https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61693
Kostya Serebryany changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61573
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61713
Bug ID: 61713
Summary: 4.9 ICE when building c++ code with atomic functions
for thumb1 target
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61306
--- Comment #11 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Confirmed. This is because the compiler will detect that the result of (a >> 8)
depends on the sign of a and thus prevent the optimization. Before this check
incorrect code could be generated. O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712
--- Comment #1 from linzj ---
Created attachment 33068
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33068&action=edit
source that crashes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712
Bug ID: 61712
Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61703
Bug ID: 61703
Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61704
Bug ID: 61704
Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61710
Bug ID: 61710
Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61709
Bug ID: 61709
Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61711
Bug ID: 61711
Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61705
Bug ID: 61705
Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61708
Bug ID: 61708
Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61706
Bug ID: 61706
Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61707
Bug ID: 61707
Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61702
Bug ID: 61702
Summary: thumb1_reorg crashes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61693
Bug ID: 61693
Summary: [asan] is not intercepting aligned_alloc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61691
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't see why you think this is invalid. ~DOMLocalMediaStream() calls
~nsRefPtr and ~nsRefPtr uses AudioNode::Release and
AudioNode is an incomplete type.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
Bug ID: 61692
Summary: ICE in extract_insn in recog.c for asm with many
parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61682
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61682
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 3 22:11:21 2014
New Revision: 212273
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212273&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61682
* wide-int.cc (wi::mul_internal): Handl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61691
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 33066
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33066&action=edit
MediaPipeline.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61677
Josh Triplett changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33055|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61691
Bug ID: 61691
Summary: [4.10 Regression] invalid use of incomplete type in
Firefox
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61306
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61688
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59850
--- Comment #28 from Tom Tromey ---
> Please let me know what I can do to help complete this branch. I'd be happy
> to help write the documentation, for instance.
It's maybe not quite ready for testing. But if you want to
give it a try and se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59850
--- Comment #27 from Josh Triplett ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #21)
> (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #20)
>
> > BTW if you want to try it out I have a branch:
> > https://github.com/tromey/gcc/tree/add-sparse-attributes
>
> T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59850
--- Comment #26 from Tom Tromey ---
(In reply to PaX Team from comment #23)
> some data points based on my experience with the 'checker' gcc plugin in PaX:
Hi. Thanks for your reply.
I didn't easily find a git repository holding the checker pl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58770
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61690
Bug ID: 61690
Summary: aliasing base template class variable doesn't work in
template derived class, when base class has two or
more template parameters
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29842
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke from comment #2)
> For the -mrelax breakage, also see:
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3298
Fixes for -mrelax have been posted by Renesas in 2009:
https://so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Hi Jerry,
Looks as if you did the business?
Maybe it should be closed.
Thanks
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61688
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Ryan Mansfield from comment #3)
> FWIW, it started happening for me at rev21
Yes, sorry I should have written: git blame points to r198088.
I didn't bisect.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61688
--- Comment #3 from Ryan Mansfield ---
FWIW, it started happening for me at rev21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61689
--- Comment #4 from wmichaelv at hotmail dot com ---
Ah, thank you. That clears it up. And my apology for my ignorant.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #19 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61689
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61677
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Perhaps related to PR61409 or PR56574.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61677
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61689
--- Comment #2 from wmichaelv at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> The program has undefined behaviour; an assignment is not a sequence point.
> See what -Wsequence-point says.
According to the order operation, gr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61688
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjambor at suse dot cz
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61688
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61689
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61689
Bug ID: 61689
Summary: Assignment and Operator not working as intended.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61688
Bug ID: 61688
Summary: [4.10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected
record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have
array_type in ipa_binfo_from_known_type_jfunc
Product:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61687
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61687
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61203
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #19 from christophe.lyon at st dot com ---
As discussed on IRC, I could test your patch, and the compiler now builds
successfully.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Summary|A program that re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think the problem is that for the w array (in C testcase) we have first a
partial group store (stores 3 out of 4 elements), then a group load (again,
loads 3 out of 4 elements) and finally the last store of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61687
Bug ID: 61687
Summary: [4.10 regression] -O PASS, -O2 report error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
C testcase:
double v[4096][4];
__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) void
bar (double p[][4])
{
int i;
double d = __builtin_sqrt (172.0);
for (i = 0; i < 4096; i++)
{
if (p[i][0] != 6.0 || p[i][
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61686
Bug ID: 61686
Summary: Incorrect check in comparison function
range_entry_cmp() in tree_ssa_reassoc.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58393
nicolas.cavallari at lri dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30800|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61594
Patrick Marlier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
With -O3 -msse2 -fno-vect-cost-model it fails as well, so this isn't a problem
in the AVX support, just that before AVX it wasn't considered profitable to
vectorize it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
With just -mavx -O3 instead of -march=corei7-avx -O3, r165435 still works
properly, r165436 ICEs, r165599 fixed the ICE, but the result is 10.0 already.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61685
Bug ID: 61685
Summary: Strange check in bid128_fma.c - rounding_correction()
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61676
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61684
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61594
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Marlier ---
Created attachment 33058
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33058&action=edit
reduced testcase
$ xgcc -Wall -Wextra -Wfatal-errors -O2 -fgnu-tm -S pr61594.c
pr61594.c: In function ‘fn1’:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61674
--- Comment #6 from Alex Finch ---
I guess I should have made that clear. The class has a static variable:
static int fLockCount;
which counts how many times an object of the class is created.
If it is >1, then IsLocked() returns true. The dest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61684
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61160
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'm seeing
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C -std=gnu++98 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C -std=gnu++11 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C -std=gnu++1y execution test
on x86_64-linux -m32, bot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61382
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61682
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 33057
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33057&action=edit
gcc410-pr61682.patch
Ugh, there seem to be multiple bugs in wi::mul_internal.
The one that affects this testcas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61684
Bug ID: 61684
Summary: ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree
check: expected ssa_name, have addr_expr in
recognize_single_bit_test, at tree-ssa-ifcombine.c:238
Pr
74 matches
Mail list logo
