[Bug middle-end/62289] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) for gfortran.dg/graphite/pr42393.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62289 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug middle-end/62289] New: [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) for gfortran.dg/graphite/pr42393.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62289 Bug ID: 62289 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) for gfortran.dg/graphite/pr42393.f90 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-c

[Bug fortran/61933] Inquire on internal units

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/23827] standard C++ should not have hex float preprocessing tokens

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23827 emsr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/23827] standard C++ should not have hex float preprocessing tokens

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23827 --- Comment #3 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: emsr Date: Thu Aug 28 02:38:24 2014 New Revision: 214616 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214616&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libcpp/ 2014-08-27 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>

[Bug sanitizer/61293] asan can not find left buffer overflow of new[]-allocated buffer, frontend help needed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61293 --- Comment #4 from Kostya Serebryany --- FTR, this has been implemented in Clang (Itanium ABI only for now): clang: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=216434 asan: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=214711&view=rev

[Bug target/62261] [sh64] ICE for negative shift counts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62261 --- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Author: kkojima Date: Wed Aug 27 23:25:14 2014 New Revision: 214612 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214612&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/62261 * config/sh/sh.md (ashlsi3): Handle ne

[Bug middle-end/30798] mode_dependent_address_p not checked when simplifying subreg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30798 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pi

[Bug target/62262] aarch64 gcc generates invalid assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62262 --- Comment #11 from carrot at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: carrot Date: Wed Aug 27 23:00:54 2014 New Revision: 214610 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214610&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/62262 * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (*andim_a

[Bug go/62288] New: Disagreement between gccgo and Solaris linker.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62288 Bug ID: 62288 Summary: Disagreement between gccgo and Solaris linker. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug c++/58678] [4.9 Regression] pykde4-4.11.2 link error (devirtualization too trigger happy)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678 --- Comment #58 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- A gentoo user wrote me that pykde still fails with the same error when build with -flto. And indeed both the testcase from comment0 and from comment 13 still fail with -flto: markus@x4 /tmp % cat tes

[Bug c/62287] New: gcc generates near call for extern weak function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62287 Bug ID: 62287 Summary: gcc generates near call for extern weak function Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 --- Comment #24 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 33407 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33407&action=edit Patch for 4.9 Here's a patch for the 4.9 branch. I'm nervous about applying it because I suspect that we have

[Bug target/61407] Build errors on latest OS X 10.10 Yosemite with Xcode 6 on GCC 4.8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407 --- Comment #33 from James Clarke --- (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #30) > The proposed changes in v4 of the patch aren't building here on 10.9. I > don't see how > > # if defined(_DARWIN_FEATURE_64_BIT_INODE) > > can completely substi

[Bug target/61407] Build errors on latest OS X 10.10 Yosemite with Xcode 6 on GCC 4.8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407 --- Comment #32 from James Clarke --- (In reply to Ilya Mikhaltsou from comment #31) > (In reply to James Clarke from comment #29) > > (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #28) > > > I noticed that MacPorts is using… > > > > > > #if SANITIZER_

[Bug libstdc++/62159] Missing headers for freestanding implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62159 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/62159] Missing headers for freestanding implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62159 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Aug 27 17:33:42 2014 New Revision: 214580 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214580&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/62159 * include/Makefile.am (install-freestanding-he

[Bug c++/52892] Function pointer loses constexpr qualification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52892 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 52892, which changed state. Bug 52892 Summary: Function pointer loses constexpr qualification https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52892 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/52892] Function pointer loses constexpr qualification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52892 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Aug 27 17:03:34 2014 New Revision: 214579 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214579&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2014-08-27 Paolo Carlini PR c++/52892 * semanti

[Bug target/62262] aarch64 gcc generates invalid assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62262 --- Comment #9 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > (In reply to Carrot from comment #5) > > Actually the original source code is guarded by assert, and the parameter > > passed to CLZ can be guaranteed n

[Bug fortran/62278] gfc_check_dependency should also check for TARGET attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62278 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- Can you provide an example? The simplistic case of subroutine foo(p) integer, save :: a(10)[*] integer, pointer :: p(:) p(:) = a(:) end subroutine foo ig25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Point> gfortran -c -O -

[Bug c++/62282] Undefined reference with __inline __attribute(__gnu_inline__) with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62282 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/62285] const reference binding to temporary when using -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62285 --- Comment #3 from Roger Zatkoff --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > There's some discussion of a similar case in PR 61769 Okay, thank you!

