https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61510
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
What happens at the line 1054 of cgraphunit.c.
= cgraph_get_node (DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN (decl));
origin_node->used_as_abstract_origin = true;
Do you really get into case where
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61510
Bug ID: 61510
Summary: [4.10 Regression]:
20_util/scoped_allocator/requirements/explicit_instant
iation.cc and
tr1/6_containers/tuple/requirements/explicit_instanti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33101
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33101
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33101
--- Comment #17 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Jun 14 22:55:40 2014
New Revision: 211673
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211673&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-06-14 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/33101
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61509
--- Comment #5 from William King ---
Preprocessed file located here:
http://quentusrex.com/switch_core_media.c.preprocessed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61509
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to William King from comment #2)
> Created attachment 32939 [details]
> Source file for switch_core_media.c
This is the source and not the preprocessed source.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61509
--- Comment #3 from William King ---
Line 7945 has the strcasecmp of the gcc output 'original' pass:
https://github.com/quentusrex/FS-6495/blob/master/gcc_debug_orig/switch_core_media.c.003t.original
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61509
--- Comment #2 from William King ---
Created attachment 32939
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32939&action=edit
Source file for switch_core_media.c
Line 3356 is the strcasecmp that is being optimized out.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61509
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61509
Bug ID: 61509
Summary: GCC miscompilation on ARM during RTL optimization when
compiled with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61482
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61482
--- Comment #5 from Trevor Saunders ---
> Could you please post the full gcc invocation?
Err yeah that would be useful ;)
gcc -flto -r -Os -nostdlib -std=gnu++11 start.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61482
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61482
--- Comment #3 from Trevor Saunders ---
Created attachment 32938
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32938&action=edit
test case
Its pretty close to undreadable, but its fairly reduced, it started at ~400k
lines.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505
--- Comment #10 from edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Sat Jun 14 14:31:55 2014
New Revision: 211667
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211667&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-14 Bernd Edlinger
PR ada/61505
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57573
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And with the released 4.9.0 too. We should add the testcase and close it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57644
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And with the released 4.9.0 too. We should add the testcase and close it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61507
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505
--- Comment #9 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Patch looks reasonable to me at first sight, can you please post it to
gcc-patches for a final review and approval? Thanks for looking into it!
Arno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Could this PR get some attention please? To have an idea about how "fun" it is,
look at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-06/msg01182.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Created attachment 32936 [details]
> this patch works for me
Works for me too (powerpc-apple-darwin9, makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 5.1), now at
stage 2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61508
Bug ID: 61508
Summary: [4.10 regression] fold-const.c:14863:55: error: cannot
convert 'const char*' to 'const_tree
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61506
--- Comment #4 from Jürgen Reuter ---
I reduced the case to the code attached. But you need to include the boost
headers (which are pretty standard tho; I have version 1.55.0).
/opt/local/include is my path for the boost headers.
$ g++ -I /opt/lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61506
--- Comment #3 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Created attachment 32937
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32937&action=edit
Code that triggers the ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61506
--- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter ---
This is the remark what I got from Andy Buckley:
"Line 29 of PDF.cc is the end of the file, which suggests to me an
unclosed scope or similar higher up. The reported errors are entirely
from within Boost itse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 32936
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32936&action=edit
this patch works for me
the main problem seems to be, that
@item is not working inside @cartouche
so I moved a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502
--- Comment #4 from Harald van Dijk ---
That's an interesting argument. You may well be right that the original code,
strictly speaking, does not prove that GCC has a bug, but I do think GCC has a
bug nonetheless, and have come up with a differen
31 matches
Mail list logo
