https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61554
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61554
--- Comment #4 from Chung-Lin Tang ---
Author: cltang
Date: Tue Jun 24 06:33:58 2014
New Revision: 211928
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211928&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-24 Chung-Lin Tang
PR tree-optimization/61554
* tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61587
--- Comment #2 from Marc van Leeuwen ---
But the error in this program is so much not with the implicitly declared copy
constructor of A itself (I suppose it is "A::A (const &A)" that the compiler is
trying to generate here) but with the fact tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61494
baoshan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pangbw at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56785
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1)
> I assume (needs to be checked) this is related to the issue, reported
> elsewhere, that makes the size of
> std::tuple>>> grow linearly with the
> nesting depth.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56785
--- Comment #12 from Eelis ---
Ooh, very nice! Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51653
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3)
> The suggestion in this PR is quite wild, but the fact that
> sizeof(tuple)==20 is a real issue that
> could probably be solved with less trouble (still ABI-br
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56785
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 32994
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32994&action=edit
stop the inheritance recursion at the last element
This fixes all the issues mentioned here
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56482
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 32993
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32993&action=edit
change GCC_TRY_COMPILE_OR_LINK test to AC_TRY_COMPILE
Does this patch (against trunk) solve the problem?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39284
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39284
--- Comment #13 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Jun 23 21:52:31 2014
New Revision: 211919
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211919&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/39284
* passes.def (peephole2): Move peephole2 pas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
--- Comment #9 from Harald van Dijk ---
Oh, very sorry about that, I hadn't realised clang stopped using gas. clang
uses its own assembler now, which supports quoted names this as a syntax
extension. Now that there is a possible syntax already, p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61589
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61396
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61532
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The tests should be fixed now - please check.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61532
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jun 23 20:29:57 2014
New Revision: 211914
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211914&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/61532
* testsuite/20_util/make_signed/requirements/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61572
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
When LRA processes insn 17 in BB3 it creates a reload pseudo 101 of DREG class
Choosing alt 0 in insn 17: (0) =d (1) %a (2) rm (3) =1
{*smulsi3_highpart_1}
Creating newreg=101 from oldr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61589
Bug ID: 61589
Summary: [4.10 Regression] FAIL:
(gcc.c-torture/compile|gcc.dg)/pr34856.c on
powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -O2 and above
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61436
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61553
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Jun 23 18:23:19 2014
New Revision: 211910
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211910&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/61553
* c-c++-common/pr61553.c (foo): Add dg-error.
Modif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-none-eabi, |arm-none-eabi,
|a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61532
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jun 23 18:17:03 2014
New Revision: 211909
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211909&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/61532
* testsuite/20_util/make_signed/requirements/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61583
--- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Mon Jun 23 17:55:49 2014
New Revision: 211908
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211908&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Merge up to 211899.
* REVISION: Update subversion id.
Picks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61370
Patrick Moran changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52830
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Moran ---
*** Bug 61370 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52830
Patrick Moran changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrick.a.moran at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61532
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ramana, are you actually testing on trunk? r210517 should have fixed three of
those failures
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61588
--- Comment #3 from af300wsm at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 32991
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32991&action=edit
Os settings for gcc 4.4.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61370
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Patrick Moran from comment #4)
> A bit unsure of the ettiquette here - as the original reporter is it
> appropriate for me to go ahead and mark this ticket dup?
yes, if you're sure it's the sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61588
--- Comment #2 from af300wsm at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 32990
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32990&action=edit
O2 settings for 4.4.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61588
--- Comment #1 from af300wsm at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 32989
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32989&action=edit
O2 settings for 4.4.7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60782
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61587
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Your type's copy constructor is implicitly-declared, so there is no exact line
number to point to. That's why it points to the class definition at line 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61588
Bug ID: 61588
Summary: Optimization defaults are not what documentation say
they should be
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.7
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33101
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33101
--- Comment #20 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Jun 23 17:05:33 2014
New Revision: 211906
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211906&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-06-23 Paolo Carlini
DR 577
PR c++/33101
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61553
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61553
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Jun 23 16:57:48 2014
New Revision: 211905
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211905&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/61553
* c-common.c (get_atomic_generic_size): Don't segfau
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50909
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61570
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Jun 23 16:28:36 2014
New Revision: 211901
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211901&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Assume x86-64 if a 32-bit processor supports SSE2 and 64-bit
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61585
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61585
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Jun 23 16:20:31 2014
New Revision: 211900
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211900&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgcc/61585
* unwind-seh.c (_Unwind_GetGR): Check for proper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61571
--- Comment #5 from davidxl ---
Thanks for the analysis. I agree it is invalid to use -fstrict-aliasing for
the code.