[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.0 Summary|[4.9/5 Regr

[Bug c++/62285] const reference binding to temporary when using -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62285 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- There's some discussion of a similar case in PR 61769

[Bug c++/62285] const reference binding to temporary when using -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62285 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/62286] New: [ARM] 4.9 Regression fails for cortex-m3 for vfp-1.c: fmacs, fmscs, fnmacs, fnmscs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62286 Bug ID: 62286 Summary: [ARM] 4.9 Regression fails for cortex-m3 for vfp-1.c: fmacs, fmscs, fnmacs, fnmscs Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug target/62284] AVR unable to find register to spill in the class POINTER_REGS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62284 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.8.3 --- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill

[Bug target/62284] AVR unable to find register to spill in the class POINTER_REGS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62284 --- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill --- Created attachment 33406 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33406&action=edit Preprocessed RTEMS flashdisk.c which triggers error

[Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 --- Comment #5 from Henrik Holst --- The `alpha` argument in test1 subroutine went missing. (Visual copy-paste between two machines... :-))

[Bug lto/61886] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- > Honza, did you get anything working? Sorry, I am at Mountain trip till 6th of September, so I do not have much chance to hack. Will take it as priority afterwards. I think cleanest approach would be to lowe

[Bug c++/62285] New: const reference binding to temporary when using -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62285 Bug ID: 62285 Summary: const reference binding to temporary when using -fPIC Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 --- Comment #4 from Henrik Holst --- Thank you Richard for looking into this issue. You probably know already exactly why this bug appeared. I just wanted to stress the severity of this issue, and especially for Fortran which is often used in "n

[Bug target/62284] New: AVR unable to find register to spill in the class POINTER_REGS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62284 Bug ID: 62284 Summary: AVR unable to find register to spill in the class POINTER_REGS Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Like Index: gcc/tree-vect-slp.c === --- gcc/tree-vect-slp.c (revision 214572) +++ gcc/tree-vect-slp.c (working copy) @@ -329,6 +329,13 @@ vect

[Bug other/62248] Configure error with --with-fpu=fp-armv8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62248 --- Comment #2 from yroux at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: yroux Date: Wed Aug 27 12:35:28 2014 New Revision: 214573 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214573&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-08-27 Yvan Roux PR other/62248 * config

[Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug c++/62282] Undefined reference with __inline __attribute(__gnu_inline__) with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62282 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/62283] SSE optimization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 --- Comment #1 from Henrik Holst --- (forgot to indent the end statement above.) The expected assembler code should be something like: movaps%xmm0, %xmm1 movups(%rdi), %xmm0 shufps$0, %xmm1, %xmm1 movups(%rsi), %

[Bug fortran/62283] New: SSE optimization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 Bug ID: 62283 Summary: SSE optimization fails Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee

[Bug c++/62282] New: Undefined reference with __inline __attribute(__gnu_inline__) with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62282 Bug ID: 62282 Summary: Undefined reference with __inline __attribute(__gnu_inline__) with -O0 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/62281] gcc doesn't conform to Solaris 32-bit ABI by expecting 16-byte stack alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62281 --- Comment #5 from Justin Carveley --- Created attachment 33405 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33405&action=edit Example 1: build script

[Bug target/62281] gcc doesn't conform to Solaris 32-bit ABI by expecting 16-byte stack alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62281 --- Comment #4 from Justin Carveley --- Created attachment 33404 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33404&action=edit Example 1: preprocessed source

[Bug target/62281] gcc doesn't conform to Solaris 32-bit ABI by expecting 16-byte stack alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62281 --- Comment #3 from Justin Carveley --- Created attachment 33403 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33403&action=edit Example 1: Solaris studio compiled module: main()

[Bug target/62281] gcc doesn't conform to Solaris 32-bit ABI by expecting 16-byte stack alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62281 --- Comment #2 from Justin Carveley --- Created attachment 33402 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33402&action=edit Example 1: gcc compiled module performing sse vector load

[Bug target/62281] gcc doesn't conform to Solaris 32-bit ABI by expecting 16-byte stack alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62281 --- Comment #1 from Justin Carveley --- Created attachment 33401 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33401&action=edit Example 2: Preprocessed source

[Bug target/62281] New: gcc doesn't conform to Solaris 32-bit ABI by expecting 16-byte stack alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62281 Bug ID: 62281 Summary: gcc doesn't conform to Solaris 32-bit ABI by expecting 16-byte stack alignment Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug lto/61886] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|4.10.0 |5.0 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/61893] Constant folding inhibits trapping with -ftrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61893 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/62080] Suboptimal code generation with eigen library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62080 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #5) > With the intrinsics patch, I notice that we don't simplify in gimple either: > > _40 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<__m128i>(_39); > MEM[(__m128i * {ref-all})vec_4(D)] =

[Bug c++/62277] [C++11] constexpr member methods are treated as const, regardless of const modifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62277 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/62280] New: Symbols visibility not equivalent to class visibility (-fvisibility=hidden)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62280 Bug ID: 62280 Summary: Symbols visibility not equivalent to class visibility (-fvisibility=hidden) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug other/62279] New: Demangler crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 Bug ID: 62279 Summary: Demangler crash Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unass

[Bug c++/62272] Gimplify throws error on method call from inside nested lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62272 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/62239] [5 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at passes.c:1795 with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62239 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/62239] [5 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at passes.c:1795 with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62239 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Aug 27 08:01:25 2014 New Revision: 214564 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214564&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-08-27 Richard Biener PR middle-end/62239 * builtins.c

[Bug other/62248] Configure error with --with-fpu=fp-armv8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62248 Yvan Roux changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yvan.roux at linaro dot org --- Comment #1 f