https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60770
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #5)
> The problem is during the TODO, in execute_update_addresses_taken, which
> finds out that q does not need its address taken anymore, and
>
> /* For v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61607
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61627
Bug ID: 61627
Summary: specification expression ICE with version 4.7.1 and
4.8.2, incorrect output with 4.4.7 and 4.9.0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59850
--- Comment #21 from Tom Tromey ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #20)
> BTW if you want to try it out I have a branch:
> https://github.com/tromey/gcc/tree/add-sparse-attributes
This still needs a bit of work.
I rebased it to be more pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jun 27 04:26:51 2014
New Revision: 212060
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212060&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-26 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/61499
gfortran.dg/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jun 27 04:23:36 2014
New Revision: 212059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212059&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-26 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/61499
* io/list_re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61433
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61626
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
0x7FFF is not exactly presentably in 64bit (double) precision
floating point. But is 80bit (the underlying precision of x86/x87). So yes
this is exactly the same issue as bug 323.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59832
--- Comment #5 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
Still broken on trunk @r211990.
Any chance someone can look at this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61626
--- Comment #2 from meidingerc1 at gmail dot com ---
I dispute that bug 61626 is a duplicate of 323. The 323 bug doesn't show up on
the system where I confirmed 61626.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58930
--- Comment #5 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #4)
> Fixed for 4.10.0.
Can this be back-ported to gcc-4_9-branch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meidingerc1 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61626
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61626
Bug ID: 61626
Summary: Cast temporary produces wrong result
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61625
nfxjfg at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61625
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
_Atomic is a qualifier. ISO C11 requires that assignments between atomic
and non-atomic versions of the same type work, and that lvalue conversion
produces the non-atomic version of the ty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61586
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Jun 26 20:23:34 2014
New Revision: 212053
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212053&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/61586
* config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_handle_trap_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61542
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57573
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57573
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Jun 26 19:38:36 2014
New Revision: 212052
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212052&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-26 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/57573
* g++.dg/temp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57573
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Agreed, I'm taking care of that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29234
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||niels at penneman dot org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55535
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61298
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to baoshan from comment #4)
> Yes, SUBREG_PROMOTED_UNSIGNED_P is supposed to be set for this case, it has
> been set originally, but the setting is lost while doing mode converting in
> function con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61625
Bug ID: 61625
Summary: _Atomic should create a new type
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61624
--- Comment #1 from Alex Sukhanov ---
Created attachment 33014
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33014&action=edit
go files
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61624
Bug ID: 61624
Summary: Internal compiler error: in read_type, at
go/gofrontend/import.cc:669
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61298
--- Comment #4 from baoshan ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #3)
>> I can say that unsigned_reg_p() probably doesn't catch every case
>> where we're doing an unsigned compare and force it to use non
> signed compare. Since you have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61542
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu Jun 26 18:50:25 2014
New Revision: 212050
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212050&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-26 Bill Schmidt
PR target/61542
* config/rs6000/vsx.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61542
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu Jun 26 18:49:01 2014
New Revision: 212048
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212048&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-26 Bill Schmidt
PR target/61542
* config/rs6000/vsx.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61542
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu Jun 26 18:47:52 2014
New Revision: 212047
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212047&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-26 Bill Schmidt
PR target/61542
* config/rs6000/vsx.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61537
--- Comment #10 from Adam Butcher ---
Fixed in 4.9.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61537
--- Comment #9 from Adam Butcher ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Thu Jun 26 18:33:57 2014
New Revision: 212045
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212045&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/61537
* parser.c (cp_parser_elaborated_type_specifier):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61622
--- Comment #1 from roland at gnu dot org ---
Created attachment 33013
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33013&action=edit
test case preprocessed source
I had to gzip the file to make bugzilla accept it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61623
Bug ID: 61623
Summary: [4.10 Regression] ICE: verify_symtab failed: Two
symbols with same comdat_group are not linked by the
same_comdat_group list.
