional move generated

2014-09-10 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63209 davidxl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/63218] New: More compact std::bitset for small n

2014-09-10 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63218 Bug ID: 63218 Summary: More compact std::bitset for small n Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ABI Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug c++/63217] New: template conversion operator returning const reference not used for conversion in some cases

2014-09-10 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63217 Bug ID: 63217 Summary: template conversion operator returning const reference not used for conversion in some cases Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/62306] [4.9/5 Regression?] Change in the comdat used for constructors

2014-09-10 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/62306] [4.9/5 Regression?] Change in the comdat used for constructors

2014-09-10 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill --- I'm not too concerned about the change.(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > 4.5+4.6+4.9 is more released compilers than 4.7/4.8 though, and 4.9 is > already widely deployed too, IMHO it is worse to

[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

2014-09-10 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 --- Comment #36 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Sep 10 17:28:59 2014 New Revision: 215134 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215134&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/61659 * decl.c (grokfndecl): Don't set DECL_COMDAT on stat

[Bug c++/61489] Wrong warning with -Wmissing-field-initializers.

2014-09-10 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

2014-09-10 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

2014-09-10 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 --- Comment #34 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Sep 10 14:27:40 2014 New Revision: 215131 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215131&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/53808 PR c++/61659 * decl2.c (note_comdat_fn): New.

[Bug lto/53808] Undefined symbol when building a library with lto

2014-09-10 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53808 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Sep 10 14:27:40 2014 New Revision: 215131 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215131&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/53808 PR c++/61659 * decl2.c (note_comdat_fn): New.

[Bug middle-end/61654] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE in release_function_body, at cgraph.c:1699

2014-09-10 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654 --- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Wed Sep 10 11:34:09 2014 New Revision: 215122 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215122&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-09-10 Martin Jambor PR ipa/61654 * cgraphclones.c (dup

[Bug c++/63194] [5 Regression] ICE in maybe_explain_implicit_delete, at cp/method.c:1552

2014-09-10 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63194 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #2 f

[Bug c++/63216] gcc crash: Segmentation fault

2014-09-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63216 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- GCC 4.7 is no longer maintained or supported, please try a later release.

[Bug c++/63216] New: gcc crash: Segmentation fault

2014-09-10 Thread winbill at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63216 Bug ID: 63216 Summary: gcc crash: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assig

[Bug rtl-optimization/25285] pessimization of goto * ("computed goto")

2014-09-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25285 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/25285] pessimization of goto * ("computed goto")

2014-09-10 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25285 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/61225] [5 Regression] Several new failures after r210458 on x86_64-*-* with -m32

2014-09-10 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Yes. I see. The patch is in review. But no feedback although I had pinged it > for > three times. > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg01325.html > > I will go on ping it. The patch n

[Bug lto/63215] LTO causes symbols for builtin functions to be omitted from object files

2014-09-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63215 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, we can easily distinguish them by seeing whether a definition is available. That is, symbols with a definition should _always_ be output? I don't see any difficulties with builtin handling in general