The implementation tries to save some space in __list_impl class by making the
sentinel marker __end_ to be just __list_node_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50909
--- Comment #8 from Alex ---
I am writing cross platform code with some platform specific USB enumeration
functionality. IOKit was just what I needed on the mac, libudev on linux. I
inevitably stumbled over this issue when trying to compile the m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61166
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61583
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61583
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon Jun 23 15:10:32 2014
New Revision: 211898
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211898&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR bootstrap/61583
* tree-vrp.c (remove_range_assertions): Do n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61587
Bug ID: 61587
Summary: Line number of code that triggers "use of deleted
function" error is absent from error message
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61583
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon Jun 23 15:08:30 2014
New Revision: 211897
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211897&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR bootstrap/61583
* tree-vrp.c (remove_range_assertions): Do n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
--- Comment #2 from jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Actually, that test case gets you a different ICE:
reduced.c:1:17: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
__thread struct __res_state foo;
^
0x9805ee crash_signal
/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61370
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Moran ---
This bug does indeed seem to be related to / duplicate of c++/52830. That is,
the two bugs reports are referring to the same trigger, but the bug manifests
differently in the two versions (in the 4.9.0 I tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50909
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61530
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61576
--- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
There is an issue with phi-node and reduction stmt - after r211302 new hammock
was inserted between reduction stmt and bb containing phi:
:
d.6_12 = d_lsm.14_17 + 1;
if (c.8_13 != 0)
goto ;
els
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60825
--- Comment #4 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: alalaw01
Date: Mon Jun 23 14:07:42 2014
New Revision: 211894
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211894&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR/60825 Make {int,uint}64x1_t in arm_neon.h a proper vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61553
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60825
--- Comment #3 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: alalaw01
Date: Mon Jun 23 12:46:52 2014
New Revision: 211892
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211892&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR/60825 Make float64x1_t in arm_neon.h a proper vector ty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61574
--- Comment #4 from jamesgua at ca dot ibm.com ---
Found the same issue with G++ 4.6.1 on zLinux.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61571
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61230
jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61560
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61569
--- Comment #2 from Valentin Nechayev ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
[overquoting skipped]
> Unfortunately that's not possible.
What about absense of warning under -Wstrict-overflow?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61583
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61576
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ysrumyan at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61576
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, but it doesn't do any PHI hoisting. -fno-tree-loop-if-convert fixes it,
-O2 -ftree-loop-if-convert breaks it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61575
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61572
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61571
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61569
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61123
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.3
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61564
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
It's not supposed to be supported to enable/disable LTO with the optimize
pragma.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61557
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61586
Bug ID: 61586
Summary: ICE on alpha in alpha_handle_trap_shadows, at
config/alpha/alpha.c:8724
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61585
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61585
Bug ID: 61585
Summary: Subscript-out-of-range in unwind-seh.c?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61582
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61576
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61583
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61584
--- Comment #2 from David Krauss ---
C "compatible type" determines integer conversion rank (C11 §6.3.1.1). C++
fixes the rank by a heuristic which the implementation cannot decide (C++11
§4.5/3).
Currently, enum promotions are incompatible betw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
--- Comment #8 from Raphaël JAKSE ---
I tried
call"$"
instead of
call($)
With gcc -S, I got :
t.s: Assembler messages:
t.s:30: Error: invalid character `"' before operand 1
I don't know if there is a way to use quoting (" ") i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61584
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.0/gcc/Structures-unions-enumerations-and-bit-fields-implementation.html
The integer type compatible with each enumerated type (C90 6.5.2.2, C99 and C11
6.7.2.2).
Normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61584
Bug ID: 61584
Summary: What defines std::underlying_type?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
86 matches
Mail list logo