Product: gcc
4.9.
GNU C (GCC) version 4.8.4 20140626 (prerelease) (arm-linux-gnueabihf)
compiled by GNU C version 4.6.3, GMP version 5.0.2, MPFR version 3.1.0-p3,
MPC version 0.9
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
GNU C (GCC) version 4.8.4 20140626 (prerelease) (arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61541
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61528
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60517
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lisp2d at lisp2d dot net
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61470
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59480
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||filip.roseen at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61484
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
--- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka ---
If anyone is interested in what architecutres are affected without looking at
the source code, there are rough statistics of ICEs encountered since it first
appeared:
ICEs count | switch
21 -march=bdver3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61362
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61451
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61596
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppluzhnikov at google dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61581
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61433
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61298
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I think I have seen this bug before. The problem comes from using
> non-logical compares for equal but logical compares for the others.
Maybe you were thinking o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6940
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56633
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56633
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Jun 26 15:34:59 2014
New Revision: 212037
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212037&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-26 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/56633
* g++.dg/cpp0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61503
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56633
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is fixed in mainline, I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61503
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
Author: glisse
Date: Thu Jun 26 15:27:52 2014
New Revision: 212036
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212036&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-26 Marc Glisse
PR target/61503
* config/i386/i386.md (x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61621
Bug ID: 61621
Summary: Normal enum switch slower than test case.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55136
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
Closely related to PR39270.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61620
Bug ID: 61620
Summary: FAIL: go.test/test/fixedbugs/bug242.go execution, -O2
-g
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60249
--- Comment #3 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
On 06/25/2014 01:45 PM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60249
>
> --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
> Ed?
>
Paolo,
I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59611
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61619
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61619
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Unfortunately the inits look like
>
> [/usr/include/c++/4.9/bits/stl_algobase.h : 378:6] MEM[(char *
> {ref-all})&S] = MEM[(char * {ref-all})&._94];
> pretmp_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61619
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61618
Stupachenko Evgeny changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||evstupac at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61144
--- Comment #22 from Rich Felker ---
> Richard Biener changed:
>What|Removed |Added
>
>Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61619
Bug ID: 61619
Summary: Benefits from -ftree-vectorize lost easily when
changing unrelated code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39270
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|paolo.carlini at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61160
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61144
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61106
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60990
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60929
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60871
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60854
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60851
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60718
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61614
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61575
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61557
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61542
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61539
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61500
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61488
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61459
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61433
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61618
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Testcase (compile with -O2 -mavx):
--cut here--
typedef float V __attribute__ ((vector_size (32)));
typedef unsigned int VI __attribute__ ((vector_size (32)));
extern V a, b, c, d;
void test_9 (void)
{
VI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61420
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5)
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> > > After providing all the missing 'USE' items:
> >
> > Where did you get them?
>
> Dear Jerry,
>
> Dominique
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61618
Bug ID: 61618
Summary: [4.10 Regression]: ICE in expand_vec_perm_pblendv, at
config/i386/i386.c with -mavx
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61618
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60898
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58972
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to Ville Voutilainen from comment #6)
Makes sense to me, I'll do that for the local-class example
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61607
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
The bogus loop cancelling is fixed as well as the equivalence recording. Still
DOM does
Registering jump thread: (3, 4) incoming edge; (4, 5) joiner; (5, 6)
normal;
Registering jump thread: (5, 7) in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58972
--- Comment #6 from Ville Voutilainen ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> Seems to be fixed on trunk, probably by Ville's fix for protected members.
Yes, that fix is for 59483, I didn't wish to have these as duplicates
because wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56974
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
There is DWARFv5 proposal for this now:
http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=131105.1
This adds DW_AT_reference[_qualifier] and DW_AT_rvalue_reference[_qualifier] as
attributes to DW_TAG_subprogram or DW_T
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
