https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61607
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
Bug 39612 depends on bug 61607, which changed state.
Bug 61607 Summary: DOM missed jump threading and destroyed loops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61607
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654
Bug ID: 61654
Summary: [4.9.1] ICE in release_function_body, at cgraph.c:1699
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61653
Bug ID: 61653
Summary: Warning 'literal-suffix' is not suppressed by gcc
pragma
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeremyhu at macports dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
--- Comment #45 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I only looked at differences in bswap so far and it all looks ok. It correctly
detects three patterns of 16bit big endian load and replace them by 16bit
unsigned loads and cast the results to in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60774
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Cahill ---
Thank you.
Best wishes,
Kevin
Kevin Cahill
Professor of Physics & Astronomy
Physics Dept. 1919 Lomas NE, MSC 07 4220
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001
kevinecah...@gmail.com cah...@unm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60774
Bud Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61306
--- Comment #9 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Mon Jun 30 02:11:21 2014
New Revision: 212134
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212134&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-30 Thomas Preud'homme
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57380
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
This testcase fails with -fPIC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61306
--- Comment #8 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Mon Jun 30 01:58:45 2014
New Revision: 212133
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212133&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-30 Thomas Preud'homme
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
--- Comment #12 from Krishnamoorthy C ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #11)
> I tested a corrected version of your example with both G++ 4.8.1 from
> Perzl.org / oss4aix.org and GCC trunk from a few days ago. I compiled both
> 32 bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
--- Comment #11 from David Edelsohn ---
I tested a corrected version of your example with both G++ 4.8.1 from Perzl.org
/ oss4aix.org and GCC trunk from a few days ago. I compiled both 32 bit
(default) and 64 bit (-maix64) and -pthread. All print
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61652
Bug ID: 61652
Summary: Option --enable-libstdcxx-debug doesn't pass debug
options to libstdc++.so
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I went to gfortran binaries and grabbed the mingw installer and installed it on
my Win7 side.
Compile the program, Un compressed the data file and ran it.
C:\Users\jerry\prs\pr61628>gfortran pr61628.f90
C:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61650
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61650
--- Comment #1 from gerald at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: gerald
Date: Sun Jun 29 20:42:31 2014
New Revision: 212127
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212127&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add PR bootstrap/61650 to the bug fixing it.
Modified:
t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61160
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54891
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61651
Bug ID: 61651
Summary: Cross compiler will use host as eroneously
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61646
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
I believe this should be fixed by
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02320.html
It is cool to have testcase though.
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
--- Comment #5 from Arjen Markus ---
I am not entirely certain, but I think it was simply part of the MinGW
installation. If not, I used the
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries site to locate one.
Regards,
Arjen
2014-06-29 16:39 GMT+02:0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61650
Bug ID: 61650
Summary: [4.10] Bootstrap failure due to dependency on ISL
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61649
Bug ID: 61649
Summary: fixincludes update for solaris___restrict in
sys/feature_tests.h on Illumos
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61645
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |enhancement
--- Comment #4 from Jonath
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61642
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61642
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Felix Fontein from comment #0)
> The following code does not compile under GCC 4.9.0 20140604 (prerelease):
I wish Arch wouldn't fsck with the release numbering like this, 4.9.0 was
released w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61648
Bug ID: 61648
Summary: g++ accepts literal operator friends for non-template
classes but not for *template* classes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The reason I asked about the windows version is that at work we just got all
upgraded to Windows 7 as a standard (vs XP) and we have been experiancing all
sorts of strange behavior, including the first blue s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38839
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32630
Bug 32630 depends on bug 38839, which changed state.
Bug 38839 Summary: BIND(C): Allow non-digit/underscore/alphabetic binding names
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38839
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36275
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32630
Bug 32630 depends on bug 36275, which changed state.
Bug 36275 Summary: [F03] Binding label can be any scalar char initialisation
expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36275
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36275
--- Comment #12 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sun Jun 29 14:14:16 2014
New Revision: 212123
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212123&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/36275
PR fortran/38839
* decl.c (ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38839
--- Comment #6 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sun Jun 29 14:14:16 2014
New Revision: 212123
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212123&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/36275
PR fortran/38839
* decl.c (che
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61627
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61645
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to lh_mouse from comment #2)
> Replace forward_list with list, splice_after with splice and before_begin
> with begin, all three static_assert's hold.
Presumably this provides an consistency argum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61647
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61645
--- Comment #2 from lh_mouse ---
(In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #1)
> "Throws: Nothing" does not impose the requirement onto implementations that
> such a function is required to be marked equivalent to noexcept(true), so
> this looks m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61645
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
--- Comment #3 from Arjen Markus ---
Hi Dominique, Jerry,
I just tried it myself:
- Download the tgz file from Bugzilla
- unzip it via gunzip
- use tar xvf to extract the file
The result was the same file.
The contents are:
- seven integers, o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61647
Bug ID: 61647
Summary: internal compiler error: in push_access_scope, at
cp/pt.c:219 for a c++ header, clang++ 3.4 generate
.pch without error
Product: gcc
Versio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845
--- Comment #21 from Marc Glisse ---
One argument against the sequence point is that we don't have one for ?: . If
we add one for ?: several testcases regress, so we have to make sure to only do
the save_expr/compound_expr thing if there are side
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53756
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|jason at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58704
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||filip.roseen at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60699
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60699
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is fixed in mainline, I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61646
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Fixed by Honza's proposed patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02320.html
Maybe you could just add the testcase?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61646
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61646
Bug ID: 61646
Summary: [4.10 Regression] ICE: in
write_ts_type_non_common_tree_pointers, at
tree-streamer-out.c:812
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61645
Bug ID: 61645
Summary: forward_list::splice_after shall not throw exceptions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61639
--- Comment #2 from David Kredba ---
The same affects Gentoo Gcc-4.7.4 and llvm-3.4.2.
52 matches
Mail list logo